Advertisement

Networks and market-based measures of systemic risk: the European banking system in the aftermath of the financial crisis

  • Gian Paolo Clemente
  • Rosanna GrassiEmail author
  • Chiara Pederzoli
Regular Article
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

This article investigates the behaviour of the European banking system during the financial crises that occurred in the last decades. Among the various approaches for measuring systemic risk, we consider network analysis, which describes the linkages among financial institutions and their whole structure. We construct a time-varying network of the European banking system. Banks are linked to form a global interconnected system and they mutually influence one another in terms of risk. We model their reciprocal influence via a weighted and directed network, in which weights are related to risk measures that are based on equity returns. Then, we apply two network indicators to investigate the prominence of a bank in spreading and receiving risk from the others. The results enable us to capture many features of the banking system while identifying the global systemically important banks. Moreover, the results of the analysis over time show how interconnections change over periods that are characterized by various economic scenarios.

Keywords

Network analysis Financial interconnectedness Systemic risk Market-based risk measures 

JEL Classification

G01 D85 G32 G28 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the editor, the guest editors of the Special Issue “Taming financial systemic risk” and the anonymous referees for their careful reviews on a previous version of this paper.

References

  1. Acharya VV, Pedersen LH, Philippon T, Richardson M (2017) Measuring systemic risk. Rev Financ Stud 30:2–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adrian T, Brunnermeier MK (2016) CoVar. Am Econ Rev 106(7):1705–1741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen F, Gale D (2000) Financial contagion. J Polit Econ 108(1):1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babus A (2016) The formation of financial networks. RAND J Econ 47(2):239–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bardoscia M, Battiston S, Caccioli F, Caldarelli G (2015) DebtRank: a microscopic foundation for shock propagation. PloS ONE 10(6):e0130406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bardoscia M, Caccioli F, Perotti JI, Vivaldo G, Caldarelli G (2016) Distress propagation in complex networks: the case of non-linear debtrank. PloS ONE 11(10):e0163825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bardoscia M, Battiston S, Caccioli F, Caldarelli G (2017) Pathways towards instability in financial networks. Nat Commun 8:14416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bargigli L, Tedeschi G (2014) Interaction in agent-based economics: a survey on the network approach. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 399:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2011) Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems. Technical reportGoogle Scholar
  10. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2014) The G-SIB assessment methodology. Score calculation, Technical reportGoogle Scholar
  11. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2017) Finalising post-crisis reforms. Technical reportGoogle Scholar
  12. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2018) Global systemically important banks: revised assessment methodology and the higher loss absorbency requirement. Technical reportGoogle Scholar
  13. Battiston S, Puliga M, Kaushik R, Tasca P, Caldarelli G (2012) DebtRank: Too central to fail? Financial networks, the fed and systemic risk. Sci Rep 2:srep00541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Battiston S, Caldarelli G, D’Errico M, Gurciullo S (2016) Leveraging the network: a stress-test framework based on DebtRank. Stat Risk Model 33(3–4):117–138Google Scholar
  15. Benoit S, Colliard JE, Hurlin C, Prignon C (2017) Where the risks lie: a survey on systemic risk. Rev Finance 21(1):109–152.  https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfw026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Benoit S, Hurlin C, Perignon C (2018) Pitfalls in systemic-risk scoring. J Financ IntermedGoogle Scholar
  17. Billio M, Getmansky M, Lo AW, Pelizzon L (2012) Econometric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors. J Financ Econ 104(3):535–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bisias D, Flood M, Lo AW, Valavanis S (2012) A survey of systemic risk analytics. Annu Rev Financ Econ 4(1):255–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bongini P, Clemente GP, Grassi R (2018) Interconnectedness, G-SIBs and network dynamics of global banking. Finance Res Lett 27:185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bosma JJ, Koetter M, Wedow M (2019) Too connected to fail? Inferring network ties from price co-movements. J Bus Econ Stat 37(1):67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Caccioli F, Barucca P, Kobayashi T (2018) Network models of financial systemic risk: a review. J Comput Soc Sci 1(1):81–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Candelon B, Ferrara L, Joëts M (2018) Global financial interconnectedness: a non-linear assessment of the uncertainty channel. Technical report WP n. 661, Banque de France. https://publications.banque-france.fr/en/global-financial-interconnectedness-non-linear-assessment-uncertainty-channel
  23. Clemente GP, Grassi R (2018) Directed clustering in weighted networks: a new perspective. Chaos Solitons Fractals 107:26–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Constantin A, Peltonen TA, Sarlin P (2016) Network linkages to predict bank distress. J Financ Stab 35:226–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Das SR (2016) Matrix metrics: network-based systemic risk scoring. J Altern Invest 18(4):33–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. De Bandt O, Héam JC, Labonne C, Tavolaro S et al (2013) Measuring systemic risk in a post-crisis world. Technical report, Banque de FranceGoogle Scholar
  27. Delli Gatti D, Gallegati M, Greenwald B, Russo A, Stiglitz JE (2010) The financial accelerator in an evolving credit network. J Econ Dyn Control 34(9):1627–1650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. European Central Bank (2009) The concept of systemic risk. Financial Stability Review, pp 134–142Google Scholar
  29. Fagiolo G (2007) Clustering in complex directed networks. Phys Rev E 76(2):026107.  https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.76.026107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Giudici P, Spelta A (2016) Graphical network models for international financial flows. J Bus Econ Stat 34(1):128–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grilli R, Tedeschi G, Gallegati M (2015) Markets connectivity and financial contagion. J Econ Interact Coord 10(2):287–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hakkio CS, Keeton WR (2009) Financial stress: What is it, How can it be measured, and Why does it matter? Econ Rev (Q II): 5–50Google Scholar
  33. Hashem SQ, Giudici P (2016) Netmes: a network based marginal expected shortfall measure. J Netw Theory Finance 2(3):1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hautsch N, Schaumburg J, Schienle M (2015) Financial network systemic risk contributions. Rev Finance 19(2):685–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holló D, Kremer M, Lo Duca M (2012) CISS—a composite indicator of systemic stress in the financial system. European Central Bank Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  36. Horn RA, Johnson CR (2012) Matrix analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Illing M, Liu Y (2006) Measuring financial stress in a developed country: an application to canada. J Financ Stab 2(3):243–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kenett DY, Tumminello M, Madi A, Gur-Gershgoren G, Mantegna RN, Ben-Jacob E (2010) Dominating clasp of the financial sector revealed by partial correlation analysis of the stock market. PloS ONE 5(12):e15032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kenett DY, Preis T, Gur-Gershgoren G, Ben-Jacob E (2012) Dependency network and node influence: Application to the study of financial markets. Int J Bifurc Chaos 22(07):1250181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kleinberg JM (1999) Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. J ACM (JACM) 46(5):604–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lenzu S, Tedeschi G (2012) Systemic risk on different interbank network topologies. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 391(18):4331–4341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leon CL, Pérez J (2014) Assessing financial market infrastructures’ systemic importance with authority and hub centrality. J Financ Mark Infrastruct 2(3):66–87Google Scholar
  43. Lo Duca M, Koban A, Basten M, Bengtsson E, Klaus B, Kusmierczyk P, Lang JH, Detken C, Peltonen T et al (2017) A new database for financial crises in European countries. Technical report, European Central BankGoogle Scholar
  44. Minoiu C, Reyes J (2013) A network analysis of global banking: 1978–2010. J Financ Stab 9(2):168–184.  https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/115/18002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Neveu AR (2018) A survey of network-based analysis and systemic risk measurement. J Econ Interact Coord 13(2):241–281.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-016-0182-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Poledna S, Thurner S (2016) Elimination of systemic risk in financial networks by means of a systemic risk transaction tax. Quant Finance 16(10):1599–1613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Poledna S, Martínez-Jaramillo S, Caccioli F, Thurner S (2018) Quantification of systemic risk from overlapping portfolios in the financial system. arXiv preprint arXiv:180200311
  48. Raddant M (2016) The response of european stock markets to the Brexit. Technical report, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW)Google Scholar
  49. Rotundo G, Ausloos M (2010) Organization of networks with tagged nodes and biased links: a priori distinct communities: the case of intelligent design proponents and Darwinian evolution defenders. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 389(23):5479–5494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sonubi A, Arcagni A, Stefani S, Ausloos M (2016) Effects of competition and cooperation interaction between agents on networks in the presence of a market capacity. Phys Rev E 94(2):022303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tabak B, Takamib M, Rochac J, Cajueirod D, Souzae S (2014) Directed clustering coefficient as a measure of systemic risk in complex banking networks. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 394:211–216.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2013.09.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tedeschi G, Mazloumian A, Gallegati M, Helbing D (2012) Bankruptcy cascades in interbank markets. PloS ONE 7(12):e52749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Teply P, Klinger T (2018) Agent-based modeling of systemic risk in the European banking sector. J Econ Interact Coord 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-018-0226-7
  54. Thurner S, Poledna S (2013) Debtrank-transparency: controlling systemic risk in financial networks. Sci Rep 3:1888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Varela LM, Rotundo G, Ausloos M, Carrete J (2015) Complex network analysis in socioeconomic models. In: Commendatore P, Kayam SS, Kubin I (eds) Complexity and geographical economics. Springer, pp 209–245Google Scholar
  56. Varotto S, Zhao L (2018) Systemic risk and bank size. J Int Money Finance 82:45–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Whaley RE (1993) Derivatives on market volatility: hedging tools long overdue. J Deriv 1:71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhou C (2010) Are banks too big to fail? Measuring systemic importance of financial institutions. Int J Cent Bank 6(34):205–250Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics, Finance and EconometricsUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of Statistics and Quantitative MethodsUniversità di Milano - BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations