The effect of structural disparities on knowledge diffusion in networks: an agent-based simulation model
- 577 Downloads
We apply an agent-based simulation approach to explore how and why typical network characteristics affect overall knowledge diffusion properties. To accomplish this task, we employ an agent-based simulation approach (ABM) which is based on a “barter trade” knowledge diffusion process. Our findings indicate that the overall degree distribution significantly affects a network’s knowledge diffusion performance. Nodes with a below-average number of links prove to be one of the bottlenecks for an efficient transmission of knowledge throughout the analysed networks. This indicates that diffusion-inhibiting overall network structures are the result of the myopic linking strategies of the actors at the micro level. Finally, we implement policy experiments in our simulation environment in order to analyse consequences of selected policy interventions. This complements previous research knowledge on diffusion processes in innovation networks.
KeywordsInnovation networks Knowledge diffusion Agent-based simulation Scale-free networks
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Dieter Schwarz Stiftung. In addition, we would like to thank Andreas Pyka, Robin Cowan, three anonymous reviewers, the participants of the EMAEE Conference, 1–3 June 2015, Maastricht, the Netherlands and the participants of the 1st EAEPE RA[X] Workshop, 2–3 November 2015, Essen, Germany for their helpful comments and suggestions. Needless to say, we are solely responsible for any remaining errors and omissions.
- Burt R (1992) Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol 94:S95–S120Google Scholar
- Erdös P, Rényi A (1959) On random graphs. Publ Math Debr 6:290–297Google Scholar
- Erdös P, Rényi A (1960) On the evolution of random graphs. Publ Math Inst Hung Acad Sci 5:17–61Google Scholar
- Hanson JR, Krackhardt D (1993) Informal networks: the company behind the chart. Harv Bus Rev 71(4):104–111Google Scholar
- Mueller M, Buchmann T, Kudic M (2014) Micro strategies and macro patterns in the evolution of innovation networks-an agent-based simulation approach in simulating knowledge dynamics. In: Gilbert N, Ahrweiler P, Pyka A (eds) Innovation networks. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 73–95Google Scholar
- Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) Belknap Press of Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
- OECD (1996) The knowledge-based economy. General distribution OCDE/GD 96(102)Google Scholar
- Powell WW, Grodal S (2005) Networks of innovators. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery DC, Nelson RR (eds) The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, pp 56–85Google Scholar