# Persistence in corporate networks

- 210 Downloads
- 1 Citations

## Abstract

We examine the bipartite graphs of German corporate boards in 1993, 1999 and 2005, focusing on their projections onto directors (the “personal” network) and onto companies (the “institutional” network). The novel feature here is our focus on the temporal evolution of the two projections. The personal networks exhibit cores of highly central directors who are densely connected among themselves, while the institutional networks show a persistent core of large corporations whose identity remains mostly the same. This results in the persistent presence of a core network of very large corporations, despite substantial turnover in the identity of directors and significant changes in Germany’s corporate governance during the investigated period. Our findings strongly suggest that core persistence originates from the board appointment decisions of the very largest corporations and is largely independent of personal destinies.

## Keywords

Board networks Corporate governance Board recruitment## References

- Alfarano S, Milaković M (2009) Network structure and \(N\)-dependence in agent-based herding models. J Econ Dyn Control 33:78–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Alfarano S, Milaković M, Raddant M (2013) A note on institutional hierarchy and volatility in financial markets. Eur J Finance 19(6):449–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barabási A-L, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286:509–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Battiston S, Bonabeau E, Weisbuch G (2003) Decision making dynamics in corporate boards. Phys A 322:567–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Battiston S, Catanzaro M (2004) Statistical properties of corporate board and director networks. Eur Phys J B 38:345–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bellenzier L, Grassi R (2014) Interlocking directorates in Italy: persistent links in network dynamics. J Econ Interact Coord 9:183–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Beyer J, Höpner M (2003) The disintegration of organized capitalism: German corporate governance in the 90s. West Eur Polit 26:179–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bonacich P (1972) Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. J Math Sociol 2:113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bonacich P (1987) Power and centrality: a family of measures. Am J Sociol 92(5):1170–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Borgatti SP (2005) Centrality and network flow. Soc Netw 27:55–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Borgatti SP (2006) Identifying sets of key players in a social network. Comput Math Organ Theory 12:21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Borgatti SP, Everett MG (1999) Models of core/periphery structures. Soc Netw 21:375–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Borgatti SP, Foster PC (2003) The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typology. J Manag 29(6):991–1013Google Scholar
- Brass DJ, Galaskiewicz J, Greve HR, Tsai W (2004) Taking stock of networks and organizations: a multilevel perspective. Acad Manag J 47(6):795–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Caldarelli G, Catanzaro M (2004) The corporate boards networks. Phys A 338:98–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Conyon MJ, Muldoon MR (2006) The small world of corporate boards. J Bus Finance Account 33(9):1321–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Davis GF, Greve HR (1999) The money center cannot hold: commercial banks in the U.S. system of corporate governance. Adm Sci Q 44:215–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Davis GF, Yoo M, Baker WE (2003) The small world of the American corporate elite, 1982–2001. Strateg Organ 1(3):301–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Galaskiewicz J (2007) Has a network theory of organizational behaviour lived up to its promises? Manag Organ Rev 3(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Haunschild P, Beckmann C (1998) When do interlocks matter? Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Adm Sci Q 43(4):815–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heemskerk E (2007) Decline of the corporate community. Amsterdam University Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Holme P (2005) Core-periphery organization of complex networks. Phys Rev E 72:046111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jobson DJ (1991) Applied multivariate data analysis. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kogut B, Walker G (2001) The small world of Germany and the durability of national networks. Am Sociol Rev 66(3):317–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mariolis P, Jones M (1982) Centrality in corporate interlock networks: reliability and stability. Adm Sci Q 27(4):571–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Milaković M, Alfarano S, Lux T (2010) The small core of the German corporate board network. Comput Math Organ Theory 16(2):201–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mintz B, Schwartz M (1981) Interlocking directorates and interest group formation. Am Sociol Rev 46(6):851–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mizruchi S (1996) What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annu Rev Sociol 22:271–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45:167–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Newman MEJ (2010) Networks, an introduction. Oxford U.P, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Newman MEJ, Girvan M (2004) Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys Rev E 4:026113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Newman MEJ, Strogatz SH, Watts DJ (2001) Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. Phys Rev E 64:026118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Palmer D (1983) Broken ties: interlocking directorates and intercorporate coordination. Admin Sci Q 28:40–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Provan KG, Fish A, Sydow J (2007) Interorganizational networks at the network level: a review of the empirical literature on whole networks. J Manag 33(3):479–516Google Scholar
- Reichardt J (2009) Structure in complex networks, lecture notes in physics. 766. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Robins G, Alexander M (2004) Small worlds among interlocking directors: network structure and distance in bipartite graphs. Comput Math Organ Theory 10:69–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schnettler S (2009) A structured overview of 50 years of small-world research. Soc Netw 31:165–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schreyögg G, Papenheim-Tockhorn H (1995) Dient der Aufsichtsrat dem Aufbau zwischenbetrieblicher Koopertationsbeziehungen? Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 65:205–230Google Scholar
- Seidman SB (1983) Network structure and minimum degree. Soc Netw 5:269–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Soramäki K, Bech M, Arnold J, Glass R, Beyeler W (2007) The topology of interbank payment flows. Phys A 379:317–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stearns LB, Mizruchi MS (1986) Broken-tie reconstitution and the functions of interorganizational interlocks: a reexamination. Admin Sci Q 31:522–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Uzzi B, Amaral LAN, Reed-Tsochas F (2007) Small-world networks and management science research: a review. Eur Manag Rev 4:77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- von Luxburg U (2007) A tutorial on spectral clustering. Stat Comput 17:395–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393:440–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar