Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 305–332 | Cite as

An agent based decentralized matching macroeconomic model

Regular Article

Abstract

In this paper we present a macroeconomic microfounded framework with heterogeneous agents—individuals, firms, banks—which interact through a decentralized matching process presenting common features across four markets—goods, labor, credit and deposit. We study the dynamics of the model by means of computer simulation. Some macroeconomic properties emerge such as endogenous business cycles, nominal GDP growth, unemployment rate fluctuations, the Phillips curve, leverage cycles and credit constraints, bank defaults and financial instability, and the importance of government as an acyclical sector which stabilize the economy. The model highlights that even extended crises can endogenously emerge. In these cases, the system may remain trapped in a large unemployment status, without the possibility to quickly recover unless an exogenous intervention takes place.

Keywords

Agent-based macroeconomics Business cycle Crisis  Unemployment Leverage 

JEL Classification

E32 C63 

References

  1. Adrian T, Shin HS (2009) Money liquidity and monetary policy. Am Econ Rev 99(2):600–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adrian T, Shin HS (2010) Liquidity and leverage. J Financ Intermed 19(3):418–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adrian T, Shin HS (2008) Liquidity, monetary policy and financial cycles. Curr Issues Econ Financ, 14(1), Federal Reserve Bank of New York (January/February)Google Scholar
  4. Ballot G, Eliasson G, Taymaz E (2006) The role of commercialization competence in endogenous economic growth. In: Working Paper, Schumepter society conferenceGoogle Scholar
  5. Ballot G, Taymaz E (1998) Human capital, technological lock-in, and evolutionary dynamics. In: Eliasson G, Green C (eds) Microfoundations of economic growth, a schumpeterian perspective. The University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  6. Baroni E, Richiardi M (2007) Orcutt’s vision, 50 years on. In: LABORatorio R. Revelli Working Papers Series 65, Center for Employment StudiesGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett RL, Bergmann BR (1986) A microsimulated transactions model of the United States economy. John Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  8. Bergmann BR (1973) Labor turnover, segmentation and rates of unemployment: a simulation-theoretic approach. Project on the economics of discrimination. University of Maryland, MimeoGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergmann BR (1974) A microsimulation of the macroeconomy with explicitely represented money flows. Ann Econ Soc Meas 3:475–489Google Scholar
  10. Booth L, Asli Demirgu-Kunt VA, Maksimovic V (2001) Capital structures in developing countries. J Financ 56(1):87–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brock WA (1993) Pathways to randomness in the economy: emergent nonlinearity and chaos in economics and finance. Estudios Econ 8:3–55Google Scholar
  12. Brunnermeier MK, Pedersen LH (2009) Market liquidity and funding liquidity. Rev Financ Stud 22(6):2201–2238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cincotti S, Raberto M, Teglio A (2010) Credit money and macroeconomic instability in the agent-based model and simulator Eurace. Econ Open-Access Open-Assess E-J. Kiel Institute for the World Economy 4(26)Google Scholar
  14. Cincotti S, Raberto M, Teglio A (2012) Debt deleveraging and business cycles. An agent-based perspective. Econ Open-Access Open-Assess E-J, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, 6(27)Google Scholar
  15. Dawid H, Neugart M (2011) Agent-based models for economic policy design. East Econ J 37(1):44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deissenberg C, van der Hoog S, Dawid H (2008) EURACE: a massively parallel agent-based model of the European economy. Appl Math Comput 204:541–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Delli Gatti D, Di Guilmi C, Gallegati M, Gaffeo E, Giulioni G, Palestrini A (2005) A new approach to business fluctuations: heterogeneous interacting agents, scaling laws and financial fragility. J Econ Behav Organ 56(4):489–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Delli Gatti D, Gallegati M, Greenwald B, Russo A, Stiglitz JE (2009) Business fluctuations and bankruptcy avalanches in an evolving network economy. J Econ Interact Coord 4(2):195–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Delli Gatti D, Gallegati M, Greenwald B, Russo A, Stiglitz JE (2010) The financial accelerator in an evolving credit network. J Econ Dyn Control 34(9):1627–1650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Delli Gatti D, Gallegati M, Kirman A (2000) Interaction and market structure. Essays on heterogeneity in economics. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, vol 484, Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  21. Diamond DW, Rajan R (2000) A theory of bank capital. J Financ 55(6):2431–2465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Donaldson G (1961) Corporate debt capacity: a study of corporate debt policy and the determination of corporate debt capacity. Harvard University, Harvard Business SchoolGoogle Scholar
  23. Dosi G, Fagiolo G, Roventini A (2006) An evolutionary model of endogenous business cycles. Comput Econ 27(1):3–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dosi G, Fagiolo G, Roventini A (2010) Schumpeter meeting Keynes: a policy-friendly model of endogenous growth and business cycles. J Econ Dyn Control 34(9):1748–1767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dosi G, Fagiolo G, Napoletano M, Roventini A (2012) Income distribution, credit and fiscal policies in an agent-based Keynesian model. In: LEM Papers series 2012/03, Laboratory of economics and management (LEM). Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  26. Eliasson G (1976) Business economic planning: theory, practice and comparison. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Eliasson G (1977) Competition and market processes in a simulation model of the Swedish economy. Am Econ Rev 67:277–281Google Scholar
  28. Eliasson G (1984) Micro heterogeneity of firms and the stability of industrial growth. J Econ Behav Organ 5(3–4):249–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eliasson G (1985) The firm and financial markets in the Swedish micro-to-macro model: theory, model and verification. IUI, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  30. Eliasson G (1991) Modeling the experimentally organized economy: complex dynamics in an empirical micro-macro model of endogenous economic growth. J Econ Behav Organ 16:153–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Epstein JM, Axtell RL (1996) Growing artificial societies: social science from the bottom up. MIT Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  32. Fagiolo G, Dosi G, Gabriele R (2004) Matching bargaining, and wage setting in an evolutionary model of labor market and output dynamics. Adv Complex Syst 7(2):157–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fagiolo G, Roventini A (2009) On the scientific status of economic policy: a tale of alternative paradigms. Knowl Eng Rev 27(Special Issue 02):163–185Google Scholar
  34. Fagiolo G, Roventini A (2012) Macroeconomic policy in DSGE and agent-based models. In: SSRN Working paper series. URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2011717
  35. Flannery MJ (1994) Debt maturity and the deadweight cost of leverage: optimally financing banking firms. Am Econ Rev 84(1):320–331Google Scholar
  36. Flannery MJ, Rangan KP (2006) Partial adjustment toward target capital structures. J Financ Econ 79(3):469–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Föllmer H (1974) Random economies with many interacting agents. J Math Econ 1:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fostel A, Geanakoplos J (2008) Leverage cycles and the anxious economy. Am Econ Rev 98(4):1211–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Frank MZ, Goyal VK (2008) Tradeoff and pecking order theories of debt. In: Eckbo E (ed) The handbook of empirical corporate finance, Ch. 12:135–197Google Scholar
  40. Gaffeo G, Delli Gatti D, Desiderio S, Gallegati M (2008) Adaptive microfoundations for emergent macroeconomics. East Econ J 34(4):441–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gallegati M, Kirman A (1999) Beyond the representative agent. Edward Elgar, NorthamptonGoogle Scholar
  42. Geanakoplos J (2010) Leverage cycle. Cowles foundation Paper No. 1304, Yale UniversityGoogle Scholar
  43. Godley W, Lavoie M (2006) Monetary economics: an integrated approach to credit, money, income, production and wealth. Palgrave MacMillanGoogle Scholar
  44. Graham JR, Harvey C (2001) The theory and practice of corporate finance. J Financ Econ 60:187–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Greenlaw D, Hatzius J, Kashyap AK, Shin HS (2008) Leveraged losses: lessons from the mortgage market meltdown. In: Proceedings of the U.S. monetary policy forumGoogle Scholar
  46. Gropp R, Heider F (2010) The determinants of bank capital structure. Rev Financ 14(4):587–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Haber G (2008) Monetary and fiscal policy analysis with an agent-based macroeconomic model. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 228:276–295Google Scholar
  48. He Z, Khang IG, Krishnamurthy A (2010) Balance sheet adjustments in the 2008 crisis. IMF Econ Rev 58:118–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hovakimian A, Opler T, Titman S (2001) The debt-equity choice. J Financ Quant Anal 36:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Howitt P, Clower R (2000) The emergence of economic organization. J Econ Behav Organ 41:55–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3:305–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kalemli-Ozcan S, Sorensen B, Yesiltas S (2011) Leverage across firms, banks, and vcuntries. In: NBER Working Papers 17354Google Scholar
  53. Kinsella S, Greiff M, Nell E (2011) Income distribution in a stock-flow consistent model with education and technological change. East Econ J 37(1):134–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kirman A (1991) Epidemics of opinion and speculative bubbles in financial markets. In: Taylor M (ed) Money and financial markets. Macmillan, NYGoogle Scholar
  55. Kirman A (1992) Whom or what does the representative individual represent? J Econ Perspect 6:117–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kirman A (1993) Ants, rationality and recruitment. Q J Econ 108:137–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kirman A (1999) Aggregate activity and economic organisation. Rev Eur des Sci Soc XXXVI(113):189–230Google Scholar
  58. LeBaron B, Tesfatsion LS (2008) Modeling macroeconomies as open-ended dynamic systems of interacting agents. Am Econ Rev 98(2):246–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lemmon M, Roberts M, Zender J (2008) Back to the beginning: persistence and the cross-section of corporate capital structure. J Financ 63:1575–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mehrotra V, Mikkelsen W, Partch M (2003) Design of financial policies in corporate spinoffs. Rev Financ Stud 16:1359–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Myers SC (1977) Determinants of corporate borrowing. J Financ Econ 5(2):147–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Myers SC, Majluf NS (1984) Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. J Financ Econ 13:87–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Neugart M (2008) Labor market policy evaluation with ACE. J Econ Behav Organ 67(2):418–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Neugart M, Richiardi M (2012) Agent-based models of the labor market. In: Working paper No. 125, LABORatorio Revelli - Center for Employment Studies, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  65. Orcutt GH (1957) A new type of socio economic system. Rev Econ Stat 58:773–797Google Scholar
  66. Rajan R, Zingales L (1995) What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. J Financ 50:1421–1460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Riccetti L, Russo A, Gallegati M (2013) Leveraged network-based financial accelerator. J Econ Dyn Control 37(8):1626–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Russo A, Catalano M, Gaffeo E, Gallegati M, Napoletano M (2007) Industrial dynamics, fiscal policy and R&D: evidence from a computational experiment. J Econ Behav Organ 64(3–4):426–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Seppecher P (2012) Flexibility of wages and macroeconomic instability in an agent-based computational model with endogenous money. Macroecon Dyn 16(s2):284–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tesfatsion LS, Judd KL (2006) Handbook of computational economics: agent-based computational economics, vol 2. North-HollandGoogle Scholar
  71. Wertheimer R, Zedlewski SR, Anderson J, Moore K (1986) DYNASIM in comparison with other microsimulation models. In: Orcutt GH, Merz J, Quinke H (eds) Microanalytic simulation models to support social and financial policy. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  72. Westerhoff F (2008) The use of agent-based financial market models to test the effectiveness of regulatory policies. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Stat 228:195–227Google Scholar
  73. Westerhoff F, Franke R (2012) Agent-based models for economic policy design: two illustrative examples. In: BERG Working paper, 88, University of BambergGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sapienza Università di RomaRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of Economics and Social SciencesUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly

Personalised recommendations