Economies with heterogeneous interacting learning agents

  • Simone Landini
  • Mauro Gallegati
  • Joseph E. Stiglitz
Regular Article

Abstract

Economic agents differ from physical atoms because of the learning capability and memory, which lead to strategic behaviour. Economic agents learn how to interact and behave by modifying their behaviour when the economic environment changes. We show that business fluctuations are endogenously generated by the interaction of learning agents via the phenomenon of regenerative-coordination, i.e. agents choose a learning strategy which leads to a pair of output and price which feedback on learning, possibly modifying it. Mathematically, learning is modelled as a chemical reaction of different species of elements, while inferential analysis develops combinatorial master equation, a technique, which is an alternative approach in modelling heterogeneous interacting learning agents.

Keywords

Heterogeneous interacting ABM Learning Master equations 

JEL Classification

C5 C6 D83 E1 E3 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank an anonymous referee for his remarks; Patrick Xihao Li, Corrado di Guilmi and participants to the EEA conference, NY May 2013, PRIN Bologna, June 2013, for suggestions; the support of the Institute for New Economic Thinking Grant INO1200022, and the EFP7, MATHEMACS and NESS, is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Alfarano S, Lux T, Wagner F (2005) Estimation of agent-based models: the case of an asymmetric herding model. Comput Econ 26(1):19–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aoki M (1996) New approaches to macroeconomic modelling. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Aoki M (2002) Modelling aggregate behaviour and fluctuations in economics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Aoki M, Yoshikawa H (2006) Reconstructing macroeconomics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchanan M (2007) The social atom: why the rich get richer, cheaters get caught, and your neighbour usually looks like you. Bloomsbury, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Delli Gatti D, Gallegati M, Greenwald B, Russo A, Stiglitz JE (2010) The financial accelerator in an evolving credit network. J Econ Dyn Control 34:1627–1650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delli Gatti D, Di Guilmi C, Gallegati M, Landini S (2012) Reconstructing aggregate dynamics in heterogeneous agents models. A Markovian Approach, Revue de l’OFCE 124(5):117–146Google Scholar
  8. Delli Gatti D, Fagiolo G, Richiardi M, Russo A, Gallegati M (2014) Agent based models. A Premier (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  9. de Groot SR, Mazur P (1984) Non-equilibrium thermodynamics. Dover Publication, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Di Guilmi C, Gallegati M, Landini S, Stiglitz JE (2011) Towards an analytic solution for agent based models: an application to a credit network economy. In: Aoki M, Binmore K, Deakin S, Gintis H (eds) Complexity and institutions: markets, norms and corporations. Palgrave Macmillan, London, IEA conference, vol. N.150-IIGoogle Scholar
  11. Feller W (1966) An introduction to probability theory and its applications. Wiley, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  12. Foley DK (1994) A statistical equilibrium theory of markets. J Econ Theory 62:321–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gardiner CW (1985) Handbook of stochastic methods. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  14. Gardiner CW, Chaturvedi S (1977) The Poisson representation I. A new technique for chemical master equations. J Stat Phys 17(6):429–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gillespie DT (2007) Stochastic simulation of chemical kinetics. Annu Rev Phys Chem 58:35–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenwald B, Stiglitz JE (1993) Financial markets imperfections and business cycles. Q J Econ 108(1):77–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Godley W, Lavoie M (2007) Monetary economics. An integrated approach to credit, money, income, production and wealth. Palgrave MacMillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirman A (2011) Learning in agent based models. East Econ J 37(1):20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirman A (2012) Can artificial economies help us understand real economies. Revue de l’OFCE, Debates and Policies 124Google Scholar
  20. McQuarrie DA (1967) Stochastic approach to chemical kinetics. J Appl Probab 4:413–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nicolis G, Prigogine I (1977) Self-organization in nonequilibrium systems: from dissipative structures to order through fluctuations. Wiley, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  22. Sargent T (1993) Bounded rationality in macroeconomics. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Stiglitz JE (1973) Taxation, corporate financial policy and the cost of capital. J Public Econ 2(1):1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stiglitz JE (1975) The theory of screening, education and the distribution of income. Am Econ Rev 65(3):283–300Google Scholar
  25. Stiglitz JE (1976) The efficiency wage hypothesis, surplus labour and the distribution of income in L.D.C’.S. Oxford Econ Papers 28(2):185–207Google Scholar
  26. Tesfatsion L, Judd KL (2006) Agent-based computational economics. In: Handbook of computational economics. Handbooks in economics series, vol 2. North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  27. van Kampen NG (2007) Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  28. Weidlich W, Braun M (1992) The master equation approach to nonlinear economics. J Evol Econ 2(3): 233–265Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simone Landini
    • 1
  • Mauro Gallegati
    • 2
  • Joseph E. Stiglitz
    • 3
  1. 1.I.R.E.S. PiemonteTurinItaly
  2. 2.DiSESUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly
  3. 3.Columbia Business SchoolColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations