Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Diffusion of competing innovations in influence networks

  • 489 Accesses

  • 3 Citations

Abstract

Although an influence network is a crucial factor affecting diffusion processes, it is generally fixed or assumed to follow some typical topologies in traditional diffusion research. The purpose of this study is to examine how innovation diffusion is changed by different influence relationship structures existing among individuals. We introduce an extended version of the regular digraph that can represent various influence relationships among influentials and followers. We focus on three key features of influence relationships (i.e. monopolization, localization, and diversification of opinions) and examine how they are associated with certain macroscopic behavioral regularities by employing agent-based simulation. The simulation results show that market becomes “locked-in” to a single product when influences are monopolized by few influentials. We also find that when influence relationship becomes complex as influentials and followers increase, market cannot be categorized by a single typology, but becomes random and unpredictable. Our model demonstrates successfully an underlying principle of collective behavior that uniformity of behavior is promoted under monopolization of opinions and random, unpredictable behavioral patterns emerge from diversification of opinions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  1. Allsop DT, Bassett BR, Hoskins JA (2007) Word-of-mouth research: principles and applications. J Advert Res 47:398–411

  2. Arthur WB (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econ J 99:116–131

  3. Bala V, Goyal S (1998) Learning from neighbours. Rev Econ Stud 65:595–621

  4. Balter D, Butman J (2005) Grapevine: the new art of word-of-mouth marketing. Penguin Group, London

  5. Barabási AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286:509–512

  6. Bass FM (1969) A new product growth for model consumer durables. Manag Sci 15:215–227

  7. Bernardes DF, Latapy M, Tarissan F (2012) Relevance of SIR model for real-world spreading phenomena: experiments on a large-scale P2P system. Proceedings of the (2012) IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM 2012). Istanbul, Turkey

  8. Bohlmann JD, Calantone RJ, Zhao M (2010) The effects of market network heterogeneity on innovation diffusion: an agent-based modeling approach. J Prod Innov Manag 27:741–760

  9. Brock WA, Durlauf SN (2001) Discrete choice with social interactions. Rev Econ Stud 68:235–260

  10. Burt RS (1987) Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence. Am J Soc 92:1287–1335

  11. Burt RS (1999) The social capital of opinion leaders. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc 556:37–54

  12. Cavusoglu H, Hu N, Li Y, Ma D (2010) Information technology diffusion with influentials, imitators, and opponents. J Manag Inf Syst 27:305–334

  13. Centola D (2010) The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science 329:1194–1197

  14. Choi H, Kim S-H, Lee J (2010) Role of network structure and network effects in diffusion of innovations. Ind Mark Manag 39:170–177

  15. Cointet JP, Roth C (2007) How realistic should knowledge diffusion models be?. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 10(3):5 http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/10/3/5.html. Accessed 26 November 2011

  16. Draief M, Massouli’e L (2010) Epidemics and rumors in complex networks, ser. In: London mathematical society lecture note series. Cambridge University Press, London

  17. Farrell J, Saloner G (1985) Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. The RAND J Econ 16(1):70–83

  18. Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Soc 78(6):1360–1380

  19. Granovetter MS (2005) The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. J Econ Perspect 19(1):33–50

  20. Feder G, Savastano S (2006) The role of opinion leaders in the diffusion of new knowledge: the case of integrated pest management. World Dev 34(7):1287–1300

  21. Huang CY, Sun CT, Lin HC (2005) Influence of local information on social simulations in small-world network models. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 8(4):8 http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/8.html. Accessed 26 November 2011

  22. Hur W (2010) Dynamics of technology adoption in markets exhibiting network effects. Asia Pac J Inf Syst 20(1):127–140

  23. Katz E, Lazarsfeld PF (1955) Personal influence: the part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Free Press, Glencoe

  24. Kearns M, Suri S, Montfort N (2006) An experimental study of the coloring problem on human subject networks. Science 313(5788):824–827

  25. Lee E, Lee J, Lee J (2006) Reconsideration of the winner-take-all hypothesis: complex networks and local bias. Manag Sci 52(12):1838–1848

  26. Liebowitz SJ, Margolis SE (1995) Path dependence, lock-in, and history. J Law Econ Organ 11(1):205–226

  27. Moore GA (1995) Inside the tornado: marketing strategies from Silicon Valley’s cutting edge. HarperBusiness, New York

  28. Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45:167–256

  29. Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York

  30. Shapiro C, Varian HR (1999) Information rules: a strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

  31. Tucker C (2008) Identifying formal and informal influuence in technology adoption with network externalities. Manag Sci 54(12):2004–2038

  32. Uchida M, Shirayama S (2008) Influence of a network structure on the network effect in the communication service market. Phys A 387(21):5303–5310

  33. Valente TW (1995) Network models of the diffusion of innovations. Hampton Press, Cresskill

  34. Van den bulte C, Joshi YV (2007) New product diffusion with influentials and imitators. Mark Sci 26(3):400–421

  35. Vickery G, Wunsch-Vincent S (2007) Participative web and user-created content: Web 2.0, wikis and social networking. OECD Publishing, Paris

  36. Watts DJ, Dodds PS (2007) Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. J Consum Res 34(4):441–458

  37. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ’small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by INHA UNIVERSITY Research Grant and by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MEST) (No. 20110016160).

Author information

Correspondence to Wonchang Hur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, J., Hur, W. Diffusion of competing innovations in influence networks. J Econ Interact Coord 8, 109–124 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-012-0106-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Diffusion
  • Network effects
  • Social networks
  • Lock-in
  • Opinion leader
  • Agent-based simulation