Ocean-atmosphere interaction in the lifecycle of ENSO: The coupled wave oscillator

Article
First Online:
Received:

Abstract

To explain the oscillatory nature of El Nino/Southern Oscillation (ENSO), many ENSO theories emphasize the free oceanic equatorial waves propagating/reflecting within the Pacific Ocean, or the discharge/recharge of Pacific-basin-averaged ocean heat content. ENSO signals in the Indian and Atlantic oceans are often considered as remote response to the Pacific SST anomaly through atmospheric teleconnections. This study investigates the ENSO life cycle near the equator using long-term observational datasets. Space-time spectral analysis is used to identify and isolate the dominant interannual oceanic and atmospheric wave modes associated with ENSO. Nino3 SST anomaly is utilized as the ENSO index, and lag-correlation/regression are used to construct the composite ENSO life cycle. The propagation, structure and feedback mechanisms of the dominant wave modes are studied in detail. The results show that the dominant oceanic equatorial wave modes associated with ENSO are not free waves, but are two ocean-atmosphere coupled waves including a coupled Kelvin wave and a coupled equatorial Rossby (ER) wave. These waves are not confined only to the Pacific Ocean, but are of planetary scale with zonal wavenumbers 1–2, and propagate all the way around the equator in more than three years, leading to the longer than 3-year period of ENSO. When passing the continents, they become uncoupled atmospheric waves. The coupled Kelvin wave has larger variance than the coupled ER wave, making the total signals dominated by eastward propagation. Surface zonal wind stress (x) acts to slow down the waves. The two coupled waves interact with each other through boundary reflection and superposition, and they also interact with an off-equatorial Rossby wave in north Pacific along 15N through boundary reflection and wind stress forcing. The precipitation anomalies of the two coupled waves meet in the eastern Pacific shortly after the SST maximum of ENSO and excite a dry atmospheric Kelvin wave which quickly circles the whole equator and leads to a zonally symmetric signal of troposphere temperature. ENSO signals in the Indian and Atlantic oceans are associated with the two coupled waves as well as the fast atmospheric Kelvin wave. The discharge/recharge of Pacific-basin-averaged ocean heat content is also contributed by the two coupled waves. The above results suggest the presence of an alternative coupled wave oscillator mechanism for the oscillatory nature of ENSO.

Keywords

ENSO Ocean-atmosphere interaction Equatorial waves 

2000 MR Subject Classification

17B40 17B50 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. [1]
    Philander, S. G., El Niño, La Niña, and the Southern Oscillation, Academic Press, London, 1990.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Barnston, A. G., He, Y. and Glantz, M. H., Predictive skill of statistical and dynamical climate models in SST forecasts during the 1997–1998 El Niño episode and the 1998 La Niña onset, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 80, 1999, 217–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Lin, J. L., Interdecadal variability of ENSO in 21 IPCC AR4 coupled GCMs, Geophys. Res. Let., 34, 2007, L12702. DOI:10.1029/2006GL028937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Bjerknes, J., Atmospheric teleconnections from the equatorial Pacific, Mon. Weather Rev., 97, 1969, 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Neelin, J. D., Battisti, D. S., Hirst, A. C., et al, ENSO theory, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 1998, 14261–14290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Wang, C. and Picaut, J., Understanding ENSO physics-A review, Earth’s Climate: The Ocean-Atmosphere Interaction, C. Wang, S.-P. Xie and J. A. Carton (eds.), AGU Geophysical Monograph Series, 147, 2004, 21–48.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Suarez, M. J. and Schopf, P. S., A delayed action oscillator for ENSO, J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 1988, 3283–3287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Battisti, D. S. and Hirst, A. C., Interannual variability in the tropical atmosphere-ocean model: influence of the basic state, ocean geometry and nonlineary, J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 1989, 1687–1712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Picaut, J., Masia, F. and du Penhoat, Y., An advective-reflective conceptual model for the oscillatory nature of the ENSO, Science, 277, 1997, 663–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Weisberg, R. H. and Wang, C., A western Pacific oscillator paradigm for the El Niño-Southern Oscillation, Geophys, Res. Lett., 24, 1997, 779–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Jin, F.-F., An equatorial ocean recharge paradigm for ENSO, Part I: Conceptual model, J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 1997, 811–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Jin, F.-F., An Equatorial ocean recharge paradigm for ENSO, Part II: a stripped-down coupled model, J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 1997, 830–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Boulanger, J.-P. and Menkes, C., Propagation and reflection of long equatorial waves in the Pacific ocean during the 1992–1993 El Niño, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 1995, 25041–25059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Picaut, J., Hackert, E., Busalacchi, A. J., et al, Mechanisms of the 1997–1998 El Niño-La Niña, as inferred from space-based observations, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 2002, 30–37. DOI:10.1029/2001JC000850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Matsuno, T., Quasi-geostrophic motions in the equatorial area, J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 44, 1966, 25–43.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Lindzen, R. S., Planetary waves on beta-planes, Mon. Wea. Rev., 95, 1967, 441–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Hayashi, Y., Space-time spectral analysis and its applications to atmospheric waves, J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 60, 1982, 156–171.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Wheeler, M. and Kiladis, G. N., Convectively coupled equatorial waves: analysis of clouds and temperature in the wavenumber-frequency domain, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 1999, 374–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Lin, J. L., Kiladis, G. N., Mapes, B. E., et al, Tropical intraseasonal variability in 14 IPCC AR4 climate models, Part I: Convective signals, J. Climate, 19, 2006, 2665–2690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Alexander, M. A., Blade, I., Newman, M., et al, The atmospheric bridge: The influence of ENSO teleconnections on airsea interaction over the global oceans, J. Climate, 15, 2002, 2205–2231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Barnett, T. P., Interaction of the Monsoon and Pacific trade wind system at interannual time scales, Part I: The equatorial zone, Mon. Wea. Rev., 111, 1983, 756–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Trenberth, K. E., Caron, J. M., Stepaniak, D. P., et al, Evolution of El Niño-Southern Oscillation and global atmospheric surface temperatures, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 2002, 40–65. DOI:10.1029/2000JD000298Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Oort, A. H. and Yienger, J. J., Observed long-term variability in the Hadley circulation and its connection to ENSO, J. Climate, 9, 1996, 2751–2767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    White, W. B., Tourre, Y. M., Barlow, M., et al, A delayed action oscillator shared by biennal, interannual, and decadal signals in the Pacific basin, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 2003, 30–70. DOI:10.1029/2002JC001490Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Lin, J. L., The double-ITCZ problem in IPCC AR4 coupled GCMs: Ocean-atmosphere feedback analysis, J. Climate, 20, 2007, 4497–4525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Lin, J. L., Mapes, B. E. and Han, W., What are the sources of mechanical damping in Matsuno-Gill type models? J. Climate, 21, 2008, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., et al, The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 1996, 437–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    White, W. B., Design of a global observing system for gyre-scale upper ocean temperature variability, Prog. Oceanogr., 36, 1995, 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Adler, R. F., Huffman, G. J., Chang, A., et al, The version 2 global precipitation climatology project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979-present), J. Hydrometeor., 4, 2003, 1147–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Christy, J. R., Spencer, R. W., Norris, W. B., et al, Error estimates of version 5.0 of MSU-AMSU bulk atmospheric temperatures, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 20, 2003, 613–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Gibson, J. K., Kllberg, P., Uppala, S., et al, ERA description, ECMWF Reanalysis Project Report, Ser. 1, 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Editorial Office of CAM (Fudan University) and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations