Journal of Computer Science and Technology

, Volume 31, Issue 6, pp 1136–1150 | Cite as

Using Computational Intelligence Algorithms to Solve the Coalition Structure Generation Problem in Coalitional Skill Games

  • Yang Liu
  • Guo-Fu Zhang
  • Zhao-Pin Su
  • Feng Yue
  • Jian-Guo Jiang
Regular Paper
First Online:
Received:
Revised:

Abstract

Coalitional skill games (CSGs) are a simple model of cooperation in an uncertain environment where each agent has a set of skills that are required to accomplish a variety of tasks and each task requires a set of skills to be completed, but each skill is very hard to be quantified and can only be qualitatively expressed. Thus far, many computational questions surrounding CSGs have been studied. However, to the best of our knowledge, the coalition structure generation problem (CSGP), as a central issue of CSGs, is extremely challenging and has not been well solved. To this end, two different computational intelligence algorithms are herein evaluated: binary particle swarm optimization (BPSO) and binary differential evolution (BDE). In particular, we develop the two stochastic search algorithms with two-dimensional binary encoding and corresponding heuristic for individual repairs. After that, we discuss some fundamental properties of the proposed heuristic. Finally, we compare the improved BPSO and BDE with the state-of-the-art algorithms for solving CSGP in CSGs. The experimental results show that our algorithms can find the same near optimal solutions with the existing approaches but take extremely short time, especially under the large problem size.

Keywords

Coalitional skill game coalitional structure generation two-dimensional binary encoding heuristic individual repair 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Khan M A, Turgut D, Bölöni L. Optimizing coalition formation for tasks with dynamically evolving rewards and non-deterministic action effects. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2011, 22(3): 415-438.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Ye D, Zhang M, Sutanto D. Self-adaptation-based dynamic coalition formation in a distributed agent network: A mechanism and a brief survey. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2013, 24(5): 1042-1051.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Li C, Sycara K, Scheller-Wolf A. Combinatorial coalition formation for multi-item group-buying with heterogeneous customers. Decision Support Systems, 2010, 49(1): 1-13.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Liao S S, Zhang J D, Lau R et al. Coalition formation based on marginal contributions and the Markov process. Decision Support Systems, 2014, 57(1): 355-363.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Ke G Y, Bookbinder J H, Kilgour D M. Coordination of transportation and quantity discount decisions, with coalition formation. International Journal of Production Research, 2014, 52(17): 5115-5130.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Saad W, Han Z, Basar T et al. Hedonic coalition formation for distributed task allocation among wireless agents. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2011, 10(9): 1327-1344.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Guerrero J, Oliver G. Multi-robot coalition formation in real-time scenarios. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2012, 60(10): 1295-1307.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Liu A, Li Q, Huang L et al. Coalitional game for community-based autonomous web services cooperation. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2013, 6(3): 387-399.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Service T C, Adams J A. Constant factor approximation algorithms for coalition structure generation. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2011, 23(1): 1-17.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Rahwan T, Michalak T, Wooldridge M et al. Anytime coalition structure generation in multi-agent systems with positive or negative externalities. Artificial Intelligence, 2012, 186: 95-122.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Zick Y, Chalkiadakis G, Elkind E. Overlapping coalition formation games: Charting the tractability frontier. In Proc. the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, June 2012, pp.787-794.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Zick Y, Markakis E, Elkind E. Arbitration and stability in cooperative games with overlapping coalitions. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2014, 50: 847-884.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Dunne P E, Kraus S, Manisterski E et al. Solving coalitional resource games. Artificial Intelligence, 2010, 174(1): 20-50.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Chitnis R, Hajiaghayi M, Liaghat V. Parameterized complexity of problems in coalitional resource games. In Proc. the 25th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, August 2011, pp.620-625.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Rahwan T, Jennings N R. An algorithm for distributing coalitional value calculations among cooperating agents. Artificial Intelligence, 2007, 171(8/9): 535-567.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Airiau S, Sen S. A fair payoff distribution for myopic rational agents. In Proc. the 8th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, May 2009, pp.1305-1306.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Chalkiadakis G, Markakis E, Boutilier C. Coalition formation under uncertainty: Bargaining equilibria and the Bayesian core stability concept. In Proc. the 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, May 2007, pp.412-419.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Chalkiadakis G, Boutilier C. Sequentially optimal repeated coalition formation under uncertainty. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2012, 24(3): 441-484.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Kenari S M S, Jahan M V, Jalali M. Multi-skill agents coalition formation under skill uncertainty. In Proc. International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing, June 2011, pp.89-96.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Sridhar U, Mandyam S. Capability-weighted group utility maximizer for network coalitional games under uncertainty. In Proc. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, August 2012, pp.613-617.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Bachrach Y, Rosenschein J S. Coalitional skill games. In Proc. the 7th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, May 2008, pp.1023-1030.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Bachrach Y, Parkes D C, Rosenschein J S. Computing cooperative solution concepts in coalitional skill games. Artificial Intelligence, 2013, 204: 1-21.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Aziz H, Brandt F, Harrenstein P. Monotone cooperative games and their threshold versions. In Proc. the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, May 2010, pp.1107-1114.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Aziz H, De Keijzer B. Complexity of coalition structure generation. In Proc. the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, May 2011, pp.191-198.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Tran-Thanh L, Nguyen T D, Rahwan T et al. An efficient vector-based representation for coalitional games. In Proc. the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, August 2013, pp.383-389.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Wu D, Cai Y, Wang J. A coalition formation framework for transmission scheme selection in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2011, 60(6): 2620-2630.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Akkarajitsakul K, Hossain E, Niyato D. Coalition-based cooperative packet delivery under uncertainty: A dynamic bayesian coalitional game. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2013, 12(2): 371-385.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Blankenburg B, He M, Klusch M et al. Risk-bounded formation of fuzzy coalitions among service agents. In Proc. the 10th International Workshop on Cooperative Information Agents, September 2006, pp.332-346.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Wei G, Vasilakos A V, Zheng Y et al. A game-theoretic method of fair resource allocation for cloud computing services. The Journal of Supercomputing, 2010, 54(2): 252-269.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Niyato D, Vasilakos A V, Zhu K. Resource and revenue sharing with coalition formation of cloud providers: Game theoretic approach. In Proc. the 11th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing, May 2011, pp.215-224.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Huang B, Gao C, Chen L. Partner selection in a virtual enterprise under uncertain information about candidates. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(9): 11305-11310.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Rahimi M R, Venkatasubramanian N, Vasilakos A V. MuSIC: Mobility-aware optimal service allocation in mobile cloud computing. In Proc. the 6th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing, June 28-July 3, 2013, pp.75-82.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Sheng Q Z, Qiao X, Vasilakos A V et al. Web services composition: A decade’s overview. Information Sciences, 2014, 280: 218-238.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Khan M A, Tembine H, Vasilakos A V. Game dynamics and cost of learning in heterogeneous 4G networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2012, 30(1): 198-213.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Duarte P B F, Fadlullah Z M, Vasilakos A V et al. On the partially overlapped channel assignment on wireless mesh network backbone: A game theoretic approach. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2012, 30(1): 119-127.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Wang C Y, Ko C H, Wei H Y et al. A boting-based Femtocell downlink cell-breathing control mechanism. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2016, 24(1): 85-98.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Dutta A, Dasgupta P, Baca J et al. SearchUCSG: A fast coalition structure search algorithm for modular robot reconfiguration under uncertainty. Robotica, 2014, 32(2): 225-244.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Roh J H, Shahidehpour M, Wu L. Market-based generation and transmission planning with uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2009, 24(3): 1587-1598.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    Bachracht Y, Meir R, Jung K et al. Coalitional structure generation in skill games. In Proc. the 24th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, July 2010, pp.703-708.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    Nguyen T D. A fast approximation algorithm for solving the complete set packing problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 237(1): 62-70.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    Sen S, Dutta P. Search for optimal coalition structures. In Proc. the 4th International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, July 2000, pp.287-292.Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    Yang J, Luo Z. Coalition formation mechanism in multi-agent systems based on genetic algorithms. Applied Soft Computing, 2007, 7(2): 561-568.Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    Keinänen H. Simulated annealing for multi-agent coalition formation. In Proc. the 3rd KES International Symposium on Agent and Multi-Agent Systems-Technologies and Applications, June 2009, pp.30-39.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    Kennedy J, Eberhart R C. A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, October 1997, pp.4104-4108.Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    Pampará G, Engelbrecht A P, Franken N. Binary differential evolution. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, July 2006, pp.1873-1879.Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    Pedrasa M A A, Spooner T D, MacGill I F. Scheduling of demand side resources using binary particle swarm optimization. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2009, 24(3): 1173-1181.Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    Cao R F, Wang X C, Wu Z K et al. A parallel Markov cerebrovascular segmentation algorithm based on statistical model. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2016, 31(2): 400-416.Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    Du H Z, Xia N, Jiang J G et al. A Monte Carlo enhanced PSO algorithm for optimal QoM in multi-channel wireless networks. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2013, 28(3): 553-563.Google Scholar
  49. [49]
    He R J, Yang Z Y. Differential evolution with adaptive mutation and parameter control using Lévy probability distribution. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2012, 27(5): 1035-1055.Google Scholar
  50. [50]
    Lu X F, Tang K. Classification- and regression-assisted differential evolution for computationally expensive problems. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2012, 27(5): 1024-1034.Google Scholar
  51. [51]
    Kennedy J, Eberhart R C. Particle swarm optimization. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, November 1995, pp.1942-1948.Google Scholar
  52. [52]
    Storn R, Price K. Differential evolution — A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of Global Optimization, 1997, 11(4): 341-359.Google Scholar
  53. [53]
    Altman D G, Machin D, Bryant T N et al. Statistics with Confidence: Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines. London, England: BMJ Books, 2000.Google Scholar
  54. [54]
    Elkind E, Chalkiadakis G, Jennings N R. Coalition structures in weighted voting games. In Proc. the 18th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, July 2008, pp.393-397.Google Scholar
  55. [55]
    Deng X, Papadimitriou C H. On the complexity of cooperative solution concepts. Mathematics of Operations Research, 1994, 19(2): 257-266.Google Scholar
  56. [56]
    Voice T, Polukarov M, Jennings N R. Coalition structure generation over graphs. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2012, 45(1): 165-196.Google Scholar
  57. [57]
    Bachrach Y, Kohli P, Kolmogorov V et al. Optimal coalition structure generation in cooperative graph games. In Proc. the 27th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, July 2013, pp.81-87.Google Scholar
  58. [58]
    Kalai E, Zemel E. Totally balanced games and games of flow. Mathematics of Operations Research, 1982, 7(3): 476-478.Google Scholar
  59. [59]
    Bachrach Y, Rosenschein J S. Power in threshold network flow games. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2009, 18(1): 106-132.Google Scholar
  60. [60]
    Xia N, Jiang J, Hu C. Solution to agent coalition problem using improved ant colony optimization algorithm. In Proc. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, September 2004, pp.475-478.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yang Liu
    • 1
  • Guo-Fu Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhao-Pin Su
    • 1
    • 2
  • Feng Yue
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jian-Guo Jiang
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Computer and InformationHefei University of TechnologyHefeiChina
  2. 2.Intelligent Manufacturing InstituteHefei University of TechnologyHefeiChina
  3. 3.Department of Science and Technology ManagementHefei University of TechnologyHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations