Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Trip Oriented Search on Activity Trajectory

Abstract

Driven by the flourish of location-based services, trajectory search has received significant attentions in recent years. Different from existing studies that focus on searching trajectories with spatio-temporal information and text de-scriptions, we study a novel problem of searching trajectories with spatial distance, activities, and rating scores. Given a query q with a threshold of distance, a set of activities, a start point S and a destination E, trip oriented search on activity trajectory (TOSAT) returns k trajectories that can cover the activities with the highest rating scores within the threshold of distance. In addition, we extend the query with an order, i.e., order-sensitive trip oriented search on activity trajectory (OTOSAT), which takes both the order of activities in a query q and the order of trajectories into consideration. It is very challenging to answer TOSAT and OTOSAT efficiently due to the structural complexity of trajectory data with rating information. In order to tackle the problem efficiently, we develop a hybrid index AC-tree to organize trajectories. Moreover, the optimized variant RAC+-tree and novel algorithms are introduced with the goal of achieving higher performance. Extensive experiments based on real trajectory datasets demonstrate that the proposed index structures and algorithms are capable of achieving high efficiency and scalability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. [1]

    Li Z, Ding B, Han J, Kays R. Swarm: Mining relaxed temporal moving object clusters. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2010, 3(1/2): 723-734.

  2. [2]

    Zheng K, Zheng Y, Yuan N, Shang S, Zhou X. Online discovery of gathering patterns over trajectories. IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2014, 26(8): 1974-1988.

  3. [3]

    Huang M, Hu P, Xia L. A grid based trajectory indexing method for moving objects on fixed network. In Proc. the 18th Int. Conf. Geoinformatics, June 2010.

  4. [4]

    Popa L S, Zeitouni K, Oria V et al. Indexing in-network trajectory flows. The VLDB Journal, 2011, 20(5): 643-669.

  5. [5]

    Chu S, Yeh C, Huang C. A cloud-based trajectory index scheme. In Proc. the 12th ICEBE, October 2009, pp.602-607.

  6. [6]

    Vlachos M, Kollios G, Gunopulos D. Discovering similar multidimensional trajectories. In Proc. the 18th ICDE, Feb. 26-Mar. 1, 2002, pp.673-684.

  7. [7]

    Chen L, Özsu M T, Oria V. Robust and fast similarity search for moving object trajectories. In Proc. the 24th SIGMOD, June 2005, pp.491-502.

  8. [8]

    Chen Z, Shen H, Zhou X, Zheng Y, Xie X. Searching trajectories by locations: An efficiency study. In Proc. the 29th SIGMOD, June 2010, pp.255-266.

  9. [9]

    Chen Z, Shen H, Zhou X. Discovering popular routes from trajectories. In Proc. the 27th ICDE, April 2011, pp.900-911.

  10. [10]

    Zheng K, Shang S, Yuan N J, Yang Y. Towards efficient search for activity trajectories. In Proc. the 29th ICDE, April 2013, pp.230-241.

  11. [11]

    Zhang C, Han J, Shou L, Lu J, La Porta T. Splitter: Mining fine-grained sequential patterns in semantic trajectories. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2014, 7(9): 769-780.

  12. [12]

    Ying J, Lee W, Weng T, Tseng V. Semantic trajectory mining for location prediction. In Proc. the 19th SIGSPATIAL, November 2011, pp.34-43.

  13. [13]

    Zhou Y, Xie X, Wang C, Gong Y, Ma W. Hybrid index structures for location-based web search. In Proc. the 14th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, October 31-November 1, 2005, pp.155-162.

  14. [14]

    Chen Y, Suel T, Markowet A. Efficient query processing in geographic web search engines. In Proc. the 25th SIGMOD, June 2006, pp.277-288.

  15. [15]

    Hariharan R, Hore B, Li C, Mehrotra S. Processing spatialkeyword (SK) queries in geographic information retrieval (GIR) systems. In Proc. the 19th SSBDM, July 2007, Article No. 16.

  16. [16]

    Cao X, Cong G, Jensen C, Ooi B. Collective spatial keyword querying. In Proc. the 30th SIGMOD, June 2011, pp.373-384.

  17. [17]

    Shang S, Ding R, Yuan B, Xie K, Zheng K, Kalnis P. User oriented trajectory search for trip recommendation. In Proc. the 15th EDBT, March 2012, pp.156-167.

  18. [18]

    Long C, Wong R, Wang K, Fu A. Collective spatial keyword queries: A distance owner-driven approach. In Proc. the 32nd SIGMOD, June 2013, pp.689-700.

  19. [19]

    Wang C, Xie X, Wang L, Lu Y, Ma W. Web resource geographic location classification and detection. In Proc. the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web, May 2005, pp.1138-1139.

  20. [20]

    De Felipe I, Hristidis V, Rishe N. Keyword search on spatial databases. In Proc. the 24th ICDE, April 2008, pp.656-665.

  21. [21]

    Zhang D, Chee Y, Mondal A, Tung A, Kitsuregawa M. Keyword search in spatial databases: Towards searching by document. In Proc. the 25th ICDE, March 29-April 2, 2009, pp.688-699.

  22. [22]

    Cong G, Jensen C S, Wu D. Efficient retrieval of the top-k most relevant spatial web objects. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2009, 2(1): 337-348.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Lei Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, W., Zhao, L., Xu, J. et al. Trip Oriented Search on Activity Trajectory. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 30, 745–761 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-015-1558-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • trajectory search
  • rating score
  • activity trajectory