Journal of Computer Science and Technology

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 919–924 | Cite as

Internet of Things: Objectives and Scientific Challenges

Article

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) is aimed at enabling the interconnection and integration of the physical world and the cyber space. It represents the trend of future networking, and leads the third wave of the IT industry revolution. In this article, we first introduce some background and related technologies of IoT and discuss the concepts and objectives of IoT. Then, we present the challenges and key scientific problems involved in IoT development. Moreover, we introduce the current research project supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program). Finally, we outline future research directions.

Keywords

Internet of things architecture data exchange information integration service delivery 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

11390_2011_1189_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (108 kb)
(PDF 107 kb)

References

  1. [1]
    Global Environment for Networking Innovation (GENI), http://www.geni.net/, Aug. 2011.
  2. [2]
    Future INternet Design (FIND), http://www.nets-find.net/, Aug. 2011.
  3. [3]
    Future Internet Research and Experimentation (FIRE), http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/fire/, Aug. 2011.
  4. [4]
    Future Internet Forum (FIF), http://fif.kr/, Aug. 2011.
  5. [5]
    New Generation Network Promotion Forum (NWGN), http://forum.nwgn.jp/, Aug. 2011.
  6. [6]
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    International Telecommunication Union. ITU Internet Reports 2005: The Internet of Things, November 2005.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Wolf W. Cyber-physical Systems. IEEE Computer, 2009, 42(3): 88–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Bush R, Meyer D. Some Internet architectural guidelines and philosophy. RFC 3429, Dec. 2002, http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfcs3439.html.
  12. [12]
    Fall K. A message-switched architecture for challenged Internets. Technical Report, IRB-TR-02-010, Intel Research at Berkeley, Jul. 2002.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Fall K. A delay-tolerant network architecture for challenged Internets. In Proc. ACM Conf. on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications, Karlsruhe, Germany, August 25–29, 2003, pp.27-34.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Acer U G, Kalyanaraman S, Abouzeid A A. Weak state routing for large scale dynamic networks. In Proc. the 13th ACM Int. Conf. Mobile Computing and Networking, Montreal, Canada, Sept. 9–14, 2007, pp.290-301.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Liu Y, Zhou G, Zhao J, Dai G, Li X Y, Gu M, Ma H, Mo L, He Y, Wang J et al. Long-term large-scale sensing in the forest: Recent advances and future directions of GreenOrbs. Frontiers of Computer Science in China, 2010, 4(3): 334–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Liu Y, He Y, Li M, Wang J, Liu K, Mo L, Dong W, Yang Z, Xi M, Zhao J, Li X Y. Does wireless sensor network scale? A measurement study on GreenOrbs. In Proc. the 30th IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, Shanghai, China, April 10–15, 2011, pp.873-881.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC & Science Press, China 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Beijing Key Lab of Intelligent Telecommunications Software and Multimedia, School of Computer ScienceBeijing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations