Journal of Computer Science and Technology

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 56–64 | Cite as

An Algorithm for Constructing 3D Struts

Regular Paper

Abstract

A simple robust “strut algorithm” is presented which, when given a graph embedded in 3D space, thickens its edges into solid struts. Various applications, crystallographic and sculptural, are shown in which smooth high-genus forms are the output. A toolbox of algorithmic techniques allow for a variety of novel, visually engaging forms that express a mathematical aesthetic. In sculptural examples, hyperbolic tessellations in the Poincaré plane are transformed in several ways to three-dimensional networks of edges embodied within a plausibly organic organization. By the use of different transformations and adjustable parameters in the algorithms, a variety of attractive forms result. The techniques produce watertight boundary representations that can be built with solid freeform fabrication equipment. The final physical output satisfies the “coolness criterion,” that passers by will pick them up and say “Wow, that’s cool!”

Keywords

sculpture solid modeling echinoderm algorithms fine arts computer-aided design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Hart G W. The Geometric Aesthetic. Chapter 10, The Visual Mind II, Michele Emmer (ed.), MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Hart G W. Solid-Segment Sculptures. Mathematics and Art, Claude Brute (ed.), Springer-Verlag, 2002.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
    Wells A F. Three Dimensional Nets and Polyhedra. Wiley, 1977.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Stephen T Hyde, Michael O’Keeffe, David M Proserpio. A short history of an elusive yet ubiquitous structure in chemistry, materials and mathematics. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition, 2008, 47(42): 7996–8000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Anderson James. Hyperbolic Geometry. Springer, 1999.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Coxeter H S M. Non-Euclidean Geometry. 6th Edition, MAA, 1998.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Schattschneider D. Coxeter and the artists: Two way inspiration. The Coxeter Legacy: Reflections and Projections, Davis C, Ellis E W (eds.), Fields Institute Comm. Ser., 46, Amer. Math. Soc, 2005, pp.258–260.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Dunham D. Hyperbolic art and the poster pattern. 2003. http://www.mathaware.org/mam/03/essay1.html.
  10. [10]
    Knezevic I, Sazdanovic R, Vukmirovic S. Tess package for mathematica. http://library.wolfram.com/infocenter/MathSource/4540.
  11. [11]

Copyright information

© Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceStony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations