Skip to main content
Log in

Stressulkusprophylaxe

Stress ulcer prophylaxis

  • Schwerpunkt
  • Published:
Der Gastroenterologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Eine medikamentöse Stressulkusprophylaxe ist fester Bestandteil der Therapie auf konservativen und operativen Intensivstationen. Blutungen aus stressbedingten Läsionen im oberen Gastrointestinaltrakt sind selten, aber dann mit einer wesentlich schlechteren Prognose vergesellschaftet. Gesicherte Indikationen zur Durchführung sind das respiratorische Versagen mit der Notwendigkeit der Durchführung einer invasiven Beatmung über einen Zeitraum von mehr als 48 h und die Koagulopathie. Auch die aktuellen Sepsisleitlinien und die Leitlinie bezüglich des infarktbedingten kardiogenen Schockes empfehlen die Durchführung. Ob eine alleinige enterale Ernährung zur Stressulkusprophylaxe ausreicht, kann nicht beantwortet werden, eine frühe enterale Ernährung hat aber auch hier einen hohen Stellenwert. Eine medikamentöse Stressulkusprophylaxe auf Normalstation ist nicht indiziert. Zur medikamentösen Stressulkusprophylaxe stehen überwiegend Protonenpumpenhemmer und H2-Rezeptor-Antagonisten zur Verfügung. Aufgrund des etwas günstigeren Nebenwirkungsprofils und der wohl ausreichenden Wirkung zumindest in der Prävention stressbedingter Ulzera sind H2-Rezeptor-Antagonisten zu bevorzugen. In der Therapie stressbedingter Ulzerationen spielen sie keine Rolle.

Abstract

Pharmaceutical prophylaxis of stress ulcers is an integral part of therapy on conservative and surgical intensive care units. Bleeding from stress-induced lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract is rare but when it occurs it is associated with a significantly worse prognosis. Established indications for the implementation of therapy are respiratory failure with the need for invasive ventilation over a period of more than 48 h and coagulopathy. The current guidelines on sepsis and the guidelines on infarction-induced cardiogenic shock also recommend the implementation. Whether enteral nutrition alone is sufficient prophylaxis for stress ulcers cannot be answered, but early enteral nutrition is also of great importance for this reason. Pharmaceutical prophylaxis of stress ulcers is not indicated outside the intensive care unit (ICU). For pharmaceutical prophylaxis of stress ulcers proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and H2 receptor antagonists (H2-RA) are also available. Due to the slightly more favorable adverse effects profile and probably sufficient effectiveness, H2-RAs should be given priority, at least in the prevention of stress-induced ulcers. Stress-induced ulcers have to be treated with PPI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Cook DJ, Fuller HD, Guyatt GH et al (1994) Risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 330: 377–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Amaral MC, Favas C, Alves JD et al (2010) Stress-related mucosal disease: incidence of bleeding and the role of omeprazole in its prophylaxis. Eur J Intern Med 21: 386–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cook DJ, Griffith LE, Walter SD et al (2001) The attributable mortality and length of intensive care unit stay of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. Crit Care 5: 368–375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Quenot JP, Thiery N, Barbar S (2009) When should stress ulcer prophylaxis be used in the ICU? Curr Opin Crit Care 15: 139–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Robert R, Gissot V, Pierrot M et al (2006) Helicobacter pylori infection is not associated with an increased hemorrhagic risk in patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care 10: R77

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Reinhart K, Brunkhorst FM, Bone HG et al (2010) Prävention, Diagnose, Therapie und Nachsorge der Sepsis. 1. Revision der S-2k Leitlinien der Deutschen Sepsis-Gesellschaft e. V. (DSG) und der Deutschen Interdisziplinären Vereingigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI). Anästhesist 59: 347–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Werdan K, Ruß M, Buerke M et al (2011) Deutsch-österreichische S3-Leitlinie „Infarktbedingter kardiogener Schock – Diagnose, Monitoring, Therapie“. Kardiologe 5: 166–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (1999) ASHP therapeutic guidelines on stress ulcer prophylaxis. Am J Health Syst Pharm 56: 347–379

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koch A, Buendgens L, Dückers H et al (2013) Ursachen, patientenspezifische Risikofaktoren und prognostische Indikatoren bei akuter gastrointestinaler Blutung und intensivmedizinischer Therapieindikation. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 108: 214–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Herzig SJ, Vaughn BP, Howell MD et al (2011) Acid-suppressive medication use and the risk for nosocomial gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Arch Intern Med 171: 991–997

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Herzig SJ, Rothberg MB (2012) Prophylaxis rate for venous thromboembolism and gastrointestinal bleeding in general medical patients: too low or too high. BMJ 344: e3248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Heidelbaugh JJ, Inadomi JM (2006) Magnitude and economic impact of inappropriate use of stress ulcer prophylaxis in non-ICU hospitalized patients. Am J Gastroenterol 101: 2200–2205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marik PE, Vasu T, Hirani A et al (2010) Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the new millenium: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 38: 2222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Phillips PO, Metzler MH, Palmieri TL et al (1996) A prospective study of simplified omeprazole suspension for the prophylaxis of stress-related mucosal damage. Crit Care Med 24: 1793–1800

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lasky MR, Metzler MH, Phillips JO (1998) A prospective study of omeprazole suspension to prevent clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding from stress ulcers in mechanically ventilated trauma patients. J Trauma 44: 527–533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cook DJ, Reeve BK, Guyatt GH et al (1996) Stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients. Resolving discordant meta-analyses. JAMA 275: 308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Barkun AN, Bardou M, Pham CQD et al (2012) Proton pump inhibitors vs. histamine 2 receptor antagonists for stress-related mucosal bleeding prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 107: 507–520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin PC, Chang CH, Hsu PI et al (2010) The efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors vs. histamine-2-receptor antagonists for stress ulcer prophylaxis among critical care patients: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 38: 1197–1205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. MacLaren R, Reynolds PM, Allen RR (2014) Histamine-2 receptor antagonists vs proton pump inhibitors on gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage and infectious complications in the intensive care unit. JAMA Intern Med 174: 564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. http://www.fda.gov/drugs/drugsafety/ucm245011.htm. Zugegriffen: 27. Juli 2014

  21. Herzig SJ, Howell MD, Ngo LH et al (2009) Acid-suppressive medication use and the risk for hospital-acquired pneumonia. JAMA 301: 2120–2128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Eom CS, Jeon CY, Lim JW et al (2011) Use of acid-suppressive drugs and risk of pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 183: 310

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Loo VG, Bourgault AM, Poirier L et al (2011) Host and pathogen factors for Clostridium difficile infection and colonization. N Engl J Med 365: 1693–1703

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim JW, Lee KL, Jeong JB et al (2010) Proton pump inhibitors as a risk factor for recurrence of Clostridium-difficile-associated diarrhea. World J Gastroenterol 16: 3573–3577

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Aseeri M, Schroeder T, Kramer J et al (2008) Gastric acid suppression by proton pump inhibitors as a risk factor for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in hospitalized patients. Am J Gastroenterol 103: 2308–2313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kämmerer W (2012) Klinisch relevante pharmakokinetische Arzneimittelinteraktionen in der Intensivmedizin. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfallmed 107: 128–140

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ho PM, Maddox TM, Wang L et al (2009) Risk of adverse outcomes associated with concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors following acute coronary syndrome. JAMA 301: 937–944

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sibbing D, Massberg S (2012) Plättchenaggregationshemmer. Kardiologe 6: 399–411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung der ethischen Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. G. Braun und H. Messmann geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Braun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Braun, G., Messmann, H. Stressulkusprophylaxe. Gastroenterologe 9, 535–540 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11377-014-0914-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11377-014-0914-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation