Advertisement

Intelligent Service Robotics

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 1–16 | Cite as

Design of a 3D-printable, robust anthropomorphic robot hand including intermetacarpal joints

  • Won Suk You
  • Young Hun Lee
  • Hyun Seok Oh
  • Gitae Kang
  • Hyouk Ryeol ChoiEmail author
Original Research Paper
  • 130 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents a new mechanical design of an anthropomorphic robot hand. The hand is designed such that it is adaptive, backdrivable, modularized to provide both dexterity and robustness. The hand has 18 joints, 14 degrees of freedom, and a new joint mechanism called an active DIP–PIP joint for the robot finger. The mechanism includes a pair of movable pulleys and springs for generating both linked and adjustable motions. Although the set of DIP (distal interphalangeal) and PIP (proximal interphalangeal) joints exhibits a coupled movement in free space, it moves adaptively when it contacts an object. To ensure a 1:1 ratio movement when a finger is moving freely and to produce additional joint torque when gripping an object, torsion springs are attached to each joint. The backdrivability of each joint is realized using an actuation module with a miniature BLDC motor and a ball screw. In addition, the relatively unknown intermetacarpal joints, which provide additional dexterity to the hand for grasping small objects, are used in the robot hand model. A modularized design simplifies the assembly of the hand and increases the economic feasibility. Experimental results are included in this paper for validating the design of the robot hand.

Keywords

Multifingered hands Mechanism design Kinematics Tendon driven Backdrivable joint 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the convergence technology development program for bionic arm through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science & ICT (No. 2014M3C1B2048175).

References

  1. 1.
    Rothling F, Haschke R, Steil JJ, Ritter H (2007) Platform portable anthropomorphic grasping with the bielefeld 20-DOF shadow and 9-DOF TUM hand. In: International conference on intelligent robots and systems, San Diego, pp 2951–2956Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deshpande AD, Xu Z, Vande Weghe MJ, Brown BH, Ko J, Chang LY, Wilkinson DD, Bidic SM, Matsuoka Y (2011) Mechanisms of the anatomically correct testbed hand. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 18:238–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bridgwater, LB, Ihrke CA, Diftler MA, Abdallah ME, Radford NA, Rogers JM, Yayathi S, Askew RS, Linn DM (2012) The Robonaut 2 hand—designed to do work with tools. In: 2012 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA, pp 3425–3430Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Melchiorri C, Palli G, Berselli G, Vassura G (2013) Development of the UB Hand IV: overview of design solutions and enabling technologies. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 20(3):72–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim YJ, Kim J, Lee JW, Park KM. Roh KS, Choi JY (2014) RoboRay hand : a highly backdrivable robotic hand with sensorless contact force measurements. In: International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Hong Kong, pp 6712–6718Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grebenstein, M, Albu-Sch\(\ddot{a}\)ffer, A, Bahls T, Chalon M, Eiberger O, Friedl W, Gruber R, Haddadin S, Hagn U, Haslinger R, H\(\ddot{o}\)ppner H, J\(\ddot{o}\)rg S, Nickl M, Nothhelfer A, Petit F, Reill J, Seitz N, Wimb\(\ddot{o}\)ck T, Wolf S, W\(\ddot{u}\)sthoff T, Hirzinger G (2011) The DLR hand arm system. In: International conference on robotics and automation, Shanghai, China, pp 3175–3182Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Odhner LU, Jentoft LP, Claffe MR, Corson N, Tenzer Y, Ma RR, Buehler M, Kohout R, Howe RD, Dollar AM (2014) A compliant, underactuated hand for robust manipulation. Int J Robot Res 33(5):736–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stuart HS, Wnag S, Gardineer B, Christensen DL, Aukes DM, Cutkosky M (2014) A compliant underactuated hand with suction flow for underwater mobile manipulation. In: International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Hong Kong, pp 6691–6697Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuo P, DeBacker J, Deshpande AD (2015) Design of robotic fingers with human-like passive parallel compliance. In: International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Seattle, pp 2562–2567Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ma RR, Spiers A, Dollar AM (2016) M\(^{2}\) Gripper: extending the dexterity of a simple, underactuated gripper. Adv Reconfig Mech Robots 36:95–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ma RR, Odhner LU, Dollar AM (2013) A modular, open-source 3D printed underactuated hand. In: International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Karlsruhe, pp 2722–2728Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kontoudis GP, Liarokapis MV, Zisimatos AG, Mavrogiannis CI, Kyriakopoulos KJ (2015) Open-source, anthropomorphic, underactuated robot hands with a selectively lockable differential mechanism: towards affordable prostheses. In: International conference on robotics and automation, Hamburg, pp 5857–5862Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Catalano MG, Grioli G, Farnioli E, Serio A, Piazza C, Bicchi A (2014) Adaptive synergies for the design and control of the Pisa/IIT SoftHand. Int J Robot Res 33(5):768–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xu K, Liu H, Liu Z, Du Y, Zhu X (2015) A single-actuator prosthetic hand using a continuum differential mechanism. In: Conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Seattle, pp 6457–6462Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mitsui K, Ozawa R, Kou T (2013) An under-actuated robotic hand for multiple grasps. In: International conference on robots and system (IROS), Tokyo, pp 5475–5480Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    You WS, Lee YH, Kang G, Oh HS, Seo JK, Choi HR (2017) Kinematic design optimization of anthropomorphic robot hand using a new performance index. In: International conference on ubiquitous robots and ambient intelligence (URAI), Jeju, South Korea, pp 20–25Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yu H, Chase RA, Strauch B (2003) Atlas of hand anatomy and clinical implications. Mosby, Maryland Heights ISBN-13: 978-0815179276Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stillfried G, Smagt P (2010) Movement model of a human hand based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In: International conference on advances in bioscience and bioengineeringGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cobos S, Ferre M, Uran MAS, Ortego J, Pena C (2008) Efficient human hand kinematics for manipulation tasks. In: Intelligent robots and systems, pp 2246–2251Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Calals B (2007) Anatomy of movement, Revised edn. Eastland Press, VistaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nordin M (2001) Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia ISBN-13: 978-0683302479Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Valero-Cuevas FJ, Johanson ME, Towles JD (2003) Towards a realistic biomechanical model of the thumb: the choice of kinematic description may be more critical than the solution method or the variability/uncertainty of musculoskeletal parameters. J Biomech 36(7):1019–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Santos VJ, Valero-Cuevas FJ (2006) Reported anatomical variability naturally leads to multimodal distributions of Denavit–Hartenberg parameters for the human thumb. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53(2):155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chalon M, Grebenstein M, Wimbock T, Hirzinger G (2010) The thumb: guidelines for a robotic design. In: International conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 5886–5893Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang H, Fan S, Liu H (2012) An anthropomorphic design guideline for the thumb of the dexterous hand. In: International conference on mechatronics and automation, pp 777–782Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Martin J, Grossard M (2014) Design of a fully modular and backdrivable dexterous hand. Int J Robot Res 33(5):783–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Calli B, Walsman A, Singh A, Srinivasa S, Abbeel P, Dollar AM (2015) Benchmarking in manipulation research: using the Yale–CMU–Berkeley object and model set. IEEE Autom Mag 22(3):36–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bae JHS, Park W, Kim D, Baeg MH, Oh SR (2012) A grasp strategy with the geometric centroid of a groped object shape derived from contact spots. In: International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Minnesota, pp 3798–3804Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cutkosky MR, Howe RD (1990) Human grasp choice and robotic grasp analysis, Chapter 1. In: Venkataraman ST, Iberall T (eds) Dextrous robot hands. Springer, Berlin, pp 5–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Won Suk You
    • 1
  • Young Hun Lee
    • 2
  • Hyun Seok Oh
    • 2
  • Gitae Kang
    • 2
  • Hyouk Ryeol Choi
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing EngineeringOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.School of Mechanical EngineeringSungkyunkwan UniversityJangan-gu, SuwonKorea

Personalised recommendations