Advertisement

Intelligent Service Robotics

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 137–148 | Cite as

Design of an anthropomorphic dual-arm robot with biologically inspired 8-DOF arms

  • Dong-Hyuk Lee
  • Hyeonjun Park
  • Jae-Han Park
  • Moon-Hong Baeg
  • Ji-Hun BaeEmail author
Original Research Paper

Abstract

From the perspective of kinematics, dual-arm manipulation in robots differs from single-arm manipulation in that it requires high dexterity in a specific region of the manipulator’s workspace. This feature has motivated research on the specialized design of manipulators for dual-arm robots. These recently introduced robots often utilize a shoulder structure with a tilted angle of some magnitude. The tilted shoulder yields better kinematic performance for dual-arm manipulation, such as a wider common workspace for each arm. However, this method tends to reduce total workspace volume, which results in lower kinematic performance for single-arm tasks in the outer region of the workspace. To overcome this trade-off, the authors of this study propose a design for a dual-arm robot with a biologically inspired four degree-of-freedom shoulder mechanism. This study analyzes the kinematic performance of the proposed design and compares it with that of a conventional dual-arm robot from the perspective of workspace and single-/dual-arm manipulability. The comparative analysis revealed that the proposed structure can significantly enhance single- and dual-arm kinematic performance in comparison with conventional dual-arm structures. This superior kinematic performance was verified through experiments, which showed that the proposed method required shorter settling time and trajectory-following performance than the conventional dual-arm robot.

Keywords

Bimanual manipulation Dual-arm manipulation Dexterous manipulation Redundant manipulator 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2016R1A6A3A04012911).

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (mp4 18429 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (mp4 20707 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Asfour T, Regenstein K, Azad P, Schröder J, Bierbaum A, Vahrenkamp N, Dillmann R (2006) ARMAR-III: an integrated humanoid platform for sensory-motor control. In: IEEE-RAS Int. Conf. Humanoid Robots, pp 169–175Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Do HM, Park C, Kyung J-H (2012) Dual arm robot for packaging and assembling of IT products. In: Int. conf. automation science and engineering (CASE), pp 1067–1070Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hirose M, Ogawa K (2007) Honda humanoid robots development. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 365(1850):11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Park I-W, Kim J-Y, Oh J-H (2005) Mechanical design of humanoid robot platform KHR-3 (KAIST Humanoid Robot 3: HUBO). In: IEEE-RAS int. conf. humanoid robots, pp 321–326Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oh J-H, Hanson D, Kim W-S, Han IY, Kim J-Y, Park I-W (2006) Design of android type humanoid robot Albert HUBO. In: IEEE/RSJ int. conf. intelligent robots and systems, pp 1428–1433Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lo S-Y, Huang H-P (2016) Realization of sign language motion using a dual-arm/hand humanoid robot. Intell Serv Robot 9(4):333–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaneko K, Harada K, Kanehiro F, Miyamori G, Akachi K (2008) Humanoid robot HRP-3. In: IEEE/RSJ int. conf. intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 2471–2478Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaneko K, Kanehiro F, Morisawa M, Akachi K, Miyamori G, Hayashi A, Kanehira N (2011) Humanoid robotics platform with lightweight and slim body. In: IEEE/RSJ int. conf. intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 4400–4407Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bagheri M, Ajoudani A, Lee J, Caldwell DG, Tsagarakis NG (2015) Kinematic analysis and design considerations for optimal base frame arrangement of humanioid shoulders. In: IEEE int. conf. robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 2710–2715Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borst C et al (2009) Rollin’ Justin-mobile platform with variable base. In: IEEE int. conf. robotics and automation, pp 1597–1598Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Loughlin C, Albu-Schäffer A, Haddadin S, Ott C, Stemmer A, Wimböck T, Hirzinger G (2007) The DLR lightweight robot: design and control concepts for forbots in human environments. Ind Robot Int J 34(5):376–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goehler C (2007) Design of a humanoid shoulder-elbow complex. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Notre DameGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yoshikawa T (1985) Manipulability of robotic mechanisms. Int J Robot Res 4(2):3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee S (1989) Dual redundant arm configuration optimization with task-oriented dual arm manipulatability. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 5(1):78–97MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Choi M-H, Lee M-Y, Lee B-H (1990) On the manipulability measure of dual arm. In: Korea Automatic Control Conference (KACC), pp 1156–1161Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Choi M-H, Lee B-H, Ko M-S (1993) Force ellipsoid and manipulability ellipsoid of two cooperating robots. J KIEE 6(2):52–60Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bae J-H, Park S-W, Par J-H, Baeg M-H, Kim D, Oh S-R (2012) Development of a low cost anthropomorphic robot hand with high capability. In: IEEE/RSJ int. conf. intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 4776–4782Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bae J-H, Park S-W, Kim D, Baeg M-H, Oh S-R (2012) A grasp strategy with the geometric centroid of a groped object shape derived from contact spots. In: IEEE int. conf. robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 3798–3804Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cheah C-C (2008) Task-space PD control of robot manipulators: unified analysis and duality property. Int J Robot Res 27(10):1152–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sciavicco L, Siciliano B (1996) Modeling and control of robot manipulators. McGraw-Hill, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kim JT, Lee J, Kim H, Seo J, Chon S-U, Park B, Park S, Cho J (2016) Method for improving the position precision of a hydraulic robot arm: dual virtual springdamper controller. Intell Serv Robot 9(2):93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Arimoto S, Sekimoto M, Hashiguchi H, Ozawa R (2005) Natural resolution of ill-posedness of inverse kinematics for redundant robots: a challenge to Bernstein’s degrees-of-freedom problem. Adv Robot 19(4):401–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Arimoto S (1996) Control theory of nonlinear mechanical systems. Oxford University Press, Inc., OxfordzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bae J-H, Park J-H, Oh Y, Kim D, Choi Y, Yang W (2015) Task space control considering passive muscle stiffness for redundant robotic arms. Intell Serv Robot 8(2):93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dong-Hyuk Lee
    • 1
  • Hyeonjun Park
    • 1
  • Jae-Han Park
    • 1
  • Moon-Hong Baeg
    • 1
  • Ji-Hun Bae
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Robot Control and Cognition Lab., Robot R&D GroupKorea Institute of Industrial Technology (KITECH)AnsanKorea

Personalised recommendations