Intelligent Service Robotics

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 93–102 | Cite as

Precise truss assembly using commodity parts and low precision welding

  • Erik Komendera
  • Dustin Reishus
  • John T. Dorsey
  • William R. Doggett
  • Nikolaus Correll
Special Issue

Abstract

Hardware and software design and system integration for an intelligent precision jigging robot (IPJR), which allows high precision assembly using commodity parts and low-precision bonding, is described. Preliminary 2D experiments that are motivated by the problem of assembling space telescope optical benches and very large manipulators on orbit using inexpensive, stock hardware and low-precision welding are also described. An IPJR is a robot that acts as the precise “jigging”, holding parts of a local structure assembly site in place, while an external low precision assembly agent cuts and welds members. The prototype presented in this paper allows an assembly agent (for this prototype, a human using only low precision tools), to assemble a 2D truss made of wooden dowels to a precision on the order of millimeters over a span on the order of meters. The analysis of the assembly error and the results of building a square structure and a ring structure are discussed. Options for future work, to extend the IPJR paradigm to building in 3D structures at micron precision are also summarized.

Keywords

Robotic assembly Autonomous robots Precision manipulation Space robotics Distributed robots 

References

  1. 1.
    Komendera E, Reishus D, Dorsey JT, Doggett WR, Correll N (2013) Precise truss assembly using commodity parts and low precision welding. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Practical Robot Applications Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lake MS (2001) Launching a 25-meter space telescope, are astronauts a key to the next technically logical step after ngst? In: IEEE Aerospace ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mahoney MJ, Ibbott AC (1988) A large deployable reflector assembly scenario, a space station utilization study. Technical Report NASA JPL D-5942Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zimpfer D, Kachmar P, Tuohy S (2005) Autonomous rendezvous, capture and in-space assembly: past, present and future. 1st Space Explor Conf: Continuing Voyage Discov 1:234–245Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schrunk D, Sharpe B, Cooper B, Thangavelu M (1999) The Moon: resources, future development and colonization. Wiley, VHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Walberg G (1993) How shall we go to mars? A review of mission scenarios. J Spacecraft Rockets 30(2):129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oegerle WR, Purves LR, Budinoff JG, Moe RV, Carnahan TM, Evans DC, Kim CK (2006) Concept for a large scalable space telescope: In-space assembly. In: Proceedings of SPIE 6265(62652C)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ebbets D, DeCino J, Green J (2006) Architecture concept for a 10 m uv-optical space telescope. In: Proceedings of SPIE 6265(62651 S–1)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lillie CF (2006) On-orbit assembly and servicing of future space observatories. In: Proceedings of SPIE 6265(6265 62652D–1)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Watson JJ, Collins TJ, Bush HG (2002) A history of astronaut construction of large space structures at NASA Langley Research Center. In: IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, vol 7. p 7–3569Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Doggett W (2002) Robotic assembly of truss structures for space systems and future research plans. In: Aerospace Conference Proceedings, 2002. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lindsey Q, Mellinger D, Kumar V (2011) Construction of cubic structures with quadrotor teams. In: Proceedings of Robotics: science and systems, June 2011Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Detweiler C, Vona M, Yoon Y, Yun S, Rus D (2007) Self-assembling mobile linkages. Robot Autom Mag IEEE 14(4):45–55Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Werfel J, Nagpal R (2008) Three-dimensional construction with mobile robots and modular blocks. Int J Robot Res 3–4(27):1566–1584Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Petersen K, Nagpal R, Werfel J (2011) Termes: an autonomous robotic system for three-dimensional collective construction. In: Robotics: science and systems VIIGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Knepper RA, Rus D (2012) Pedestrian-inspired sampling-based multi-robot collision avoidance. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dorsey JT, Jones TC, Doggett WR, Brady JS, Berry FC, Ganoe GG, Anderson EJ, King BD, Mercer CD (2011) Recent developments in the design, capabilities and autonomous operations of a lightweight surface manipulation system and test bed. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Space ConferenceGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik Komendera
    • 1
  • Dustin Reishus
    • 1
  • John T. Dorsey
    • 2
  • William R. Doggett
    • 2
  • Nikolaus Correll
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of Colorado at BoulderBoulderUSA
  2. 2.NASA Langley Research CenterHamptonUSA

Personalised recommendations