Intelligent Service Robotics

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 119–134 | Cite as

A novel 3D sensory system for robot-assisted mapping of cluttered urban search and rescue environments

Original Research Paper

Abstract

In this paper, the first application of utilizing a unique 3D sensor for sequential 3D map building in unknown cluttered urban search and rescue (USAR) environments is proposed. The sensor utilizes a digital fringe projection and phase shifting technique to provide real-time 2D and 3D sensory information of the environment. The proposed sensor is unique over current technologies in that high-resolution 3D information of rubble filled environments can be acquired from the single sensor at a speed of 30 frames per second (fps). Furthermore, we propose the development of a novel robust and reliable landmark identification technique that utilizes both 2D and 3D depth images taken by the sensor for 3D mapping. Preliminary experiments show the potential of the real-time 3D sensory system and landmark identification scheme for robotic 3D mapping in unknown cluttered USAR-like environments.

Keywords

Urban search and rescue Structured light sensing Landmark identification 3D mapping 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992) A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14: 239–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bosse M, Newman P, Leonard J, Soika M, Feiten W, Teller S (2003) An Atlas framework for scalable mapping. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 1899–1906Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Craighead J, Day B, Murphy R (2006) Evaluation of Canesta’s range sensor technology for urban search and rescue and robot navigation. Technical Report, CRASAR-TR2006-2, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ellekilde L-P, Huang S, Miró JV, Dissanayake G (2007) Dense 3D map construction for indoor search and rescue. J Field Robot 24(1): 71–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fischler MA, Bolles RC (1981) Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun ACM 24: 381–395CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Geng ZJ (1996) Rainbow 3-D camera: new concept of high-speed three vision system. Opt Eng 35: 376–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harding KG (1988) Color encoded Moiré contouring. In: Optics, illumination, and image sensing for machine vision III, Proceedings of SPIE, vol 1005, pp 169–178Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang PS, Han X (2006) On improving the accuracy of structured light systems. Proceedings of SPIE two- and three-dimensional methods for inspection and metrology IV, optics east, 6382Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang P, Hu Q, Jin F, Chiang FP (1999) Color-encoded digital fringe projection technique for high-speed three-dimensional surface contouring. Opt Eng 38: 1065–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ishida H, Nagatani K, Tanaska Y (2004) Three-dimensional localization and mapping for a Crawler-type mobile robot in an occluded area using the scan matching method. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 449–454Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kadous M, Sammut C, Sheh R (2005) Caster: a robot for urban search and rescue. Australas Conf Robot Autom 1–10Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karlsson N, Di Bernardo E, Ostrowski J, Goncalves L, Pirjanian P, Munich ME (2005) The vSLAM algorithm for robust localization and mapping. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, (ICRA), pp 24–29Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kurisu M, Yokokohji Y, Oosato Y (2005) Development of a laser range finder for 3D map-building in rubble the 2nd report: development of the 2nd prototype. In: IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation, pp 1842–1847Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lobo J, Queiroz C, Dias J (2003) World feature detection and mapping using stereovision and inertial sensors. J Robot Auton Syst 44: 69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lowe DG (1999) Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In: International conference on computer vision, pp 1150–1157Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lowe DG (2004) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis 60(2): 91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McKinnon B, Baltes J, Anderson J (2005) “A region-based approach to stereo matching in USAR”. In: Proceedings of RoboCup-05, OsakaGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    MESA Imaging (2009) SR4000 Data Sheet Rev. 3.0. Available at http://www.mesa-imaging.ch/dlm.php?fname=pdf/SR4000_Data_Sheet.pdf
  19. 19.
    Mikolajczyk K, Schmid C (2005) A performance evaluation of local descriptors. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 27(10): 1615–1630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Murphy RR (2004) Human–robot interaction in rescue robotics. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 34(2): 138–153CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nuchter A et al (2005a) Mapping of rescue environments with Kurt3D. IEEE Int Workshop Rescue Robot (SSRR ‘05):158–163Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nüchter A, Lingemann K, Hertzberg J, Surmann H (2005b) 6D SLAM with approximate data association. In: International conference on advanced robotics (ICAR), pp 242–249Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nejat G, Zhang Z (2006) Finding disaster victims: robot-assisted 3D mapping of urban search and rescue environments via landmark identification. In: IEEE the 9th international conference on control, automation, robotics and vision (ICARCV), pp 1381–1386Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oggier T, Büttgen B, Lustenberger F, Becker G, Rüegg B, Hodac A (2006) SwissRanger SR3000 and first experiences based on miniaturized 3D-TOF cameras. Available at http://www.mesa-imaging.ch/pdf/Application_SR3000_v1_1.pdf
  25. 25.
    Ohno K, Nomura T, Tadokoro S (2006) Real-time robot trajectory estimation and 3-D map construction using 3-D camera. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 5279–5285Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pathak K, Birk A, Vaskevicius N, Pfingsthorn M, Schwertfeger S, Poppinga J (2010) Online 3D SLAM by registration of large planar surface segments and closed form pose-graph relaxation. J Field Robot 27: 52–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pavillon N (2003) Edge detector. Available at http://bigwww.epfl.ch/demo/subpixeledge/start.php
  28. 28.
    Poppinga J, Birk A, Pathak K (2010) A characterization of 3D sensors for response robots. Robocup 2009 (Lect Notes Artif Intell 5949): 264–275Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rapp H (2007) Experimental and theoretical investigation of correlating TOF-camera systems. Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rioux M (1984) Laser range finder based on synchronized scanners. J Appl Opt 23(21): 3837–3844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Salvi J, Pages J, Batlle J (2004) Pattern codification strategies in structured light systems. Pattern Recognit 37(4): 827–849CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Se S, Jasiobedzki P (2006) Photo-realistic 3D model reconstruction. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 3076–3082Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Se S, Lowe D, Little J (2001) Vision-based mobile robot localization and mapping using scale-invariant features. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 2051–2058Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Smith R, Self M, Cheeseman P (1990) Estimating uncertain spatial relationships in robotics. Auton Robot Vehicles 167–193Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tripp J, Ulitsky A, Pashin S, Mak N, Hahn J (2003) Development of a compact, high-resolution 3D laser range imaging system. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 5088: 112–122Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Videre Design LLC (2010) Apparen family of stereo vision cameras and software. Menlo Park, CA. Available at http://www.videredesign.com/
  37. 37.
    Wulf O, Nüchter A, Hertzberg J, Wagner B (2008) Benchmarking urban six-degree-of-freedom simultaneous localization and mapping. J Field Robot 25(3): 148–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhang L, Curless B, Seitz SM (2002) Rapid shape acquisition using color structured light and multi-pass dynamic programming. In: The 1st IEEE international symposium on 3D data processing, visualization, and transmission, pp 24–36Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang S, Huang P (2004) High-resolution, real-time 3D shape acquisition. In: IEEE computer vision and pattern recognition workshop on realtime 3D sensors and their uses, pp 28–37Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhang S, Huang PS (2006a) High-resolution, real-time 3-D shape measurement. Opt Eng 45(12):123601-1–123601-8Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhang S, Huang PS (2006) Novel method for structured light system calibration. Opt Eng 45(8): 083601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhang Z, Guo H, Nejat G, Huang P (2007) Finding disaster victims: a sensory system for robot assisted 3D mapping of urban search and rescue environments. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Rome, Italy, pp 3889–3894Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhang Z, Nejat G (2008) Robot-assisted intelligent 3D mapping of unknown cluttered search and rescue environments. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 2115–2120Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhe Zhang
    • 1
  • Goldie Nejat
    • 2
    • 3
  • Hong Guo
    • 3
  • Peisen Huang
    • 3
  1. 1.Autonomous Systems Laboratory, Department of Mechanical EngineeringThe State University of New York at Stony BrookStony BrookUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringThe State University of New York at Stony BrookStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations