Advertisement

Intelligent Service Robotics

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 175–182 | Cite as

Real-time center of buoyancy identification for optimal hovering in autonomous underwater intervention

  • Giacomo Marani
  • Song K. Choi
  • Junku Yuh
Original Research Paper

Abstract

This work addresses the problem of optimal positioning for an intervention AUV, minimizing the energy consumption and improving the stability in orientation. During a generic intervention task, the vehicle is generally maintained in a hovering configuration, thus requiring a 6 DOF control of the vehicle positioning. The choice of roll and pitch, if done arbitrarily, can severely impact the power efficiency of the vehicle, especially in heavy systems, since the center of buoyancy (COB) may not be necessarily aligned over the center of mass (COM). This approach uses an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) to identify the location of the center of buoyancy relative to the center of mass, thus allowing to compute the working orientation that maintains the COB vertically aligned above the COM. The EKF is implemented online and hence is able to detect movements of the COB due for example to ballast operations. This algorithm has been firstly implemented in simulation and then successfully validated with the SAUVIM (Semi-Autonomous Underwater Vehicle for Intervention Missions) autonomous underwater vehicle. With its weight of about 4 tons, this testbed is an optimal platform for validating the precision of the filter, since a very small variation of the target pitch and roll results in a large restoring torque.

Keywords

AUV Underwater intervention Hovering Autonomous underwater manipulation Optimal control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Antonelli G (2006) Underwater robots, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antonelli G, Caccavale F, Chiaverini S, Fusco G (2001) A novel adaptive control law for autonomous underwater vehicles. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, ICRA 2001, vol 1, pp 447–452. doi: 10.1109/ROBOT.2001.932591
  3. 3.
    Fjellstad OE, Fossen T (1994) Position and attitude tracking of auv’s: a quaternion feedback approach. IEEE J Oceanic Eng 19(4): 512–518. doi: 10.1109/48.338387 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fjellstad OE, Fossen T (1994) Singularity-free tracking of unmanned underwater vehicles in 6 dof. In: Proceedings of the 33rd IEEE conference on decision and control, 1994, vol 2, pp 1128–1133. doi: 10.1109/CDC.1994.411068
  5. 5.
    Fossen T, Balchen J (1991) The nerov autonomous underwater vehicle. In: Proceedings of the ocean technologies and opportunities in the Pacific for the 90’s, OCEANS ’91, pp 1414–1420Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hanai A, Choi S, Marani G, Rosa K (2009) Experimental validation of model-based thruster fault detection for underwater vehicles. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA ’09, pp 194–199. doi: 10.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152425
  7. 7.
    Kwatny H, Blankenship G (1995) Symbolic construction of models for multibody dynamics. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 11(2): 271–281. doi: 10.1109/70.370509 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marani G (1997) Robosim: a program for simulating mechanical systems in robotics. Master’s thesis, University of PisaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marani G (2000) Symbolic computation in system modelling, identification and control. PhD thesis, University of PisaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marani G, Choi SK, Yuh J (2009) Underwater autonomous manipulation for intervention missions AUVS. Ocean Eng 36(1):15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2008.08.007, URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V4F-4T7F5PD-1/2/ce310fd84710cc86d5ffd871b95edd70, aUVGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sun Y, Cheah C (2003) Adaptive setpoint control for autonomous underwater vehicles. In: Proceedings fo the 42nd IEEE conference on decision and control, vol 2, pp 1262–1267. doi: 10.1109/CDC.2003.1272782
  12. 12.
    Yuh J, Choi SK (1999) Semi-autonomous underwater vehicle for intervention mission: an AUV that does more than just swim. Sea Technol 40(10): 37–42Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yuh J, Choi S, Ikehara C, Kim G, McMurty G, Ghasemi-Nejhad M, Sarkar N, Sugihara K (1998) Design of a semi-autonomous underwater vehicle for intervention missions (sauvim). In: Proceedings of the 1998 International Symposium on Underwater Technology, pp 63–68. doi: 10.1109/UT.1998.670059
  14. 14.
    Yuh J, Nie J, Lee C (1999) Experimental study on adaptive control of underwater robots. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, vol 1, pp 393–398. doi: 10.1109/ROBOT.1999.770010

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Autonomous Systems LaboratoryUniversity of Hawaii at ManoaHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.College of EngineeringUniversity of Hawaii at ManoaHonoluluUSA
  3. 3.Korea Aerospace UniversityGoyang City, Gyeonggi-DoKorea

Personalised recommendations