A review of carbon isotopes of phytoliths: implications for phytolith-occluded carbon sources
Phytolith-occluded carbon (PhytOC) is mainly derived from the products of photosynthesis, which can be preserved in soils and sediments for hundreds-to-thousands of years due to the resilient nature of the amorphous phytolith silica. Therefore, stable and radioactive carbon (C) isotopes of phytoliths can be effectively utilized in paleoecological and archeological research. However, there still exists debate about the applicability of C isotopes of phytoliths, as a “two-pool” hypothesis to characterize PhytOC sources has been proposed, whereby a component of the PhytOC is derived from soil organic matter (SOM) absorbed through plant roots. Therefore, it is necessary to review this topic to better understand the source of PhytOC.
Materials and method
We introduce the stable and radioactive C isotopic compositions of PhytOC, present the impacts of different extraction methods on the study of PhytOC, and discuss the implications of these factors for determining the sources of PhytOC.
Results and discussion
Based on this review, we suggest that organic matter synthesized by photosynthesis is the main source of PhytOC. However, it is important to make clear whether and how SOM-derived C present in phytoliths influence the controversial “too-old” skew and isotopic fractionation.
Though the two-pool hypothesis has been proved by many researches, the carbon isotopes of phytoliths still have potential in paleoecology and archeology, because the main source is photosynthesis and many previous studies put forward the availability of these parameters. This review also shows that phytolith C isotopes may vary with different organic C compounds within phytoliths, which needs further study at the molecular scale. Different phytolith extraction methods can influence 14C dating results.
KeywordsC3 and C4 plants δ13C 14C dating Phytolith extraction method
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 41930862, 41571130042, 41701049] and the State’s Key Project of Research and Development Plan of China [grant number 2016YFA0601002 and 2017YFC0212700].
- Alexandre A, Balesdent J, Cazevieille P, Chevassus-Rosset C, Signoret P, Mazur JC, Harutyunyan A, Doelsch E, Basile-Doelsch I, Miche H, Santos GM (2016) Direct uptake of organically derived C by grass roots and allocation in leaves and phytoliths: 13C labeling evidence. Biogeosciences 13:1693–1703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gallagher KL, Alfonso-Garcia A, Sanchez J, Potma EO, Santos GM (2015) Plant growth conditions alter phytolith carbon. Front Plant Sci 6Google Scholar
- Hodson MJ (2019) The relative importance of cell wall and lumen phytoliths in carbon sequestration in soil: a hypothesis. Front Earth Sci 7Google Scholar
- Li R, Xie S, Gu Y (2010) Advances in the biogeochemical study of phytolith stable isotope. Adv Earth Sci 25:812–819Google Scholar
- Li Z, Song Z, Cornelis JT (2014) Impact of rice cultivar and organ on elemental composition of phytoliths and the release of bio-available silicon. Front Plant Sci 5Google Scholar
- McClaran And Umlauf (2000) Desert grassland dynamics estimated from C isotopes in grass phytoliths and soil organic matter. J Veg Sci 11:71–76Google Scholar
- Piperno DR (1990) Phytolith analysis: an archaeological and geological perspective. Arct Alp Res 54Google Scholar
- Piperno DR (2006) Phytoliths: a comprehensive guide for archaeologists and paleoecologists. AltaMira Press, LanhamGoogle Scholar
- Piperno DR (2016) Standard evaluations of bomb curves and age calibrations along with consideration of environmental and biological variability show the rigor of phytolith dates on modern neotropical plants: review of comment by Santos, Alexandre, and prior. J Archaeol Sci 71:59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Santos GM, Southon JR, Alexandre A, Treseder KK, Corbineau R, Reyerson PE (2012b) Interactive comment on “comment on possible source of ancient C in phytolith concentrates from harvested grasses” by GM Santos et al., by LA Sullivan and JF Parr. Biogeosciences 9:6114–6124Google Scholar
- Smith FA, Anderson KB (2001) Characterization of organic compounds in phytoliths: improving the resolving power of phytolith δ13C as a tool for paleoecological reconstruction of C3 and C4 grasses. In: Meunier JD, Colin F (eds) Phytoliths: applications in earth science and human history. A.A. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, pp 317–327Google Scholar
- Song Z, Mcgrouther K, Wang H (2016b) High potential of phytoliths in terrestrial C sequestration at a centennial–millennial scale: reply to comments by Santos and Alexandre, Earth-Sci Rev https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.11.00
- Sullivan LA, Parr JF (2008) Bomb pulse dating of phytolith-occluded carbon for quantification of carbon sequestration in perennial vegetation, Progress Report no. AINGRA08061, AINSE-Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Lucas Heights, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Zhang X, Song Z, Hao Q, Wang Y, Ding F, Song A (2019) Phytolith-occluded carbon storages in Forest litter layers in southern China: implications for evaluation of long-term forest carbon budget. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.0058