Effect of soil acidification on the growth and nitrogen use efficiency of maize in Ultisols

  • Xiaoying Pan
  • M. Abdulaha-Al Baquy
  • Peng Guan
  • Jing Yan
  • Ruhai Wang
  • Renkou XuEmail author
  • Lu Xie
Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article



To examine the effect of soil acidification on growth and nitrogen (N) uptake by maize in Ultisols.

Materials and methods

A clay Ultisol derived from Quaternary red earth and a sandy Ultisol derived from tertiary red sandstone were used in this study. A pot experiment was conducted with maize growing in the two Ultisols acidified to different pH values. Urea with 15N abundance of 10.11% was used to investigate the distribution of N fertilizer between soil and plant. Total N content and 15N abundance in plant and soil samples were determined by elemental analysis-isotope mass spectrometry.

Results and discussion

Critical soil pHs of 4.8 and 5.0 were observed for maize growing in the clay and sandy Ultisols, respectively. Below the critical soil pH, increasing soil pH significantly increased maize height and the yield of maize shoots and roots (both P < 0.05), but changes in soil pH showed no significant effect on maize growth above the critical soil pH in both Ultisols. Maize growing in the sandy Ultisol was more sensitive to changes in soil pH than in the clay Ultisol. Increase in the pH in both Ultisols also increased N accumulation in maize, the N derived from fertilizer in maize, physiological N use efficiency, and N use efficiency (NUE) by maize. Changes in soil pH had a greater effect on these parameters below the critical soil pH, compared to above. The change in soil pH had a greater effect on N accumulation in maize, the N derived from fertilizer in maize, and NUE in the sandy Ultisol than in the clay Ultisol. The NUE increased by 24.4% at pH 6.0, compared with pH 4.0 in the clay Ultisol, while the NUE at pH 5.0 was 4.8 times that at pH 4.0 in the sandy Ultisol. The increase in soil pH increased the ratio of N accumulation in maize/soil residue N and decreased the potential loss of fertilizer N from both Ultisols.


Soil acidification inhibited maize growth, reduced N uptake by maize, and thus, decreased NUE. To maintain soil pH of acidic soils above the critical values for crops is of practical importance for sustainable food production in acidic soils.


15N labeling Maize growth Nitrogen use efficiency Soil acidification Ultisol 


Funding information

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development of China (No. 2016YFD0200302) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41877036).


  1. Adams F (1984) Soil acidity and liming (2nd). Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Alva AK, Asher CJ, Edwards DG (1990) Effect of solution pH, external calcium concentration, and aluminium activity on nodulation and early growth of cowpea. Aust J Agric Res 41:359–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baquy MAA, Li JY, Xu CY, Mehmood K, Xu RK (2017) Determination of critical pH and Al concentration of acidic Ultisols for wheat and canola crops. Solid Earth 8:149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baquy MAA, Li JY, Jiang J, Mehmood K, Shi RY, Xu RK (2018a) Critical pH and exchangeable Al of four acidic soils derived from different parent materials for maize crops. J Soils Sediments 18:1490–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baquy MAA, Li JY, Shi RY, Kamran MA, Xu RK (2018b) Higher cation exchange capacity determined lower critical soil pH and higher Al concentration for soybean. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:6980–6989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chartres CJ, Cumming RW, Beattie JA, Bowrnan GM, Wood JT (1990) Acidification of soils on a transect from plains to slopes, south western New-South-Wales. Aust J Soil Res 28:539–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen XP, Cui ZL, Fan MS, Vitousek P, Zhao M, Ma WQ, Wang ZL, Zhang WJ, Yan XY, Yang JC, Deng XP, Gao Q, Zhang Q, Guo SW, Ren J, Li SQ, Ye YL, Wang ZH, Huang JL, Tang QY, Sun YX, Peng XL, Zhang JW, He MR, Zhu YJ, Xue JQ, Wang GL, Wu L, An N, Wu LQ, Ma L, Zhang WF, Zhang FS (2014) Producing more grain with lower environmental costs. Nature 514:486–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen ZM, Wang HY, Liu XW, Lu DJ, Zhou JM (2016) The fates of 15N-labeled fertilizer in a wheat-soil system as influenced by fertilization practice in a loamy soil. Sci Rep 6:34754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cui ZL, Chen XP, Zhang FS (2010) Current nitrogen management status and measures to improve the intensive wheat–maize system in China. Ambio 39:376–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dogan I, Ozyigit II, Demir G (2014) Influence of aluminum on mineral nutrient uptake and accumulation inurtica piluliferal. J Plant Nutr 37:469–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duan YH, Xu MG, Wang BR, Yang XY, Huang SM, Gao SD (2011) Long-term evaluation of manure application on maize yield and nitrogen use efficiency in China. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75:1562–1573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans CE, Kamprat EJ (1970) Lime response as related to percent Al saturation, solution Al, and organic matter content. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 34:893–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fan MS, Shen JB, Yuan LX, Jiang RF, Chen XP, Davies WJ, Zhang FS (2012) Improving crop productivity and resource use efficiency to ensure food security and environmental quality in China. J Exp Bot 63:13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guo JH, Liu XJ, Zhang Y, Shen JL, Han WX, Zhang WF, Christie P, Goulding KWT, Vitousek PM, Zhang FS (2010) Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science 327:1008–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hofmeier M, Roelcke M, Han Y, Lan T, Bergmann H, Böhm D, Cai ZC, Nieder R (2015) Nitrogen management in a rice–wheat system in the Taihu region: recommendations based on field experiments and surveys. Agric Ecosyst Environ 209:60–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hu ZY, Xu CK, Zhou LN, Sun BH, He YQ, Zhou J, Cao ZH (2007) Contribution of atmospheric nitrogen compounds to N deposition in a broadleaf forest of southern China. Pedosphere 17:360–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang JW, Grunes DL, Kochian LV (1992) Aluminum effects on the kinetics of calcium uptake into cells of the wheat root apex: quantification of calcium fluxes using a calcium-selective vibrating microelectrode. Planta 188:414–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jiang CQ, Lu DJ, Zu CL, Zhou JM, Wang HY (2018) Root-zone fertilization improves crop yields and minimizes nitrogen loss in summer maize in China. Sci Rep 8:15139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jiang J, Xu RK, Zhao AZ (2010) Comparison of the surface chemical properties of four soils derived from Quaternary red earth as related to soil evolution. Catena 80:154–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiang LG, Dai TB, Jiang D, Jiang D, Cao WX, Gan XQ, Wei SQ (2004) Characterizing physiological N-use efficiency as influenced by nitrogen management in three rice cultivars. Field Crop Res 88:239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaiser J (2001) The other global pollutant: nitrogen proves tough to curb. Science 294:1268–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kamprath EJ (2003) Soil acidity and liming. Soil Science Society of North Carolina, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  23. Kariuki SK, Zhang H, Schroder JL, Edwards J, Payton M, Carver BF, Raun WR, Krenzer EG (2007) Hard red winter wheat cultivar responses to a pH and aluminum concentration gradient. Agron J 99:88–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keltjens WG (1995) Magnesium uptake by Al-stressed maize plants with special emphasis on cation interactions at root exchange sites. Plant Soil 171:141–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kemmitt SJ, Wright D, Goulding KWT, Jones DL (2006) pH regulation of carbon and nitrogen dynamics in two agricultural soils. Soil Biol Biochem 38:898–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kidd PS, Proctor J (2000) Effects of aluminium on the growth and mineral composition of Betula pendula Roth. J Exp Bot 51:1057–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liao H, Yan XL (2003) Advanced plant nutrition. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  28. Lidon FC, Azinheira HG, Barreiro MG (2000) Aluminum toxicity in maize: biomass production and nutrient uptake and translocation. J Plant Nutr 23:151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu DL, Helyar KR, Conyers MK, Fisher R, Poile GJ (2004) Response of wheat, triticale and barley to lime application in semi-arid soils. Field Crop Res 90:287–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu K, Luan S (2001) Internal aluminum block of plant inward K+ channels. Plant Cell 13:1453–1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lofton J, Godsey CB, Zhang H (2010) Determining aluminum tolerance and critical soil pH for winter canola production for acidic soils in temperate regions. Agron J 102:327–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Malkanthi DRR, Yokoyama K, Yoshida T, Moritsugu M, Matsushita K (1995) Effects of low pH and Al on growth and nutrient uptake of several plants. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 41:161–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meriño-Gergichevich C, Alberdi M, Ivanov A, Reyes-Díaz M (2010) Al3+-Ca2+ Interaction in plants growing in acid soils: Alphytotoxicity response to calcareous amendments. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 10: 217–243Google Scholar
  34. Moll RH, Kamprath EJ, Jackson WA (1982) Analysis and interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen utilization. Agron J 74:562–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. National Bureau of Statistics of China (2018)
  36. Nichol BE, Oliveira LA, Class ADM, Siddiqi MY (1993) The effects of aluminum on the influx of calcium, potassium, ammonium, nitrate, and phosphate in an aluminum sensitive cultivar of barley (Hordeum vdgare 1.). Plant Physiol 101:1263–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pansu DM, Gautheyrou J (2006) Handbook of soil analysis. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rao IM, Zeigler RS, Vera R, Sarkarung S (1993) Selection and breeding for acid-soil tolerance in crops. Bioscience 43:454–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rengel Z, Elliott DC (1992) Mechanism of aluminum inhibition of net 45Ca2+ uptake by amaranthus protoplasts. Plant Physiol 98:632–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rengel Z, Bose J, Chen Q, Tripathi BN (2015) Magnesium alleviates plant toxicity of aluminium and heavy metals. Crop Pasture Sci 66:1298–1307Google Scholar
  41. Reuss JO, Johnson DW (1986) Effect of soil processes on the acidification of water by acid deposition. J Environ Qual 14:26–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rhoads FM, Manning A (1989) Soybean, corn, and wheat yields with variable soil pH on Plinthic Acrisols. Fertil Res 19:137–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Richter J, Roelcke M (2000) The N-cycle as determined by intensive agriculture – examples from central Europe and China. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 57:33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ryan PR, Kochian LV (1993) lnteraction between aluminum toxicity and calcium uptake at the root apex in near-isogenic lines of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) differing in aluminum tolerance. Plant Physiol 102:975–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schroder JL, Zhang HL, Girma K, Raun WR, Penn CJ, Payton ME (2011) Soil acidification from long-term use of nitrogen fertilizers on winter wheat. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75:957–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shi ZL, Jing Q, Cai J, Jiang D, Cao WX, Dai TB (2012) The fates of 15N fertilizer in relation to root distributions of winter wheat under different N splits. Eur J Agron 40:86–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL (2011) Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. PNAS 108:20260–20264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Valle SR, Pinochet D, Calderini DF (2011) Uptake and use efficiency of N, P, K, Ca and Al by Al-sensitive and Al-tolerant cultivars of wheat under a wide range of soil Al concentrations. Field Crop Res 121:392–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. van Schöll L, Keltjens WG, Hoffland E, van Breemen N (2005) Effect of ectomycorrhizal colonization on the uptake of Ca, Mg and Al by Pinus sylvestris under aluminium toxicity. Forest Ecol Manag 215:352–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. von Uexküll HR, Mutert E (1995) Global extent, development and economic impact of acid soils. Plant Soil 171:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang GL, Ye YL, Chen XP, Cui ZL (2014) Determining the optimal nitrogen rate for summer maize in China by integrating agronomic, economic, and environmental aspects. Biogeosciences 11:3031–3041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang SJ, Luo SS, Yue SC, Shen YF, Li SQ (2016) Fate of 15N fertilizer under different nitrogen split applications to plastic mulched maize in semiarid farmland. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 105:129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Warembourg FR (1993) Nitrogen fixation in soil and plant systems. In: Knowles R, Blackburn TH (eds) Nitrogen Isotope Techniques. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 127–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Xiong Y, Li Q (1990) Soils of China. Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  55. Yao YL, Zhang M, Tian YH, Zhao M, Zhang BW, Zhao M, Zeng K, Yin B (2018) Urea deep placement for minimizing NH3 loss in an intensive rice cropping system. Field Crop Res 218:254–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yu TR (1997) Chemistry of variable charge soils. Oxford University Press, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang HM, Wang BR, Xu MG, Fan TL (2009) Crop yield and soil responses to long-term fertilization on a red soil in Southern China. Pedosphere 19:199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhou J, Xia F, Liu XM, He Y, Xu JM, Brookes PC (2014) Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on the acidification of two typical acid soils in South China. J Soils Sediments 14:415–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhu JG, Han Y, Liu G, Zhang YL, Shao XH (2000) Nitrogen in percolation water in paddy fields with a rice/wheat rotation. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 57:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhu ZL, Chen DL (2002) Nitrogen fertilizer use in China–Contributions to food production, impacts on the environment and best management strategies. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 63:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoying Pan
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Abdulaha-Al Baquy
    • 1
    • 2
  • Peng Guan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jing Yan
    • 1
  • Ruhai Wang
    • 1
  • Renkou Xu
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Lu Xie
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil ScienceChinese Academy of SciencesNanjingChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations