Advertisement

Effects of different long-term cropping systems on phosphorus adsorption and desorption characteristics in red soils

  • Xiaomei Gou
  • Yan CaiEmail author
  • Changquan Wang
  • Bing Li
  • Yi Zhang
  • Xiaoyan Tang
  • Jie Shen
  • Zehui Cai
Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Phosphorus (P) fertilizer has been applied in regions with red soils to ensure high crop yield. However, the supply of bioavailable P for crop plants is insufficient due to the strong adsorption and fixing behaviors in red soils. In this study, we explored P adsorption and desorption characteristics in red soils under different long-term cropping systems. We also analyzed how the cropping systems affect P adsorption and desorption through changing soil physicochemical properties under the experimental conditions.

Materials and methods

Eighteen red soil samples were collected at depths of 0–20 cm from six cropping systems (abandoned farmland, corn continuous cropping, taro continuous cropping, pea–corn rotation, canola–tobacco rotation, and walnut–tobacco intercropping for at least 10 years) in Miyi County, Sichuan Province, China. Soil physicochemical properties, zeta potentials, and P adsorption and desorption characteristics were evaluated.

Results and discussion

The P adsorption capacity of soils increased at a decreasing rate with increasing exogenous P concentration, while the P desorption capacity increased constantly; however, the change in the percentage of desorbed P had no clear trend. The soils under pea–corn rotation and taro continuous cropping had lower P adsorption capacities and higher P desorption capacities compared to those under the other cropping systems. The maximum P adsorption capacities (Qm) of pea–corn rotation and taro continuous cropping soils were 16.1% and 32.4% of abandoned farmland soil, while the corresponding desorption coefficients were 6.93 and 1.62 times higher than that of abandoned farmland soil, respectively. Soil available P (AP), cation exchange capacity (CEC), and clay content were positively correlated with a and readily desorbable P (RDP), while they were negatively correlated with Qm (P < 0.05); opposite trends were found in the sand content. In addition, the zeta potential of soil colloids decreased with increasing soil pH. Among the cropping systems, the absolute value of zeta potential was lowest for tobacco–walnut intercropping, while its isoelectric point was the highest, resulting in the highest P adsorption capacity.

Conclusions

The long-term cropping systems affect P adsorption and desorption characteristics and P availability in red soils by influencing soil physicochemical properties. The main factors driving the changes in P adsorption behavior were AP, CEC, free Fe oxides, and sand content, while AP, sand, and clay contents were the major factors for the P desorption.

Keywords

Adsorption–desorption characteristics Cropping system Phosphorus Physicochemical properties Red soil Zeta potential 

Abbreviations

P

Phosphorus

MBC

Maximum buffer capacity of soil phosphorus

EPC0

Equilibrium phosphorus concentration at zero adsorption

ΔG

Gibbs free energy

RDP

Readily desorbable phosphorus

DPS

Degree of phosphorus saturation

IEP

Isoelectric point

Notes

Funding information

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2018YFD0200700).

Supplementary material

11368_2019_2493_MOESM1_ESM.docx (36 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 35 kb)

References

  1. Abdala DB, Ghosh AK, da Silva IR, de Novais RF, Venegas VHA (2012) Phosphorus saturation of a tropical soil and related P leaching caused by poultry litter addition. Agric Ecosyst Environ 231:291–295Google Scholar
  2. Abiven S, Menasseri S, Angers DA, Leterme P (2007) Dynamics of aggregate stability and biological binding agents during decomposition of organic materials. Eur J Soil Sci 58:239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adhikari T, Singh MV (2003) Sorption characteristics of lead and cadmium in some soils of India. Geoderma 114:81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ai C, Zhang SQ, Zhang X, Guo DD, Zhou W, Huang SM (2018) Distinct responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to changes in fertilization regime and crop rotation. Geoderma 319:156–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson G, Williams EG, Moir JO (1974) A comparison of the sorption of inorganic phosphate and inositol hexaphosphate by six acid soils. J Soil Sci 25:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arias M, Silva-Carballal JD, García-Río L (2006) Retention of phosphorus by iron and aluminum-oxides-coated quartz particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 295:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Atere CT, Ge TD, Zhu ZK, Liu SL, Huang XZ, Shibsitova O, Guggenberger G, Wu JS (2018) Assimilate allocation by rice and carbon stabilisation in soil: effect of water management and phosphorus fertilisation. Plant Soil 3:1–15Google Scholar
  8. Bache BW, Williams EG (1971) A phosphate sorption index for soils. Eur J Soil Sci 22:289–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bai JH, Ye XF, Jia J, Zhang GL, Zhao QQ, Cui BS, Liu XH (2018) Phosphorus sorption-desorption and effects of temperature, pH and salinity on phosphorus sorption in marsh soils from coastal wetlands with different flooding conditions. Chemosphere 188:677–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Balota EL, Yada IF, Amaral H, Ankatani AS, Dick RP, Coyne MS (2014) Long-term land-use influences soil microbial biomass P and S, phosphatase and arylsulfatase activities, and S mineralization in a Brasilian Oxisol. Land Degrad Dev 25:397–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barrow NJ (2017) The effects of pH on phosphate uptake from the soil. Plant Soil 410(1–2):401–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bender MA, Santos DR, Tiecher T, Minella JPG, Barros CAP, Ramon R (2018) Phosphorus dynamics during storm events in a subtropical rural catchment in southern Brazil. Agric Ecosyst Environ 261:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boparai HK, Sharma KN (2006) Phosphorus adsorption and desorption characteristics of some soils as affected by clay and available phosphorus content. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 54(1):111–114Google Scholar
  14. Bornø ML, Müller-Stöver DS, Liu FL (2018) Contrasting effects of biochar on phosphorus dynamics and bioavailability in different soil types. Sci Total Environ 627:963–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bray RH, Kurtz LT (1945) Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soil. Soil Sci 59:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Castro B, Torrent J (1998) Phosphate sorption by calcareous Vertisols and Inceptisols as evaluated from extended P-sorption curves. Eur J Soil Sci 49(4):661–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheng ZB, Chen Y, Zhang FH (2019) Effect of cropping systems after abandoned salinized farmland reclamation on soil bacterial communities in arid northwest China. Soil Tillage Res 187:204–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Debicka M, Kocowicz A, Weber J, Jamroz E (2016) Organic matter effects on phosphorus sorption in sandy soils. Arch Agron Soil Sci 62:840–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fang HW, Cui ZH, He GJ, Huang L, Chen MH (2017) Phosphorus adsorption onto clay minerals and iron oxide with consideration of heterogeneous particle morphology. Sci Total Environ 605–606:357–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fink JR, Inda AV, Bavaresco J, Barrón V, Torrent J, Bayer C (2016) Adsorption and desorption of phosphorus in subtropical soils as affected by management system and mineralogy. Soil Tillage Res 155:62–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foy CD, Duke JA, Devine TE (1992) Tolerance of soybean germplasm to an acid Tatum subsoil. J Plant Nutr 15:527–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle fraction and particle size analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 1, 2nd edn. ASA and SSSA, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  23. Gérard F (2016) Clay minerals, iron/aluminum oxides, and their contribution to phosphate sorption in soils-a myth revisited. Geoderma 262:213–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gilbert N (2009) Environment: the disappearing nutrient. Nature 461:716–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guedes RS, Melo LCA, Vergütz L, Rodríguez-Vila A, Covelo EF, Fernandes AR (2016) Adsorption and desorption kinetics and phosphorus hysteresis in highly weathered soil by stirred flow chamber experiments. Soil Tillage Res 162:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hartmann M, Frey B, Mayer J, Mäder P, Widmer F (2015) Distinct soil microbial diversity under long-term organic and conventional farming. ISME J 9:1177–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hartono A, Funakawa S, Kosaki T (2005) Phosphorus sorption-desorption characteristics of selected acid upland soils in Indonesia. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 51:787–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haynes RJ (1982) Effects of liming on phosphate availability in acid soils. Plant Soil 68:289–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heidari S, Reyhanitabar A, Oustan S (2017) Kinetics of phosphorus desorption from calcareous soils using DGT technique. Geoderma 305:275–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hively WD, Gerard-Marchant P, Steenhuis TS (2006) Distributed hydrological modeling of total dissolved phosphorus transport in an agricultural landscape. II. Dissolved phosphorus transport. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10:263–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Holford ICR (1979) Evaluation of soil phosphate buffering indices. Soil Res 17:495–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. House WA, Denison FH (2000) Factors influencing the measurement of equilibrium phosphate concentrations in river sediments. Water Res 34(4):1187–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huang X, Gao NY, Zhang QL (2007) Thermodynamics and kinetics of cadmium adsorption onto oxidized granular activated carbon. J Environ Sci 19:1287–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hutchison KJ, Hesterberg D (2004) Dissolution of phosphate in a phosphorus enriched Ultisol as affected by microbial reduction. J Environ Qual 33:1793–1802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jackson ML (1958) Soil chemical analysis. Soil Chem Anal. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  36. Jalali M, Jalali M (2016) Relation between various soil phosphorus extraction methods and sorption parameters in calcareous soils with different texture. Sci Total Environ 566-567:1080–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jiang J, Xu RK, Wang Y, Zhao AZ (2008) The mechanism of chromate sorption by three variable charge soils. Chemosphere 71:1469–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jiao SY, Zhang M, Wang YM, Liu JQ, Li YQ (2014) Variation of soil nutrients and particle size under different vegetation types in the Yellow River Delta. Acta Ecol Sin 34:148–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kleinman PJA, Sharpley AN, Moyer BG, Elwinger GF (2002) Effect of mineral and manure phosphorus sources on runoff phosphorus. J Environ Qual 31:2026–2033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lai DYF, Lam KC (2009) Phosphorus sorption by sediments in a subtropical constructed wetland receiving stormwater runoff. Ecol Eng 35:735–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lair GJ, Zehetner F, Khan ZH, Gerzabek MH (2009) Phosphorus sorption-desorption in alluvial soils of a young weathering sequence at the Danube River. Geoderma 149:39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Li QX, Jin ZW, Chen XM, Jing Y, Huang QR, Zhang JB (2017) Effects of biochar on aggregate characteristics of upland red soil in subtropical China. Environ Earth Sci 76:372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liu Y, Zhu ZQ, He XS, Yan C, Du YQ, Huang YD, Su P, Wang S, Zheng XX, Xue YJ (2018) Mechanisms of rice straw biochar effects on phosphorus sorption characteristics of acid upland red soils. Chemosphere 207:267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lu HY, Yang LZ, Shabbir S (2014) The adsorption process during inorganic phosphorus removal by cultured periphyton. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21(14):8782–8791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lu JY, Dijkstra FA, Wang P, Cheng WX (2019) Roots of non-woody perennials accelerated long-term soil organic matter decomposition through biological and physical mechanisms. Soil Biol Biochem 134:42–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mandal KG, Baral U, Padhi J, Majhi P, Chakraborty H, Kumar A (2012) Effects of cropping on soil properties and organic carbon stock in Deras region, India. Reg Environ Chang 12(4):899–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McDonald GJ, Norton SA, Fernandez IJ, Hoppe KM, Dennis J, Amirbahman A (2019) Chemical controls on dissolved phosphorus mobilization in a calcareous agricultural stream during base flow. Sci Total Environ 660:876–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mehra OP, Jackson ML (1960) Iron oxide removal from soils and clays by a dithionite-citrate system buffered with sodium bicarbonate. In: Swineford ADA (ed) National Conference on Clays and Clay Minerals. WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  49. Messiga AJ, Ziadi N, Angers DA, Morel C, Parent LE (2011) Tillage practices of a clay loam soil affect soil aggregation and associated C and P concentrations. Geoderma 164:225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Murphy PNC, Stevens RJ (2010) Lime and gypsum as source measures to decrease phosphorus loss from soils to water. Water Air Soil Pollut 212:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oburger E, Jones DL, Wenzel WW (2011) Phosphorus saturation and pH differentially regulate the efficiency of organic acid anion-mediated P solubilization mechanisms in soil. Plant Soil 341:363–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pizzeghello D, Berti A, Nardi S, Morari F (2011) Phosphorus forms and P sorption properties in three alkaline soils after long-term mineral and manure applications in northeastern Italy. Agric Ecosyst Environ 141(1):58–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pizzeghello D, Berti A, Nardi S, Morari F (2016) Relationship between soil test phosphorus and phosphorus release to solution in three soils after long-term mineral and manure application. Agric Ecosyst Environ 233:214–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Quesada CA, Lloyd J, Anderson LO, Fyllas NM, Schwarz M, Czimczik CI (2011) Soil of Amazonia with particular reference to the rainfor sites. Biogeosciences 8(6):3851–3921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ruttenberg KC, Sulak DJ (2011) Sorption and desorption of dissolved organic phosphorus onto iron (oxyhydr) oxides in seawater. Geochim Cosmochim Ac 75:4095–4112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sander M, Lu Y, Pignatello JJ (2005) A thermodynamically based method to quantify true sorption hysteresis. J Environ Qual 34:1063–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sawers RJ, Svane SF, Quan C, Gronlund M, Wozniak B, Gebreselassie MN, Gonzalez-Munoz E, Chavez Montes RA, Baxter I, Goudet J, Jakobsen I, Paszkowski U (2017) Phosphorus acquisition efficiency in arbuscular mycorrhizal maize is correlated with the abundance of root-external hyphae and the accumulation of transcripts encoding PHT1 phosphate transporters. New Phytol 214:632–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schollenberger CJ (1931) Determination of soil organic matter. Soil Sci 31:483–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sims JT, Maguire RO, Leytem AB, Gartley KL, Pautler MC (2002) Evaluation of Mehlich–3 as an agri-environmental soil phosphorus test for the mid-Atlantic United States of America. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:2016–2032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Six J, Paustian K, Elliott ET, Combrink C (2000) Soil structure and soil organic matter: I. Distribution of aggregate size classes and aggregate associated carbon. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:681–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Soil Survey Staff (1999) Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. USDA Soil Conservation Service, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  62. Song C, Xu M, Zhao W, Xu F, Zhang T, Yang WY (2015) Study on phosphorus availability and its related affecting factors of purple soil under different types of land use. J Soil Water Conserv (China) 29(06):85–89+95Google Scholar
  63. Sui YB, Thompson ML (2000) Phosphorus sorption, desorption, and buffering capacity in a biosolids-amended Mollisol. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64(1):164–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tellen VA, Yerima BPK (2018) Effects of land use change on soil physicochemical properties in selected areas in the North West region of Cameroon. Environ Syst Res 7:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tran Ba L, Le Van K, Van Elsacker S, Cornelis WM (2016) Effect of cropping system on physical properties of clay soil under intensive rice cultivation. Land Degrad Dev 27(4):973–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Valladares GS, Pereira MG, Dos Anjos LHC (2003) Phosphate sorption in low activity clay soil. Bragantia 62(1):111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Viaud V, Santillàn-Carvantes P, Akkal-Corfini N, Le Guillou C, Prévost-Bouré NC, Ranjard L, Menasseri-Aubry S (2018) Landscape-scale analysis of cropping system effects on soil quality in a context of crop-livestock farming. Agric Ecosyst Environ 265:166–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vinhal-Freitas IC, Corrêa’s GF, Wendling B, Bobuľská L, Ferreira AS (2017) Soil textural class plays a major role in evaluating the effects of land use on soil quality indicators. Ecol Indic 74:182–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wang LQ, Liang T (2014) Effects of exogenous rare earth elements on phosphorus adsorption and desorption in different types of soils. Chemosphere 103:148–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wang DR, Jin XC, Zhao HC, Zhou XN, Wu FC (2007) Effects of hydrilla Verticillata on phosphorus retention and release in sediments. Water Air Soil Pollut 181(1–4):329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wang LY, Han YZ, Zhang CL, Pei ZY (2011) Reclaimed soil properties and weathered gangue change characteristics under various vegetation types on gangue pile. Acta Ecol Sin 31(21):6429–6441Google Scholar
  73. Wang XY, Zhang LP, Zhang FF, Zhang HS, Mei D (2013) Phosphorus adsorption by soils from four land use patterns. Asian J Chem 25(1):282–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Weng LP, Vega FA, van Riemsdijk WH (2011) Competitive and synergistic effects in pH dependent phosphate adsorption in soils: LCD modeling. Environ Sci Technol 45:8420–8428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Withers PJA, Edwards AC, Foy RH (2001) Phosphorus cycling in UK agriculture and implications for phosphorus loss from soil. Soil Use Manag 17:139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Withers PJA, Flynn NJ, Warren GP, Taylor M, Chambers BJ (2016) Sustainable management of biosolid phosphorus: a field study. Soil Use Manag 32(S1):54–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Xiong JB, Mahmood Q (2010) Adsorptive removal of phosphate from aqueous media by peat. Desalination 259(1):59–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Xu RK, Qafoku NP, Van Ranst E, Li JY, Jiang J (2016) Adsorption properties of subtropical and tropical variable charge soils: implications from climate change and biochar amendment. Adv Agron 135:1–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Xue YJ, Hou HB, Zhu SJ (2009) Characteristics and mechanisms of phosphate adsorption onto basic oxygen furnace slag. J Hazard Mater 162:973–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yang XY, Chen XW, Yang XT (2019) Effect of organic matter on phosphorus adsorption and desorption in a black soil from Northeast China. Soil Tillage Res 187:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zhang WL, Xu AG, Zhang RL, Ji HJ (2014) Review of soil classification and revision of China soil classification system. J Integr Agr (China) 47:3214–3230Google Scholar
  82. Zhang YH, Huang SM, Guo DD, Zhang SQ, Song X, Yue K, Zhang KK, Bao DJ (2019) Phosphorus adsorption and desorption characteristics of different textural fluvo-aquic soils under long-term fertilization. J Soils Sediments 19(3):1306–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zhao ZJ, Jin R, Fang D, Wang H, Dong Y, Xu RK, Jiang J (2018) Paddy cultivation significantly alters the forms and contents of Fe oxides in an Oxisol and increases phosphate mobility. Soil Tillage Res 184:176–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zhu J, Li M, Whelan M (2018) Phosphorus activators contribute to legacy phosphorus availability in agricultural soils: a review. Sci Total Environ 612:522–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of ResourcesSichuan Agricultural UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations