Advertisement

  • Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article
  • Published:

The nutrient release rate accounts for the effect of organic matter type on soil microbial carbon use efficiency of a Pinus tabulaeformis forest in northern China

  • 69 Accesses

Abstract

Purpose

Microbial carbon use efficiency (CUE) greatly controls the magnitude of soil organic carbon turnover. This study was conducted to estimate the CUE with the additions of different organic matter (OM) to the top soil of a Pinus tabulaeformis forest and explore the variations of CUE and ecoenzyme activity with the quality of the added OM.

Materials and methods

Five types of OM, i.e., P. tabulaeformis leaves, Quercus wutaishanica leaves, maize straw, biochar, and wood, were separately crushed by a machine and then manually mixed in the top 20 cm of soil in a plot at 5 × 5 m in June 2014. Concurrently, 20 g of each OM larger than 1 cm was put in a nylon bag of 10 × 15 cm and placed above the plot ground to monitor the OM decomposition. The soil samples were taken and analyzed for the physicochemical properties, the extracellular enzyme activity, and soil microbial biomass, and the OM decomposition rate was also measured in August 2017.

Results and discussion

The OM in the litter bag absorbed nitrogen from the soil particle during the decomposition period, and the nitrogen release rates of wood debris and maize straw were significantly lower at − 625.01% and − 276.98%. The carbon targeting enzyme, i.e., α-1,4-glucosidase (AG), was also influenced by the OM addition and changed from 5.39 nmol h−1 g−1 with the Q. wutaishanica leaf addition to 14.82 nmol h−1 g−1 with the wood debris addition. Significant differences were simultaneously detected in the soil microbial biomass carbon content among different OM additions. These changes in soil biophysical properties contributed to much of the variation in CUEC:N. The CUEC:N meaning the microbial carbon assimilation at the cost of nitrogen was highest at 0.221 for wood debris addition.

Conclusions

The addition of OM differing in quality could influence the soil resource content, exo-enzyme activity, and soil microbial biomass through its nutrient release rate. The CUEC:N could act as an integrative proxy of soil biophysical properties because it also correlated with the soil nutrient content, ecoenzymatic stoichiometry and the OM nutrient release rate. The high CUEC:N value indicated a big carbon stabilization in soils with wood debris addition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Ågren GI, Bosatta E, Magill AH (2001) Combining theory and experiment to understand effects of inorganic nitrogen on litter decomposition. Oecologia 128:94–98

  2. Allen AP, Gillooly JF (2009) Towards an integration of ecological stoichiometry and the metabolic theory of ecology to better understand nutrient cycling. Ecol Lett 12:369–384

  3. Bao SD (2007) Soil agro-chemistrical analysis. China Agriculture Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

  4. Bradford MA, Crowther TW (2013) Carbon use efficiency and storage in terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytol 199:7–9

  5. Chen R, Senbayram M, Blagodatsky S, Myachina O, Dittert K, Lin X, Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y (2014) Soil C and N availability determine the priming effect: microbial N mining and stoichiometric decomposition theories. Glob Chang Biol 20:2356–2367

  6. Cleveland CC, Liptzin D (2007) C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass? Biogeochemistry 85:235–252

  7. Eivazi F, Tabatabai MA (1977) Phosphatases in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 9:167–172

  8. Fierer N, Craine JM, Mclauchlan K, Schimel JP (2005) Litter quality and the temperature sensitivity of decomposition. Ecology 86:320–326

  9. Gallaher RN, Weldon CO, Boswell FC (1976) A semiautomated procedure for total nitrogen in plant and soil samples. Soil Sci Soc Am J 40:887–889

  10. German DP, Weintraub MN, Grandy AS, Lauber CL, RInkes ZL, Allison SD (2011) Optimization of hydrolytic and oxidative enzyme methods for ecosystem studies. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1387–1397

  11. Guo J, Wang W, Cao X, Wang Z, Lu B (1992) A study on forest soil groups of Taiyue mountain. J Beijing Forest Univ 14:134–142 (in Chinese with English abstract)

  12. Hättenschwiler S, Jørgensen HB (2010) Carbon quality rather than stoichiometry controls litter decomposition in a tropical rain forest. J Ecol 98:754–763

  13. Hatton P, Castanha C, Torn MS, Bird JA (2015) Litter type control on soil C and N stabilization dynamics in a temperate forest. Glob Chang Biol 21:1358–1367

  14. Jian S, Li J, Chen J, Wang G, Mayes MA, Dzantor KE, Hui D, Luo Y (2016) Soil extracellular enzyme activities, soil carbon and nitrogen storage under nitrogen fertilization: a meta-analysis. Soil Biol Biochem 101:32–43

  15. Jing X, Chen X, Tang M, Ding Z, Jiang L, Li P, Ma S, Tian D, Xu L, Zhu J, Ji C, Shen H, Zheng C, Fang J, Zhu B (2017) Nitrogen deposition has minor effect on soil extracellular enzyme activities in six Chinese forests. Sci Total Environ 607-608:806–815

  16. Keiblinger KM, Hall EK, Wanek W, Szukics U, Hämmerle I, Ellersdorfer G, Böck S, Strauss J, Sterflinger K, Richter A, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S (2010) The effect of resource quantity and resource stoichiometry on microbial carbon-use-efficiency. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73:430–440

  17. Li H, Yu G, Li J, Chen Y, Liang T (2007a) Decomposition dynamics and nutrient release of litters for four artificial forests in the red soil and hilly region of subtropical China. Acta Ecol Sin 27:898–908 (in Chinese with English abstract)

  18. Li H, Yu G, Li J, Liang T, Chen Y (2007b) Dynamics of litter decomposition and phosphorus and potassium release in Jinggang Mountain region of Jiangxi Province, China. Chin J Appl Ecol 18:233–240 (in Chinese with English abstract)

  19. Loeppmann S, Blagodatskaya E, Pausch J (2016) Substrate quality affects kinetic and catalytic efficiency of exo-enzymes in rhizosphere and detritusphere. Soil Biol Biochem 92:111–118

  20. Manzoni S, Jackson RB, Trofymow JA, Porporato A (2008) The global stoichiometry of litter nitrogen mineralization. Science 321:684–686

  21. Manzoni S, Taylor P, Richter A, Porporato A, Ǻgren GI (2012) Environmental and stoichiometric controls on microbial carbon-use efficiency in soils. New Phytol 196:79–91

  22. Moorhead DL, Sinsabaugh RL, Hill BH, Weintraub MN (2016) Vector analysis of ecoenzyme activities reveal constraints on coupled C, N and P dynamics. Soil Biol Biochem 93:1–7

  23. Nannipieri P, Glagnoni L, Renella G, Puglisi E, Ceccanti B, Masciandaro G, Fornasier F, Moscatelli MC, Marinari S (2012) Soil enzymology: classical and molecular approaches. Biol Fertil Soils 48:743–762

  24. Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1982) Methods of soil analysis. In: Miller RH, Keeney DR (ed) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Agronomy Series No 9, ASA SSSA, Madison, pp 101–129

  25. Ng EL, Patti AF, Rose MT, Schefe CR, Wilkinson K, Cavagnaro TR (2014) Functional stoichiometry of soil microbial communities after amendment with stabilized organic matter. Soil Biol Biochem 76:170–178

  26. Sinsabaugh RL (1994) Enzymatic analysis of microbial pattern and process. Biol Fertil Soils 17:69–74

  27. Sinsabaugh RL, Follsatd Shah JJ (2012) Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry and ecological theory. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 43:313–343

  28. Sinsabaugh RL, Moorhead DL (1994) Resource allocation to extracellular enzyme production: a model for nitrogen and phosphorus control of litter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1305–1311

  29. Sinsabaugh RL, Findlay S, Franchini P, Fischer D (1997) Enzyme analysis of riverine bacterioplankton production. Limnol Oceanogr 42:29–38

  30. Sinsabaugh RL, Lauber CL, Weintraub MN, Ahmed B, Allison SD, Crenshaw C, Contosta AR, Cusack D, Frey S, Gallo ME, Gartner TB, Hobbie SE, Holland K, Keeler BL, Powers JS, Stursova M, Takacs-Vesbach C, Waldrop MP, Wallenstein MD, Zak DR, Zeglin LH (2008) Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecol Lett 11:1252–1264

  31. Sinsabaugh RL, Hill BH, Follsatd Shah JJ (2009) Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment. Nature 462:795–798

  32. Sinsabaugh RL, Manoni S, Moorhead DL, Richter A (2013) Carbon use efficiency of microbial communities: stoichiometry, methodology and modeling. Ecol Lett 16:930–939

  33. Sinsabaugh RL, Belnap J, Findlay SG, Follstad Shah JJ, Hill BH, Kuehn KA, Kuske CR, Litvak ME, Martinez NG, Moorhead DL, Warnock DD (2014) Extracellular enzyme kinetics scale with resource availability. Biogeochemistry 121:287–304

  34. Sinsabaugh RL, Turner BL, Talbot JM, Waring BG, Powers JS, Kuske CR, Moorhead DL, Follstad Shah JJ (2016) Stoichiometry of microbial carbon use efficiency in soils. Ecol Monogr 86:172–189

  35. Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry: the biology and elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University, Princeton

  36. Takriti M, Wild B, Schnecker J, Mooshammer M, Knoltsch A, Lashchinskiy N, Alves RJE, Gentsch N, Gittel A, Mikutta R, Wanek W, Richter A (2018) Soil organic matter quality exerts a stronger control than stoichiometry on microbial substrate use efficiency along a latitudinal transect. Soil Biol Biochem 121:212–220

  37. Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707

  38. Xu Z, Yu G, Zhang X, He N, Wang Q, Wang S, Wang R, Zhao N, Jia Y, Wang C (2017) Soil enzyme activity and stoichiometry in forest ecosystems along the North-South Transect in eastern China (NSTEC). Soil Biol Biochem 104:152–163

  39. Yu J, Deem LM, Crow SE, Deenik JL, Penton CR (2018) Biochar application influences microbial assemblage complexity and composition due to soil and bioenergy crop type interactions. Soil Biol Biochem 117:97–107

  40. Zechmeister-Boltnstern S, Keiblinger KM, Mooshammer M, Peñuelas J, Richter A, Sardans J, Wanek W (2015) The application of ecological stoichiometry to plant-microbial-soil organic matter transformations. Ecol Monogr 85:133–155

  41. Zhou Z, Xu M, Kang F, Sun OJ (2015) Maximum temperature accounts for annual soil CO2 efflux in temperate forests of Northern China. Sci Rep 5:12142. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12142

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Bo Wang, Jiawei Shi, Yu Wang, Weicheng Sun, and Qinyang Lv for their intensive assistance with the field investigation and the laboratory analyses. We appreciate two anonymous reviewers for their effort and inspiring comments.

Funding information

The financial support for this research was jointly provided by the National Key Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (No. 2016YFD0600205), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2015ZCQ-LX-03), and the Normal Research Funds for Taiyueshan Long Term Forest Ecosystem Research Station (No. 2017-, 2018-LYPT-DW-153).

Author information

Correspondence to Zhiyong Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible editor: Jianming Xue

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Z., Zhang, H., Yuan, Z. et al. The nutrient release rate accounts for the effect of organic matter type on soil microbial carbon use efficiency of a Pinus tabulaeformis forest in northern China. J Soils Sediments 20, 352–364 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-019-02423-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ecoenzyme activity
  • Microbial carbon use efficiency
  • Nutrition release rate
  • Organic matter type