Demonstration and validation of enhanced monitored natural recovery at a pesticide-contaminated sediment site
- 47 Downloads
Monitored natural recovery (MNR) combined with a thin-layer cap (TLC), often referred to as enhanced monitored natural recovery (EMNR), has the potential to accelerate and improve the effectiveness of MNR as a remedial strategy while minimizing widespread disturbance to the existing habitat. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a nominal 15-cm thin-layer sand cap as an EMNR remedial strategy to address sediments that were moderately contaminated with the chlorinated pesticide dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane and its derivatives, collectively DDX.
Materials and methods
Physical, chemical, and biological measurements were conducted pre-remedy placement and 2, 14, and 25 months post-placement. Measurements were used to evaluate (1) TLC stability; (2) bottom-up mixing of the TLC; (3) advection through the TLC; (4) characteristics of newly deposited sediment atop the EMNR layer compared to pre-remedy surface sediment conditions; (5) changes in contaminant bioavailability; and (6) physical impacts to the benthic community.
Results and discussion
Significant reductions were observed from measurements conducted pre- and post-placement in surface sediment (84–97%), porewater (33–75%), and tissue concentrations (Lumbriculus variegatus deployed in situ) (72–82%). A 63 to 72% decrease in DDX depositional mass flux also was observed. Multiple lines of evidence indicated that the TLC material remained stable. Deposition of suspended material with low concentrations of DDX influenced low concentrations in the surface sediments. No adverse effects were observed on the benthic invertebrate community after TLC placement, and ecological metrics indicated increases in benthic community health, even in the short time period (2 months) following TLC placement.
This demonstration showed that EMNR can be effective at reducing biological exposure in surface sediments while minimizing short-term disturbances to benthic communities at sites where MNR is a remedy option, but natural deposition rates are inadequate to achieve cleanup goals within a reasonable timeframe.
KeywordsBioaccumulation Bioavailability DDX Enhanced monitored natural recovery Sediment remediation Thin-layer cap
Funding for this research was provided by the US Department of Defense Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP; Project ER-201368, leveraged with Project ER-201130). The authors would like to thank Quantico site and project managers including Donna Heric and Maria Hoidal (Marine Corps Base Quantico), Fred Evans and Lyndsay Kelsey (Naval Facilities Engineering Command Washington), and Heather Thurston (Battelle). Numerous others made significant technical contributions to the success of this work, including Marienne Colvin, Joel Guerrero, Chuck Katz, Bradley Davidson, Ernie Arias, Lewis Hsu (Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific); Mark Greenberg, Alan Humphrey, Scott Grosssman, Stephen Blaze (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency); Jonathan Mcburney (Leidos); Jennifer Arblaster (Geosyntec Consultants); Jacob Munson, Renee Dolecal (San Diego State University Research Foundation); Chris Stransky, Kelly Tait (Amec); Adrienne Cibor (Nautilus Environmental); Michelle Knowlen, Jay Word, Brian Hester (Ecoanalysts); George Christian (Normandeau Associates); Robert Diaz (Diaz and Daughters); Joe Germano (Germano and Associates); John Radford (Zebra-Tech, Ltd.); Allyson Holman, Jenifer Milam, Patricia Tuminello, Guilherme Lotufo (Engineering Research and Development Center, Army Corps of Engineers); Magdalena Rakowska, Courtney Thomas, Danny Reible (Texas Tech University); Dean Atwood, Phil Earhart (Quantico Marina); and Todd Weidner (Battelle).
- ASTM D422–63 (2007) Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils (withdrawn 2016). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA www.astm.org. Accessed 2019
- Battelle, Otten M, Neptune and Company (2007) Final Quantico Embayment (Site 99), southern wetlands (Site 96), and Potomac River Southern Area 1 feasibility study, USAGoogle Scholar
- Blake A, Chadwick D, White P, Jones C (2007) User’s guide for assessing sediment transport at navy facilities, SPAWAR Systems Center San Diego, Technical Report 1960. https://semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/175408.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2019
- Bouchard RW (2004) Guide to aquatic invertebrates of the Upper Midwest. University of Minnesota, USAGoogle Scholar
- Burkhard L (2009) Estimation of biota sediment accumulation factor (BSAF) from paired observations of chemical concentrations in biota and sediment. EPA/600/R-06/047 (final report). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ecological Risk Assessment Support Center, Cincinnati, OH, USAGoogle Scholar
- Burton GA, Rosen G, Chadwick DB, Stransky C, Bailey H, Greenberg MS, Radford J (2013) Improved in situ approach for assessing sediment ecological risk, remediation effectiveness, and stormwater impacts. Seventh International Conference on Remediation of Contaminated Sediments, Dallas, Texas, USA (February 4–7, 2013). ISBN 978–0–9819730-6-7, ©2013 Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH, USA www.battelle.org/sedimentscon. Accessed 2019
- Chadwick DB, Arias E (2014) Demonstration of an in-situ friction-sound probe for mapping particle size at contaminated sediment sites. Space and Naval Warfare Center Pacific Technical Report #2040, for the Department of Defense's Environmental Security Technology Certification Program, 78 pp https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a600561.pdf. Accessed 8 February 2019
- Chadwick DB, Colvin M, Davidson B, Rosen G, Burton A, Moore D (2017) Remedy and recontamination assessment array. Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) Project 2537. Final technical report. 578 pp. March 2017. https://www.serdp-estcp.org/Program-Areas/Environmental-Restoration/Contaminated-Sediments/ER-2537/ER-2537. Accessed 8 February 2019
- Hiltunen JK, Klem DJ (1980) A guide to the Naididae (Annelida: Clitellata: Oligochaeta) of North America. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-600/4-80-031, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
- Jersak J, Göransson G, Ohlsson Y, Larsson L, Flyhammar P, Lindh P (2016) In-situ capping of contaminated sediments. Method overview. SGI Publication 30-1E, Swedish Geotechnical Institute, SGI, Linköping. http://www.swedgeo.se/en/research%2D%2Dlearning/publikationer. Accessed 8 February 2019
- Kirtay V, Rosen G, Colvin M, Guerrero J, Katz C, Chadwick DB, Fetters K, Magar V, Arblaster J, Grover M, Conder J, Greenberg M, Humphrey A, Weidner T (2017) Final technical report: demonstration and validation of enhanced monitored natural recovery at department of defense sediment sites. ESTCP Project: ER-201368. US Department of Defense Environmental Security Technology Certification ProgramGoogle Scholar
- Kirtay V, Conder J, Rosen G, Magar V, Grover M, Arblaster J, Fetters K, Chadwick B (2018) Performance of an in situ activated carbon treatment to reduce PCB availability in an active harbor. Environ Sci Technol 37:1767–1777Google Scholar
- Llansó RJ, Dauer DM (2002) Methods for calculating the Chesapeake Bay benthic index of biotic integrity. https://sci.odu.edu/chesapeakebay/data/benthic/BIBIcalc.pdf. Accessed 8 February 2019
- Magar VS, Chadwick DB, Bridges TS, Fuchsman PC, Conder JM, Dekker TJ, Steevens JA, Gustavson KE, Mills MA (2009) Technical guide: monitored natural recovery at contaminated sediment sites. Published by the Environmental Security testing and Certification Program (ESTCP). ESTCP-ER-0622 Virginia, USA. At https://clu-in.org/download/contaminantfocus/sediments/ER-0622-MNR-FR.pdf. Accessed 8 February 2019
- Pennak R (1989) Fresh-water invertebrates of the United States: Protozoa to Mollusca, 3rd edn. Wiley, Chichester, UKGoogle Scholar
- R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria URL https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 2019
- Rosen G, Chadwick DB, Colvin M, Stransky C, Burton A, Radford J, Bailey H, Cibor A, Grover M, Greenberg M (2017) Demonstration and commercialization of the sediment ecosystem assessment protocol. Space and Naval Warfare Center Pacific technical report #3052, for the Department of Defense’s Environmental Security Technology Certification Program, 278 ppGoogle Scholar
- Stimpson K, Klemm DJ, Hiltunen J (1982) A guide to the freshwater Tubificidae (Annelida: Clitellata: Oligochaeta) of North America. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/3-82/033, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
- Thorp J, Covich A (2010) Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates. 3rd ed. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-690647-9.50029-6, Copyright
- USEPA (2005) Contaminated sediment remediation guidance for hazardous waste sites. OSWER 9355.0-85. EPA-540-R-05-012. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
- USEPA (2013) Use of amendments for in situ remediation at superfund sediment sites. OSWER 9200.2-128FS. Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
- USEPA (2015) Determination of the biologically relevant sampling depth for terrestrial and aquatic ecological risk assessments. EPA/600/R-15/176. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Ecological Risk Assessment Support Center, Cincinnati, OH, USAGoogle Scholar