Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 571–583 | Cite as

Ripening reduces the shrinkage of processed dredged material

  • Katja OingEmail author
  • Alexander Gröngröft
  • Annette Eschenbach
Sediments, Sec 5 • Sediment Management • Research Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The utilization of dredged material in dike construction as a substitute for traditionally used materials is considered as an option to preserve natural resources such as marsh sediments. As a prerequisite for this application, the equivalency with respect to soil physical and mechanical properties of the materials must be assessed. Previous investigations have shown pronounced differences in shrinkage behavior and desiccation cracking between sediments and dredged material. The key objective of the study was to assess whether shrinkage of processed dredged material can be reduced by further processing, i.e., dewatering, which can be referred to as ripening.

Materials and methods

To compare the shrinkage behavior of the materials, three different methods of different scales were applied. Small-scale methods conducted were the standard procedure for the determination of the shrinkage limit and the determination of the coefficient of linear extensibility (COLErod). Large-scale shrink-swell experiments were carried out in a specially constructed test system with 90 l capacity for a period of up to 385 days. Here the materials were ripened, i.e., air-dried, until shrinkage almost ceased, and a rewetting-air-drying cycle was conducted. Shrinkage and swelling were determined during the processes by measuring the changes in volume. On the ripened materials, COLErod was determined.

Results and discussion

The experiments show that the shrinkage behavior of processed dredged material can be ameliorated by ripening. COLErod of the ripened materials were about 20–80% lower than COLErod of the un-ripened materials. The large-scale shrink-swell experiments showed that shrinkage in the second drying cycle amounted to less volume than in the first drying cycle and that shrinkage behavior in contrast to the first drying cycle, where pronounced proportional shrinkage was observed, was dominated by structural and residual shrinkage in this cycle.

Conclusions

Ripening of processed dredged material is considered a useful pre-treatment option to ameliorate the shrink-swell behavior of processed dredged material and to obtain a better functional equivalency with traditionally used dike construction materials such as fine-grained marsh sediments.

Keywords

Coefficient of linear extensibility Crack formation Drying-rewetting cycles Marsh sediments Processed dredged material Ripening 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Julia Gebert for valuable advice and ideas during the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding information

This study was funded by the Hamburg Port Authority (HPA).

References

  1. Allam MM, Sridharan A (1981) Effect of wetting and drying on shear strength. J Geotech Eng Div 107(4):421–438Google Scholar
  2. Basma AA, Al-Homoud AS, Malkawi AIH, Al-Bashabsheh MA (1996) Swelling-shrinkage behavior of natural expansive clays. Appl Clay Sci 11(2–4):211–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beyer K, Grabe J, Timmers V (2012) Artificial weathering and drying of compacted cohesive fill in a large-scale environmental chamber. In: Unsaturated soils: research and applications. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brils J, de Boer P, Mulder J, de Boer E (2014) Reuse of dredged material as a way to tackle societal challenges. J Soils Sediments 14(9):1638–1641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blümel W, Tamminga PG (1987) Water permeability of dredged mud. In: Hanrahan ET, Orr TLL, Widdis TF (eds) Proc. of the ninth European conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Dublin, 31 August - 3 September 1987. Groundwater effects in geotechnical engineering, vol 2, pp 545–548Google Scholar
  6. Bronswijk JJB (1990) Shrinkage geometry of a heavy clay soil at various stresses. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:1500–1502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown KW, Launius KW, Deuel LE Jr (1980) Physical properties of confined dredged materials. Soil Sci 129(2):95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cantré S, Saathoff F (2013) Investigation of dredged materials in combination with geosynthetics used in dike construction. Procedia Eng 57:213–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collis-George N (1991) Drainage and soil structure: a review. Aust J Soil Res 29:923–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deng C, Teng X, Peng X, Zhang B (2014) Effects of simulated puddling intensity and pre-drying on shrinkage capacity of a paddy soil under long-term fertilization. Soil Tillage Res 140:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Detzner H-D, Knies R (2004) Treatment and beneficial use of dredged sediments from the port of Hamburg. In: Proceedings of the world dredging congress XVII, dredging in a sensitive environment, Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  12. EAK (2002) Empfehlungen für Küstenschutzwerke, korrigierte Ausgabe 2007, Die Küste 65, KFKi (Kuratorium für Forschung im Küsteningenieurwesen), 589 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Gray CW, Allbrook R (2002) Relationships between shrinkage indices and soil properties in some New Zealand soils. Geoderma 108(3):287–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Groenevelt PH, Grant CD (2001) Re-evaluation of the structural properties of some British swelling soils. Eur J Soil Sci 52(3):469–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gröngröft A, Tresselt K, Harms C, Miehlich G (2001) Design and effectiveness of a landfill cover system based on sludge as barrier material, In: Christensen TH, Cossu R, Stegmann R (eds) Proceedings Sardinia 2001, Eighth International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, Calgari: CISA. Vol. III, pp 317–324Google Scholar
  16. Gröngröft A, Tresselt K, Berger K, Melchior S, Türk M, & Miehlich G (2002) Austrocknungsverhalten einer mineralischen Oberflächendichtung aus Hafenschlick; Ergebnisse eines fünfjährigen Feldversuchs. Höxteraner Berichte zu angewandten Umweltwissenschaften, Bd, 3Google Scholar
  17. Gröngröft A, Gebert J, Eschenbach A (2014) Water balance of dikes constructed with dredged material – results from a long-term field test. In: Saathoff F, Cantré S (eds) Proceedings of the South Baltic conference on dredged materials in dike construction. Universität Rostock, Rostock, pp 61–66Google Scholar
  18. Horn R, Peng X, Fleige H, Dörner J (2014) Pore rigidity in structured soils—only a theoretical boundary condition for hydraulic properties? J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 60(1):3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. HPA (2016) Teilbericht Umlagerung von Baggergut nach Neßsand. Unpublished reportGoogle Scholar
  20. HPA (2017) Teilbericht Umlagerung von Baggergut nach Neßsand. Unpublished reportGoogle Scholar
  21. IGBE (1993) Bodenmechanische Untersuchung von Proben aus der Betriebsanlage METHA, 2. Überprüfung der Standardeinbaumethode. Institut für Grundbau, Bodenmechanik und Energiewasserbau, Universität HannoverGoogle Scholar
  22. Kodikara J, Barbour S L, Fredlund D G (1999) Changes in clay structure and behaviour due to wetting and drying. In Proceedings 8th Australia New Zealand conference on geomechanics: consolidating knowledge (p. 179). Australian Geomechanics SocietyGoogle Scholar
  23. LAGA Ad-hoc-AG “Deponietechnische Vollzugsfragen” (2008) Eignungsbeurteilung von METHA Material zur Herstellung von mineralischen Dichtungen in Oberflächenabdichtungssystemen von Deponien 16.06.2008Google Scholar
  24. Lucian C (2016) Prediction of expansive soil based on the coefficient of linear extensibility (COLE). IJOER 2(9):71–76Google Scholar
  25. Luther-Mosebach J, Kalinski K, Gröngröft A, Eschenbach A (2016) CO2 fluxes in subtropical dryland soils—a comparison of the gradient and the closed chamber method. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 000:1–10Google Scholar
  26. Netzband A, Christiansen H, Maaß B, Werner G (1998) Relocation of dredged material from Hamburg harbor in the River Elbe. Water Sci Technol 37(6–7):241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oing K, Gröngröft A, Eschenbach A (2014) Gleichwertigkeit von Baggergut mit üblichen Bodenmaterialien im Deichbau: Schrumpfungsverhalten und Schadstofffreisetzungspotenzial von aufbereitetem Baggergut. In: Henneberg M (ed) Schriftenreihe Umweltingenieurwesen 47:105–109Google Scholar
  28. Parker JC, Amos DF, & Kaster DL (1977) An Evaluation of Several Methods of Estimating Soil Volume Change 1. Soil Science Society of America Journal 41(6), 1059–1064Google Scholar
  29. Oing K, Gröngröft A, Eschenbach A (2018) Enhanced dewatering optimizes compactibility of processed dredged material. J Soils Sediments 18(9):3020–3030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peng X, Horn R (2007) Anisotropic shrinkage and swelling of some organic and inorganic soils. Eur J Soil Sci 58(1):98–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peng X, Horn R (2013) Identifying six types of soil shrinkage curves from a large set of experimental data. Soil Soil Sci Soc Am J 77(2):372–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peng X, Horn R, Smucker A (2007) Pore shrinkage dependency of inorganic and organic soils on wetting and drying cycles. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71(4):1095–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peng X, Dörner J, Zhao Y, Horn R (2009) Shrinkage behaviour of transiently-and constantly-loaded soils and its consequences for soil moisture release. Eur J Soil Sci 60(4):681–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pons L, Van der Molen W (1973) Soil genesis under dewatering regimes during 1000 years of polder development. Soil Sci 116:228–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pons LJ, Zonneveld IS (1965) Soil ripening and soil classification. Initial soil formation in alluvial deposits and a classification of the resulting soils. Int. Inst. Land Reclam. Improv. Publ. No. 13. H. Veenman and Zonen, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  36. Quirk JP, Murray RS (1971) Towards a model for soil structural behavior. Aust J Soil Res 29:829–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rijniersce K (1983) A simulation model for physical soil ripening in the Ijsselmeerpolders. In Proceeding of Overdruk uit: polders of the world: papers international symposium, Lelistad, Netherlands, pp 407–417Google Scholar
  38. Rizkallah V, Blümel W (1995) Geotechnische Aspekte bei der Deponierung von Elbschlick. Jahrbuch der Hafenbautechnischen Gesellschaft 50:155–161Google Scholar
  39. Saathoff F, Cantré S, Sikora Z (2015) South Baltic guideline for the application of dredged materials, coal combustion products and geosynthetics in Dike construction. Annex II. PDF auf www.dredgdikes.eu
  40. Schafer WM, Singer MJ (1976a) A new method of measuring shrink-swell potential using soil pastes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 40:805–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schafer WM, Singer MJ (1976b) Influence of physical and mineralogical properties on swelling soils in Yolo County, California. Soil Sci Soc Am J 40:557–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tresselt K (2000) Feldversuche zur Wirksamkeit von Oberflächendichtungssystemen mit Dichtungen aus Hafenschlick. Hamburger Bodenkundliche Arbeiten 46:1–280Google Scholar
  43. Tresselt K, Miehlich G, Gröngröft A, Melchior S, Berger K, Harms C (1998) Harbor sludge as barrier material in landfill cover systems. Water Sci Technol 37(6–7):307–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tripathy S, Subba Rao KS, Fredlund DG (2002) Water content–void ratio swell–shrink paths of compacted expansive soils. Can Geotech J 39:938–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vaught R, Brye KR, Miller DM (2006) Relationships among coefficient of linear extensibility and clay fractions in expansive, stoney soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1983–1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vermeulen J, Van Dijk SG, Grotenhuis JTC, Rulkens WH (2005) Quantification of physical properties of dredged sediments during physical ripening. Geoderma 129(3):147–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Widomski MK, Stępniewski W, Horn R, Bieganowski A, Gazda L, Franus M, Pawłowska M (2015) Shrink-swell potential, hydraulic conductivity and geotechnical properties of clay materials for landfill liner construction. Int Agrophys 29(3):365–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilding LP, Tessier D (1988) Genesis of Vertisols: shrink-swell phenomena. In: Wilding LP, Puentes R (eds) Vertisols: their distribution, properties, classification and management. Texas A&M University Printing Center, College Station, pp 55–81Google Scholar
  49. Wysocka A, Stêpniewski W, Horn R (2006) Shrinkage properties of three clay materials at different temperatures. Int Agrophys 20(3):255Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katja Oing
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alexander Gröngröft
    • 1
  • Annette Eschenbach
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Soil ScienceUniversity of HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations