Biocrusts resist runoff erosion through direct physical protection and indirect modification of soil properties
- 63 Downloads
Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are ubiquitous in arid and semi-arid regions and play many critical roles in soil stabilization and erosion prevention, greatly decreasing soil loss. Although sediments may be completely controlled by well-developed biocrusts, runoff loss is observed. Consequently, it is important to study how biocrusts resist runoff erosion in different developmental stages to evaluate and manage water erosion.
Materials and methods
In the Loess Plateau Region, we sampled 32 biocrust plots representing eight stages of biocrust development and 5 slope cropland soil plots as bare soil control plots. We then used a rectangular open channel hydraulic flume to test the effects of biocrust development on runoff erosion.
Results and discussion
As expected, the establishment of biocrusts enhanced soil stability, and accordingly, soil anti-scourability significantly increased with biocrust development. Biocrusts exhibiting more than 36% or 1.22 g dm−2 of moss coverage or biomass fully protected the soil from runoff erosion. Moreover, soil properties, such as soil organic matter, soil cohesion and soil bulk density, were also important in reducing erosion. The findings indicated that biocrusts inhibited runoff erosion through direct physical protection related to biocrust cover and biomass and through the indirect modification of soil properties. In the early biocrust development stage (when moss cover was less than 36%), cyanobacterial biocrust played a primary role in providing resistance to runoff erosion, with resistance being positively related to cyanobacterial biomass (chlorophyll a) and influenced by soil properties.
The relationship between soil anti-scourability and moss coverage or biomass can be divided into two stages based on a moss cover or biomass threshold. The capacity of biocrusts to resist runoff erosion was limited when moss cover was below the threshold value. Therefore, the stage corresponding to this level of moss cover should be of concern when estimating, predicting and managing water erosion.
KeywordsCyanobacteria Development Loess Plateau Moss Water erosion
We also express our gratitude to the anonymous reviewers and editors for their constructive comments and suggestions.
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 41830758, 41571268) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant no. 2018M643754).
- Belnap J, Rosentreter R, Leonard S, Kaltenecker JH, Williams J, Eldridge D (2001) Biological soil crusts: ecology and management. United States Department of the Interior Bureau of land management printed materials distribution center, Denver, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
- Belnap J, Büdel B (2016) Biological soil crusts as soil stabilizers. In: Weber B, Büdel B, Belnap J (eds) Biological soil crusts as an organizing principle in drylands. Springer International Publishing, pp 305–320Google Scholar
- Belnap J, Weber B, Büdel B (2016) Biological soil crusts as an organizing principle in drylands. In: Weber B, Büdel B, Belnap J (eds) Biological soil crusts as an organizing principle in drylands. Springer International Publishing, pp 3–13Google Scholar
- Gao LQ (2017) Effects and the mechanism of biological soil crusts on water erosion prevention on the Loess Plateau. Doctor, Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Environment, the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of EducationGoogle Scholar
- Gao LQ, Zhao YG, Qin NQ, Zhang GX, Yang K (2012) Impact of biological soil crust on soil physical properties in the Hilly Loess Plateau Region. China J Nat Resour 27:1316–1326Google Scholar
- Li Y, Wu Q, Zhu X, Tian J (1990) Studies on the intensification of soil anti-scourability by plant roots in the Loess Plateau-I. the increasing effect of soil anti-scourability by the roots of chinese pine. J Soil Water Conserv 4:1–5+10Google Scholar
- Li Q, Liu GB, Xu MX, Sun H, Zhang Z, Gao LQ (2013a) Effect of seasonal freeze-thaw on soil anti-scouribility and its related physical property in hilly Loess Plateau. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 29:105–112Google Scholar
- Li Q, Liu GB, Xu MX, Zhang Z, Sun H (2013b) Soil anti-scouribility and its related physical properties on abandoned land in the Hilly Loess Plateau. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 29:153–159Google Scholar
- Li L, Zhao YG, Wang YH, Wang Y (2015) Impact of different types of biological soil crusts on slope runoff generation. J Nat Resour 30:1013–1023Google Scholar
- Morgan RPC (2005) Soil Erosion and conservation, 3rd edn. Blackwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Ran MY, Zhao YG, Liu YL (2011) Soil anti-scourability of biological soil crust with different coverage in Loess hilly region. Soil Water Conserv China (12):43–45Google Scholar
- Wang Y, Zhao YG, Yao CZ, Zhang PP (2014) Surface roughness characteristics of biological soil crusts and its influencing factors in the hilly Loess Plateau region, China. Chin J Appl Ecol 25:647–656Google Scholar
- Yang LN (2013) Diversity and ecological suitability of cyanophytes in biological soil crusts on the Loess Plateau. Master, Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of EducationGoogle Scholar
- Zhao YG, Xu MX, Wang QJ, Shao MA (2006) Impact of biological soil crust on soil physical and chemical properties of rehabilitated grassland in hlly Loess Plateau. China J Nat Resour 21:441–448Google Scholar