Advertisement

Characterization of soil profiles and elemental concentrations reveals deposition of heavy metals and phosphorus in a Chicago-area nature preserve, Gensburg Markham Prairie

  • Liliana M. Hernandez Gonzalez
  • Vivien A. Rivera
  • Colin B. Phillips
  • Loren A. Haug
  • Shelby L. Hatch
  • Loren E. Yeager
  • Haebin Chang
  • Jennifer Alvarez
  • Karl J. Gnaedinger
  • William M. Miller
  • Aaron I. PackmanEmail author
Soils, Sec 5 • Soil and Landscape Ecology • Research Article
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Gensburg Markham Prairie (GMP), a high-quality tallgrass prairie and wetland in the Chicago area, is surrounded by high-traffic highways and residential communities. Anthropogenic inputs are a concern given observed ecosystem degradation around the periphery of the prairie. To understand soil quality and the potential for habitat degradation in GMP, we evaluated concentrations of metals and phosphorus in soil profiles, identified possible sources of contamination, and assessed the likelihood that contamination would impact the prairie ecosystem.

Materials and methods

We collected 15 intact soil cores (to a depth of 120 cm) and 22 surface soil samples (0–10-cm depth), determined the soil type, and measured pH, organic matter, and concentrations of Pb, Cu, Zn, Mg, Fe, K, Ca, and P using ICP-OES. To quantify soil pollution, we calculated the element enrichment factor (EF) and single element pollution index (SEPI) for each sample. We also used principal component analysis (PCA) to interpret relationships between site variables, elemental concentrations, and sources of metals.

Results and discussion

Heavy metals (Pb, Cu, and Zn) and P were found to accumulate in surface samples. The mean EF values for Pb, Cu, Zn, and P revealed significant enrichment of these elements in the soil profiles. However, SEPI analyses indicate that GMP soils have a low level of contamination. PCA revealed that concentrations are highest for samples with high organic matter content near the ground surface and that Pb, Cu, and Zn have common sources of pollution.

Conclusions

We observed enrichment of Pb, Cu, Zn, and P because of deposition from the urban built environment, but the enrichment levels are low enough that they are not expected to negatively impact the ecosystem of GMP. The detailed soil chemistry data constitute a spatial contamination map that can be used to assess potential long-term impacts on the ecosystem, such as reduction of plant growth and species diversity, and inform site management and biodiversity conservation efforts.

Keywords

Metals Phosphorus Prairie Soil Wetland 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the following people for their help and assistance, especially with the sample collection and analysis: Denzel Akosa, Gabriel Martinez Milian, Alma Bartholow, Julia Standley Pradhan, Adisa Hadzic, Jordan Gurneau, and Diella Packman. We gratefully acknowledge and thank John Legge, who is the Chicago Conservation Director of The Nature Conservancy, and Ron Panzer and Anthony Merisko from Northeastern Illinois University for making this project possible by providing us access to the study site. Sample preparation was performed at the NU General Chemistry Laboratory and elemental analysis at the NU Integrated Molecular Structure Education and Research Center (IMSERC).

Funding information

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) (grant number EAR-1541891), the Illinois Water Resources Center, the Institute for Energy and Sustainability at Northwestern (ISEN), and the Posner Fellowship Program. Liliana M. Hernandez Gonzalez was supported by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE-1324585).

Compliance with ethical standards

This research does not involve studies with human participants and/or animals.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11368_2019_2315_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (911 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 910 kb)
11368_2019_2315_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 2 (PDF 1210 kb)

References

  1. Abdu N, Abdullahi AA, Abdulkadir A (2017) Heavy metals and soil microbes. Environ Chem Lett 15:65–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adamiec E, Jarosz-Krzemińska E, Wieszała R (2016) Heavy metals from non-exhaust vehicle emissions in urban and motorway road dusts. Environ Monit Assess 188:369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Chalabi AS, Hawker D (2000) Distribution of vehicular lead in roadside soils of major roads of Brisbane, Australia. Water Air Soil Pollut 118:299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ASTM D2487-17 (2017) Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  5. Bååth E (1989) Effects of heavy metals in soil on microbial processes and populations (a review). Water Air Soil Pollut 47:335–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bai J, Cui B, Zhang K et al (2011) Spatial distribution and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in surface sediments from a typical plateau lake wetland, China. Ecol Model 222:301–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bai J, Jia J, Zhang G, Zhao Q, Lu Q, Cui B, Liu X (2016) Spatial and temporal dynamics of heavy metal pollution and source identification in sediment cores from the short-term flooding riparian wetlands in a Chinese delta. Environ Pollut 219:379–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bai J, Xiao R, Zhao Q, Lu Q, Wang J, Reddy KR (2014) Seasonal dynamics of trace elements in tidal salt marsh soils as affected by the flow-sediment regulation regime. PLoS One 9:e107738.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107738 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barbieri M (2016) The importance of enrichment factor (EF) and geoaccumulation index (Igeo) to evaluate the soil contamination. J Geol Geophys 5.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2381-8719.1000237
  10. Beckman P, Sankaran R, Catlett C et al (2016) Waggle: an open sensor platform for edge computing. In: IEEE Sensors 2016. Orlando, FlGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolund P, Hunhammar S (1999) Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol Econ 29:293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bradl HB (2004) Adsorption of heavy metal ions on soils and soils constituents. J Colloid Interface Sci 277:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cannon WF, Horton JD (2009) Soil geochemical signature of urbanization and industrialization - Chicago, Illinois, USA. Appl Geochem 24:1590–1601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carter Johnson W, Werner B, Guntenspergen GR et al (2010) Prairie wetland complexes as landscape functional units in a changing climate. Bioscience 60:128–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (2016) 2016 Expressway Atlas: annual average daily traffic on northeastern Illinois expresswaysGoogle Scholar
  16. Clarkson BR, Ausseil AE, Gerbeaux P (2013) Wetland ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv New Zeal - Cond trends:192–202Google Scholar
  17. Coffin AW (2007) From roadkill to road ecology: a review of the ecological effects of roads. J Transp Geogr 15:396–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cole KL, Engstrom DR, Futyma RP, Stottlemyer R (1990) Past atmospheric deposition of metals in northern Indiana measured in a peat core from Cowles Bog. Environ Sci Technol 24:543–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cook County Board of Comissioners (2010) Cook County 2008 LiDAR and Topographic Data Services (Contract No. 08–41-342), 1-Foot Contours for Cook County, Illinois. Geodatabase Vector Digital Data, Version 1.0. Published: May 2010Google Scholar
  20. Davidson NC (2014) How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. Mar Freshw Res 65:936–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deely JM, Fergusson JE (1994) Heavy metal and organic matter concentrations and distributions in dated sediments of a small estuary adjacent to a small urban area. Sci Total Environ 153:97–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Erwin KL (2009) Wetlands and global climate change: the role of wetland restoration in a changing world. Wetl Ecol Manag 17:71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gambrell RP (1994) Trace and toxic metals in wetlands-a review. J Environ Qual 23:883–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gao H, Bai J, Xiao R, Liu P, Jiang W, Wang J (2013) Levels, sources and risk assessment of trace elements in wetland soils of a typical shallow freshwater lake, China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27:275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Giller KE, Witter E, McGrath SP (2009) Heavy metals and soil microbes. Soil Biol Biochem 41:2031–2037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hameed A, Obaidy MJA1, Al Mashhadi AAM (2013) Heavy metal contaminations in urban soil within Baghdad City, Iraq. J Environ Prot (Irvine, Calif) 4:72–82Google Scholar
  27. Hans Wedepohl K (1995) The composition of the continental crust. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 59:1217–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hanson PC (1981) A plant survey of the Gensburg-Markham Prairie. In: Stuckey RL, Reese KJ (eds) Proceedings of the Sixth North American Prairie Conference. Ohio Biological Survey otes 15, Colombus, Ohio, pp 156–158Google Scholar
  29. Hanson PC (1975) A vegetational study of the Gensburg-Markham Prairie. Northeastern Illinois UniversityGoogle Scholar
  30. Hernandez Gonzalez LM, Rivera VA, Phillips CB et al (2018) Characterization and elemental analyses of soil cores from a prairie wetland nature preserve in the Chicago area. Gensburg Markham Prairie.  https://doi.org/10.1594/IEDA/111197
  31. IEPA (1994) A summary of selected background conditions for inorganics in soilGoogle Scholar
  32. Jolliffe I (2002) Principal component analysis, second edition, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Kabata-Pendias A, Pendias H (2001) Trace elements in soils and plants. CRC Press LLC, Third EditionGoogle Scholar
  34. Khalid S, Shahid M, Niazi NK et al (2016) A comparison of technologies for remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils. J Geochem Explor 182:247–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Khan MAQ, Coello WF, Saleem ZA (1973) Lead content of soils along Chicago’s Eisenhower and Loop-Terminal Expressways. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 1:209–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Komor SC (1994) Geochemistry and hydrology of a calcareous fen within the Savage Fen wetlands complex, Minnesota, USA. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58:3353–3367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lawrimore J (2017) U.S. Hourly Precipitation Data. In: NOAA’s Natl. Centers Environ. Inf. https://data.nodc.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/iso?id=gov.noaa.ncdc:C01032. Accessed 1 Nov 2017
  38. Lee S-Y, Ryan ME, Hamlet AF, Palen WJ, Lawler JJ, Halabisky M (2015) Projecting the hydrologic impacts of climate change on montane wetlands. PLoS One 10:e0136385.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136385 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Leung DWM, Tiwari S, Sarangi BK et al (2013) Metal hyperaccumulating ferns: progress and future prospects. pp 68–88Google Scholar
  40. Lin C, Li P, Cheng H, Ouyang W (2015) Vertical distribution of lead and mercury in the wetland argialbolls of the Sanjiang Plain in northeastern China. PLoS One 10:e0124294.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Liu C, Kroeze C, Hoekstra AY, Gerbens-Leenes W (2012) Past and future trends in grey water footprints of anthropogenic nitrogen and phosphorus inputs to major world rivers. Ecol Indic 18:42–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Locke II RA, Berg RC, Mushrush MJ (1997) Vulnerability of Illinois nature preserves to potential ground-water contamination volume II: selected site data from vulnerability assessments and sensitivity classifications prepared for the Illinois nature preserves commissionGoogle Scholar
  43. Mielke HW (1999) Lead in the inner cities: policies to reduce children’s exposure to lead may be overlooking a major source of lead in the environment. Am Sci 87:62–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. NCERA-13 (1966) Recommended chemical soil test procedures for the North Central RegionGoogle Scholar
  45. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A et al (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830Google Scholar
  46. Post TW (1980) A vegetational analysis of the Gensburg-Markham Prairie. Northeastern Illinois UniversityGoogle Scholar
  47. Rieuwerts JS, Thornton I, Farago ME, Ashmore MR (2015) Factors influencing metal bioavailability in soils: preliminary investigations for the development of a critical loads approach for metals. Chem Speciation Bioavail 10:16–75Google Scholar
  48. Rodríguez-Seijo A, Andrade ML, Vega FA (2017) Origin and spatial distribution of metals in urban soils. J Soils Sediments 17:1514–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sheldon AR, Menzies NW (2005) The effect of copper toxicity on the growth and root morphology of Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana Knuth.) in resin buffered solution culture. Plant Soil 278:341–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sims JT, Simard RR, Joern BC (1998) Phosphorus loss in agricultural drainage: historical perspective and current research. J Environ Qual 27:277–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Soil Science Division Staff (2017) USDA Soil Survey ManualGoogle Scholar
  52. Strawn DG, Sparks DL (2000) Effects of soil organic matter on the kinetics and mechanisms of Pb(II) sorption and desorption in soil. Soil Scie Soc Am J 64:144–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1996) Aquatic chemistry: chemical equilibria and rates in natural waters. Wiley, 1040 ppGoogle Scholar
  54. Sutherland RA (2000) Bed sediment-associated trace metals in an urban stream, Oahu, Hawaii. Environ Geol 39:611–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Turekian KK, Wedepohl KH (1961) Distribution of the elements in some major unit of the earth’s crust. Geol Soc Am Bull 72:175–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Turer D, Maynard JB, Sansalone JJ (2001) Heavy metal contamination in soils of urban highways: comparison between runoff and soil concentrations at Cincinnati, Ohio. Water Air Soil Pollut 132:293–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. U.S. EPA (2005) Ecological Soil Screening Levels for LeadGoogle Scholar
  58. U.S. EPA (2006) Ecological Soil Screening Levels for Copper Interim FinalGoogle Scholar
  59. U.S. EPA (2007) Ecological Soil Screening Levels for Zinc Interim FinalGoogle Scholar
  60. Wiggers R (2000) Gensburg-Markham Prairie - classic prairie restorations. Chicago Wilderness MagGoogle Scholar
  61. Wu S, Peng S, Zhang X, Wu D, Luo W, Zhang T, Zhou S, Yang G, Wan H, Wu L (2015) Levels and health risk assessments of heavy metals in urban soils in Dongguan, China. J Geochemical Explor 148:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wuana R, Okieimen FE (2011) Heavy metals in contaminated soils: a review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation. ISRN Ecol 2011:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Xiao R, Bai J, Lu Q, Zhao Q, Gao Z, Wen X, Liu X (2015) Fractionation, transfer, and ecological risks of heavy metals in riparian and ditch wetlands across a 100-year chronosequence of reclamation in an estuary of China. Sci Total Environ 517:66–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yong RN, Phadungchewit Y (1993) pH influence on selectivity and retention of heavy metals in some clay soils. Can Geotech 30:821–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zedler JB (2003) Wetlands at your service: reducing impacts of agriculture at the watershed scale. Front Ecol Environ 1:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhang G, Bai J, Xiao R, Zhao Q, Jia J, Cui B, Liu X (2017) Heavy metal fractions and ecological risk assessment in sediments from urban, rural and reclamation-affected rivers of the Pearl River Estuary, China. Chemosphere 184:278–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zohar I, Teutsch N, Levin N, Mackin G, de Stigter H, Bookman R (2017) Urbanization effects on sediment and trace metals distribution in an urban winter pond (Netanya, Israel). J Soils Sediments 17:2165–2176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zoller WH, Gladney ES, Duce RA (1974) Atmospheric concentrations and sources of trace metals at the South Pole. Source Sci New Ser Assoc Pet Geol Bull 183:198–200Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liliana M. Hernandez Gonzalez
    • 1
  • Vivien A. Rivera
    • 1
  • Colin B. Phillips
    • 1
  • Loren A. Haug
    • 1
  • Shelby L. Hatch
    • 2
  • Loren E. Yeager
    • 2
  • Haebin Chang
    • 2
  • Jennifer Alvarez
    • 3
  • Karl J. Gnaedinger
    • 4
  • William M. Miller
    • 5
  • Aaron I. Packman
    • 1
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringEvanstonUSA
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Environmental SciencesNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  4. 4.The Nature ConservancyMarkhamUSA
  5. 5.Department of Chemical and Biological EngineeringNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations