Advertisement

Additional application of aluminum sulfate with different fertilizers ameliorates saline-sodic soil of Songnen Plain in Northeast China

  • Meng Zhou
  • Xiaobing Liu
  • Qingfeng Meng
  • Xiannan Zeng
  • Jizhou Zhang
  • Dawei Li
  • Jie Wang
  • Weiling Du
  • Xianfa MaEmail author
Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article
  • 75 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Serious soil salinization, including excessive exchangeable sodium and high pH, significantly decreases land productivity. Reducing salinity and preventing alkalization in saline-sodic soils by comprehensive improvement practices are urgently required. The combinations of aluminum sulfate with different types of fertilizer at different rates were applied on rice paddy with saline-sodic soils of the Songnen Plain in Northeast China to improve soil quality and its future utilization.

Materials and methods

Experiments were carried out in a completely randomized block design. Twelve treatments with aluminum sulfate at the rates of 0, 250, 500, and 750 kg hm−2 with inorganic, bio-organic, and organic-inorganic compound fertilizers were performed. Soil pH, electronic conductivity (EC), cation exchangeable capacity (CEC), exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), total alkalinity, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), soil organic carbon (SOC), available nutrients, soluble ions, rice growth, and yield in the saline-sodic soils were measured across all treatments. The relationships among the measured soil attributes were determined using one-way analysis of variance, correlation analysis, and systematic cluster analysis.

Results and discussion

The pH, EC, ESP, total alkalinity, SAR, Na+, CO32−, and HCO3 in saline-sodic soil were significantly decreased, while CEC, SOC, available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP), available potassium (AK), K+, and SO42− were significantly increased due to the combined application of aluminum sulfate with fertilizer compared with the fertilizer alone. The most effective treatment in reducing salinity and preventing alkalization was aluminum sulfate at a rate of 500 kg hm−2 with organic-inorganic compound fertilizer. This treatment significantly decreased the soil pH, EC, ESP, total alkalinity, SAR, Na+, and HCO3 by 5.3%, 28.9%, 41.1%, 39.3%, 22.4%, 23.5%, and 35.9%, but increased CEC, SOC, AN, AP, AK, K+, SO42−, rice height, seed setting rate, 1000-grain weight, and yield by 77.5%, 115.5%, 106.3%, 47.1%, 43.3%, 200%, 40%, 6.2%, 43.9%, 20.3%, and 42.2%, respectively, compared with CK treatment in the leaching layer.

Conclusions

The combined application by aluminum sulfate at a rate of 500 kg hm−2 with organic-inorganic compound fertilizer is an effective amendment of saline-sodic soils in Songnen Plain, Northeast China. These results are likely related to the leaching of Na+ from the soil leaching layer to the salt accumulation layer and desalination in the surface soil, and the increase of SOC improved the colloidal properties and increased fertilizer retention in soil. In addition, the environmental impact of aluminum sulfate applied to soil needs to be further studied.

Keywords

Alkalization prevention Aluminum sulfate Fertilizer Saline-sodic soils Salinity reduction 

Notes

Funding information

This research was financially supported by Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (200903001-06-6) as well as Heilongjiang Province Science and Technology Program Project (YS15B15).

References

  1. Abbasi MK, Hina M, Khalique A, Khan SR (2007) Mineralization of three organic manures used as nitrogen source in a soil incubated under laboratory conditions. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 38:1691–1711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antil RS, Singh M (2007) Effects of organic manures and fertilizers on organic matter and nutrients status of the soil. Arch Agron Soil Sci 53:519–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arora S, Singh AK, Singh YP (eds) (2017) Bioremediation of salt affected soils: an Indian perspective. ISBN 978–3–319-48257-6, Springer, 301 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Bao SD (2008a) Analysis of soil agrochemistry (3rd edition). Beijing, China: China Agricultural Press. 30–34, 56–68, 81–83, 106–108 pGoogle Scholar
  5. Bao SD (2008b) Analysis of soil agrochemistry (3rd edition). Beijing, China: China Agricultural Press. 193–199 pGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhattacharyya P, Chakrabarti K, Chakraborty A, Nayak DC, Tripathy S, Powell MA (2007) Municipal waste compost as an alternative to cattle manure for supplying potassium to lowland rice. Chemosphere 66:1789–1793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boivin P, Favre F, Hammecker C, Maeght JL, Delariviere J, Poussin JC, Wopereis MCS (2002) Processes driving soil solution chemistry in a flooded rice-cropped vertisol: analysis of long-time monitoring data. Geoderma 110:87–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chi CM, Wang ZC (2010) Characterizing salt-affected soils of Songnen Plain using saturated paste and 1:5 soil-to-water extraction methods. Arid Soil Res Rehabil 24:1–11Google Scholar
  9. Clark GJ, Dodgshun N, Sale PWG, Tang C (2007) Changes in chemical and biological properties of a sodic clay subsoil with addition of organic amendments. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2806–2817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crescimanno G, Santis AD (2004) Bypass flow, salinization and sodication in a cracking clay soil. Geoderma 121:307–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferreras L, Gomez E, Toresani S, Firpo I, Rotondo R (2006) Effect of organic amendments on some physical, chemical and biological properties in a horticultural soil. Bioresour Technol 97:635–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gill JS, Sale PWG, Tang C (2008) Amelioration of dense sodic subsoil using organic amendments increases wheat yield more than using gypsum in a high rainfall zone of southern Australia. Field Crops Res 107:265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giller KE, Cadisch G, Mugwira LM (1998) Potential benefits from interactions between mineral and organic nutrient sources. Soil fertility research for maize-based farming systems in Malawi and Zimbabwe. Soil Ferti Net/CIMMYT, Harare, Zimbabwe, pp 155–158Google Scholar
  14. Hanay A, Kiziloglu FM, Canbolat M (2004) Reclamation of saline-sodic soils with gypsum and MSW compost. Compost Sci Util 12:175–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jackson ML (1962) Soil chemistry of analysis. Englewood Cliffe, New Jersy: Prentice Hall. 78 pGoogle Scholar
  16. Khotabaei M, Emami H, Astaraei AR, Fotovat A (2013) Improving soil physical indicators by soil amendment to a saline-sodic soil. Desert 18:73–78Google Scholar
  17. Lax A, Diaz E, Castillo V, Albaladejo J (1994) Reclamation of physical and chemical properties of a salinized soil by organic amendment. Arid Soil Res Rehab 8:9–17Google Scholar
  18. Larney FJ, Angers DA (2012) The role of organic amendments in soil reclamation: a review. Can J Soil Sci 92:19–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li FH, Keren R (2009) Calcareous sodic soil reclamation as affected by corn stalk application and incubation: a laboratory study. Pedosphere 19:465–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li R, Tao R, Ling N, Chu GX (2017) Chemical organic and bio-fertilizer management practices effect on soil physicochemical property and antagonistic bacteria abundance of a cotton field: Implications for soil biological quality. Soil Till Res 167:307–38Google Scholar
  21. Li XJ (2000) The alkali-saline land and agricultural sustainable development of the west Songnen Plain in China. Sci Geogr Sin 20:51–55Google Scholar
  22. Li XJ, Li QS, Wang ZC, Liu XT (2002) A research on characteristics and rational exploitation of sodia saline land in the west Songnen Plain. Res Agr Modern 23:261–264Google Scholar
  23. Luo JQ, Wang LL, Li QS, Zhang QK, He BY, Wang Y, Qin LP, Li SS (2015) Improvement of hard saline–sodic soils using polymeric aluminum ferric sulfate (PAFS). Soil Till Res 149:12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mahmoodabadi M, Yazdanpanah N, Sinobas LR, Pazira E, Neshat A (2013) Reclamation of calcareous saline sodic soil with different amendments (i): redistribution of soluble cations within the soil profile. Agric Water Manage 120:30–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meena MD, Joshi PK, Jat HS, Chinchmalatpure AR, Narjary B (2016) Changes in biological and chemical properties of saline soil amended with municipal solid waste compost and chemical fertilizers in a mustard-pearl millet cropping system. Catena 140:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Melero S, Madejón E, Ruiz JC, Herencia JF (2007) Chemical and biochemical properties of a clay soil under dryland agriculture system as affected by organic fertilization. Eur J Agron 26:327–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oo AN, Iwai CB, Saenjan P (2015) Soil properties and maize growth in saline and nonsaline soils using cassava-industrial waste compost and vermicompost with or without earthworms. Land Degrad Dev 26:300–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Panhwar QA, Naher UA, Shamshuddin J, Othman JR, Ismail MR (2016) Applying limestone or basalt in combination with bio-fertilizer to sustain rice production on an acid sulfate soil in Malaysia. Sustainability 8:700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Qadir M, Ghafoor A, Murtaza G (2001) Use of saline-sodic waters through phytoremediation of calcareous saline-sodic soils. Agr Water Manage 50:197–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Qadir M, Oster JD, Schubert S, Noble AD, Sahrawat KL (2007) Phyroremediation of sodic and saline-sodic soils. Adv Agron 96:197–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Richards L (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp 98–105Google Scholar
  32. Robbins CW (1984) Sodium adsorption ratio-exchangeable sodium percentage relationships in a high potassium saline-sodic soil. Irrigation Sci 5:173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sadiq M, Hassan G, Mehdi SM, Hussain N, Jamil M (2007) Amelioration of saline sodic soils with tillage implements and sulfuric acid application. Pedosphere 17:182–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sakadevan K, Nguyen ML (2010) Extent, impact, and response to soil and water salinity in arid and semiarid regions. Adv Agron 109:55–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Subardja VO, Anas R, Widyastuti R (2016) Utilization of organic fertilizer to increase paddy growth and productivity using System of Rice Intensification (SRI) method in saline soil. J Degrad Min Land Manage 3:543–549Google Scholar
  36. Summer M (2000) Handbook of soil science. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 2148Google Scholar
  37. Sun YN (2011) Study on the auxiliary effect of leaching on improving soda saline-alkaline soil with aluminum sulfate. Jilin Agr Univ, Changchun (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  38. Tejada M, Garcia C, Gonzalez JL, Hernandez MT (2006) Use of organic amendment as a strategy for saline soil remediation: influence on the physical, chemical and biological properties of soil. Soil Biol Biochem 38:1413–1421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tucker BM (1954) The determination of exchangeable calcium and magnesium in carbonate soils. Aust J Agric Res 5:706–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. USDA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. USDA, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang L, Seki K, Miyazaki T, Ishihama Y (2009) The causes of soil alkalinization in the Songnen Plain of Northeast China. Paddy Water Environ 7:259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang Y, Han X, Zhao LP, Ma J (2006) Study on function of aluminum sulfate on soda alkail-saline soil improvement. J Soil Water Conserv 20:50–53 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  43. Wong VNL, Dalal RC, Greene RSB (2009) Carbon dynamics of sodic and saline soils following gypsum and organic material additions: a laboratory incubation. Appl Soil Ecol 41:29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wu YP, Li YF, Zheng CY, Zhang YF, Sun ZJ (2013) Organic amendment application influence soil organism abundance in saline alkali soil. Eur J Soil Biol 54:32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Xiong W, Guo S, Jousset A, Zhao QY, Wu HS, Li R, Kowalchuk GA, Shen Q (2017) Bio-fertilizer application induces soil suppressiveness against Fusarium wilt disease by reshaping the soil microbiome. Soil Biol Biochem 114:238–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Xiong Y, Li QK (1987) Chinese soil. Beijing, China. Science PressGoogle Scholar
  47. Yao FX, Yu GF, Jiang (2005) Accelerated degradation of B-13 p, p, -DDT in red paddy soil. In: Pro 3rd Nat Conf Environ Chem (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  48. Yin HN, Tang Z, Lu F (2003) Analysis of eco-environment degradation mechanism in the west of Northeast Plain in China during the last 100 years. Res Soil Water Conserv 10(4):190–192 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  49. Zhao LP, Wang Y, Ma J, Li CL, Qie RQ, Han X (2001) Study on improvement of sodic saline-alkaline soil in the west of Jilin Province. Chin J Soil Sci 32 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Resources and EnvironmentNortheast Agricultural UniversityHarbinChina
  2. 2.Northeast Institute of Geography and AgroecologyChinese Academy of SciencesHarbinChina
  3. 3.Department of Biological CenterHarbin Academy of Agricultural SciencesHarbinChina
  4. 4.Institute of Crop Cultivation and TillageHeilongjiang Academy of Agricultural SciencesHarbinChina
  5. 5.Institute of Natural Resources and EcologyHeilongjiang Academy of SciencesHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations