Advertisement

Soil organic matter alteration under biochar amendment: study in the incubation experiment on the Podzol soils of the Leningrad region (Russia)

  • Nataliya Orlova
  • Evgeny AbakumovEmail author
  • Elena Orlova
  • Kirill Yakkonen
  • Vlada Shahnazarova
Humic Substances and Nature-like Technologies
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Biochar is one of the most widely used ameliorants for soil amendment, which is known as factor which rises crop yields and levels of soil biological activity. Nowadays, it is under investigated how biochar application affects the dynamics of the humic components and whole soil organic matter (SOM) and the processes of its alteration. This investigation is aimed to evaluate the influence of biochar on the content, composition, and transformation of humic acids (HAs) as the main component of the SOM.

Materials and methods

The incubation experiment was carried out on three Podzol Antric soils, with varying amounts of initial total organic carbon. The incubation time was 90 days, using biochar gravimetric doses of 0.1 and 1.0%. The biochar was produced by fast pyrolysis of birch and aspen wood at 550 °С. Humus composition was analyzed for the organic matter fractions extracted with 0.1 M NaOH (containing HAs 1 + fulvic acids (FAs) 1) and 0.1 M Na4P2O7 (containing HAs 1 + FAs 1 + HAs 2 + FAs 2). Isolated HAs were characterized for their elemental composition (C, N, H, and S) and molecular composition with the use of solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (13C-NMR) techniques.

Results and discussion

We found that 0.1% of biochar amendment does not influence SOM mineralization, but 1.0% of biochar increases the mineralization by 15–18%. This process is accompanied by changes in the composition and properties of the HS. The increased proportion of HA aromatic fragments in biochar indicates an increasing of their stability. However, in soils with high humus content and a significant amount of insoluble matter, the processes of mineralization and the growth of HAs are taking place simultaneously. The replenishment of HAs could be the outcome of both the intensification of the transformation processes (mineralization and humification) of the more sustainable insoluble matter compounds and the humification of the biochar itself.

Conclusions

The influence of biochar on humification in Podzol Antric soils was revealed on the basis of incubation experiment. Both negative and positive changes under biochar in HS system were demonstrated. The active decrease of humus total contents and also the labile HS ought to qualify as negative changes. The increase of HA chemical maturity that leads to the stability of humus in whole as well as the intensive new HA formation thought to qualify as positive changes.

Keywords

Biochar Humic acids Humification Mineralization Soil organic matter 

Notes

Funding information

Analytical analyses were performed at the Centre for Magnetic Resonance of Research Park of St Petersburg State University. Work is performed with financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project No 18-016-00208а.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abakumov E, Maksimova E, Tsibart A (2018) Assessment of postfire soils degradation dynamics: stability and molecular composition of humic acids with use of spectroscopy methods. Land Degrad Dev 29:2092–2101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexandrova LN (1980) Soil organic matter and its transformation processes. Leningrad Nauka: 287Google Scholar
  3. Alexandrova LN, Yurlova OV (1984) Methods for determination of the optimization of the humus content in arable sod-podzolic soils exampled on soils in the Leningrad region. Pochvovedenie 8:21–28Google Scholar
  4. Asai H, Samson BK, Stephan HM, Songyikhangsuthor K, Homma K, Kiyono Y, Inoue Y, Shiraiwa T, Horie T (2009) Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in northern Laos 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crop Res 111(1–2):81–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bityutskii NP, Maiorov EI, Orlova NE (2012) The priming effects induced by earthworm mucus on mineralization and humification of plant residues. Eur J Soil Biol 50:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen Y, Che G, Robinson D, Yang Z, Guo J, Xie J, Fu S, Zhou L, Yang Y (2016) Large amounts of easily decomposable carbon stored in subtropical forest subsoil are associated with r-strategy-dominated soil microbes. Soil Biol Biochem 95:233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng CH, Lehmann J, Thies JE, Burton SD, Engelhard MH (2006) Oxidation of black carbon by biotic and abiotic processes. Org Geochem 37:1477–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chertov, OG., Komarov, AS. (2013) Theoretical approaches to modelling the dynamics of soil organic matter Eurasian Soil Science, 46(8):845–853Google Scholar
  9. Chukov SN, Ejarque E, Abakumov EV (2017) Characterization of humic acids from tundrasoils of northern western Siberia by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. Eur Soil Sci 50:30–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeLuca TH, MacKenzie MD, Gundale MJ (2009) Biochar effects on soil nutrient transformations. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 251–270Google Scholar
  11. Downie A, Crosky A, Munroe P (2009) Physical properties of biochar. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 13–32Google Scholar
  12. Gaunt J, Lehmann J (2008) Energy balance and emissions associated with biochar sequestration and pyrolysis bioenergy production. Env Sci Technol 42:4152–4158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guo M, Uchimiya SM, He Z (2016) Agricultural and environmental applications of biochar: advances and barriers. Soil Sci Society of America Inc., Fitchburg, pp 495–504Google Scholar
  14. Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W (2002) Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal - a review. Biol Fertil Soils 35:219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jien SH, Wang CS, Lee CH, Lee TY (2015) Stabilization of organic matter by biochar application in compost-amended soils with contrasting pH values and textures. Sustainability 7:13317–13333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones DL, Murphy DV, Khalid M, Ahmad W, Edwards-Jones G, DeLuca TH (2011) Short-term biochar-induced increase in soil CO2 release is both biotically and abiotically mediated. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1723–1731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kelleher BP, Simpson AJ (2006) Humic substances in soils: are they really chemically distinct? Environ Sci Technol 40:4605–4611Google Scholar
  18. Klucakova M, Kalina M (2015) Composition, particle size, charge and colloidal stability of pH-fractionated humic acids. J Soils Sediments 15:1900–1908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kniker H (2006) How does fire affect the nature and stability of soil organic nitrogen and carbon. Biogeosciences 86:91–118Google Scholar
  20. Kumada K (1987) Chemistry of soil organic matter. Japan Scientific Societies Press and Elsevier, Tokyo. Chemistry of Soil Organic Matter, Volume 17:240Google Scholar
  21. Kuzyakov Y, Subbotina I, Chen H, Bogomolova I, Xu X (2009) Black carbon decomposition and incorporation into soil microbial biomass estimated by 14C labeling. Soil Biol Biochem 41:210–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lehmann J, Czimczik C, Laird D, Sohi S (2009) Stability of biochar in the soil. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 183–205Google Scholar
  23. Lehmann J, Kleber M (2015) The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature 528:60–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lehmann J, da Silva JP Jr, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Glaser B (2003) Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil 249:343–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lehmann J, Sohi S (2008) Comment on “Fire-derived charcoal causes loss of forest humus”. Science 321:1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luo Y, Durenkamp M, De Nobili M, Lin Q, Brookes PC (2011) Short term soil priming effects and the mineralisation of biochar following its incorporation to soils of different pH. Soil Biol Biochem 43:2304–2314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luo Y, Durenkamp M, De Nobili M, Lin Q, Devonshire BJ, Brookes PC (2013) Microbial biomass growth, following incorporation of biochars produced at 350 °C or 700 °C, in a silty-clay loam soil of high and low pH. Soil Biol Biochem 57:513–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luo Y, Zang H, Yu Z, Chen Z, Gunina A, Kuzyakov Y, Xu J, Zhang K, Brookes P (2017) Priming effects in biochar enriched soils using a three-sourcepartitioning approach: 14C labelling and 13C natural abundance. Soil Biol Biochem 106:28–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lutzow V, Bruun S, Stenberg B, Breland TA, Jensen LS (2006) Prediction of gross and net N mineralization-immobilization-turnover from respiration. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1121–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maestrini B, Nannipieri P, Abiven S (2014) A meta-analysis on pyrogenic organic matter induced priming effect. GCB Bioenergy 7:577–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Major J, Lehmann J, Rondon M, Goodale C (2010) Fate of soil-applied black carbon: downward migration, leaching and soil respiration. Glob Chang Biol 16:1366–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis: Soil Science Society of America Book Series 5 Part 3—chemical methods. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, USA, pp 961–1010Google Scholar
  33. Orlov DS (1990) Soil humic acids and general theory of humification. MSU. Moscow, pp 325Google Scholar
  34. Orlova N, Bakina L (2002) Modern processes of humus formation in cultivated sod-podzolic soils of the North-West of Russia, Agrochemistry: 5–12Google Scholar
  35. Orlova N, Bakina L, Orlova E (2007) Methods of studying the content and composition of humus. Publishing House Of St. Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, p 147Google Scholar
  36. Orlova N, Labutova N, Orlova E, Bankina T (2017) Biochemical and microbiological aspects of the biochar use as a meliorant of soils. Problem remediation waste household, industrial and agricultural productions. Krasnodar, pp 323–325Google Scholar
  37. Ponomaryova VV, Plotnikova TA (1980) Humus and soil formation. L. Nauka, pp 221Google Scholar
  38. Rogovska N, Laird D, Cruse R, Fleming P, Parkin T, Meek D (2011) Impact of biochar on manure carbon stabilization and greenhouse gas emissions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75:871–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schmidt MWI, Skjemstad JO, Gehrt E, Kögel-Knabner I (1999) Charred organic carbon in German chernozemic soils. Eur J Soil Sci 50:351–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Bruun S, EL-Zehery T (2012) Biochar effect on the mineralization of soil organic matter Pesq agropec bras, Brasília 47(5):665–671Google Scholar
  41. Schnitzer M (1982) Organic matter characterization. Methods of soil analysis, part 2, chemical and microbiological properties, agronomy monograph, edited by: Page B, Miller R, Keeney D, Soil Science Society of America, Madison: 581–594Google Scholar
  42. Semenov VM, Kogut BM (2015) Soil organic matter Moscow. Geos, pp 232Google Scholar
  43. Smith JL, Collins HP, Bailey VL (2010) The effect of young biochar on soil respiration. Soil Biol Biochem 42:2345–2347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sutton R, Sposito G (2005) Molecular structure in soil humic substances: the new view. Environmental science & technology 39(23):9009–9015Google Scholar
  45. Swift RS (1996) Organic matter characterization. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of Soil Analysis. Soil Science Society of America Book Series 5 Part 3—chemical methods; ASA and SSSA. Madison, WI, USA, pp 1011–1020Google Scholar
  46. Swift RS, Hayes MHB (2018) The existence and importance of humic substances and of humin 19th International Conference of Humic Substances and their Contribution to the Climate Change Mitigation 16–21 September 2018 Albena Resort, Bulgaria, pp 152–153Google Scholar
  47. Thomas GW (1996) Soil pH and soil acidity. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis: Soil Science Society of America Book Series 5 part 3—chemical methods; ASA and SSSA: Madison, WI, USA, pp 487–488Google Scholar
  48. Vasilevich R, Lodygin E, Beznosikov V, Abakumov E (2018) Molecular composition of raw peat and humic substances from permafrost peat soils of European Northeast Russia as climate change markers. Sci Total Environ 615:1229–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vorobyova LF (2006) Theory and practice chemical analysis of soils. M:GEOS: 400Google Scholar
  50. Wang J, Xiong Z, Yan X, Kuzyakov Y (2016) Carbon budget by priming in a biochar-amended soil. pp 26-34Google Scholar
  51. WRB (2014) World Reference Base for Soil Resources. International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps; World Soil Resources Reports No. 106; FAO: Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  52. Yamato M, Okimori Y, Wibowo IF, Anshori S, Ogawa M (2006) Effects of the application of charred bark of Acacia mangium on the yield of maize, cowpea and peanut, and soil chemical properties in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 52:489–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zech W, Senesi N, Guggenberger G, Kaiser K, Lehmann J, Miano TM, Miltner A, Schroth G (1997) Factors controlling humification and mineralization of soil organic matter in the tropics. Geoderma 79:117–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhao X, Wang JW, Xu HJ, Zhou CJ, Wang SQ, Xin GX (2014) Effects of crop-straw biochar on crop growth and soil fertility over a wheat-millet rotation in soils of China. Soil Use Manag 30:311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zibilske LM (1994) Carbon mineralization. In: Weaver RW (ed) Methods of soil analysis: Soil Science Society of America Book Series 5 part 2—microbial and biochemical properties; ASA and SSSA: Madison, WI, USA, pp 835–863Google Scholar
  56. Zimmerman AR, Gao B, Ahn M-Y (2011) Positive and negative carbon mineralization priming effects among a variety of biochar-amended soils. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1169–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Saint-Petersburg State UniversitySaint-PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.All-Russia Institute for Agricultural MicrobiologySaint-PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations