Advertisement

Theory to describe incomplete ion exchange in charged heterogeneous systems

  • Wei Du
  • Xinmin Liu
  • Rui Li
  • Rui TianEmail author
  • Wuquan Ding
  • Hang Li
Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article
  • 110 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Incomplete ion exchange state in charged heterogeneous systems has been observed for a long time, but no general theory to describe this seemingly ordinary yet important phenomenon has been developed. The purposes of this study were to verify the effects of specific ions on the incomplete ion exchange and establish a theory to describe the incomplete ion exchange state.

Materials and methods

Permanently charged montmorillonite were pre-saturated with KNO3. K+-saturated montmorillonite (~ 0.5 g) were evenly spread in the exchange chamber. Exchange solutions (CsNO3, NaNO3, and LiNO3) with electrolyte concentrations of 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.02, and 0.03 mol L−1 concentrations flowed across the sample layer with a constant flow rate of 0.5 mL min−1, respectively. The adsorption amount for each cation species was calculated based on the concentration difference before and after each experiment.

Results and discussion

There were great differences between the adsorption amounts of Cs+, Na+, and Li+. The adsorption amounts of different ions were smaller than the cation exchange capacity of montmorillonite, aside from the Cs+ adsorption at the maximum Cs+ concentration of 0.03 mol L−1. Therefore, the observed adsorption equilibrium of cations was actually in an incomplete ion exchange state rather than a complete ion exchange state. The amounts of adsorbed cations at the incomplete ion exchange state displayed the order of Cs+ > Na+ > Li+, which means that the activation energies of cation exchange adsorption possessed the order of Cs+ < Na+ < Li+.

Conclusions

The potential barrier of diffusion for the adsorption and desorption ions in the electric field resulted in the incomplete ion exchange state. There is a basic rule for the incomplete ion exchange-exhibited specific ion effects: the ratio of the adsorption rate constants of an ion under two ionic concentrations will equal the ratio of the two concentrations.

Keywords

Incomplete ion exchange Ion adsorption rate Ion non-classical polarization Smoluchowski equation Specific ion effects 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41501241 and 41530855). We also thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on this study.

References

  1. Barrow N, Brümmer G, Strauss R (1993) Effects of surface heterogeneity on ion adsorption by metal oxides and by soils. Langmuir 9:2606–2611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolt G (1955) Ion adsorption by clays. Soil Sci 79:267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borukhov I, Andelman D, Orland H (1997) Steric effects in electrolytes: a modified Poisson-Boltzmann equation. Phys Rev Lett 79:435–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borukhov I, Andelman D, Orland H (2000) Adsorption of large ions from an electrolyte solution: a modified Poisson–Boltzmann equation. Electrochim Acta 46:221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boström M, Williams D, Ninham B (2001) Specific ion effects: why DLVO theory fails for biology and colloid systems. Phys Rev Lett 87:168103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boström M, Parsons DF, Salis A, Ninham BW, Monduzzi M (2011) Possible origin of the inverse and direct Hofmeister series for lysozyme at low and high salt concentrations. Langmuir 27:9504–9511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carrick S, Almond P, Buchan G, Smith N (2010) In situ characterization of hydraulic conductivities of individual soil profile layers during infiltration over long time periods. Eur J Soil Sci 61:1056–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colella C (1996) Ion exchange equilibria in zeolite minerals. Mineral Deposita 31:554–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collins KD, Washabaugh MW (1985) The Hofmeister effect and the behaviour of water at interfaces. Q Rev Biophys 18:323–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crank J (1979) The mathematics of diffusion. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Cui Z, Fang H, Huang L, Ni K, Reible D (2017) Effect of surface heterogeneity on phosphorus adsorption onto mineral particles: experiments and modeling. J Soils Sediments 17:2887–2898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Du W, Li R, Liu X-M, Tian R, Li H (2016) Specific ion effects on ion exchange kinetics in charged clay. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 509:427–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Du W, Li R, Liu X, Tian R, Ding W, Li H (2017) Estimating Hofmeister energy in ion-clay mineral interactions from the Gouy-Chapman theory. Appl Clay Sci 146:122–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fang H, Cui Z, He G, Huang L, Chen M (2017) Phosphorus adsorption onto clay minerals and iron oxide with consideration of heterogeneous particle morphology. Sci Total Environ 605:357–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fischer L, Brümmer G, Barrow N (2007) Observations and modelling of the reactions of 10 metals with goethite: adsorption and diffusion processes. Eur J Soil Sci 58:1304–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldberg S (1998) Ion adsorption at the soil particle-solution interface: modeling and mechanisms. In: Huang PM, Senesi N, Buffle J (eds) Structure and surface reactions of soil particles, Wiley, New York, p 377–412Google Scholar
  17. Griffin RA, Jurinak JJ (1973) The interaction of phosphate with calcite. Soil Sci Soc Am J 37:847–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haerifar M, Azizian S (2014) Fractal-like kinetics for adsorption on heterogeneous solid surfaces. J Phys Chem C 118:1129–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hu F, Xu C, Li H, Li S, Yu Z, Li Y, He X (2015) Particles interaction forces and their effects on soil aggregates breakdown. Soil Tillage Res 147:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hu F, Liu J, Xu C, Wang Z, Liu G, Li H, Zhao S (2018) Soil internal forces initiate aggregate breakdown and splash erosion. Geoderma 320:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huang XR, Li H, Li S, Xiong HL, Jiang XJ (2016) Role of cationic polarization in humus-increased soil aggregate stability. Eur J Soil Sci 67:341–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jardine PM, Sparks DL (1984) Potassium-calcium exchange in a multireactive soil system: I. Kinetics. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keren R (1991) Specific effect of magnesium on soil erosion and water infiltration. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:783–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koning D, Comans RNJ (2004) Reversibility of radiocaesium sorption on illite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 68:2815–2823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuan W-H, Lo S-L, Wang MK, Lin C-F (1998) Removal of Se (IV) and Se (VI) from water by aluminum-oxide-coated sand. Water Res 32:915–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li H, Wu L (2007a) A new approach to estimate ion distribution between the exchanger and solution phases. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:1694–1698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li H, Wu L (2007b) A generalized linear equation for non-linear diffusion in external fields and non-ideal systems. New J Phys 9:357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li H, Wu L, Zhu H, Hou J (2009) Ion diffusion in the time-dependent potential of the dynamic electric double layer. J Phys Chem C 113:13241–13248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li H, Li R, Zhu H, Wu L (2010) Influence of electrostatic field from soil particle surfaces on ion adsorption–diffusion. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:1129–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li H, Hou J, Liu X, Li R, Zhu H, Wu L (2011a) Combined determination of specific surface area and surface charge properties of charged particles from a single experiment. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75:2128–2135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li R, Li H, Xu C, Liu X, Tian R, Zhu H, Wu L (2011b) Analytical models for describing cation adsorption/desorption kinetics as considering the electrostatic field from surface charges of particles. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 392:55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li R, Li H, Zhu H, Wu L (2011c) Kinetics of cation adsorption on charged soil mineral as strong electrostatic force presence or absence. J Soils Sediments 11:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li R, Li H, Liu X, Tian R, Zhu H, Xiong H (2014) Combined measurement of surface properties of particles and equilibrium parameters of cation exchange from a single kinetic experiment. RSC Adv 4:24671–24678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li S, Li H, Xu CY, Huang XR, Xie DT, Ni JP (2013) Particle interaction forces induce soil particle transport during rainfall. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77:1563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li X, Li H, Yang G (2017) Electric fields within clay materials: how to affect the adsorption of metal ions. J Colloid Interface Sci 501:54–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu X, Li H, Li R, Xie D, Ni J, Wu L (2014) Strong non-classical induction forces in ion-surface interactions: general origin of Hofmeister effects. Sci Rep 4:5047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu X, Ding W, Tian R, Du W, Li H (2017) Position of shear plane at the clay–water interface: strong polarization effects of counterions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 81:268–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Majzik A, Tombácz E (2007) Interaction between humic acid and montmorillonite in the presence of calcium ions I. Interfacial and aqueous phase equilibria: adsorption and complexation. Org Geochem 38:1319–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oncsik T, Trefalt G, Borkovec M, Szilagyi I (2015) Specific ion effects on particle aggregation induced by monovalent salts within the Hofmeister series. Langmuir 31:3799–3807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parsons DF, Boström M, Nostro PL, Ninham BW (2011) Hofmeister effects: interplay of hydration, nonelectrostatic potentials, and ion size. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:12352–12367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Paulus WJ, Komarneni S, Roy R (1992) Bulk synthesis and selective exchange of strontium ions in Na4Mg6Al4Si4O20F4 mica. Nature 357:571–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Petrache HI, Zemb T, Belloni L, Parsegian VA (2006) Salt screening and specific ion adsorption determine neutral-lipid membrane interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:7982–7987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Salis A, Ninham BW (2014) Models and mechanisms of Hofmeister effects in electrolyte solutions, and colloid and protein systems revisited. Chem Soc Rev 43:7358–7377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sparks DL (1986) Kinetics of ionic reactions in clay minerals and soils. Adv Agron 38:231–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sparks DL (2003) Environmental soil chemistry, Second edn. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Sparks DL (2018) Kinetics and mechanisms of chemical reactions at the soil mineral/water interface. In: Sparks DL (ed) Soil physical chemistry, 2nd edn. CRC Press, New York, p 135–192Google Scholar
  47. Sun J, Yang D, Sun C, Liu L, Yang S, Jia Y, Cai R, Yao X (2014) Potassium niobate nanolamina: a promising adsorbent for entrapment of radioactive cations from water. Sci Rep 4:7313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tertre E, Hubert F, Bruzac S, Pacreau M, Ferrage E, Pret D (2013) Ion-exchange reactions on clay minerals coupled with advection/dispersion processes. Application to Na+/Ca2+ exchange on vermiculite: reactive-transport modeling, batch and stirred flow-through reactor experiments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 112:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tertre E, Delville A, Prêt D, Hubert F, Ferrage E (2015) Cation diffusion in the interlayer space of swelling clay minerals—a combined macroscopic and microscopic study. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 149:251–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tian R, Li H, Zhu H, Liu X, Gao X (2013) Ca and Cu induced aggregation of variably charged soil particles: a comparative study. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77:774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Van Riemsdijk W, De Wit J, Koopal L, Bolt G (1987) Metal ion adsorption on heterogeneous surfaces: adsorption models. J Colloid Interface Sci 116:511–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Xia T, Qi Y, Liu J, Qi Z, Chen W, Wiesner MR (2017) Cation-inhibited transport of graphene oxide nanomaterials in saturated porous media: the Hofmeister effects. Environ Sci Technol 51:828–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yu ZH, Liu XM, Xu CY, Xiong HL, Li H (2016) Specific ion effects on soil water movement. Soil Tillage Res 161:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chongqing Key Laboratory of Soil Multi-Scale Interfacial Processes, College of Resources and EnvironmentSouthwest UniversityChongqingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.College of Natural Resources and EnvironmentNorthwest A&F UniversityYanglingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Chongqing Key Laboratory of Environmental Materials & Remediation TechnologiesChongqing University of Arts and ScienceChongqingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations