Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 171–185 | Cite as

Understanding the mechanisms of soil water repellency from nanoscale to ecosystem scale: a review

  • Jiefei Mao
  • Klaas G. J. Nierop
  • Stefan C. Dekker
  • Louis W. Dekker
  • Baoliang ChenEmail author
Soils, Sec 2 • Global Change, Environ Risk Assess, Sustainable Land Use • Review Article
  • 92 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Soil water repellency (SWR) can interrupt water infiltration that may decline plant growth and potentially trigger soil erosion. Until now research has been mainly focused on understanding the mechanisms of SWR at different scales by observation and modelling studies.

Materials and methods

This review systematically discusses the possible mechanisms at different scales of the occurrence and persistence of SWR from nanoscale to ecosystem scale.

Results and discussion

Soil characteristics are strongly related to the severity of SWR, particularly in soil organic matter and soil moisture. The presence of a higher amount of hydrophobic organic compounds and lower soil moisture content lead to higher water repellency, suggesting that the interaction at the nanoscale between organic compounds and water molecules primarily determines the persistence of SWR. The repeated alternation of drying-wetting process largely modifies the relationship between water molecules and soil particles that impacts the possibility of SWR from hydrophilic in wet condition to hydrophobic in dry condition. Within ecosystem scale, vegetation and microbes are original sources of SWR-inducing compounds influencing the distribution and prevalence of SWR. Nevertheless, the challenge of global climate change, drought and warming can increase SWR. Extreme SWR induces more serious runoff and overland flow that is enhanced by intensive precipitation.

Conclusions

We conclude that understanding the interaction of water molecules and organic compounds at soil particle surface is essential to understand SWR at the nanoscale. Expanding the mechanisms of SWR from nanoscale to a larger scale is fundamental to improve the remediation of soil pollution and mitigate global change.

Keywords

Ecosystem Nanoscale Organic compounds Soil hydrophobicity Soil moisture 

Notes

Funding information

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 21425730, 21537005 and 21621005), the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant 2014CB441106), the National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China (Grant 21707118), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant 2017FZA6006).

References

  1. Abegunrin TP, Awe GO, Idowu DO, Adejumobi MA (2016) Impact of wastewater irrigation on soil physico-chemical properties, growth and water use pattern of two indigenous vegetables in Southwest Nigeria. Catena 139:167–178Google Scholar
  2. Al-Abadleh HA, Grassian VH (2003) Oxide surfaces as environmental interfaces. Surf Sci Rep 52:63–161Google Scholar
  3. Algara-Siller G, Lehtinen O, Wang FC, Nair RR, Kaiser U, Wu HA, Geim AK, Grigorieva IV (2015) Square ice in graphene nanocapillaries. Nature 519:443–445Google Scholar
  4. Andrade G, Mihara KL, Linderman RG, Bethlenfalvay GJ (1998) Soil aggregation status and rhizobacteria in the mycorrhizosphere. Plant Soil 202:89–96Google Scholar
  5. Aquino AJA, Tunega D, Schaumann GE, Haberhauer G, Gerzabek MH, Lischka H (2011a) The functionality of cation bridges for binding polar groups in soil aggregates. Int J Quantum Chem 111:1531–1542Google Scholar
  6. Aquino AJA, Tunega D, Pašalić H, Schaumann GE, Haberhauer G, Gerzabek MH, Lischka H (2011b) Molecular dynamics simulations of water molecule-bridges in polar domains of humic acids. Environ Sci Technol 45:8411–8419Google Scholar
  7. Assouline S, Narkis K (2011) Effects of long-term irrigation with treated wastewater on the hydraulic properties of a clayey soil. Water Resour Res 47:1–12Google Scholar
  8. Atanassova I, Doerr SH (2010) Organic compounds of different extractability in total solvent extracts from soils of contrasting water repellency. Eur J Soil Sci 61:298–313Google Scholar
  9. Atanassova I, Doerr SH (2011) Changes in soil organic compound composition associated with heat-induced increases in soil water repellency. Eur J Soil Sci 62:516–532Google Scholar
  10. Bailey RG (2009) Scale of ecosystem units. In: Bailey RG (ed) Ecosystem geography from ecoregions to sites. Springer, New York, pp 25–28Google Scholar
  11. Bauters TWJ, Steenhuis TS, DiCarlo DA, Nieber JL, Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ, Parlange JY, Haverkamp R (2000) Physics of water repellent soils. J Hydrol 231–232:233–243Google Scholar
  12. Bisdom EBA, Dekker LW, Schoute JFT (1993) Water repellency of sieve fractions from sandy soils and relationships with organic material and soil structure. Geoderma 56:105–118Google Scholar
  13. Blackwell PS (2000) Management of water repellency in Australia, and risks associated with preferential flow, pesticide concentration and leaching. J Hydrol 231–232:384–395Google Scholar
  14. Bond RD (1964) The influence of the microflora on the physical properties of soils II: field studies on water repellent sands. Aust J Soil Res 2:123–131Google Scholar
  15. Bond RD, Harris JR (1964) The influence of the microflora on physical properties of soils I: effects associated with filamentous algae and fungi. Aust J Soil Res 2:111–122Google Scholar
  16. Buczko U, Bens O, Hüttl RF (2005) Variability of soil water repellency in sandy forest soils with different stand structure under scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and beech (Fagus sylvatica). Geoderma 126:317–336Google Scholar
  17. Buczko U, Bens O, Durner W (2006) Spatial and temporal variability of water repellency in a sandy soil contaminated with tar oil and heavy metals. J Contam Hydrol 88:249–268Google Scholar
  18. Bull ID, Nott CJ, Van Bergen PF, Poulton PR, Evershed RP (2000) Organic geochemical studies of soils from the Rothamsted classical experiments- VI the occurrence and source of organic acids in an experimental grassland soil. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1367–1376Google Scholar
  19. Cawson JG, Nyman P, Smith HG, Lane PNJ, Sheridan GJ (2016) How soil temperatures during prescribed burning affect soil water repellency, infiltration and erosion. Geoderma 278:12–22Google Scholar
  20. Chandler D (2005) Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly. Nature 437:640–647.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04162 Google Scholar
  21. Chen B, Xing B (2005) Sorption and conformational characteristics of reconstituted plant cuticular waxes on montmorillonite. Environ Sci Technol 39:8315–8323.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es050840j Google Scholar
  22. Chen B, Zhou D, Zhu L (2008) Transitional adsorption and partition of nonpolar and polar aromatic contaminants by biochars of pine needles with different pyrolytic temperatures. Environ Sci Technol 42:5137–5143.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es8002684 Google Scholar
  23. Chepil WS (1958) Soil conditions that influence wind erosion. USDA Technical Bulletin No1185Google Scholar
  24. Chotte JL (2005) Importance of microorganisms for soil aggregation. In: Varma A, Buscot F (eds) Microorganisms in soils: roles in genesis and functions. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 107–119Google Scholar
  25. Crockford H, Topalidis S, Richardson DP (1991) Water repellency in a dry sclerophyll eucalypt forest -measurements and processes. Hydrol Process 5:405–420.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360050408 Google Scholar
  26. de Blas E, Rodríguez-Alleres M, Almendros G (2010) Specification of lipid and humic fractions in soils under pine and eucalyptus forest in Northwest Spain and its effect on water repellency. Geoderma 155:242–248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.12.007 Google Scholar
  27. de Blas E, Almendros G, Sanz J (2013) Molecular characterization of lipid fractions from extremely water-repellent pine and eucalyptus forest soils. Geoderma 206:75–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.04.027 Google Scholar
  28. De Jonge H, Freijer JI, Verstraten JM, Westerveld J, Van der Wielen FWM (1997) Relation between bioavailability and fuel oil hydrocarbon composition in contaminated soils. Environ Sci Technol 31:771–775.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es960456 Google Scholar
  29. De Jonge LW, Jacobsen OH, Moldrup P (1999) Soil water repellency: effects of water content, temperature, and particle size. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:437–442.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.03615995006300030003x Google Scholar
  30. De Rooij GH (2000) Modeling fingered flow of water in soils owing to wetting front instability: a review. J Hydrol 231–232:277–294.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00201-8 Google Scholar
  31. DeBano LF (1981) Water repellent soils: a state-of-the-art. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-46, 21pGoogle Scholar
  32. DeBano LF (2000) The role of fire and soil heating on water repellency in wildland environments: a review. J Hydrol 231-232:195–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00194-3 Google Scholar
  33. Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ (1994) How water moves in a water repellent sandy soil: potential and actual water repellency. Water Resour Res 30:2507–2517.  https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR00749 Google Scholar
  34. Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ (1996a) Preferential flow paths in a water repellent clay soil with grass cover. Water Resour Res 32:1239–1249.  https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR00267 Google Scholar
  35. Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ (1996b) Variation in water content and wetting patterns in Dutch water repellent peaty clay and clayey peat soils. Catena 28:89–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(96)00047-1 Google Scholar
  36. Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ (2000) Wetting patterns and moisture variability in water repellent Dutch soils. J Hydrol 231-232:148–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00191-8 Google Scholar
  37. Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ, Oostindie K, Boersma OH (1998) Effect of drying temperature on the severity of soil water repellency. Soil Sci 163:780–796.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-199810000-00002 Google Scholar
  38. Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ, Oostindie K, Moore D, Wesseling JG (2009) Methods for determining soil water repellency on field-moist samples. Water Resour Res 45:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007070 Google Scholar
  39. Denef K, Roobroeck D, Wadu MCWM, Lootens P, Boeckx P (2009) Microbial community composition and rhizodeposit-carbon assimilation in differently managed temperate grassland soils. Soil Biol Biochem 41:144–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.10.008 Google Scholar
  40. Diehl D (2013) Soil water repellency: dynamics of heterogeneous surfaces. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 432:8–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.05.011 Google Scholar
  41. Doerr SH, Thomas AD (2000) The role of soil moisture in controlling water repellency: new evidence from forest soils in Portugal. J Hydrol 231- 232:134–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00190-6 Google Scholar
  42. Doerr SH, Shakesby RA, Walsh RPD (1996) Soil hydrophobicity variations with depth and particle size fraction in burned and unburned Eucalyptus globulus and Pinus pinaster forest terrain in the Águeda Basin, Portugal. Catena 27:25–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0341-8162(96)00007-0 Google Scholar
  43. Doerr SH, Shakesby RA, Walsh RPD (2000) Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth Sci Rev 51:33–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00011-8 Google Scholar
  44. Doerr SH, Llewellyn CT, Douglas P, Morley CP, Mainwaring KA, Haskins C, Johnsey L, Ritsema CJ, Stagnitti F, Allinson G, Ferreira AJD, Keizer JJ, Ziogas AK, Diamantis J (2005) Extraction of compounds associated with water repellency in sandy soils of different origin. Aust J Soil Res 43:225–237.  https://doi.org/10.1071/SR04091 Google Scholar
  45. Doerr SH, Shakesby RA, Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ (2006) Occurrence, prediction and hydrological effects of water repellency amongst major soil and land-use types in a humid temperate climate. Eur J Soil Sci 57:741–754.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00818.x Google Scholar
  46. Doerr SH, Ritsema CJ, Dekker LW, Scott DF, Carter D (2007) Water repellence of soils: new insights and emerging research needs. Hydrol Process 21:2223–2228.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6762 Google Scholar
  47. Doerr SH, Woods SW, Martin DA, Casimiro M (2009) ‘Natural background’ soil water repellency in conifer forests of the North-Western USA: its prediction and relationship to wildfire occurrence. J Hydrol 371:12–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.011 Google Scholar
  48. Feeney DS (2004) Impact of fungi upon soil water relations. PhD dissertation, University of Albertay Dundee, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  49. Feeney DS, Hallett PD, Rodger S, Bengough AG, White NA, Young IM (2006) Impact of fungal and bacterial biocides on microbial induced water repellency in arable soil. Geoderma 135:72–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.11.007 Google Scholar
  50. Ferreira CSS, Walsh RPD, Steenhuis TS, Shakesby RA, Nunes JPN, Coelho COA, Ferreira AJD (2015) Spatiotemporal variability of hydrologic soil properties and the implications for overland flow and land management in a peri-urban Mediterranean catchment. J Hydrol 525:249–263.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.039 Google Scholar
  51. Franco CMM, Tate ME, Oades JM (1995) Studies on non-wetting sands. I. the role of intrinsic particulate organic-matter in the development of water-repellency in non-wetting sands. Aust J Soil Res 33:253–263.  https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9950253 Google Scholar
  52. Franco CMM, Clarke PJ, Tate ME, Oades JM (2000) Hydrophobic properties and chemical characterisation of natural water repellent materials in Australian sands. J Hydrol 231–232:47–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00182-7 Google Scholar
  53. García-Orenes F, Arcenegui V, Chrenková K, Mataix-Solera J, Moltó J, Jara-navarro AB, Torres MP (2017) Effects of salvage logging on soil properties and vegetation recovery in a fire-affected Mediterranean forest: a two year monitoring research. Sci Total Environ 586:1057–1065Google Scholar
  54. Goebel M, Hobbie SE, Bulaj B, Zadworny M, Douglas D, Oleksyn J, Reich PB, Eissenstat DM (2011) Decomposition of the finest root branching orders: linking belowground dynamics to fine- root function and structure. Ecol Monogr 81:89–102Google Scholar
  55. Graça J (2015) Suberin: the biopolyester at the frontier of plants. Front Chem 3:1–9Google Scholar
  56. Hallett PD (2007) An introduction to soil water repellency In: Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Adjuvants for Agrochemicals (ISAA2007), Columbus, USAGoogle Scholar
  57. Hallett PD, Young IM (1999) Changes to water repellence of soil aggregates by substrate-induced microbial activity. Eur J Soil Sci 50:35–40Google Scholar
  58. Hallett PD, Ritz K, Wheatley RE (2001) Microbial derived water repellency in golf course soil. Int Turfgrass Soc Res J 9:518–524Google Scholar
  59. Hamlett CAE, Shirtcliffe NJ, McHale G, Ahn S, Bryant R, Doerr SH, Newton MI (2011) Effect of particle size on droplet infiltration into hydrophobic porous media as a model of water repellent soil. Environ Sci Technol 45:9666–9670Google Scholar
  60. Hansel FA, Aoki CT, Maia CMBF, Cunha A, Dedecek RA (2008) Comparison of two alkaline treatments in the extraction of organic compounds associated with water repellency in soil under Pinus taeda. Geoderma 148:167–172Google Scholar
  61. Hardie MA, Cotching WE, Doyle RB, Lisson S (2012) Influence of climate, water content and leaching on seasonal variations in potential water repellence. Hydrol Process 26:2041–2048Google Scholar
  62. Harper RJ, McKissock I, Gilkes RJ, Carter DJ, Blackwell PS (2000) A multivariate framework for interpreting the effects of soil properties, soil management and landuse on water repellency. J Hydrol 231-232:371–383Google Scholar
  63. Hedrick RM, Mowry DT (1952) Effect of synthetic polyelectrolytes on aggregation, aeration, and water relationships of soil. Soil Sci 73:427–441Google Scholar
  64. Heeren DM, Miller RB, Fox GA, Storm DE, Halihan T, Penn CJ (2010) Preferential flow effects on subsurface contaminant transport in alluvial floodplains. Trans ASABE 53:127–136Google Scholar
  65. Henderson MA (2002) The interaction of water with solid surfaces: fundamental aspects revisited. Surf Sci Rep 46:1–308Google Scholar
  66. Hiradate S, Kawamoto K, Wijewardana NS, Müller K, Møldru P, Clothier BE, Komatsu T (2014) Orientation of functional groups of soil organic matter on the surface of water repellent soils determined by pulse saturation magic angle spinning (PSTMAS) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy in 'EGU general assembly 2014′, EGU2014–13697, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  67. Horne DJ, McIntosh JC (2000) Hydrophobic compounds in sands in New Zealand- extraction, characterisation and proposed mechanisms for repellency expression. J Hydrol 231–232:35–46Google Scholar
  68. Hubbert KR, Wohlgemuth PM, Beyers JL, Narog MG, Gerrard R (2012) Post-fire soil water repellency, hydrologic response, and sediment yield compared between grass-converted and chaparral watersheds. Fire Ecol 8:143–162Google Scholar
  69. Jansen B, Nierop KGJ, Hageman JA, Cleef AM, Verstraten JM (2006) The straight- chain lipid biomarker composition of plant species responsible for the dominant biomass production along two altitudinal transects in the Ecuadorian Andes. Org Geochem 37:1514–1536Google Scholar
  70. Jordán A, González FA, Zavala LM (2010) Re-establishment of soil water repellency after destruction by intense burning in a Mediterranean heathland (SW Spain). Hydrol Process 24:736–748Google Scholar
  71. Kaiser M, Kleber M, Berhe A (2015) How air-drying and rewetting modify soil organic matter characteristics: an assessment to improve data interpretation and inference. Soil Biol Biochem 80:324–340Google Scholar
  72. Kerr TF, Ruwanza S (2016) Does Eucalyptus grandis invasion and removal affect soils and vegetation in the eastern Cape Province, South Africa? Austral Ecol 41:328–338Google Scholar
  73. Kleber M, Sollins P, Sutton R (2007) A conceptual model of organo-mineral interactions in soils: self-assembly of organic molecular fragments into zonal structures on mineral surfaces. Biogeochem 85:9–24Google Scholar
  74. Knapp AK, Fay PA, Blair JM (2002) Rainfall variability, carbon cycling, and plant species diversity in a Mesic grassland. Science 298:2202–2205Google Scholar
  75. Kobayashi M, Shimizu T (2007) Soil water repellency in a Japanese cypress plantation restricts increases in soil water storage during rainfall events. Hydrol Process 21:2356–2364Google Scholar
  76. Kolattukudy PE (1980) Biopolyester membranes of plants: cutin and suberin. Science 208:990–1000Google Scholar
  77. Lebron I, Robinson DA, Oatham M, Wuddivira MN (2012) Soil water repellency and pH soil change under tropical pine plantations compared with native tropical forest. J Hydrol 414:194–200Google Scholar
  78. Li Y, Deng Y, Chen B (2012) Sorption of chlorophenols onto fruit cuticles and potato periderm. J Environ Sci 24:675–681Google Scholar
  79. Lichner L, Babejova N, Dekker LW (2002) Effects of kaolinite and drying temperature on the persistence of soil water repellency induced by humic acids. Rostlinná Výroba 48:203–207Google Scholar
  80. Lichner L, Hallett PD, Feeney DS, ĎugovÁ O, Šír M, Tesař M (2007) Field measurement of soil water repellency and its impact on water flow under different vegetation. Biologia 62:537–541Google Scholar
  81. Lipsius K, Mooney SJ (2006) Using image analysis of tracer staining to examine the infiltration patterns in a water repellent contaminated sandy soil. Geoderma 136:865–875Google Scholar
  82. Lozano E, Jiménez-Pinilla P, Mataix-Solera J, Arcenegui V, BÁrcenas GM, GonzÁlez- Pérez JA, García-Orenes FJ, Torres MP, Mataix-Beneyto J (2013) Biological and chemical factors controlling the patchy distribution of soil water repellency among plant species in a Mediterranean semiarid forest. Geoderma 212–220:207–−208Google Scholar
  83. Lynch JM, Bragg E (1985) Microorganisms and soil aggregate stability. Adv Soil Sci 2:133–171Google Scholar
  84. Ma’shum M, Tate ME, Jones GP, Oades JM (1988) Extraction and characterization of water repellent materials from Australian soils. Eur J Soil Sci 39:99–110Google Scholar
  85. MacDonald LH, Huffman EL (2004) Post-fire soil water repellency: persistence and soil moisture thresholds. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:1729–1734Google Scholar
  86. Mao J (2016) Water repellent soils: from molecule to ecosystem. PhD dissertation Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 186 ppGoogle Scholar
  87. Mao J, Nierop KGJ, Sinninghe Damsté JS, Dekker SC (2014) Roots induce stronger soil water repellency than leaf waxes. Geoderma 232-234:328–340Google Scholar
  88. Mao J, Nierop KGJ, Rietkerk M, Dekker SC (2015) Predicting soil water repellency using hydrophobic organic compounds and their vegetation origin. Soil 1:411–425Google Scholar
  89. Mao J, Nierop KGJ, Rietkerk M, Sinninghe Damsté JS, Dekker SC (2016) The influence of vegetation on soil water repellency-markers and soil hydrophobicity. Sci Total Environ 566–567:608–620Google Scholar
  90. Materechera SA, Alston AM, Kirby JM, Dexter AR (1992) Influence of root diameter on the penetration of seminal roots into a compacted subsoil. Plant Soil 144:297–303Google Scholar
  91. Mendez-Millan M, Dignac MF, Rumpel C, Derenne S (2011) Can cutin and suberin biomarkers be used to trace shoot and root-derived organic matter? A molecular and isotopic approach. Biogeochem 106:23–38Google Scholar
  92. Michel JC, Riviere LM, Bellon-Fontaine MN (2001) Measurement of the wettability of organic materials in relation to water content by the capillary rise method. Eur J Soil Sci 52:459–467Google Scholar
  93. Miyata S, Kosugi K, Gomi T, Onda Y, Mizuyama T (2007) Surface runoff as affected by soil water repellency in a Japanese cypress forest. Hydrol Process 21:2365–2376Google Scholar
  94. Moody JA, Shakesby RA, Robichaud PR, Cannon SH, Martin DA (2013) Current research issues related to post-wildfire runoff and erosion processes. Earth-Sci Rev 122:10–37Google Scholar
  95. Morley CP, Mainwaring KA, Doerr SH, Douglas P, Llewellyn CT, Dekker LW (2005) Organic compounds at different depths in a sandy soil and their role in water repellency. Aust J Soil Res 43:239–249Google Scholar
  96. Müller K, Deurer M (2011) Review of the remediation strategies for soil water repellency. Agr Ecosyst Environ 144: 208–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.008
  97. Müller K, Deurer M, Kawamoto K, Kuroda T, Subedi S, Hiradate S, Komatsu T, Clothier BE (2014) A new method to quantify how water repellency compromises soils' filtering function. Eur J Soil Sci 65:348–359Google Scholar
  98. Naafs DFW, Van Bergen PF, Boogert SJ, De Leeuw JW (2004a) Solvent-extractable lipids in an acid andic forest soil variations with depth and season. Soil Biol Biochem 36:297–308Google Scholar
  99. Naafs DFW, Van Bergen PF, De Jong MA, Oonincx A, De Leeuw JW (2004b) Total lipid extracts from characteristic soil horizons in a podzol profile. Eur J Soil Sci 55:657–669Google Scholar
  100. Nepstad DC, Carvalho CR, Davidson EA, Jipp PH, Lefebvre PA, Negreiros GH, Da Silva ED, Stone TA, Trumbore SE, Vieira S (1994) The role of deep roots in the hydrological and carbon cycles of Amazonian forests and pastures. Nature 372:666–669Google Scholar
  101. Nielsen UN, Ball BA (2014) Impacts of altered precipitation regimes on soil communities and biogeochemistry in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. Glob Chang Biol 21:1407–1421Google Scholar
  102. Nierop KGJ, Naafs DFW, Van Bergen PF (2005) Origin, occurrence and fate of extractable lipids in Dutch coastal dune soils along a pH gradient. Org Geochem 36:555–566Google Scholar
  103. Nunes JP, Naranjo Quintanilla P, Santos JM, Serpa D, Carvalho-Santos C, Rocha J, Keizer JJ, Keesstra SD (2018) Afforestation, subsequent forest fires and provision of hydrological services: a model-based analysis for a Mediterranean mountainous catchment. Land Degrad Dev 29:776–788Google Scholar
  104. Olshansky Y, Polubesova T, Chefetz B (2014) Reconstitution of cutin monomers on smectite surfaces: adsorption and esterification. Geoderma 232:406–413Google Scholar
  105. Oostindie K, Dekker LW, Wesseling JG, Geissen V, Ritsema CJ (2017) Impacts of grass removal on wetting and actual water repellency in a sandy soil. J Hydrol Hydromechanics 65:88–98Google Scholar
  106. Pierson FB, Williams CJ, Kormos PR, Hardegree SP, Clark PE, Rau BM (2010) Hydrologic vulnerability of sagebrush steppe following pinyon and juniper encroachment rangeland. Rangeland Ecol Manag 63:614–629Google Scholar
  107. Polubesova T, Chen Y, Stefan C, Selle M, Werner P, Chefetz B (2009) Sorption of polyaromatic compounds by organic matter-coated Ca2+- and Fe3+- montmorillonite. Geoderma 154:36–41Google Scholar
  108. Poulenard J, Michel JC, Bartoli F, Portal JM, Podwojewski P (2004) Water repellency of volcanic ash soils from Ecuadorian paramo: effect of water content and characteristics of hydrophobic organic matter. Eur J Soil Sci 55:487–496Google Scholar
  109. Rahav M, Brindt N, Yermiyahu U, Wallach R (2017) Induced heterogeneity of soil water content and chemical properties by treated wastewater irrigation and its reclamation by freshwater irrigation. Water Resour Res 53:4756–4774Google Scholar
  110. Ramos MC, Martínez-Casasnovas JA (2009) Impacts of annual precipitation extremes on soil and nutrient losses in vineyards of NE Spain. Hydrol Process 235:224–235Google Scholar
  111. Reichow SL, Clemens DM, Freites JA, Németh-Cahalan KL, Heyden M, Tobias DJ, Hall JE, Gonen T (2013) Allosteric mechanism of water-channel gating by Ca2+–calmodulin. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:1085–1092Google Scholar
  112. Reyer C, Leuzinger S, Rammig A, Wolf A, Bartholomeus RP, Bonfante A, De Lorenzi F, Dury M, Gloning P, Abou Jaoudé R, Klein T, Kuster TM, Martins M, Niedrist G, Riccardi M, Wohlfahrt G, De Angelis P, de Dato G, François L, Menzel A, Pereira M (2013) A plant’s perspective of extremes: terrestrial plant responses to changing climatic variability. Glob Chang Biol 19:75–89Google Scholar
  113. Rillig MC (2005) A connection between fungal hydrophobins and soil water repellency? Pedobiologia 49:395–399Google Scholar
  114. Rillig MC, Mardatin NF, Leifheit EF, Antunes PM (2010) Mycelium of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increases soil water repellency and is sufficient to maintain water-stable soil aggregates. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1189–1191Google Scholar
  115. Ritsema CJ, Dekker LW, Hendrickx JMH, Hamminga W (1993) Preferential flow mechanism in a water repellent sandy soil. Water Resour Res 29:2183–2193Google Scholar
  116. Robinson DA, Lebron I, Ryel RJ, Jones SB (2009) Soil water repellency: a method of soil moisture sequestration in pinyon-juniper woodland. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:624–634Google Scholar
  117. Rodríguez-Alleres M, Benito E (2011) Spatial and temporal variability of surface water repellency in sandy loam soils of NW Spain under Pinus pinaster and Eucalyptus globulus plantations. Hydrol Process 25:3649–3658Google Scholar
  118. Rodríguez-Alleres M, de Blas E, Benito E (2007) Estimation of soil water repellency of different particle size fractions in relation with carbon content by different methods. Sci Total Environ 378:147–150Google Scholar
  119. Schiermeier Q (2011) Climate and weather: extreme measures. Nature 477:148–149Google Scholar
  120. Schreiner O, Shorey EC (1910) Chemical nature of soil organic matter. USDA Bureau of Soils Bulletin 74:2–48Google Scholar
  121. Schulz S, Brankatschk R, Kümig AD, Kögel-Knabner I, Schloter M, Zeyer J (2013) The role of microorganisms at different stages of ecosystem development for soil formation. Biogeoscience 10:3983–3996Google Scholar
  122. Scott DF (1993) The hydrological effects of fire in south African mountain catchments. J Hydrol 150:409–432Google Scholar
  123. Seddon AW, Maciasfauria M, Long PR, Benz D, Willis KJ (2016) Sensitivity of global terrestrial ecosystems to climate variability. Nature 531:229–232Google Scholar
  124. Shakesby RA, Bento CPM, Ferreira CSS, Ferreira AJD, Stoof CR, Urbanek E, Walsh RPD (2015) Impacts of prescribed fire on soil loss and soil quality: an assessment based on an experimentally-burned catchment in Central Portugal. Catena 128:278–293Google Scholar
  125. Siteur K, Mao J, Nierop KGJ, Rietkerk M, Dekker SC, Eppinga MB (2016) Soil water repellency: a potential driver of vegetation dynamics in coastal dunes. Ecosystems 19:1210–1224Google Scholar
  126. Soto B, Basanta R, Benito E, Perez R, Diaz-Fierros F (1994) Runoff and erosion from burnt soils in northwest Spain. In: Sala M, Rubio JL (eds) Soil erosion as a consequence of forest fires. Logroño, Geoforma Ediciones, pp 91–98Google Scholar
  127. Sposito G (1989) The chemistry of soils. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  128. Steinmetz Z, Kurtz MP, Dag A, Zipori I, Schaumann GE (2015) The seasonal influence of olive mill wastewater applications on an orchard soil under semi-arid conditions. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 178:641–648Google Scholar
  129. Tajkhorshid E, Nollert P, Jensen MØ, Miercke LJW, O’Connell J, Stroud RM, Schulten K (2002) Control of the selectivity of the aquaporin water channel family by global orientational tuning. Science 296:525–530Google Scholar
  130. Tamimi N, Diehl D, Njoum M, Marei A, Schaumann GE (2016) Effects of olive mill wastewater disposal on soil: interaction mechanisms during different seasons. J Hydrol Hydromechanics 64:176–195Google Scholar
  131. Traff DC, Niemann JD, Middlekauff SA, Lehman BM (2015) Effects of woody vegetation on shallow soil moisture at a semiarid montane catchment. Ecohydrology 8:935–947Google Scholar
  132. Travis MJ, Wiel-Shafran A, Weisbrod N, Adar E, Gross A (2010) Greywater reuse for irrigation: effect on soil properties. Sci Total Environ 408:2501–2508Google Scholar
  133. Trenberth KE, Fasullo JT, Shepherd TG (2015) Attribution of climate extreme events. Nat Clim Chang 5:725–730Google Scholar
  134. Urbanek E, Doerr S (2017) CO2 efflux from soil with seasonal water repellency. Biogeosciences 14:4781–4794Google Scholar
  135. Urbanek E, Walsh RPD, Shakesby RA (2015) Patterns of soil water repellency change with wetting and drying : the influence of cracks, roots and drainage conditions. Hydrol Process 29: 2799–2813.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10404
  136. Van Bergen PF, Bull ID, Poulton PR, Evershed RP (1997) Organic geochemical studies of soils from the Rothamsted classical experiments- I Total lipid extracts, solvent insoluble residues and humic acids from Broadbalk wilderness. Org Geochem 26:117–135Google Scholar
  137. Van Eck CM, Nunes JP, Vieira DCS, Keesstra S, Keizer JJ (2016) Physically-based modelling of the post-fire runoff response of a forest catchment in Central Portugal: using field versus remote sensing based estimates of vegetation recovery. Land Degrad Devp 27:1535–1544Google Scholar
  138. Varela ME, Benito E, Keizer JJ (2015) Influence of wildfire severity on soil physical degradation in two pine forest stands of NW Spain. Catena 133:342–348Google Scholar
  139. Vogelmann ES, Reichert JM, Prevedello J, Awe GO, Mataix-Solera J (2013) Can occurrence of soil hydrophobicity promote the increase of aggregates stability? Catena 110:24–31Google Scholar
  140. Vogelmann ES, Miguel J, Prevedello J, Oladele G, Cerdà A (2017) Soil moisture influences sorptivity and water repellency of topsoil aggregates in native grasslands. Geoderma 305:374–381Google Scholar
  141. Wagner S, Cattle SR, Scholten T (2007) Soil-aggregate formation as influenced by clay content and organic-matter amendment. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 170:173–180Google Scholar
  142. Wahren FT, Julich S, Nunes JP, Gonzalez-Pelayo O, Hawtree D, Feger KH, Keizer JJ (2016) Combining digital soil mapping and hydrological modeling in a data scarce watershed in north-Central Portugal. Geoderma 264:350–362Google Scholar
  143. Wallach R, Ben-Arie O, Graber ER (2005) Soil water repellency induced by long-term irrigation with treated sewage effluent. J Environ Qual 34:1910–1920Google Scholar
  144. Wallis MG, Horne DJ, McAuliffe KW (1990) A study of water repellency and its amelioration in a yellow-brown sand 1 severity of water repellency and its effects of wetting and abrasion. N Z J Agric Res 33:139–144Google Scholar
  145. Wang Z, Wu QJ, Wu L, Ritsema CJ, Dekker LW, Feyen J (2000) Effects of soil water repellency on infiltration rate and flow instability. J Hydrol 231-232:265–276Google Scholar
  146. Wang Z, Liu Z, Liu M, Xu K, Mayer LM (2016) The impact of drying on structure of sedimentary organic matter in wetlands: probing with native and amended polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Sci Total Environ 568:42–51Google Scholar
  147. White JC, Peters R, Kelsey JW (2007) Surfactants differentially impact p,p’-DDE accumulation by plant and earthworm species. Environ Sci Technol 41:2922–2929Google Scholar
  148. White AM, Lockington DA, Gibbes B (2016) Does fire alter soil water repellency in subtropical coastal sandy environments? Hydrol Process 31:341–348Google Scholar
  149. Wijewardana NS, Müller K, Moldrup P, Clothier B, Komatsu T, Hiradate S, de Jonge LW, Kawamoto K (2016) Soil-water repellency characteristic curves for soil profiles with organic carbon gradients. Geoderma 264:150–159Google Scholar
  150. Williams CJ, Pierson FB, Robichaud PR, Boll J (2014) Hydrologic and erosion responses to wildfire along the rangeland-xeric forest continuum in the western US: a review and model of hydrologic vulnerability. Int J Wildland Fire 23:155–172Google Scholar
  151. Yeats TH, Rose JKC (2013) The formation and function of plant cuticles. Plant Physiol 163:5–20Google Scholar
  152. Young IM, Feeney DS, O’Donnell AG, Goulding KWT (2012) Fungi in century old managed soils could hold key to the development of soil water repellency. Soil Biol Biochem 45:125–127Google Scholar
  153. Zavala LM, González FA, Jordán A (2009) Intensity and persistence of water repellency in relation to vegetation types and soil parameters in Mediterranean SW Spain. Geoderma 152:361–374Google Scholar
  154. Zavala LM, García-Moreno J, Gordillo-Rivero ÁJ, JordÁn A, Mataix-Solera J (2014) Natural soil water repellency in different types of Mediterranean woodlands. Geoderma 226-227:170–178Google Scholar
  155. Zeppel M, Wilks J, Lewis JD (2014) Impacts of extreme precipitation and seasonal changes in precipitation on plants. Biogeosciences 11:3083–3093Google Scholar
  156. Zheng W, Morris EK, Rillig MC (2014) Ectomycorrhizal fungi in association with Pinus sylvestris seedlings promote soil aggregation and soil water repellency. Soil Biol Biochem 78:326–331Google Scholar
  157. Zheng W, Morris EK, Lehmann A, Rillig MC (2016) Interplay of soil water repellency, soil aggregation and organic carbon a meta-analysis. Geoderma 283:39–47Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Organic Pollution Process and ControlZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of Earth Sciences-Organic Geochemistry, Faculty of GeosciencesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development- Environmental Sciences, Faculty of GeosciencesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Soil Physics and Land Management GroupWageningen University and ResearchWageningenThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Faculty of Management, Science, and TechnologyDepartment of Science, Netherlands Open UniversityHeerlenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations