Advertisement

Coupling soil transfer from hillslope to riparian zone through natural fingerprint in a catchment with tobacco crop

  • Fábio L. Melquiades
  • Rodrigo O. Bastos
  • Leonardo S. Andreoni
  • Edivaldo L. Thomaz
  • Valdemir Antoneli
Soils, Sec 5 • Soil and Landscape Ecology • Research Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Studies on soil provenance are important to evaluate the impacts generated in agricultural soil and in the micro basin environment intending to point out solutions to erosion control. This study has been accomplished to evaluate the soil transport in a hillslope where there is a tobacco crop and its connectivity with the riparian zone, correlating the location and depth profile of the samples with their chemical signature.

Materials and methods

Easy sample preparation, non-destructive analytical methods, and multivariate statistics for soil discrimination in different position and depths were performed for chemical element quantification. The micro basin studied is in the center of Parana State, in Brazil. Eleven soil profiles were sampled comprising hillslope, riparian zone, connection zone, and control area. The profiles were collected at five depths: 0–10, 10–20, 20–30, 30–40, and 40–50 cm. The analytical techniques applied were gamma spectrometry, to determine eU, eTh, K, and 137Cs, and portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry for Ca, Ti, Mn, Fe, Sr, and Zr quantification.

Results and discussion

137Cs was identified on the surface of the control area, confirming that this zone has not been disturbed since the last global fallout. Individual analysis per metal and principal component analysis (PCA) with the average values per depth and location were performed and interpreted together with the results of the 137Cs. Samples collected in the connection area shows chemical similarity to the superficial samples of the riparian zone, either for the control area or the deposition zone.

Conclusions

The sediments generated by the tobacco crop have a similar chemical signature compared to the undisturbed soil for the analyzed natural elements. This is product of the natural pedogenesis process occurring in the toeslope micro basin riparian zone. The predominant influence in the PCA’s responses is related to the local topography. The chemical signature of the hillslope soil is changing while it moves to the deposition.

Keywords

Connectivity Fingerprint Multivariate analysis Soil erosion 

Notes

Funding information

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development–CNPq for the support of project 472324/2013–6 and CNPq project 481919/2010-4 and for the grants 301665/2017-6 and 304722/2017-0. Also to CAPES for the student scholarship. This study is also part of the project INCT-FNA 464898/2014-5.

Supplementary material

11368_2018_2181_MOESM1_ESM.doc (130 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 130 kb)

References

  1. Andrello AC, Appoloni CR, Filho VFN (2007) Assesment of soil erosion by 137Cs technique in native forests in Londrina City, Parana, Brazil. Braz Arch Biol Technol 50:1051–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antoneli V, Lenatorvicz HH, Bednarz JA, Pulido-Fernández M, Brevik EC, Cerdà A, Rodrigo-Comino J (2018) Rainfall and land management effects on erosion and soil properties in traditional Brazilian tobacco plantations. Hydrol Sci J 63:1008–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bender MA, dos Santos DR, Tiecher T, Minella JPG, de Barros CAP, Ramon R (2018) Phosphorus dynamics during storm events in a subtropical rural catchment in southern Brazil. Agric Ecosyst Environ 261:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benham BL, Vaughan DH, Laird MK, Ross BB, Peek DR (2007) Surface water quality impacts of conservation tillage practices on burley tobacco production systems in Southwest Virginia. Water Air Soil Pollut 179:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castilhos NDB, Melquiades FL, Thomaz EL, Bastos RO (2015) X-ray fluorescence and gamma-ray spectrometry combined with multivariate analysis for topographic studies in agricultural soil. Appl Radiat Isot 95:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins A, Walling D, Leeks G (1997) Use of the geochemical record preserved in floodplain deposits to reconstruct recent changes in river basin sediment sources. Geomorphology 19:151–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Currie LA (1968) Limits for quantitative detection and quantitative determination. Anal Chem 40:586–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Didoné EJ, Minella JPG, Merten GH (2015) Quantifying soil erosion and sediment yield in a catchment in southern Brazil and implications for land conservation. J Soils Sediments 15:2334–2346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guzmán ETR, Ríos MS, García JLI, Regil EO (1995) Uranium in phophate rock and derivatives. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 189:301–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guzmán G, Quinton JN, Nearing MA (2013) Sediment tracers in water erosion studies: current approaches and challenges. J Soils Sediments 13:816–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haddadchi A, Ryder DS, Evrard O, Olley J (2013) Sediment fingerprinting in fluvial systems: review of tracers, sediment sources and mixing models. Int J Sediment Res 28:560–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IUSS Working Group WRB (2006) World reference base for soil resources 2006. World soil resources reports no. 103. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  13. Kabata-Pendias A, Pendias H (2000) Trace elements in soils and plants. CRC Press LLC, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaniu MI, Angeyo KH, Mwala AK, Mangala MJ (2012) Direct rapid analysis of trace bioavailable soil macronutrients by chemometrics-assisted energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence and scattering spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 729:21–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Khan K, Khan HM, Tufail M, Khatibeh A, Ahmad N (1998) Radiometric analysis of Hazara phosphate rock and fertilizers in Pakistan. J Environ Radioact 38:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kraushaar S, Schumann T, Ollesch G, Schubert M, Vogel HJ, Siebertet C (2015) Sediment fingerprinting in northern Jordan: element-specific correction factors in a carbonatic setting. J Soils Sediments 15:2155–2173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maher BA, Watkins SJ, Brunskill G, Alexander J, Fiealding CR (2009) Sediment provenance in a tropical fluvial and marine context by magnetic ‘fingerprinting’ of transportable sand fractions. Sedimentology 56:841–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Martínez-Carreras N, Udelhoven T, Krein A, Gallart F, Iffly JF, Ziebel J, Hoffmann L, Pfister L, Walling DE (2010) The use of sediment colour measured by diffuse reflectance spectrometry to determine sediment sources: application to the Attert River catchment (Luxembourg). J Hydrol 382:49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Massart DL, Vandeginste BGM, Buydens LMC, Jong SD, Lewi PJ, Smeyers-Verbeke J (1997) Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  20. Melquiades FL, Andreoni LFS, Thomaz EL (2013) Discrimination of land-use types in a catchment by energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence and principal component analysis. Appl Radiat Isot 77:27–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Olley J, Burton J, Smolders K, Pantus F, Pietsch T (2012) The application of fallout radionuclides to determine the dominant erosion process in water supply catchments of subtropical south-east Queensland, Australia. Hydrol Process 27:885–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peart MR (1993) Using sediment properties as natural tracers for sediment source: two case studies from Hong Kong. Tracers in hydrology. Proceedings of the Yokohama symposium. IAHS Publ 215:313–318Google Scholar
  23. Ritchie JC, McHenry JR (1990) Application of radioactive fallout cesium-137 for measuring soil erosion and sediment accumulation rates and patterns: a review. J Environ Qual 19:215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sedláček J, Bábek O, Nováková T (2017) Sedimentary record and anthropogenic pollution of a complex, multiple source fed dam reservoirs: an example from the Nové Mlýny reservoir, Czech Republic. Sci Total Environ 574:1456–1471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shepard B B, Stephen AL, Thomas MW (1984) Monitoring levels of fine sediment within tributaries of flathead lake, and impacts of fine sediment on bull trout recruitment. In: Wild Trout III Symposium; Yellowstone National Park, WYGoogle Scholar
  26. Stone M, Haight M (2000) Distribution of dioxins and furans in size-fractioned suspended solids in Canagagigue Creek, Elmira, Ontario. In: The role of sediment transport in nutrient and contamination transfer, Proceeding of a symposium held in Waterloo, Canada, July 2000. IAHS publication, 263Google Scholar
  27. Torres Astorga R, de los Santos Villalobos S, Velasco H, Domínguez-Quintero O, Pereira Cardoso R, Meigikos dos Anjos R, Diawara Y, Dercon G, Mabit L (2018) Exploring innovative techniques for identifying geochemical elements as fingerprints of sediment sources in an agricultural catchment of Argentina affected by soil erosion. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:20868–20879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Walling DE (2013) The evolution of sediment source fingerprinting investigations in fluvial systems. Watershed sediment source identification: tools, approaches, and case studies. J Soils Sediments 13:1658–1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Walling DE, Collins AL, Stroud RW (2008) Tracing suspended sediment and particulate phosphorus sources in catchments. J Hydrol 350:274–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang X, Liu Z, Miao J, Zuo N (2015) Relationship between nutrient pollutants and suspended sediments in upper reaches of Yangtze River. Water Sci Eng 8:121–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilkinson SN, Wallbrink PJ, Hancock GJ, Blake WH, Shakesby RA, Doerr SH (2009) Fallout radionuclide tracers identify a switch in sediment sources and transport-limited sediment yield following wildfire in a eucalypt forest. Geomorphology 110:140–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xu N, Wei FS, Ten EJ, Chen LQ (1993) Evaluation of indigenous concentrations of uranium and thorium in soils of China. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 24:1795–1803CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied Nuclear Physics Laboratory, Department of PhysicsUniversidade Estadual de Londrina, UELLondrinaBrazil
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsUniversidade Estadual do Centro-OesteGuarapuavaBrazil
  3. 3.Post Graduation Program in Applied ChemistryUniversidade Estadual do Centro OesteGuarapuavaBrazil
  4. 4.Department of GeographyUniversidade Estadual do Centro-OesteGuarapuavaBrazil
  5. 5.Department of GeographyUniversidade Estadual do Centro-OesteIratiBrazil

Personalised recommendations