Quantitative relationships between soil landscape index and classification grain
- 60 Downloads
Understanding space grain impact on soil landscape patterns is helpful to discover specific spatial heterogeneity of soil landscape. The objectives of this study were to reveal the effect of soil classification grain on soil landscape indices and establish a quantitative characterization function between soil landscape index and soil classification grain then we can reveal the sensitivity of soil landscape indices to soil classification grain and the significance of the function with respect to practical applications.
Materials and methods
A soil and land use vector map of Dongxiang County was made at a scale of 1:50,000. The vector map units were classified into five hierarchies of soil classification grain, such as soil great group (G1), subgroup (G2), family (G3), species (G4), and species + land use (G5). Using Fragstats 4.2 software, 40 soil landscape indices of the five soil classification grains were calculated from the vector map and its derived raster maps, at different grain sizes ranging from 10 m × 10 m to 6 km × 6 km. A numerically investigated method was developed to quantify and analyze values of the different soil classification grains, quantitative relationships, and sensitivities of soil landscape indices to soil classification grains.
Results and discussion
The effects of soil classification grain varied according to different soil landscape indices. The quantitative values of G1-G5 soil classification grains were quantified to be 0.7 km × 0.7 km, 0.5 km × 0.5 km, 0.2 km × 0.2 km, 0.15 km × 0.15 km, and 0.06 km × 0.06 km, respectively. The quantitative relationships of the abovementioned 28 landscape indices to soil classification grain were described by linear, logarithmic, reciprocal, quadratic, and power function with different sensitivities. The 13 landscape indices and their functions of the quantitative relationships to soil classification grain, which exhibited high sensitivity coefficients (PEAR > 0.90), should be adopted as a new approach in the future to quantitatively assess and forecast the spatial heterogeneity of soil landscape.
The soil classification grain strongly affects the spatial heterogeneity of the soil landscape. The quantification method of soil classification grains and the quantitative expression functions between soil landscape indices and the classification grain developed in this study could potentially provide a basic tool to quantitatively assess and forecast the spatial heterogeneity of soil landscapes. Among them, the landscape indices with high sensitivity to soil classification grains should be preferentially adopted within the new approach.
KeywordsGrain effect Sensitivity analysis Soil classification grain Soil landscape index
This paper received support from the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41571206), the Special project of the National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2016YFD0200301), and the Special project of the National Science and Technology Basic Work (No. 2015FY110700-S2).
- Carter MR, Gregorich EG (1993) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- Chen C, Zhang ZQ, Shi XZ, Ren HY, Pan JJ, Yu DS, Tan MZ, Sun WX (2011) Relationship of soil vectoe maps of different classification grades and the smallest dividable raster. Acta Pedol Sin 48:470–478 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Cressie NAC (1993) Statistics for spatial data, revised edition. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Francis JM, Klopatek JM (2000) Multiscale effects of grain size on landscape pattern analysis. Geogr Inf Sci 6:27–37Google Scholar
- Fu BJ, Chen LD, Ma KM, Wang YL, et al (2011) Principles of landscape ecology. Science Press Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Land use Administration of Jiangxi Province (1991) Jiangxi soil. China Agr Sci Technol. Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Li HB, Wang ZQ, Wang QC (1998) Theory and methodology of spatial heterogeneity quantification. Chin J Appl Ecol 9:651–657 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Li SY, Zhou SL, Xu QC, Yin JM, Xiao JX (2007) Divisions of agricultural clmiate resources in Jiangxi province. Acta Agric Jiangxi 19:102–105 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Ene E (2012) FRAGSTATS v4: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available at the following web site: http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html
- Qiu XX, Li DC, Zhao YC, Liu F, Song XD, Zhang GL (2016) The landscape pattern analysis based on different soil classification system: a case study of midstream of the Heihe River basin in northwest China. Soils 48:1022–1031 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Shen WJ, Wu JG, Lin YB, Ren H, Li QF (2003) Effects of changing grain size on landscape pattern analysis. Acta Ecol Sin 23(12):2506–2519 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (2001) Landscape ecology in theory and practice. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Wang SJ (2017) The impact of changing grain size on soil landscape pattern indices. J Anhui Agric 45:182–185 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Xu JH (2014) Measurement geography. High Educ Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Xu L, Bian XQ, Qing XL, Zhang QG, Liu L (2010) Effects of grain size change on landscape pattern indices of Hefei City. Chin J Appl Ecol 21:1167–1173 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Zhang XL, Qu YH, Ren YY, Zhao FF (2014a) Correlative analysis among pedodiversity, land use diversity and the other related ecological indexes. Ecol Environ Sci 23:923–931 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Zhao WW, Fu BJ, Chen LD (2003) The effects of grain change on landscape indices. Quat Sci 23:326–333 (in Chinese)Google Scholar