Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 716–728 | Cite as

Influence of vegetation restoration on soil physical properties in the Loess Plateau, China

  • Chaojun Gu
  • Xingmin MuEmail author
  • Peng Gao
  • Guangju Zhao
  • Wenyi Sun
  • John Tatarko
  • Xuejin Tan
Soils, Sec 2 • Global Change, Environ Risk Assess, Sustainable Land Use • Research Article
  • 271 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Extensive vegetation recovery has been implemented to control severe soil erosion on the Loess Plateau, China. However, no systematic study has been done on the soil improvement benefit and preferable pattern of vegetation rehabilitation. In this study, the effects of vegetation restoration on soil physical properties at ten sites with different vegetation types and varying restoration periods were investigated.

Materials and methods

The experiment was carried out in the Yanhe river basin in the hilly-gully region of the Loess Plateau. Ten sites, including two replanted arboreal forests for 25 and 35 years, three replanted scrubland for 15, 30, and 45 years, four secondary natural grassland for 10, 20, 30, and 40 years, and one farmland, were selected for soil sampling. Sampling was conducted at 0–20 cm and 20–40 cm layers.

Results and discussion

Vegetation restoration significantly decreased bulk density, and increased aggregate stability and saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks), while their effects on porosity was complicated. The soil texture class did not change with vegetation succession, but minor differences in sand, silt, and clay components were observed. Bulk density, macroporosity, and > 0.25 mm aggregate stability were the principal physical parameters that affected Ks. Moreover, bulk density had the most effect on Ks (− 0.84), while > 0.25 mm aggregate stability had the lowest impact (0.38). Bulk density and Ks were correlated with most of the other soil physical properties. Replanted scrubland and secondary natural grassland had higher soil physical quality index (SDexter) than replanted arboreal forests and farmland.

Conclusions

It is reasonable to take bulk density and Ks as the indicators to evaluate the effect of vegetation restoration on soil physical properties. Planting shrubs and grassland is better than forest for eco-environment rehabilitation in the study area. Results of this study provide a reference to regional eco-environmental rehabilitation and conservation.

Keywords

Bulk density Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil physical properties Soil quality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41671285) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0501707, 2016YFC0402401).

References

  1. Ahuja L, Naney J, Green R, Nielsen D (1984) Macroporosity to characterize spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and effects of land management. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48(4):699–702Google Scholar
  2. Ajayi AE, Horn R (2016) Transformation of ex-arable land to permanent grassland promotes pore rigidity and mechanical soil resilience. Ecol Eng 94:592–598Google Scholar
  3. Bartlett MS (1954) A note on the multiplying factors for various χ2 approximations. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 16:296–298Google Scholar
  4. Berger TW, Hager H (2000) Physical top soil properties in pure stands of Norway spruce (Picea abies) and mixed species stands in Austria. For Ecol Manag 136(1):159–172Google Scholar
  5. Bissonnais YL (1996) Aggregate stability and assessment of soil crustability and erodibility: I. Theory and methodology. Eur J Soil Sci 47(4):425–437Google Scholar
  6. Bissonnais YL, Arrouays D (1997) Aggregate stability and assessment of soil crustability and erodibility: II. Application to humic loamy soils with various organic carbon contents. Eur J Soil Sci 48(1):39–48Google Scholar
  7. Celik I (2005) Land-use effects on organic matter and physical properties of soil in a southern Mediterranean highland of Turkey. Soil Tillage Res 83(2):270–277Google Scholar
  8. Cerdà A (2000) Aggregate stability against water forces under different climates on agriculture land and scrubland in southern Bolivia. Soil Tillage Res 57(3):159–166Google Scholar
  9. Chi CM, Wang ZC (2009) Effect of sand on saturated hydraulic conductivity and salts leaching of sodic soil. J Soil Water Conserv 23(01):99–102 +116 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Dexter AR (2004) Soil physical quality: part I. Theory, effects of soil texture, density, and organic matter, and effects on root growth. Geoderma 120(3):201–214Google Scholar
  11. Erktan A, Cécillon L, Graf F, Roumet C, Legout C, Rey F (2016) Increase in soil aggregate stability along a Mediterranean successional gradient in severely eroded gully bed ecosystems: combined effects of soil, root traits and plant community characteristics. Plant Soil 398(1–2):121–137Google Scholar
  12. Fang W, Peng SL (1997) Development of species diversity in the restoration process of establishing a tropical man-made forest ecosystem in China. For Ecol Manag 99(1):185–196Google Scholar
  13. Feng X, Sun G, Fu B, Su C, Liu Y, Lamparski H (2012) Regional effects of vegetation restoration on water yield across the Loess Plateau, China. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16(8):2617–2628Google Scholar
  14. Fu B, Wang J, Chen L, Qiu Y (2003) The effects of land use on soil moisture variation in the Danangou catchment of the Loess Plateau, China. Catena 54(1):197–213Google Scholar
  15. Gao P, Mu XM, Wang F, Li R (2011) Changes in streamflow and sediment discharge and the response to human activities in the middle reaches of the Yellow River. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15(1):1–10Google Scholar
  16. Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysicalal approach to quantitative morphology. Geol Soc Am Bull 56(3):275–370Google Scholar
  17. Jabro J (1992) Estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity of soils from particle size distribution and bulk density data. Trans ASAE 35(2):557–560Google Scholar
  18. Jia X, Shao M, Wei X, Horton R, Li X (2011) Estimating total net primary productivity of managed grasslands by a state-space modeling approach in a small catchment on the Loess Plateau, China. Geoderma 160(3):281–291Google Scholar
  19. Jiao F, Wen ZM, An SS (2011) Changes in soil properties across a chronosequence of vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau of China. Catena 86(2):110–116Google Scholar
  20. Lado M, Paz A, Ben-Hur M (2004) Organic matter and aggregate size interactions in infiltration, seal formation, and soil loss. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68(3):935–942Google Scholar
  21. Li Y (2000) Effects of forest on water circle on the loess plateau. J Nat Resour 16(5):427–432 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  22. Li Y, Shao M (2006) Change of soil physical properties under long-term natural vegetation restoration in the Loess Plateau of China. J Arid Environ 64(1):77–96Google Scholar
  23. Li X, He M, Duan Z, Xiao H, Jia X (2007) Recovery of topsoil physicochemical properties in revegetated sites in the sand-burial ecosystems of the Tengger Desert, northern China. Geomorphology 88(3):254–265Google Scholar
  24. Li Z, Liu WZ, Zhang XC, Zheng F-L (2009) Impacts of land use change and climate variability on hydrology in an agricultural catchment on the Loess Plateau of China. J Hydrol 377(1):35–42Google Scholar
  25. Li W, Yan M, Qingfeng Z, Zhikaun J (2012) Effects of vegetation restoration on soil physical properties in the wind–water erosion region of the northern Loess Plateau of China. Clean Soil Air Water 40(1):7–15Google Scholar
  26. Luxmoore R (1981) Comments and letters to the. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:671–673Google Scholar
  27. McVicar TR, Li L, Van Niel TG, Zhang L, Li R, Yang Q, Zhang X, Mu X, Wen Z, Liu W (2007) Developing a decision support tool for China's re-vegetation program: simulating regional impacts of afforestation on average annual streamflow in the Loess Plateau. For Ecol Manag 251(1):65–81Google Scholar
  28. Mu X, Zhang X, Shao H, Gao P, Wang F, Jiao J, Zhu J (2012) Dynamic changes of sediment discharge and the influencing factors in the Yellow River, China, for the recent 90 years. Clean Soil Air Water 40(3):303–309Google Scholar
  29. Neris J, Jiménez C, Fuentes J, Morillas G, Tejedor M (2012) Vegetation and land-use effects on soil properties and water infiltration of Andisols in Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain). Catena 98:55–62Google Scholar
  30. Reynolds W, Elrick D, Youngs E, Amoozegar A, Booltink H, Bouma J (2002) 3.4 Saturated and field-saturated water flow parameters. In: Dane JH, Topp GC (eds) Methods of soil analysis Part 4. Physical methods. SSSA, Madison, pp 797–878Google Scholar
  31. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52(3–4):591–611Google Scholar
  32. Stolte J, van Venrooij B, Zhang G, Trouwborst KO, Liu G, Ritsema CJ, Hessel R (2003) Land-use induced spatial heterogeneity of soil hydraulic properties on the Loess Plateau in China. Catena 54(1):59–75Google Scholar
  33. Van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44(5):892–898Google Scholar
  34. Van Hall R, Cammeraat L, Keesstra S, Zorn M (2017) Impact of secondary vegetation succession on soil quality in a humid Mediterranean landscape. Catena 149:836–843Google Scholar
  35. Wang H, Yang Z, Saito Y, Liu JP, Sun X, Wang Y (2007) Stepwise decreases of the Huanghe (Yellow River) sediment load (1950–2005): impacts of climate change and human activities. Glob Planet Chang 57(3):331–354Google Scholar
  36. Wang Y, Fu B, Lü Y, Chen L (2011) Effects of vegetation restoration on soil organic carbon sequestration at multiple scales in semi-arid Loess Plateau, China. Catena 85(1):58–66Google Scholar
  37. Wilson GV, Xu M, Chen Y, Liu G, Romkens MJM (2005) Macropore flow and mass wasting of gullies in the Loess Plateau, China. Int J Sediment Res 20(3):249Google Scholar
  38. Xu M, Zhao Y, Liu G, Wilson GV (2006) Identification of soil quality factors and indicators for the Loess Plateau of China. Soil Sci 171(5):400–413Google Scholar
  39. Zhang K, Dang H, Tan S, Wang Z, Zhang Q (2010) Vegetation community and soil characteristics of abandoned agricultural land and pine plantation in the Qinling Mountains, China. For Ecol Manag 259(10):2036–2047Google Scholar
  40. Zhang YW, Deng L, Yan WM, Shangguan ZP (2016) Interaction of soil water storage dynamics and long-term natural vegetation succession on the Loess Plateau, China. Catena 137:52–60Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chaojun Gu
    • 1
  • Xingmin Mu
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Peng Gao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Guangju Zhao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wenyi Sun
    • 1
    • 2
  • John Tatarko
    • 3
  • Xuejin Tan
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Soil and Water ConservationNorthwest A&F UniversityYanglingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Soil and Water ConservationChinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water ResourcesYanglingChina
  3. 3.Rangeland Resources and Systems Research UnitUSDA–Agricultural Research ServiceFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations