Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 211–220 | Cite as

Transformation of clay minerals in nanoparticles of several zonal soils in China

  • Zhi Yi Zhang
  • Li Huang
  • Fan Liu
  • Ming Kuang Wang
  • Georges Martial Ndzana
  • Zhi Jie Liu
Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article
  • 84 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Clay minerals significantly affect the physical, chemical, and biological processes of soils. They undergo spontaneous modification and transformation depending to the climatic conditions. Information concerning the compositions and transformation of clay minerals in nanoparticle colloids (NPs) (25–100 nm) is severely lacking. Studying clay mineral transformation is important approach to understand soil formation. This study was conducted to determine the transformation sequence of clay minerals in several zonal soil NPs.

Materials and methods

Four soils (Haplustalf, Alf-1; Hapludalf, Alf-2; Hapludults, Ult-1 and Ult-2) were collected from B horizons developed under three different climatic zones of China. Alf-1 (36° 05′ N and 117° 24′ E) was located under a warm temperate zone and Alf-2 (30° 38′ N and 115° 26′ E), Ult-1 (29° 13′ N and 113° 46′ E), and Ult-2 (19° 27′ N and 109° 17′ E) under a subtropical zone. The clay particles (< 2000 nm) (CPs) and nanoparticles (25–100 nm) (NPs) of tested soils were separated. The element composition of CPs and NPs was identified by microwave digestion method. The mineralogy and chemical bonding of clay minerals were studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR).

Results and discussion

With decreasing latitude, NPs and CPs showed that the molar ratio of SiO2 to Al2O3 trends to diminish, indicating the phenomenon of desilication and allitization in the tested soils. XRD analysis revealed that the main clay mineral of Alf-1 NPs was illite, followed by vermiculite, kaolinite, and kaolinite interstratified minerals (KIMs). The clay minerals of Alf-2, Ult-1, and Ult-2 NPs were dominated by kaolinite (and KIMs), followed by illite, with a little content of hydroxyl-interlayered vermiculite (HIV) in Ult-1 NPs and trace content of gibbsite in Ult-2 NPs. With decreasing latitude, vermiculite and HIV decreased in NPs. When compared to CPs, smectite as well as illite-vermiculite mix-layer mineral (I-V) and illite-HIV mix-layer mineral (I-HIV) were not detected in NPs. The analysis of d060 region by XRD showed that with decreasing latitude, the main clay minerals in NPs were dioctahedral minerals (e.g., illite or kaolinite). These clay minerals resulted from the transformation of trioctahedral minerals in CPs. The disappearance of 2:1 swelling minerals and trioctahedral minerals showed that the NPs were more susceptible to weathering than CPs.

Conclusions

With decreasing latitude, the transformation of clay minerals followed the sequence of illite → HIV → kaolinite → gibbsite in tested NPs.

Keywords

Clay minerals Nanoparticles Transformation Zonal soils 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the beamline BL14B1 (Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility) for providing the beam time. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of People’s Republic of China (Grant No. 41271252).

References

  1. Banfield JF, Zhang HZ (2001) Nanoparticles in the environment. Rev Mineral Geochem 44:1–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhattacharyya T, Pal DK, Srivastava P (2000) Formation of gibbsite in the presence of 2:1 minerals: an example from Ultisols of northeast India. Clay Miner 35:827–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biswas P, Wu C-Y (2005) Nanoparticles and the environment. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 55:708–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonifacio E, Falsone G, Simonov G, Sokolova T, Tolpeshta I (2009) Pedogenic processes and clay transformations in bisequal soils of the Southern Taiga zone. Geoderma 149:66–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calabi-Floody M, Theng BKG, Reyes P, Mora ML (2009) Natural nanoclays: applications and future trends—a Chilean perspective. Clay Miner 44:161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calabi-Floody M, Bendall JS, Jara AA, Welland ME, Theng BK, Rumpel C, de la Luz MM (2011) Nanoclays from an Andisol: extraction, properties and carbon stabilization. Geoderma 161:159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chamley H (1989) Clay sedimentology. Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chou YM, Song SR, Tsao TM, Lin CS, Wang MK, Lee JJ, Chen FJ (2014) Identification and tectonic implications of nano-particle quartz (< 50 nm) by synchrotron X-ray diffraction in the Chelungpu fault gouge, Taiwan. Tectonophysics 619-620:36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Churchman GJ, Whitton JS, Claridge GGC, Theng BKG (1984) Intercalation method using formamide for differentiating halloysite from kaolinite. Clay Clay Miner 32:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deepthy R, Balakrishnan S (2005) Climatic control on clay mineral formation: evidence from weathering profiles developed on either side of the Western Ghats. J Earth Syst Sci 114:545–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dudek T, Cuadros J, Huertas J (2007) Structure of mixed-layer kaolinite-smectite and smectite-to-kaolinite transformation mechanism from synthesis experiments. Am Mineral 92:179–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eisazadeh A, Kassim KA, Nur H (2012) Solid-state NMR and FTIR studies of lime stabilized montmorillonitic and lateritic clays. Appl Clay Sci 67:5–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farmer VC, Russell JD (1967) Infrared absorption spectrometry in clay studies. Clay Clay Miner 15:121–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernandez R, Martirena F, Scrivener KL (2011) The origin of the pozzolanic activity of calcined clay minerals: a comparison between kaolinite, illite and montmorillonite. Cement Concrete Res 41:113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, 2 ed. Agronomy monographs, 9. ASA-SSA, Madison, pp 383–411Google Scholar
  16. Gérard F (2016) Clay minerals, iron/aluminum oxides, and their contribution to phosphate sorption in soils—a myth revisited. Geoderma 262:213–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. He Y, Li DC, Velde B, Yang YF, Huang CM, Gong ZT, Zhang GL (2008) Clay minerals in a soil chronosequence derived from basalt on Hainan Island, China and its implication for pedogenesis. Geoderma 148:206–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hong H, Gu Y, Li R, Zhang K, Li Z (2010) Clay mineralogy and geochemistry and their palaeoclimatic interpretation of the Pleistocene deposits in the Xuancheng section, southern China. J Quaternary Sci 25:662–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jackson ML (1979) Soil chemical analysis—advanced course, 2nd edn. University of Wisconsin, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiang J, Xu R-k, A-z Z (2010) Comparison of the surface chemical properties of four soils derived from Quaternary red earth as related to soil evolution. Catena 80:154–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krasil'nikov PV (2009) A handbook of soil terminology, correlation and classification. Earthscan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lin CW, Hseu ZY, Chen ZS (2002) Clay mineralogy of Spodosols with high clay contents in the subalpine forests of Taiwan. Clay Clay Miner 50:726–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mckeague JA, Day JH (1966) Dithionite and oxalate-extractable Fe and Al as aids in differentiating various classes of soils. Can J Soil Sci 46:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mehra OP, Jackson ML (1960) Iron oxide removal from soils and clays by a dithionite-citrate system buffered with sodium bicarbonate. Clay Clay Miner 7:317–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meunier A (2007) Soil hydroxy-interlayered minerals: a re-interpretation of their crystallochemical properties. Clay Clay Miner 55:380–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mirabella A, Egli M (2003) Structural transformations of clay minerals in soils of a climosequence in an Italian Alpine environment. Clay Clay Miner 51:264–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moore DM, Reynolds RC (1989) X-ray diffraction and the identification and analysis of clay minerals. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Ndzana GM (2018) Characteristics of clay minerals in soil particles from an argillic horizon of Alfisol in central China. Appl Clay Sci 151:148–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. No. 5. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 961–1010Google Scholar
  30. Paola A, Pierre B, Vincenza C, Di MV, Bruce V (2016) Short term clay mineral release and re-capture of potassium in a Zea mays field experiment. Geoderma 264:54–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Research Group and Cooperative Research Group on Chinese Soil Taxonomy (1995) Index on Chinese Soil Taxonomy (second version) (In Chinese). Agricultural Science and Technology of China Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  32. Rhoades JD (1982) Cation exchange capacity. In: Page AL (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 2, 2nd edn. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 149–157Google Scholar
  33. Shi YX, Dai XR, Song ZG, Zhang WG, Wang LQ (2005) Characteristics of clay mineral assemblages and their spatial distribution of Chinese Loess in different climatic zones. (In Chinese with English abstract.). Acta Sedimentol Sin 23:690–695Google Scholar
  34. Singer A (2006) Weathering patterns in representative soils of Guanxi Province, south-east China, as indicated by detailed clay mineralogy. Eur J Soil Sci 44:173–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Skiba M (2007) Clay mineral formation during podzolization in an alpine environment of the Tatra Mountains, Poland. Clay Clay Miner 55:618–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Soil Survey Staff (2014) Keys to soil taxonomy, 12th edn. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  37. Tsao TM, Chen YM, Wang MK (2011) Origin, separation and identification of environmental nanoparticles: a review. J Environ Monitor 13:1156–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tsao TM, Chen YM, Sheu HS, Zhuang SY, Shao PH, Chen HW, Chiang KY (2012) Red soil chemistry and mineralogy reflect uniform weathering environments in fluvial sediments, Taiwan. J SoilsSediments 12:1054–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tsao T, Chen Y, Sheu H, Tzou Y, Chou Y, Wang M (2013) Separation and identification of soil nanoparticles by conventional and synchrotron X-ray diffraction. Appl Clay Sci 85:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. US EPA (1996) Microwave assisted acid digestion of siliceous and organically based matrices. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  41. Vogelsang V, Kaiser K, Wagner FE, Jahn R, Fiedler S (2016) Transformation of clay-sized minerals in soils exposed to prolonged regular alternation of redox conditions. Geoderma 278:40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Waychunas GA, Kim CS, Banfield JF (2005) Nanoparticulate iron oxide minerals in soils and sediments: unique properties and contaminant scavenging mechanisms. J Nanopart Res 7:409–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilson MJ (1999) The origin and formation of clay minerals in soils: past, present and future perspectives. Clay Miner 52:279–287Google Scholar
  44. Zhang ZY, Huang L, Liu F, Wang MK, Fu QL, Zhu J (2016) Characteristics of clay minerals in soil particles of two Alfisols in China. Appl Clay Sci 120:51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang ZY, Huang L, Liu F, Wang MK, Fu QL, Zhu J (2017) The properties of clay minerals in soil particles from two Ultisols, China. Clay Clay Miner 65:273–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhi Yi Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Li Huang
    • 1
  • Fan Liu
    • 1
  • Ming Kuang Wang
    • 3
  • Georges Martial Ndzana
    • 1
  • Zhi Jie Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation (Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River), Ministry of AgricultureHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.Qianjiang Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Agro-Environment and Arable Land Conservation (Ministry of Agriculture), Plant Protection, Soil and Fertilizer Research InstituteHubei Academy of Agricultural SciencesWuhanChina
  3. 3.Department of Agricultural ChemistryNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations