Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 18, Issue 9, pp 2948–2959 | Cite as

Influence of organic and inorganic passivators on Cd and Pb stabilization and microbial biomass in a contaminated paddy soil

  • Saqib Bashir
  • Muhammad Shaaban
  • Qaiser Hussain
  • Sajid Mehmood
  • Jun Zhu
  • Qingling Fu
  • Omar Aziz
  • Hongqing Hu
Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article

Abstract

Purpose

Soil contamination with heavy metals, such as Cd and Pb, has caused severe health and environmental risks all over the world. Possible eco-friendly solutions for Cd and Pb immobilization were required to reduce its mobility through various cost-effective amendments.

Materials and methods

A laboratory incubation study was conducted to assess the efficiency of biochar (BC), zeolite (ZE), and rock phosphate (RP) as passivators for the stabilization of Cd and Pb in paddy soil as well as soil microbial biomass. Various extraction techniques were carried out: a sequential extraction procedure, the European Community Bureau of Reference (BCR), toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) test, and single extraction with CaCl2. The impact of passivators on soil pH, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and microbial biomass (carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus) was examined in the metal contaminated soil.

Results and discussion

The results showed that the exchangeable portion of Cd in soil was significantly reduced by 34.8, 21.6, and 18.8% with ZE, RP, and BC at a 3% application rate, respectively. A similar tendency of reduction in Pb soluble portion was observed by ZE (9.6%), RP (20%), and BC (21.4%) at a 3% application rate. Moreover, the TCLP leachate of Cd and Pb was apparently reduced by 17 and 30.3% with BC at a 3% application dose, respectively, when compared to the control. Soil pH, nutrients, and microbial biomass C, N, and P were significantly increased with the addition of BC, RP, and ZE passivators.

Conclusions

The results showed that the incorporation of BC, ZE, and RP significantly reduced the Cd and Pb mobility in paddy soil as well as enhanced soil nutrients and microbial biomass. Overall, among all the amendments, rice straw derived-BC performed better for Cd and Pb immobilization in paddy soil.

Keywords

Biochar Heavy metals Immobilization Microbial biomass Rock phosphate Zeolite 

Notes

Funding information

The study was financially supported by National Science and Technology Support Plan of China (2015BAD05B02).

References

  1. Adriano DC, Wenzel WW, Vangronsveld J, Bolan NS (2004) Role of assisted natural remediation in environmental cleanup. Geoderma 122:121–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad M, Lee SS, Lee SE, Al-Wabel MI, Tsang DCW, Ok YS (2017) Biochar-induced changes in soil properties affected immobilization/mobilization of metals/metalloids in contaminated soils. J Soils Sediments 7:717–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bashir S, Hussain Q, Akmal M, Riaz M, Hu HQ, Ijaz SS, Iqbal M, Abro S, Mehmood S, Ahmad M (2018a) Sugarcane bagasse-derived biochar reduces the cadmium and chromium bioavailability to mash bean and enhances the microbial activity in contaminated soil. J Soils Sediments 18:874–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bashir S, Zhu J, Fu Q, Hu HQ (2018b) Cadmium mobility, uptake and anti-oxidative response of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatic) under rice straw biochar, zeolite and rock phosphate as amendments. Chemosphere 194:579–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bashir S, Zhu J, Fu Q, Hu HQ (2018c) Comparing the adsorption mechanism of Cd by rice straw pristine and KOH modified biochar. Environ Sci Pollut Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-018-1292-Z
  6. Bogusz A, Oleszczuk P, Dobrowolski R (2015) Application of laboratory prepared and commercially available biochars to adsorption of cadmium, copper and zinc ions from water. Bioresour Technol 196:540–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolan N, Kunhikrishnan A, Thangarajan R, Kumpiene J, Park J, Makino T, Kirkham MB, Scheckel K (2014) Remediation of heavy metalloids contaminated soils—to mobilize or to immobilize. J Hazard Mater 266:141–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brookes PC, Landman A, Pruden G, Jenkinson DS (1985) Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 17:837–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brookes PC, Powlson DS, Jenkinson DS (1982) Measurement of microbial biomass phosphorus in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 14:319–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown GE, Trainor TP, Chaka AM (2008) Geochemistry of mineral surfaces and factors affecting their chemical reactivity. In: Nilsson A, Pettersson LGM, Norskov JK (eds) Chemical bonding at surfaces and interfaces. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 457–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cao X, Ma L, Liang Y, Gao B, Harris W (2011) Simultaneous immobilization of lead and atrazine in contaminated soils using dairy-manure biochar. Environ Sci Technol 45(11):4884–4889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cao XD, Harris W (2010) Properties of dairy-manure-derived biochar pertinent to its potential use in remediation. Bioresour Technol 101:5222–5228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cui L, Pan G, Li L, Bian R, Liu X, Yan JL, Quan G, Ding C, Chen T, Liu Y, Liu Y, Yin C, Wei C, Yang Y, Hussain Q (2016) Continuous immobilization of cadmium and lead in biochar amended contaminated paddy soil: a five-year field experiment. Ecol Eng 93:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frišták V, Pipíška M, Lesny J, Soja G, Friesl-Hanl W, Packová A (2015) Utilization of biochar sorbents for Cd2+, Zn2+, and Cu2+ ions separation from aqueous solutions: comparative study. Environ Monit 9:14–40Google Scholar
  15. Gee GW, Bauder JW, Klute A (1986) USA. Particle-size analysis. Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Phys Mineral Method 9:383–411Google Scholar
  16. Herath I, Iqbal MCM, Al-Wabel MI, Abdul JA, Ahmad M, Usman ARA, Ok YS, Vithanage M (2017) Bioenergy-derived waste biochar for reducing mobility, bioavailability, and phytotoxicity of chromium in anthropized tannery soil. J Soils Sediments 7:731–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Houben D, Evrard L, Sonnet P (2013) Mobility, bioavailability and pH dependent leaching of cadmium, zinc and lead in a contaminated soil amended with biochar. Chemosphere 92:1450–1457Google Scholar
  18. Huang J, Hu B, Qi K, Chen W, Pang X, Bao W, Tian G (2016) Effects of phosphorus addition on soil microbial biomass and community composition in a subalpine spruce plantation. Eur J Soil Biol 72:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hussain M, Farooq M, Nawaz A, Al-Sadi AM, Solaiman ZM, Alghamdi SS, Ammara U, Ok YS, Siddique KHM (2017) Biochar for crop production: potential benefits and risks. J Soils Sediments 17:685–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Inglezakis VJ, Loizidou MD, Grigoropoulou HP (2002) Equilibrium and kinetic ion exchange studies of Pb+2, Cr+3, Fe+3 and Cu+2 on natural clinoptilolite. Water Res 36:2784–2792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Islam M, Chandra MP, Patel R (2010) Physico-chemical characterization of hydroxyapatite and its application towards removal of nitrate from water. J Environ Manag 91:1883–1891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jiang TY, Jiang J, Xu RK, Li Z (2012) Adsorption of Pb(II) on variable charge soils amended with rice-straw derived biochar. Chemosphere 89:249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kiikilä O, Perkiömäki J, Barnette M, Derome J, Pennanen T, Tulisalo E, Fritze H (2001) In situ bioremediation through mulching of soil polluted by a copper–nickel smelter. J Environ Qual 30:1134–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kolb SE, Fermanich KJ, Dornbush ME (2009) Effect of charcoal quantity on microbial biomass and activity in temperate soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:1173–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kumari KG, Moldrup ID, Paradelo PM, De Jonge LW (2014) Phenanthrene sorption on biochar-amended soils: application rate, aging and physicochemical properties of soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:2105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumpiene J, Lagerkvist A, Maurice C (2008) Stabilization of As, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn in soil using amendments: a review. Waste Manag 28:215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota—a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1812–1836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li J, Li Z, Wang FM, Zou B, Chen Y, Zhao J, Mo QF, Li Y, Li X, Xia H (2015) Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus addition on soil microbial community in a secondary tropical forest of China. Biol Fertil Soils 51:207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liang B, Yang X, He X (2011) Effects of 17-year fertilization on soil microbial biomass C and N and soluble organic C and N in loessial soil during maize growth. Biol Fertil Soils 47:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liang XF, Han J, Xu YM, Sun YB, Wang L, Tan X (2014) In situ field-scale remediation of Cd polluted paddy soil using sepiolite and palygorskite. Geoderma 9–18:235–236Google Scholar
  31. Lu RK (2000) Methods of inorganic pollutants analysis. In: Soil and agro-chemical analysis methods. Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing, pp 205–266Google Scholar
  32. Lu W, Ding W, Zhang J (2014) Biochar suppressed the decomposition of organic carbon in a cultivated sandy loam soil: a negative priming effect. Soil Biol Biochem 76:12–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meena MD, Biswas DR (2015) Effect of rock phosphate enriched compost and chemical fertilizers on microbial biomass phosphorus and phosphorus fractions. African J Microbiol Res 9:1519–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mohamed I, Zhang G, Li Z, Liu Y, Chen F, Dai K (2015) Ecological restoration of an acidic Cd contaminated soil using bamboo biochar application. Ecol Eng 84:67–76Google Scholar
  35. Murrieta MSV, Garduño IM, Hernández OF, Govaerts B, Dendooven L (2006) C and N mineralization and microbial biomass in heavy-metal contaminated soil. Eur J Soil Biol 42:89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Naggar AE, Shaheen SM, Ok YS, Rinklebe J (2018) Biochar affects the dissolved and colloidal concentrations of Cd, Cu, Ni, and Zn and their phytoavailability and potential mobility in a mining soil under dynamic redox-conditions. Sci Total Environ 624:1059–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ok YS, Lim JE, Moon DH (2011) Stabilization of Pb and Cd contaminated soils and soil quality improvements using waste oyster shells. Environ Geochem Health 33:83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oste LA, Lexmond TM, Van Riemsdijk WH (2002) Metal immobilization in soils using synthetic zeolites. J Environ Qual 31:813–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Park JH, Choppala GK, Bolan NS, Chung JW, Chuasavathi T (2011) Biochar reduces the bioavailability and phytotoxicity of heavy metals. Plant Soil 348:439–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Querol X, Alastuey A, Moreno N, Alvarez-Ayuso E, Garcia-Sanchez A, Cama J, Ayora C, Simon M (2006) Immobilization of heavy metals in polluted soils by the addition of zeolitic material synthesized from coal fly ash. Chemosphere, 62:171–180Google Scholar
  41. Rauret G, Lopez-Sanchez JF, Sahuquillo A, Rubio R, Davidson C, Ure A, Quevauviller P (1999) Improvement of the BCR three step sequential extraction procedure prior to the certification of new sediment and soil reference materials. J Environ Monit 1:57–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rizwan MS, Imtiaz M, Chhajro MA, Huang G, Fu Q, Zhu J, Aziz O, Hu H (2016) Influence of pyrolytic and non-pyrolytic rice and castor straws on the immobilization of Pb and Cu in contaminated soil. Environ Technol 37:2679–2686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shaaban M, Abid M, Qi-An P (2013) Short term influence of gypsum, farm manure and commercial humic acid on physical properties of salt affected soil in rice paddy system. J Chem Soc Pak 35:1034–1040Google Scholar
  44. Shaheen SM, Rinklebe J (2015) Impact of emerging and low cost alternative amendments on the (im)mobilization and phytoavailability of Cd and Pb in a contaminated floodplain soil. Ecol Eng 74:319–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shaheen SM, Rinklebe J, Selim HM (2015) Impact of various amendments on the bioavailability and immobilization of Ni and Zn in a contaminated floodplain soil. Inter J Environ Sci Techn, 12:2765–2776Google Scholar
  46. Stewart CE, Zheng JY, Botte J (2013) Co-generated fast pyrolysis biochar mitigates greenhouse gas emissions and increases carbon sequestration in temperate soils. GCB Bioenergy 5:153–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. USEPA (1992) Test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/ chemical methods. US Environmental Pollution Agency USA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  48. Usman RA, Kuzyakov Y, Stahr K (2004) Effect of clay minerals on extractability of heavy metals and sewage sludge mineralization in soil. Chem Ecol 20:123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vaughan DJ, Pattrick RAD, Wogelius RA (2002) Minerals, metals and molecules: ore and environmental mineralogy in the new millenium. Mineral Mag 66:653–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wen J, Yi Y, Zeng G (2016) Effects of modified zeolite on the removal and stabilization of heavy metals in contaminated lake sediment using BCR sequential extraction. J Environ Manag 178:63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu J, Joergensen RG, Pommerening B, Haussod R, Brookes PC (1990) Measurement of soil microbial biomass C by fumigation-extraction-an automated procedure. Soil Biol Biochem 22:1167–l169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Xu X, Cao X, Zhao L, Wang H, Yu H, Gao B (2013) Removal of Cu, Zn, and Cd from aqueous solutions by the dairy manure-derived biochar. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:358–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yuan JH, Xu RK, Zhang H (2011) The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresour Technol 102:3488–3497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang HY, Li AM, Zhang W, Shuang CD (2016) Combination of Na-modified zeolite and anion exchange resin for advanced treatment of a high ammonia nitrogen content municipal effluent. J Colloid Interf Sci 468:128–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhou H, Zhang D, Wang P, Liu X, Cheng K, Li L, Zheng J, Zhang X, Zheng J, Crowley D, Van Zwieten L, Pan G (2017) Changes in microbial biomass and the metabolic quotient with biochar addition to agricultural soils: a meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 239:80–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhu R, Yu R, Yao J, Mao D, Xing C, Wang D (2008) Removal of Cd2+ from aqueous solutions by hydroxyapatite. Catal Today 139:94–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhu W, Chen S, Yang J (2004) Effects of soil amendments on lead uptake by two vegetable crops from a lead-contaminated soil from Anhui, China. Environ Int 30:351–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zin ZZ, Zulkifli H, Tarmizi AM, Hamadan AB, Khalid Raja ZRO (2005) Rock phosphate fertilizers recommended for young oil palm planted on inland soils. MPOB Information Series, ISSN 1511-7871. Malaysian Palm Oil Board, Ministry of Plantation Industries and Commodities, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saqib Bashir
    • 1
  • Muhammad Shaaban
    • 1
  • Qaiser Hussain
    • 2
  • Sajid Mehmood
    • 1
  • Jun Zhu
    • 1
  • Qingling Fu
    • 1
  • Omar Aziz
    • 1
  • Hongqing Hu
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation (Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtse River), Ministry of Agriculture, College of Resources and EnvironmentHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.Department of Soil Science & SWCPMAS-Arid Agriculture UniversityRawalpindiPakistan

Personalised recommendations