Immobilization of phosphate by a Technosol spolic silandic: kinetics, equilibrium and dependency on environmental variables
- 84 Downloads
Phosphorus is an essential element that at high concentrations generates eutrophication of aquatic systems. In this study, we used batch and continuous tests to evaluate the efficiency of a Technosol to retain the phosphorus present (as phosphate) in aqueous samples.
Materials and methods
Phosphate sorption on Technosol was studied through batch and continuous experiments. Sorption kinetics and isotherms were investigated at different phosphate loadings and pH. In batch tests, we have determined how the presence of different anions (bicarbonate, sulphate, chloride, chromate and molybdate) affected phosphate retention. In continuous flow systems, phosphate immobilization was assessed as a function of flow rate, pH and Technosol concentration. Finally, the potential reutilization of the column was evaluated using consecutive sorption-desorption cycles.
Results and discussion
Phosphate sorption follows a pseudo-second-order kinetics model and a Langmuir isotherm model. The maximum sorption capacity ranged from 7.1 to 18.5 mg g−1, with larger values obtained at the highest pH. The main mechanisms involved in the sorption process were precipitation (as Ca-P minerals) and surface adsorption. In the column experiments, we observed a sorption reduction from 6.19 ± 0.06 to 2.37 ± 0.06 mg g−1 as the flow rate increased from 1.5 to 5.0 mL min−1. In addition, the retention capacity decreased by 14% when the height of the reactive layer was halved. Finally, the retention capacity of the Technosol spolic silandic recovered well after several sorption-desorption cycles, reaching 40% of the original value after first and second cycles.
The material effectively retained phosphate in batch and continuous flow systems. The Technosol spolic silandic is considered an efficient sorbent to remove the excess of phosphate from the soil solution and the aqueous system. This material may be a useful tool to mitigate or minimize two important environmental problems: eutrophication and the scarcity of natural sources of phosphate. The Technosol can thus be recycled as a phosphate-rich amendment and the leachates can be used to produce liquid fertilizer.
KeywordsAndic Decontamination Eutrophication Phosphate Sorption Technosol
This work was supported by the Group of Excellence GI-1245, AMBIOSOL (Instituto de Investigaciones Tecnológicas − Universidad de Santiago de Compostela; GRC2014/003) financed by Xunta de Galicia and by the INTERREG V-A POCTEP Program (0366/RES2VALHUM/1/P). The authors belong to the CRETUS Strategic Partnership (AGRUP2015/02), co-funded by FEDER (UE). The authors thank the company CVAN (Centro de Valorización Ambiental del Norte. Touro, Spain) for preparing and supplying the Technosol. Two anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged for their feedback and constructive comments, which have greatly contributed to improve this manuscript.
- Arnalds O (2008) Andosols. In: Chesworth W (ed) Encyclopedia of soil science. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 39–46Google Scholar
- EC (1991) Directive 91/271/EEC of the European parliament and of the council—on concerning urban waste water treatment. Off J Eur Communities:135/40–135/52Google Scholar
- FAO and ITPS (2015) Status of the world’s soil resources (SWSR)—main report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
- IUSS Working Group WRB (2015) World reference base for soil resources 2014, update 2015 international soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
- Lehmann A (2006) Technosols and other proposals on urban soils for the WRB (World Reference Base for Soil Resources). Int Agrophys 20:129–134Google Scholar
- Luengo C, Brigante M, Antelo J, Avena M (2006) Kinetics of phosphate adsorption on goethite: comparing batch adsorption and ATR-IR measurements. J Colloid Interface Sci 138:12–19Google Scholar
- Parkhurst DL, Appelo CAJ (2013) Description of input and examples for PHREEQC version 3—a computer program for speciation, batch- reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 6, chap A43Google Scholar
- Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH (1996) Methods of soil analysis part 3—chemical methods. SSSA Book Ser. 5. Soil Science Society of America, America Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USAGoogle Scholar