A new method to treat farm dairy effluent to produce clarified water for recycling and to reduce environmental risks from the land application of effluent
There is increasing public concern about the amount of fresh water used on New Zealand dairy farms and the adverse impacts that farm dairy effluent (FDE) has on the environment. FDE mainly consists of fresh water (99%) with a small amount of solid material (1%). There is an opportunity to treat FDE to remove the colloidal solid material and recycle the water to wash the farm yard.
Materials and methods
A new method of treating FDE has been developed. The method uses a coagulant to flocculate and settle the colloidal particles in the FDE and thus produce the clarified water for recycling. The research and development programme involved three stages: (i) standard laboratory jar tests to establish the amount of coagulant required to treat the FDE, (ii) large tank tests to confirm the effectiveness of the coagulant at a larger scale and (iii) construction and testing of two pilot plants. A pasture field trial was conducted to test the effect of the clarified water and treated effluent on plant production.
Results and discussion
The new method of treating FDE was highly successful in removing the colloidal material and producing clarified water that can be recycled to wash the farm yard. The average turbidity of the clarified water from the first pilot plant was 52 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) (a 97% reduction in NTU compared to the original FDE) and the average Escherichia coli concentration was 9 cfu per 100 mL (a 99.99% reduction compared to the original untreated FDE). The average total-phosphorus (P) concentration of the clarified water was 1.8 g m−3 (94% reduction), dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP) was < 0.1 g m−3 (99% reduction) and total nitrogen (N) was reduced by > 70% (from 200 to 61 g m−3). The average turbidity of the clarified water from the second pilot plant was < 20 NTU (a 99.5% reduction). There was no adverse impact from the land application of the clarified water or the treated FDE on plant growth.
A new method for treating farm dairy effluent was successfully developed that produced clarified water that could be recycled to wash the farm yard and had a lower potential risk of environmental impacts when applied to land than untreated FDE. Land application of the clarified water or the treated FDE had no adverse impact on plant growth.
KeywordsClarified water Coagulation Farm dairy effluent Polyferric sulphate Water treatment
The authors thank Ravensdown and Lincoln University for funding the research programme. We thank Carole Barlow, Steve Moore and Roger Atkinson for their excellent technical assistance, and Dave Saville (Saville Statistics Ltd) for statistical analysis. We thank Jamie Thompson of Ravensdown, Sam Logan of WaterForce Ltd., Angus McLean of Reid & Harrison Ltd., and James Hardisty of Control Focus Ltd. for their input and construction of the pilot plants.
- APHA (2012) American Public Health Association Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater: 9223 B Enzyme substrate coliform test; 4500-Norg D (modified); 4500-NH3 F (modified); 4500-P B & E (modified); 4500-P G (modified), 22nd edn. American Public Health Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- ASTM (2013) Standard practice for coagulation-flocculation jar test of water, ASTM D2035–13. ASTM International, West Conshohocken www.astm.org. Accessed 25 July 2018
- Chen S, Di HJ, Cameron KC, Podolyan A, Shen JP, He J (2018) Effect of treated farm dairy effluents, with or without animal urine, on nitrous oxide emissions, ammonia oxidisers and denitrifiers in soil. J Soils Sediments (this issue)Google Scholar
- DairyNZ (2014) Reducing nitrogen loss: a guide to good management practices. DairyNZ, Hamilton https://wwwdairynzconz/media/1237817/reducing-nitrogen-losspdf. Accessed 27 July 2018Google Scholar
- FDA (2017) Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Chapter 1b, part 184 Direct food substances affirmed as generally recognized as safe, Sec. 184.1307 Ferric sulfate. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=184.1307. Accessed 8 June 2018
- Gerba CP (1996) Pathogens in the environment. In: Pepper IL, Gerba CP, Brusseau ML (eds) Pollution science. Academic Press, New York, pp 279–294Google Scholar
- Hendrich S, Fan M, Sung S, Brown R, Lebepe-Mazur S, Myers R, Osweiler G (2001) Toxicity evaluation of polymeric ferric sulphate. Int J Environ Tech and Manag 1:464–471Google Scholar
- Hewitt A (2010) New Zealand soil classification. Landcare Research Science Series No. 1, 3rd edn. Manaaki Whenua Press - Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd., LincolnGoogle Scholar
- Houlbrooke DJ, Monaghan RM (2009) The influence of soil drainage characteristics on contaminant leakage risk associated with the land application of farm dairy effluent. Report prepared for Environment Southland. http://envirolink.govt.nz/assets/Envirolink/694-ESR219-Soil-drainage-and-contaminant-leakage-risk.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2018
- Houlbrooke DJ, Horne DJ, Hedley MJ, Hanly JA, Scotter DR (2004a) Minimising surface water pollution resulting from farm-dairy effluent application to mole-pipe drained soils. 1. An evaluation of the deferred irrigation system for sustainable land treatment in the Manawatu. N Z J Agric Res 47:405–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McLaren RG, Cameron KC (1996) Soil science sustainable production and environmental protection. Oxford University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- Ministry for Primary Industries (2017) Operational code NZCP1: design and operation of farm dairies 19 may 2017. Animal Products Group, Regulation and Assurance, Ministry of Primary Industries, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
- Ministry for the Environment (2017) A draft guide for swimming, E. coli and the national targets under the national policy statement for freshwater management 2014. Ministry for the Environment, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
- Monaghan RM, Smith LC (2004) Minimising surface water pollution resulting from farm-dairy effluent application to mole-pipe drained soils. II. The contribution of preferential flow of effluent to whole-farm pollutant losses in subsurface drainage from a West Otago dairy farm. N Z J Agric Res 47:417–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Soil Survey Staff (2014) Keys to soil taxonomy, 12th edn. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Waikato Regional Council (2012) Water take rules for dairy shed use (June 2012) Information for farmers in the Waikato. https://www.waikatoregion.govt.nz/assets/PageFiles/21822/2200849.pdf. Accessed 8 June 2018
- Wang XM, Di HJ, Cameron KC. (2018) Effect of treated farm dairy effluent on E. coli, phosphorus and nitrogen leaching and greenhouse gas emissions: a field lysimeter study. J Soils Sediments (this isse)Google Scholar