Composition and settling properties of suspended particulate matter in estuaries of the Chesapeake Bay and Baltic Sea regions
- 52 Downloads
Our goal was to understand how differences in source material (allochthonous vs. autochthonous) and phytoplankton communities (diatoms vs. cyanobacteria) influence composition and settling properties of suspended particulate matter.
Materials and methods
We characterized the composition and settling properties of suspended particulate matter in two systems—one which has a high hydrologic loading factor (watershed to surface area ratio), and a diatom-dominated phytoplankton community (James River Estuary, USA), and a second, where hydrologic inputs are proportionally smaller, and the summer phytoplankton community is dominated by cyanobacteria (Curonian Lagoon, Lithuania).
Results and discussion
In the James, we found that TSS concentrations were positively related to discharge, whereas POC concentrations were negatively correlated with discharge and positively correlated with Chl-a. We infer that suspended particulate matter in this system was largely derived from allochthonous inputs, but that the organic matter fraction was derived from autochthonous production. In the Curonian Lagoon, TSS concentrations were correlated with Chl-a, but not discharge, indicating that suspended particulate matter was largely of autochthonous origin. In the James, the proportion of settleable materials was greater during high TSS concentrations, indicating that high discharge events delivered heavier particulates. In the Curonian Lagoon, we observed a seasonal decline in settling rates associated with the shift from mixed (diatoms and chlorophytes) to cyanobacteria-dominated phytoplankton, which we attribute to the presence of positively buoyant cyanobacteria.
We found that a comparative approach yielded useful insights regarding sources, composition, and settling properties of suspended particulate matter in two estuaries that differ in hydrologic loading and phytoplankton community composition. Our findings suggest that the presence of positively buoyant cyanobacteria favors export losses of particulate C, N, and P to marine waters over retention through sedimentation in transitional zones.
KeywordsBaltic Sea Chesapeake Bay Cyanobacteria Settling rates Suspended sediment
This paper is dedicated to Prof. Saulius Gulbinskas, a valued member of the Klaipeda research group, whose research efforts informed our understanding of sedimentation processes in the Curonian Lagoon. PAB is grateful to the US Fulbright Commission for their support of his research in Lithuania.
- HELCOM (2015) Guidelines for the Baltic monitoring programme for the third stage, part D. Biological determinands. Baltic Sea environment proceedings no. 27 D. Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission, Helsinki Commission, p 164Google Scholar
- Kalff J (2002) Limnology: inland water ecosystems. Upper Saddle River ,NJ, Prentice Hall, p 300Google Scholar
- Marshall HG, Burchardt L (1998) Phytoplankton composition within the tidal freshwater region of the James River, Virginia. P Biol Soc Wash 111:720–730Google Scholar
- Olenina I, Hajdu S, Edler L, Andersson A, Wasmund N, Busch S, Göbel J, Gromisz S, Huseby S, Huttunen M, Jaanus A, Kokkonen P, Ledaine I, Niemkiewicz E (2006) Biovolumes and size-classes of phytoplankton in the Baltic Sea. HELCOM Baltic Sea environmental proceedings, no. 106, pp 144Google Scholar
- Pilkaitytė R, Razinkovas A (2007) Seasonal changes in phytoplankton composition and nutrient limitation in a shallow Baltic lagoon. Boreal Environ Res 12:551–559Google Scholar
- Remeikaite-Nikiene N, Lujaniene G, Malejevas V, Bariseviciute R, Zilius M, Vybernaite-Lubiene I, Garnaga-Budre G, Stankevicius A (2017) Assessing nature and dynamics of POM in transitional environment (the Curonian lagoon, SE Baltic Sea) using a stable isotope approach. Ecol Indic 82:217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smayda TJ (1978) From phytoplankters to biomass. In: Phytoplankton manual. UNESCO, Paris, France, pp 273–279Google Scholar
- Smock LA, Wright AB, Benke AC (2005) Atlantic Coast rivers of the southeastern United States. In: Benke AC, Cushing CE (eds) Rivers of North America. Elsevier, New York, pp 73–122Google Scholar
- Vaičiutè D, Bresciani M, Bucas M (2012) Validation of MERIS bio-optical products with in situ data in the turbid Lithuanian Baltic Sea coastal waters. J Appl Remote Sens 6:063568Google Scholar
- Wetzel RG (2001) Limnology. Lake and river ecosystems, 3rd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, p 346Google Scholar
- Zilius M, Bartoli M, Bresciani M, Katarzyte M, Ruginis T, Petkuviene J, Lubiene I, Giardino C, Bukaveckas PA, de Wit R, Razinkovas-Baziukas A (2014) Feedback mechanisms between cyanobacterial blooms, transient hypoxia, and benthic phosphorus regeneration in shallow coastal environments. Estuar Coasts 37:680–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar