Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 1478–1489 | Cite as

Soil C:N:P stoichiometry in plantations of N-fixing black locust and indigenous pine, and secondary oak forests in Northwest China

Soils, Sec 2 • Global Change, Environ Risk Assess, Sustainable Land Use • Research Article
  • 96 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Soil nutrient concentrations and stoichiometry are important indicators of plant growth, terrestrial productivity, and ecosystem functioning. Nevertheless, little is known about the vertical distribution and the environmental factors influencing the spatial patterns of different forest types under the “Grain for Green” program and the “Natural Forest Resources Protection” project in Northwest of China.

Materials and methods

We collected 114 soil profile samples within a 0–100-cm depth from black locust and Chinese pine plantations, and secondary oak forests. We determined the vertical distributions of soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and their ratios along environmental gradients in Shaanxi Province, Northwest China.

Results and discussion

The results showed that both SOC and TN concentrations decreased exponentially within the soil profiles of the three forest types, but there was minimal change in TP. Significant differences in SOC, TN, and TP were found in the surface soil layers among the forest types. Both SOC and TN were relatively low in the N-fixing black locust plantations and TP was comparatively low in the Chinese pine plantations. The C:N:P ratios decreased with increasing soil depth for the three forest types. These ratios were comparatively high in the Chinese pine plantations, relatively low in the black locust plantations, and moderate in the oak forests. The differences in the ratios among the three forest types were more significant in surface soil than in deep soil. Precipitation was positively correlated with the concentrations of SOC and TN and the ratios of C:N:P. Temperature was negatively correlated with concentrations of SOC and TN and the ratios of C:N:P across all soil depths. A log-transformed linear C-N relationship was found for all three forest types, suggesting a well-constrained coupling between the levels of the two elements.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrated the effect of different tree species on soil C:N:P ratios and their controlling factors within soil profiles along environmental gradients. The secondary oak forest accumulated soil C and N more effectively than the plantations. The Chinese pine plantations were relatively more susceptible to P limitation. Therefore, the mechanism of different plant species on soil biogeochemical processes at the whole soil profile level must be considered when developing forest management strategies and implementing vegetation restoration projects.

Keywords

Forest types Northwest China Soil nutrient status Spatial variability Vertical distribution 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11368_2017_1884_Fig7_ESM.jpg (1.2 mb)
Fig. S1 Sampling sites of the three forest types in Shaanxi Province (JPEG 1222 kb)

References

  1. Batjes NH (1996) Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. Eur J Soil Sci 47(2):151–163.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01386.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Behera N, Sahani U (2003) Soil microbial biomass and activity in response to Eucalyptus plantation and natural regeneration on tropical soil. For Ecol Manag 174(1-3):1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00057-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bing HJ, Wu YH, Zhou J, Sun HY, Luo J, Wang JP, Yu D (2016) Stoichiometric variation of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in soils and its implication for nutrient limitation in alpine ecosystem of eastern Tibetan Plateau. J Soils Sediments 16(2):405–416.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1200-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonner MTL, Schmidt S, Shoo LP (2013) A meta-analytical global comparison of aboveground biomass accumulation between tropical secondary forests and monoculture plantations. For Ecol Manag 291:73–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bremner J, Mulvaney C (1982) Nitrogen-total, methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, p 595–624Google Scholar
  6. Bui EN, Henderson BL (2013) C:N:P stoichiometry in Australian soils with respect to vegetation and environmental factors. Plant Soil 373(1-2):553–568.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1823-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao Y, Chen Y (2017) Ecosystem C:N:P stoichiometry and carbon storage in plantations and a secondary forest on the Loess Plateau, China. Ecol Eng 105:125–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.04.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chai H, Yu GR, He NP, Wen D, Li J, Fang JP (2015) Vertical distribution of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in typical Chinese terrestrial ecosystems. Chin Geogr Sci 25(5):549–560.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-015-0756-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen Y, Cao Y (2014) Response of tree regeneration and understory plant species diversity to stand density in mature Pinus tabulaeformis plantations in the hilly area of the Loess Plateau, China. Ecol Eng 73:238–245.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen CR, Xu ZH, Mathers NJ (2004) Soil carbon pools in adjacent natural and plantation forests of subtropical Australia. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68(1):282–291.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.2820 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cierjacks A, Kowarik I, Joshi J, Hempel S, Ristow M, von der Lippe M, Weber E (2013) Biological Flora of the British Isles: Robinia pseudoacacia. J Ecol 101(6):1623–1640.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cleveland CC, Liptzin D (2007) C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass? Biogeochemistry 85(3):235–252.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-007-9132-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cui GY, Chen YM, Cao Y (2015a) Temporal-spatial pattern of carbon stocks in forest ecosystems in Shaanxi, Northwest China. Plos One 10(11):e0142753.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cui GY, Chen YM, Cao Y, Chun-Chun AN (2015b) Analysis on carbon stock distribution patterns of forest ecosystems in Shaanxi Province. Chin J Plant Ecol 39:333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davidson EA, Janssens IA (2006) Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 440(7081):165–173.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04514 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dawud SM, Raulund-Rasmussen K, Ratcliffe S, Domisch T, Finer L, Joly FX, Hattenschwiler S, Vesterdal L (2017) Tree species functional group is a more important driver of soil properties than tree species diversity across major European forest types. Funct Ecol 31(5):1153–1162.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12821 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deans JD, Diagne O, Lindley DK, Dione M, Parkinson JA (1999) Nutrient and organic-matter accumulation in Acacia senegal fallows over 18 years. For Ecol Manag 124(2-3):153–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00063-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Epstein HE, Burke IC, Lauenroth WK (2002) Regional patterns of decomposition and primary production rates in the US Great Plains. Ecology 83:320–327Google Scholar
  19. Eswaran H, Vandenberg E, Reich P (1993) Organic-carbon in soils of the world. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57(1):192–194.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700010034x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fang JY, Piao SL, Tang ZY, Peng CH, Wei J (2001) Interannual variability in net primary production and precipitation. Science 293(5536):1723–11723.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.293.5536.1723a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Feng DF, Bao WK, Pang XY (2017) Consistent profile pattern and spatial variation of soil C/N/P stoichiometric ratios in the subalpine forests. J Soils Sediments 17(8):2054–2065.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1665-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guo LB, Gifford RM (2002) Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis. Glob Chang Biol 8(4):345–360.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1354-1013.2002.00486.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Han WX, Fang JY, Guo DL, Zhang Y (2005) Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China. New Phytol 168(2):377–385.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01530.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jobbagy EG, Jackson RB (2000) The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol Appl 10(2):423–436.  https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0423:TVDOSO]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kahle P, Baum C, Boelcke B, Kohl J, Ulrich R (2010) Vertical distribution of soil properties under short-rotation forestry in Northern Germany. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 173(5):737–746.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200900230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lemenih M, Olsson M, Karltun E (2004) Comparison of soil attributes under Cupressus lusitanica and Eucalyptus saligna established on abandoned farmlands with continuously cropped farmlands and natural forest in Ethiopia. For Ecol Manag 195(1-2):57–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lemma B, Kleja DB, Nilsson I, Olsson M (2006) Soil carbon sequestration under different exotic tree species in the southwestern highlands of Ethiopia. Geoderma 136(3-4):886–898.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li Y, Xu M, Zou XM, Shi PJ, Zhang YQ (2005) Comparing soil organic carbon dynamics in plantation and secondary forest in wet tropics in Puerto Rico. Glob Chang Biol 11(2):239–248.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00896.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li ZQ, Yang L, Lu W, Guo W, Gong XS, Xu J, Yu D (2015) Spatial patterns of leaf carbon, nitrogen stoichiometry and stable carbon isotope composition of Ranunculus natans CA Mey. (Ranunculaceae) in the arid zone of northwest China. Ecol Eng 77:9–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.01.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liao CZ, Luo YQ, Fang CM, Chen JK, Li B (2012) The effects of plantation practice on soil properties based on the comparison between natural and planted forests: a meta-analysis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21(3):318–327.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00690.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ma J, Bu RC, Liu M, Chang Y, Qin Q, Hu YM (2015) Ecosystem carbon storage distribution between plant and soil in different forest types in Northeastern China. Ecol Eng 81:353–362.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Macedo MO, Resende AS, Garcia PC, Boddey RM, Jantalia CP, Urquiaga S, Campello EFC, Franco AA (2008) Changes in soil C and N stocks and nutrient dynamics 13 years after recovery of degraded land using leguminous nitrogen-fixing trees. For Ecol Manag 255(5-6):1516–1524.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marin-Spiotta E, Sharma S (2013) Carbon storage in successional and plantation forest soils: a tropical analysis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22(1):105–117.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2012.00788.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McGroddy ME, Daufresne T, Hedin LO (2004) Scaling of C:N:P stoichiometry in forests worldwide: implications of terrestrial redfield-type ratios. Ecology 85(9):2390–2401.  https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nelson DW, Sommers LE, Sparks D, Page A, Helmke P, Loeppert R, Soltanpour P, Tabatabai M, Johnston C, Sumner M (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of soil analysis. Part 3—chemical methods, p 961–1010Google Scholar
  36. Parkinson J, Allen S (1975) A wet oxidation procedure suitable for the determination of nitrogen and mineral nutrients in biological material. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 6(1):1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103627509366539 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Piao SL, Fang JY, Zhou LM, Guo QH, Henderson M, Ji W, Li Y, Tao S (2003) Interannual variations of monthly and seasonal normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) in China from 1982 to 1999. J Geophys Res-Atmos 108(D14):4401.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002848 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Post WM, Emanuel WR, Zinke PJ, Stangenberger AG (1982) Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature 298(5870):156–159.  https://doi.org/10.1038/298156a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Qiu LP, Zhang XC, Cheng JM, Yin XQ (2010) Effects of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) on soil properties in the loessial gully region of the Loess Plateau, China. Plant Soil 332(1-2):207–217.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0286-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reich PB, Oleksyn J (2004) Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. PNAS 101(30):11001–11006.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403588101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Wright IJ, Niklas KJ, Hedin L, Elser JJ (2010) Evidence of a general 2/3-power law of scaling leaf nitrogen to phosphorus among major plant groups and biomes. Proc Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 277(1683):877–883.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1818 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rice SK, Westerman B, Federici R (2004) Impacts of the exotic, nitrogen-fixing black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) on nitrogen-cycling in a pine-oak ecosystem. Plant Ecol 174(1):97–107.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VEGE.0000046049.21900.5a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shan C, Liang Z, Hao W (2002) Review on growth of locust and soil water in Loess Plateau. Acta Botan Boreali-Occiden Sin 23:1341–1346Google Scholar
  44. Song BL, Yan MJ, Hou H, Guan JH, Shi WY, Li GQ, Du S (2016) Distribution of soil carbon and nitrogen in two typical forests in the semiarid region of the Loess Plateau, China. Catena 143:159–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sundqvist MK, Wardle DA, Vincent A, Giesler R (2014) Contrasting nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics across an elevational gradient for subarctic tundra heath and meadow vegetation. Plant Soil 383(1-2):387–399.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2179-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tarnocai C, Canadell JG, Schuur EAG, Kuhry P, Mazhitova G, Zimov S (2009) Soil organic carbon pools in the northern circumpolar permafrost region. Glob Biogeochem Cycle 23:2607–2617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tateno R, Tokuchi N, Yamanaka N, Du S, Otsuki K, Shimamura T, Xue Z, Wang S, Hou Q (2007) Comparison of litterfall production and leaf litter decomposition between an exotic black locust plantation and an indigenous oak forest near Yan’an on the Loess Plateau, China. For Ecol Manag 241(1-3):84–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.12.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thomas SM, Johnson AH, Frizano J, Vann DR, Zarin DJ, Joshi A (1999) Phosphorus fractions in montane forest soils of the Cordillera de Piuchue, Chile: biogeochemical implications. Plant Soil 211(2):139–148.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004686213319 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tian HQ, Chen GS, Zhang C, Melillo JM, Hall CAS (2010) Pattern and variation of C:N:P ratios in China’s soils: a synthesis of observational data. Biogeochemistry 98(1-3):139–151.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-009-9382-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tsunekawa A, Liu G, Yamanaka N, Du S (2014) Restoration and development of the degraded Loess Plateau. Springer, China.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54481-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Uselman SM, Qualls RG, Thomas RB (2000) Effects of increased atmospheric CO2, temperature, and soil N availability on root exudation of dissolved organic carbon by a N-fixing tree (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) Plant Soil 222(1/2):191–202.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004705416108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Walker TW, Adams AFR (1958) Studies on soil organic matter: I. Influence of phosphorus content of parent materials on accumulations of carbon, nitrogen, sulfur, and organic phosphorus in grassland soils. Soil Sci 85(6):307–318.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-195806000-00004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wall A, Hytonen J (2005) Soil fertility of afforested arable land compared to continuously. Plant Soil 275(1-2):247–260.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-1869-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang S, Huang M, Shao X, Mickler RA, Li K, Ji J (2004) Vertical distribution of soil organic carbon in China. Environ Manag 33:S200–S209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang FM, Li ZA, Xia HP, Zou B, Li NY, Liu J, Zhu WX (2010) Effects of nitrogen-fixing and non-nitrogen-fixing tree species on soil properties and nitrogen transformation during forest restoration in southern China. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 56(2):297–306.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2010.00454.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang QD, Song JM, Cao L, Li XG, Yuan HM, Li N (2017) Distribution and storage of soil organic carbon in a coastal wetland under the pressure of human activities. J Soils Sediments 17(1):11–22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1475-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wiesmeier M, Sporlein P, Geuss U, Hangen E, Haug S, Reischl A, Schilling B, von Lutzow M, Kogel-Knabner I (2012) Soil organic carbon stocks in southeast Germany (Bavaria) as affected by land use, soil type and sampling depth. Glob Chang Biol 18(7):2233–2245.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02699.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wu HB, Guo ZT, Peng CH (2003) Distribution and storage of soil organic carbon in China. Glob Biogeochem Cycle 17:67–80Google Scholar
  59. Yang Y, Luo Y (2011) Carbon: nitrogen stoichiometry in forest ecosystems during stand development. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20(2):354–361.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00602.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yang YH, Mohammat A, Feng JM, Zhou R, Fang JY (2007) Storage, patterns and environmental controls of soil organic carbon in China. Biogeochemistry 84(2):131–141.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-007-9109-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yang YH, Fang JY, Tang YH, Ji CJ, Zheng CY, He JS, Zhu BA (2008) Storage, patterns and controls of soil organic carbon in the Tibetan grasslands. Glob Chang Biol 14(7):1592–1599.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01591.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yuan ZY, Chen HYH, Reich PB (2011) Global-scale latitudinal patterns of plant fine-root nitrogen and phosphorus. Nat Commun 2:344.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1346 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang C, Liu GB, Xue S, Sun CL (2013) Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen storage as affected by land use in a small watershed of the Loess Plateau, China. Eur J Soil Biol 54:16–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2012.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhao FZ, Sun J, Ren CJ, Kang D, Deng J, Han XH, Yang GH, Feng YZ, Ren GX (2015) Land use change influences soil C, N, and P stoichiometry under ‘Grain-to-Green Program’ in China. Sci Rep 5:10195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zheng S, Shangguan Z (2007) Spatial patterns of leaf nutrient traits of the plants in the Loess Plateau of China. Trees Struct Funct 21(3):357–370.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-007-0129-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhou J, Wu YH, Bing HJ, Yang ZJ, Wang JP, Sun HY, Sun SQ, Luo J (2016) Variations in soil phosphorus biogeochemistry across six vegetation types along an altitudinal gradient in SW China. Catena 142:102–111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess PlateauNorthwest A&F UniversityYanglingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Soil and Water ConservationChinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water ResourcesYanglingChina
  3. 3.College of ForestryNorthwest A&F UniversityYanglingChina

Personalised recommendations