Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 917–928 | Cite as

Adsorption and risk of phosphorus loss in soils in Amazonia

  • Rafael Silva Guedes
  • Alfonso Rodríguez-Vila
  • Rubén Forján
  • Emma Fernández Covelo
  • Antonio Rodrigues Fernandes
Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article

Abstract

Purpose

Low availability of phosphorus in Amazonian soils is the result of both naturally occurring low levels and adsorption processes in the soil. These factors encourage the use of intensive phosphate fertilizations to increase productivity, which, in turn, increases P saturation and contamination risk. This study was designed to determine the adsorption capacity, as well as the risk of P loss and contamination of water bodies by P in Amazonian soils.

Materials and methods

Eleven soils located in zones free from any alteration were selected in order to set parameters for natural conditions for the local soils. Adsorption experiments were carried out in CaCl2 solution 0.01 mol L−1, containing 0 to 200 mg L−1 of P in the form of KH2PO4. The phosphorus sorption index (PSI) was determined, and soluble and available forms of P were extracted in water, Mehlich-1, Olsen, and CaCl2 solutions. The phosphorus saturation degree (PSD) was obtained by extraction with acid solution of ammonium oxalate.

Results and discussion

PSI was lower in the soil GL (Eutric Gleysol) and higher for NT (Rhodic Nitisol), while the maximum adsorption capacity (Smax) was lower in the soil AR (Ferralic Arenosol) and higher in AC1 (Haplic Acrisol 1). The PSD was higher in AT (Hortic Anthrosol) which also showed higher values of soluble and available P, while lower saturation values were observed in FR2 (Xanthic Ferralsol), FR4 (Rhodic Ferralsol), Haplic Acrisol 2, and Eutric Gleysol (< 5%).

Conclusions

These soils presented low to medium maximum adsorption capacity and low P saturation; however, Ferralic Arenosol soil showed a high risk of P loss, making P management very difficult. Similarly, Hortic Anthrosol showed high susceptibility to P loss.

Keywords

Dark earth Maximum adsorption capacity Phosphorus saturation Tropical soils 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank CAPES for the financial support to the first author’s doctoral scholarship under the process no: BEX 10664/14-9 and CNPq for the last author’s productivity scholarships.

References

  1. Abdala DB, Ghosh AK, da Silva IR et al (2012) Phosphorus saturation of a tropical soil and related P leaching caused by poultry litter addition. Agric Ecosyst Environ 162:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdala DB, Northrup PA, Vicentin FC, Sparks DL (2015) Residence time and pH effects on the bonding configuration of orthophosphate surface complexes at the goethite/water interface as examined by Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy. J Colloid Interface Sci 442:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen BL, Mallarino AP, Klatt JG et al (2002) Soil and surface runoff phosphorus relationships for five typical USA midwest soils. J Environ Qual 35:599–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alleoni LRF, Brinton SR, O’Connor GA (2008) Runoff and leachate losses of phosphorus in a sandy spodosol amended with biosolids. J Environ Qual 37:259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alleoni LRF, Fernandes AR, de Campos M (2014) Degree of phosphorus saturation of an Oxisol amended with biosolids in a long-term field experiment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:5511–5520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alvarez VVH, Fonseca DM (1990) Definição de doses de fósforo para determinação da capacidade máxima de adsorção de fosfatos e para ensaios em casa de vegetação. Rev Bras Ciência do Solo 14:49–55Google Scholar
  7. Alvarez VVH, Novais RF, Dias LE, Oliveira JA (2000) Determinação e uso do fósforo remanescente. Soc Bras Ciência do Solo 25:27–33Google Scholar
  8. Anderson JM, Ingram JSI (1994) Tropical soil biology and fertility: a handbook of methods, 2nd edn. CABI, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Azeez JO, Van Averbeke W (2011) Effect of manure types and period of incubation on phosphorus-sorption indices of a weathered tropical soil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 42:2200–2218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bache BW, Williams EG (1971) A phosphate sorption index for soils. J Soil Sci 22:289–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barrow NJ (1984) Modeling the effects of pH on phosphate sorption by soils. J Soil Sci 35:283–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burns RG, DeForest JL, Marxsen J et al (2013) Soil enzymes in a changing environment: current knowledge and future directions. Soil Biol Biochem 58:216–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campos M (2014) Grau de saturação de fósforo em solos tropicais altamente intemperizados. Dissertation, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”Google Scholar
  14. Campos M, Antonangelo JA, Alleoni LRF (2016) Phosphorus sorption index in humid tropical soils. Soil Tillage Res 156:110–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cantarella H, Quaggio JA, Raij B van, et al (2001) Determinação da matéria orgânica. In: Van Raij B, Andrade JC, Quaggio JA (eds) Análise química para avaliação da fertilidade de solos tropicais. Instituto Agronômico Campinas, Campinas, pp 173–180Google Scholar
  16. Cunha TJF, Novotny EH, Madari BE et al (2009) Spectroscopy characterization of humic acids isolated from Amazonian dark earth soils (Terra Preta De Índio). In: Woods WI, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J et al (eds) Amazonian dark earths: Wim Sombroek’s vision. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Curi N, Camargo OA, Guedes GAA (1988) Sorção de fósforo em materiais de Latossolos do Brasil Sudeste e Sul. Anais. Rio Janeiro EMBRAPA, SNLCS. 267–282Google Scholar
  18. Driessen P, Deckers J, Spaargaren O (2001) Lecture notes on the major soils of the world. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  19. Embrapa (2011) Manual de métodos de análise de solo, 2nd edn. Embrapa Solos, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  20. Falcão NPS, Clement CR, Tsai SM, Comerford NB (2009) Pedology, fertility, and biology of central Amazonian dark earths. In: Woods WI, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J et al (eds) Amazonian dark earths: Wim Sombroek’s vision. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 213–228Google Scholar
  21. Gburek WJ, Barberis E, Haygarth PM et al (2005) Phosphorus mobility in the landscape. In: Sims J, Sharpley A (eds) Phosphorus: agriculture and the environment. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 947–953Google Scholar
  22. Gee GW, Or D (2002) Particle-size analysis. In: Dane JH, Toop GC (eds) Methods of soil analysis: physical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 255–293Google Scholar
  23. Gérard F (2016) Clay minerals, iron/aluminum oxides, and their contribution to phosphate sorption in soils—a myth revisited. Geoderma 262:213–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ghosh AK, Barbosa J, da Silva IR (2011) An environmental threshold of soil test P and degree of P saturation of Brazilian Oxisols. CLEAN - Soil, Air, Water 39:421–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graetz DA, Nair VD (2009) Phosphorus sorption isotherm determination. In: Kovar JL, Pierzynski GM (eds) Methods of phosphorus analysis for soils, sediments, residuals, and waters. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, pp 33–37Google Scholar
  26. Hiemstra T, Mia S, Duhaut PB, Molleman B (2013) Natural and pyrogenic humic acids at goethite and natural oxide surfaces interacting with phosphate. Environ Sci Technol 47:9182–9189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hue NV (1991) Effects of organic acids/anions on P sorption and phytoavailability in soils with different mineralogies. Soil Sci 152:463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia - Inmep (2017) Precipitação total anual http://www.inmet.gov.br/portal/index.php?r=clima/page&page=desvioChuvaAnual. Accessed 15 September 2017
  29. IUSS Working Group WRB (2014) World reference base for soil resources 2014, International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  30. Jackson ML (1969) Soil chemical analysis—advanced course, 2nd edn. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  31. Kämpf N, Kern DC (2005) O solo como registro da ocupação humana pré-histórica na Amazônia. Tópicos em ciência do solo Viçosa, MG, Soc Bras Ciência do Solo 4:277–320Google Scholar
  32. Lehmann J, Campos CV, Vasconselos de Macêdo JL, German L (2004) Sequential P fractionation of relict anthropogenic dark earths of Amazonia. In: Glaser B, Woods WI (eds) Amazonian dark earths: explorations in space and time. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lehmann J, Kern D, German L et al (2003) Soil fertility and production potential. In: Lehmann J, Kern DC, Glaser B, Wodos WI (eds) Amazonian dark earths: origin properties management. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 105–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu J, Aronsson H, Bergström L, Sharpley A (2012) Phosphorus leaching from loamy sand and clay loam topsoils after application of pig slurry. Spring 1:53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Loeppert RL, Inskeep WP (1996) Iron. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part, vol 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 639–664Google Scholar
  36. Lookman R, Vandeweert N, Merckx R, Vlassak K (1995) Geostatistical assessment of the regional distribution of phosphate sorption capacity parameters (FeOX and AlOX) in northern Belgium. Geoderma 66:285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maguire RO, Sims JT (2002) Measuring agronomic and environmental soil phosphorus saturation and predicting phosphorus leaching with Mehlich 3. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:2033–2039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Manly BFJ (1994) Multivariate statistical methods: a primer, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Mehlich A (1953) Determination of P, Ca, Mg, K, Na, and NH4. University of N. Carolina, RaleighGoogle Scholar
  40. Mehra OP, Jackson ML (1960) Iron oxide removal from soils and clays by a dithionite-citrate system buffered with sodium bicarbonate. National conference on clays and clays minerals, In, pp 317–327Google Scholar
  41. Melo VF, Fontes MPF, Novais RF et al (2001) Características dos óxidos de ferro e de alumínio de diferentes classes de solos. Rev Bras Ciência do Solo 25:19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mesquita Filho MV, Torrent J (1993) Phosphate sorption as related to mineralogy of a hydrosequence of soils from the Cerrado region (Brazil). Geoderma 58:107–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moreira A, Fageria NK (2009) Soil chemical attributes of Amazonas State, Brazil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 40:2912–2925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Motta PEF, Curi N, Siqueira JO et al (2002) Adsorção e formas de fósforo em Latossolos: influência da mineralogia e histórico de uso. Rev Bras Ciência do Solo 26:349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nair VD, Portier KM, Graetz DA, Walker ML (2004) An environmental threshold for degree of phosphorus saturation in sandy soils. This research was supported by the Florida Agricultural Experiment Station and a grant from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and approved for publication as J. J Environ Qual 33:107–113Google Scholar
  47. Pote DH, Daniel TC, Sharpley AN et al (1996) Relating extractable soil phosphorus to phosphorus losses in runoff. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:855–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Quesada CA, Lloyd J, Anderson LO et al (2011) Soils of Amazonia with particular reference to the RAINFOR sites. Biogeosciences 8:1415–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rajput A, Panhwar QA, Naher UA et al (2014) Influence of incubation period, temperature and different phosphate levels on phosphate adsorption in soil. Am J Agric Biol Sci 9:251–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Resende M, Santana DP (1988) Uso das Relações Ki e Kr na estimativa da mineralogia para classificação dos Latossolos. In: Reunião de classificação, correlação de solos e interpretação de aptidão agrícola. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Rio de Janeiro, pp 225–232Google Scholar
  51. Ruivo MDL, Cunha EDS, Kern DC (2004) Organic matter in archaeological black earths and yellow latosol in the Caxiuanã, Amazonia, Brazil. In: Glaser B, Woods WI (eds) Explorations in Amazonian dark earths. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 95–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Samadi A, Gilkes RJ (1999) Phosphorus transformations and their relationships with calcareous soil properties of southern Western Australia. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sánchez-Alcalá I, del Campillo MC, Torrent J (2014) Extraction with 0.01 m CaCl2 underestimates the concentration of phosphorus in the soil solution. Soil Use Manag 30:297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schoumans OF (2009) Determination of the degree of phosphate saturation in non-calcareous soils. In: Kovar JL, Pierzynski GM (eds) Methods of phosphorus analysis for soils, sediments, residuals and waters., 2nd edn. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, pp 29–32Google Scholar
  55. Self-Davis ML, Moore PA, Joern BC (2009) Determination of water-and/or dilute salt-extractable phosphorus. In: Kovar JL, Pierzynski GM (eds) Methods of phosphorus analysis for soils, sediments, residuals, and waters, 2nd edn. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, pp 22–24Google Scholar
  56. Sharpley AN, Ahuja LR (1982) Effects of temperature and soil-water content during incubation on the desorption of phosphorus from soil. Soil Sci 133:350–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Siemens J, Ilg K, Lang F, Kaupenjohann M (2004) Adsorption controls mobilization of colloids and leaching of dissolved phosphorus. Eur J Soil Sci 55:253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sims JT (2009) Soil test phosphorus: principles and methods. In: Kovar JL, Pierzynski GM (eds) Methods of phosphorus analysis for soils, sediments, residuals and waters, 2nd edn. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, pp 9–19Google Scholar
  59. Sparks DL (2003) Environmental soil chemistry, 2nd edn. Elsevier Inc., BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  60. Townsend AR, Porder S (2012) Agricultural legacies, food production and its environmental consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:5917–5918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ulén B, Djodjic F, Etana A et al (2011) The need for an improved risk index for phosphorus losses to water from tile-drained agricultural land. J Hydrol 400:234–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Uusitalo R, Tuhkanen HRH-R (2008) Phosphorus saturation of Finnish soils: evaluating an easy oxalate extraction method. Agric Food Sci 9:61–70Google Scholar
  63. Vale Júnior JF, Souza MIL, Nascimento PPRR, Cruz DL (2011) Solos da Amazônia: etnopedologia e desenvolvimento sustentável. Agro@mbiente Online 5:158–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vettori L (1969) Métodos de análise de solo. Divisão de Pedologia e Fertilidade do Solo, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  65. Whittig LD, Allardice WR, Klute A (1986) X-ray diffraction techniques. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Madison, WI, pp 331–362Google Scholar
  66. Yu W, Ding X, Xue S et al (2013) Effects of organic-matter application on phosphorus adsorption of three soil parent materials. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 13:1003–1017Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rafael Silva Guedes
    • 1
  • Alfonso Rodríguez-Vila
    • 2
  • Rubén Forján
    • 2
  • Emma Fernández Covelo
    • 2
  • Antonio Rodrigues Fernandes
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Agricultural SciencesFederal Rural University of AmazoniaBelémBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Plant Biology and Soil Science, Faculty of BiologyUniversity of VigoVigoSpain

Personalised recommendations