Short-term effects of organo-mineral biochar and organic fertilisers on nitrogen cycling, plant photosynthesis, and nitrogen use efficiency
- 558 Downloads
Organo-mineral biochar fertiliser has the potential to replace conventional biochar and organic fertiliser to improve soil quality and increase plant photosynthesis. This study explored mechanisms involved in nitrogen (N) cycling in both soil and ginger plants (Zingiber officinale: Zingiberaceae) following different treatments including organic fertiliser, commercial bamboo biochar fertiliser, and organo-mineral biochar fertiliser.
Materials and methods
Soil received four treatments including (1) commercial organic fertiliser (5 t ha−1) as the control, (2) commercial bamboo biochar fertiliser (5 t ha−1), (3) organo-mineral biochar fertiliser at a low rate (3 t ha−1), and (4) organo-mineral biochar fertiliser at a high rate (7.5 t ha−1). C and N fractions of soil and plant, and gas exchange measurements were analysed.
Results and discussion
Initially, organo-mineral biochar fertiliser applied at the low rate increased leaf N. Organo-mineral biochar fertiliser applied at the high rate significantly increased N use efficiency (NUE) of the aboveground biomass compared with other treatments and improved photosynthesis compared with the control. There was N fractionation during plant N uptake and assimilation since the 15N enrichment between the root, leaf, and stem were significantly different from zero; however, treatments did not affect this N fractionation.
Organo-mineral biochar fertiliser has agronomic advantages over inorganic and raw organic (manure-based) N fertiliser because it allows farmer to put high concentrations of nutrients into soil without restricting N availability, N uptake, and plant photosynthesis. We recommend applying the low rate of organo-mineral biochar fertiliser as a substitute for commercial organic fertiliser.
KeywordsAdsorption Charcoal Gas exchange Ginger Isotope Organic farming
TTNN was supported by VIED and University of the Sunshine Coast to undertake this study. We thank Mt. Mellum Horticulture for the farm access and facility support. We acknowledge Mr. Geoffrey Lambert and Mr. Radoslaw Bak for the assistance with laboratory analysis and Mr. Murray Elks, Ms. Emma Worthington, Mr. Bruce Randall, Dr. David Walton, Mr. Ross McIntosh, Mr. Ian Darby, Mr. Chris Taylor, and Mrs. April Grey during this experimental establishment and harvest. This study was supported with Seed Funding from University of the Sunshine Coast (USC/CRN2012/03) and Griffith University (EFC-JRE). SHB and CYX were research fellows supported by Collaborative Research Network, University of the Sunshine Coast Research Futures project (CRN2011:08).
- Bai SH, Trueman SJ, Nevenimo T, Hannet G, Bapiwai P, Poienou M, Wallace HM (2017) Effects of shade-tree species and spacing on soil and leaf nutrient concentrations in cocoa plantations at 8 years after establishment. Agric Ecosyst Environ 264:134–143Google Scholar
- Camacho H, Brescia A (2009) The Australian ginger industry: overview of market trends and opportunities. Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, The State of QueenslandGoogle Scholar
- Criss RE (1999) Principles of stable isotope distribution, vol 254. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Doescher PS, Miller RF, Wang J, Rose J (1990) Effects of nitrogen availability on growth and photosynthesis of Artemisia tridentata ssp. Wyomingensis. Great Basin Nat 50:9–19Google Scholar
- Farrar MB (2016) Biochar based fertilizer: effects on yield, plant growth, nutrient uptake and soil fertility. Honours Thesis, University of the Sunshine Coast, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Guertal E (2009) Slow-release nitrogen fertilizers in vegetable production: a review. HortTechnology 19:16–19Google Scholar
- Hall DO, Rao KK (1994) Photosynthesis, 5th edn. Cambridge University Press, Great BritainGoogle Scholar
- He Y, Zhou X, Jiang L, Li M, Du Z, Zhou G, Shao J, Wang X, Xu ZH, Hosseini-Bai S, Wallace H, Xu CY (2016) Effects of biochar application on soil greenhouse gas fluxes: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy 4:743–755Google Scholar
- Hohener P, Aelion CM (2009) Fundamentals of environmental isotopes and their use in biodegradation. In: Aelion CM, Höhener P, Hunkeler D, Aravena R (eds) Environmental isotopes in biodegradation and bioremediation. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 3–22Google Scholar
- Isbell R (1996) The Australian Soil Classification. Australian soil and land survey handbook series, vol 4. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
- Joseph S, Graber E, Chia C, Munroe P, Donne S, Thomas T, Nielsen S, Marjo C, Rutlidge H, Pan GX, Li L, Taylor P, Rawal A, Hook J (2013) Shifting paradigms: development of high-efficiency biochar fertilizers based on nano-structures and soluble components. Carbon Manag 4:323–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Joseph S, Anawar HM, Storer P, Blackwell P, Chia C, Lin Y, Munroe P, Donne S, Horvat J, Wang J, Solaiman ZM (2015) Effects of enriched biochars containing magnetic iron nanoparticles on mycorrhizal colonisation, plant growth, nutrient uptake and soil quality improvement. Pedosphere 25:749–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Joseph S, Xu C, Wallace H, Farrar M, Nguyen TN, Bai S, Solaiman Z (2016) Biochar production from agricultural and forestry wastes and microbial interactions. In: Wong JWC, Tyagi RD, Pandey A (eds) Current developments in biotechnology and bioengineering: solid waste management, 1st edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 443–474Google Scholar
- Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology, 1st edn. Earthscan, London, pp 1–12Google Scholar
- Motulsky H (1995) Intuitive biostatistics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Nair KPP (2013) The agronomy and economy of turmeric and ginger: the invaluable medicinal spice crops, 1st edn. Elsevier, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Sohi SP, Krull E, Lopez-Capel E, Bol R (2010) A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. In: Sparks DL (ed) Advances in agronomy, vol 105. Elsevier Science Publishing, London, pp 47–82Google Scholar
- Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas ML, Niinemets U, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L, Pyankov VI, Roumet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ, Villar R (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar