Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 2217–2228 | Cite as

Forms of Cu (II), Zn (II), and Pb (II) compounds in technogenically transformed soils adjacent to the Karabashmed copper smelter

  • Tatiana M. Minkina
  • Vitaly G. Linnik
  • Dina G. Nevidomskaya
  • Tatiana V. Bauer
  • Saglara S. Mandzhieva
  • Vitaliy Y. Khoroshavin
Reclamation and Management of Polluted Soils: Options and Case Studies

Abstract

Purpose

The aim was to study Cu (II), Zn (II), and Pb (II) forms in technogenically transformed soils adjacent to the Karabashmed copper smelter.

Materials and methods

Studies were performed in the plume zone of the Karabash smelter and in the floodplains of Ryzhii Brook and Sak-Egla River. Geomorphological and geochemical migration processes prevail in technogenic landscapes. The differentiation of landscape-geochemical conditions plays the dominant role, which determines the localization of metals. The total Mn, Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd, and As contents and the macroelement compositions of soils were determined by X-ray fluorescence. The composition of Cu, Pb, and Zn compounds in soils was determined by the Tessier sequential fractionation. The determination of the geochemical fractions of heavy metals in soils is a key issue in the study of their mobility. The metals were fractionated into the following five fractions: exchangeable, bound to carbonates, bound to Fe and Mn oxides, bound to organic matter, and residual fractions.

Results and discussion

It is shown that the total Zn and As contents in the 0- to 5-cm layer of soils on monitoring plots exceed their lithosphere clarks in hundreds of times, and the total Cu, Pb, and Cr contents exceed their lithosphere clarks in tens of times. Factors and processes controlling the distribution and transport of Cu, Pb, and Zn forms in soils were determined. According to landscape-geochemical differentiation, the eluvial (automorphic) catena (plot T4) takes the main technogenic load of dust fallouts from the Karabash copper smelter. The accumulation of material brought from above and the geochemical precipitation of discharges from tailings dumps occur in superaqual catenas (plots T1, T2, and T3). In the technogenically transformed soils, the basic stabilizers of the mobility of Cu is organic matter, for Pb it is Fe-Mn (hydro) oxides, and for Zn - it is clay minerals.

Conclusions

The distributions of Cu, Zn, and Pb forms in the studied technogenically transformed soils are due to a number of factors: First, these are the composition of technogenic pollutants contaminating ecosystems and the time during which the contamination occurred, and second, this is the combination of physicochemical properties controlling the buffer properties of the polydisperse system of soils and parent materials.

Keywords

Heavy metals Spolic Technosols Mobility and fractional composition Technogenic contamination South Urals 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Ministry of Education and science of Russian Federation, project no. 5.948.2017/PCh; the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 12-05-10074-k and no. 16-34-00573 mol_a; and Grant of President of Russian Federation no. 7285.2016.5.

References

  1. Akkajit P, Tongcumpou C (2010) Fractionation of metals in cadmium contaminated soil: relation and effect on bioavailable cadmium. Geoderma 156:126–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aminov PG (2008) Studying the composition of epiphytosuspensions for the indication of mining technogenesis. Vest Orenburg Gos Univ no 6(88):93–100 (in Russian) Google Scholar
  3. Aminov PG, Lonshchakova GF (2009) Sedimentation in watercourses under the effect of sulfide ore tailings (Karabash geotechnical system, Southern Urals). Metallogeniya drevnikh i sovremennykh okeanov 15:319–324 (in Russian) Google Scholar
  4. Aminov PG, Udachin VN, Filippova KA, Lonshchakova GF, Kaigorodiva SY (2013) Geochemistry of soils of the Karabash geotechnical system (Southern Urals). Nauchn Obozr no 12:73–78 (in Russian) Google Scholar
  5. Aminov PG, Udachin VN, Filippova KA, Lonshchakova GF, Udachin LG (2015) Determination of the discharge of surface and hidden currents using a chemical label and the estimation of heavy metal load on the Sak-Elga River under the effect of acid mine waters. In: Vaulin SD (ed) Proceedings of the 67th scientific conference. Chelyabisk, pp 403–411 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  6. Belogub EV, Udachin VN, Korablev GG (2003) Karabash ore area (Southern Urals). Guide to geological-ecological excursion. RAN (in Russian)Google Scholar
  7. Cerqueira B, Vega FA, Serra C, Silva LFO, Andrade ML (2011) Time of flight secondary ionmass spectrometry and high-resolution transmission lectronmicroscopy/energy dispersive spectroscopy: a preliminary study of the distribution of Cu 2+ and Cu 2+/Pb2+ on a Bt horizon surfaces. J Hazard Mater 195:422–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chernien’kova TV (2002) Response of forest plants on the industrial contamination. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian) Google Scholar
  9. Covelo EF, Vega FA, Andrade ML (2007a) Competitive sorption and desorption of heavy metals by individual soil components. J Hazard Mater 140:308–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Covelo EF, Vega FA, Andrade ML (2007b) Heavy metal sorption and desorption capacity of soils containing endogenous contaminants. J Hazard Mater 143:419–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Covelo EF, Matías JM, Vega FA, Reigosa MJ, Andrade ML (2008) A tree regression analysis of factors determining the sorption and retention of heavy metals by soil. Geoderma 147:75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dinu M, Linnik V, Tatsy Y, and Kremleva T (2013) Content of some metals in soils at different distances from the Karabash Copper Smelter. In: EGU General Assembly 2013. Geophysical Research Abstracts. Vol. 15, EGU 2013–9044Google Scholar
  13. FAO (2006) World Reference Base for soil resources. ISRIC, RomeGoogle Scholar
  14. Formentini TA, Mallmann FJK, Pinheiro A, CVS F, Bender MA, Veiga M, Santos DR, Doelsch E (2015) Copper and zinc accumulation and fractionation in a clayey Hapludox soil subject to long-term pig slurry application. Sci Total Environ 536:831–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gashkina NA, Tatsii YG, Udachin VN, Aminov PG (2015) Biogeochemical indication of environmental contamination: a case study of a large copper smelter. Geochem Int 53(3):253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldshmidt VM (1930) Distribution principles of chemical elements in minerals and hard rocks. In: Geochemistry of rare elements, Moscow, pp 215–242 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  17. GOST 12536 (2003) Soils. Methods of laboratory particle size and microaggregate distribution (in Russian)Google Scholar
  18. Kalabin GV, Moiseenko TI (2011) Ecodynamics of technogenic provinces of mining production: from degradation to restoration. Dokl Earth Sci 437(1):432–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Linnik VG, Khoroshavin VY, Pologrudova OA (2013) Natural landscapes degradation and chemical contamination in the near zone of Karabash copper-smelting industrial complex. Tyumen State University Herald 4:84–91Google Scholar
  20. Ma LQ, Rao GN (1997) Chemical fractionation of cadmium, copper, nickel, and zinc in contaminated soils. J Environ Qual 26:259–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Makunina GS (2001) Geoecological features of the Karabash technogenic anomaly. Geoekol Inzh Geol Gidrogeol Geokriol 3:221–226Google Scholar
  22. Makunina GS (2002) Chemical properties of soils in the Karabash technogenic area. Eur Soil Sci 35:326–333Google Scholar
  23. Methodological recommendations of the scientific council on the methods of mineralogical studies no. 158 (2008) Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  24. Minkina TM, Motusova GV, Nazarenko OG, Mandzhieva SS (2010) Heavy metal compounds in soil: transformation upon soil pollution and ecological significance. Nova Science Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  25. Minkina TM, Soldatov AV, Motuzova GV, Podkovyrina YS, Nevidomskaya DG (2014a) Speciation of copper and zinc compounds in artificially contaminated chernozem by X-ray absorption spectroscopy and extractive fractionation. J Geochem Explor 144:306–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Minkina TM, Bauer TV, Batukaev AA, Mandzhieva SS, Burachevskaya MV, Sushkova SN, Varduni TV, Sherstnev AK, Kalinichenko VP (2015) Transformation of technogenic Cu and Zn compounds in chernozem. Environ Eng Manag J 14(2):481–486Google Scholar
  27. Minkina TM, Soldatov AV, Nevidomskaya DG, Motuzova GV, Podkovyrina YS, Mandzhieva SS (2016) New approaches to studying heavy metals in soils by X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XANES) and extractive fractionation. Geochem Int 54(2):197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Myers J, Thorbjornsen K (2004) Identifying metals contamination in soil: a geochemical approach. Soil Sediment Contam 13:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nannoni F, Protano G, Riccobono F (2011) Fractionation and geochemical mobility of heavy elements in soils of a mining area in northern Kosovo. Geoderma 16:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pinskii DL, Minkina TM (2013) Regularities of Cu, Pb and Zn adsorption by chernozems of the South of Russia. Eur J Soil Sci 2:59–68Google Scholar
  31. Pinskii DL, Minkina TM, Mandzhieva SS, Fedorov UA, Bauer TV, Nevidomskaya DG (2014) Adsorption features of Cu(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II) by an ordinary chernozem from nitrate, chloride, acetate, and sulfate solutions. Eur Soil Sci 47:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rykus MV, Bazhin EA, Savel’ev DE, Snachev VI (2009) Geology and geological features of ultrabasites and gabbroids of the Southern and Middle Urals junction zone (Kyshtym area). Neftegaz Delo 7:72–80Google Scholar
  33. Shaheen SM, Rinklebe J (2014) Geochemical fractions of chromium, copper, and zinc and their vertical distribution in floodplain soil profiles along the Central Elbe River, Germany. Geoderma 228-229:142–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shcherbakova EP (2000) Recent mineral formation in technogenic ponds of sulfate type (Southern Urals). Mineralogiya Tekhnogenezisa 1:169–171Google Scholar
  35. Strawn DG, Palmer NE, Furnare LJ, Goodell C, Amonette JE, Kukkadaru RK (2004) Copper sorption mechanisms on smectites. Clay Clay Miner 52(3):321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tessier A, Campbell PGC, Bisson M (1979) Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Anal Chem 51:844–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Udachin V, Williamson BJ, Purvis OW, Dubbin W, Brooks S, Herrington RJ, Spiro B, Coste B, Mikhailova I (2003) Assessment of environmental impacts of active smelter operations and abandoned mines in Karabash, Ural Mountains of Russia. Sustain Dev 11(3):133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Udachin VN, Vul’yamson BD, Rykov SP (2005) Phase composition of dusts from metallurgical enterprises of the Southern Urals and their behavior in model solutions. Mineralogiya Tekhnogenezisa 6:97–105Google Scholar
  39. Udachin VN, Williamson B, Kitagava R, Lonschakova GF, Aminov PG, Udachina LG (2011) Chemical composition and mechanisms of formation of acid mine waters of Southern Urals. Water Chem Ecol 10:3–8Google Scholar
  40. Ul'rikh D, Timofeeva S (2015) Modern state of the tailing dump in Karabash city and its influence of the technogenesis of the adjoining territory. Ecol Ind Russia 19(1):56–59Google Scholar
  41. Vega FA, Covelo EF, Andrade ML (2005) Limiting factors for reforestation of mine spoils from Galicia (Spain). Land Degrad Dev 16(1):27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vega FA, Andrade ML, Covelo EF (2010) Influence of soil properties on the sorption and retention of cadmium, copper and lead, separately and together, by 20 soil horizons: comparison of linear regression and tree regression analyses. J Hazard Mater 174:522–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vinogradov AP (1957) Geochemistry of rare and dispersed chemical elements in soils. RAN, Moscow (in Russian) Google Scholar
  44. Vorob’eva LA (2006) Theory and practice of the chemical analysis of soils. GEOS, Moscow (in Russian) Google Scholar
  45. Williamson BJ, Udachin VN, Purvis OW, Spiro B, Cressey G, Jones GC (2004) Characterization of airborne particulate pollution in the Cu smelter and former mining town of Karabash, South Ural mountains of Russia. Environ Monit Asses 98(1–3):235–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yin H, Tan N, Liu C, Wang J, Liang X, Qu M, Feng X, Qiu G, Tan W, Liu F (2016) The associations of heavy metals with crystalline iron oxides in the polluted soils around the mining areas in Guangdong Province, China. Chemosphere 161:181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tatiana M. Minkina
    • 1
  • Vitaly G. Linnik
    • 2
    • 3
  • Dina G. Nevidomskaya
    • 1
  • Tatiana V. Bauer
    • 1
  • Saglara S. Mandzhieva
    • 1
  • Vitaliy Y. Khoroshavin
    • 4
  1. 1.Southern Federal UniversityRostov-on-DonRussia
  2. 2.Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Faculty of GeographyLomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  4. 4.Tyumen State UniversityTyumenRussia

Personalised recommendations