Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 1537–1553 | Cite as

Methodological perspectives on the application of compound-specific stable isotope fingerprinting for sediment source apportionment

  • Hari R. Upadhayay
  • Samuel Bodé
  • Marco Griepentrog
  • Dries Huygens
  • Roshan M. Bajracharya
  • William H. Blake
  • Gerd Dercon
  • Lionel Mabit
  • Max Gibbs
  • Brice X. Semmens
  • Brian C. Stock
  • Wim Cornelis
  • Pascal Boeckx
Frontiers in Soils and Sediments • Review Article

Abstract

Purpose

Compound-specific stable isotope (CSSI) fingerprinting of sediment sources is a recently introduced tool to overcome some limitations of conventional approaches for sediment source apportionment. The technique uses the 13C CSSI signature of plant-derived fatty acids (δ13C-fatty acids) associated with soil minerals as a tracer. This paper provides methodological perspectives to advance the use of CSSI fingerprinting in combination with stable isotope mixing models (SIMMs) to apportion the relative contributions of different sediment sources (i.e. land uses) to sediments.

Results and discussion

CSSI fingerprinting allows quantitative estimation of the relative contribution of sediment sources within a catchment at a spatio-temporal resolution, taking into account the following approaches. First, application of CSSI fingerprinting techniques to complex catchments presents particular challenges and calls for well-designed sampling strategies and data handling. Hereby, it is essential to balance the effort required for representative sample collection and analyses against the need to accurately quantify the variability within the system. Second, robustness of the CSSI approach depends on the specificity and conservativeness of the δ13C-FA fingerprint. Therefore, saturated long-chain (>20 carbon atoms) FAs, which are biosynthesised exclusively by higher plants and are more stable than the more commonly used short-chain FAs, should be used. Third, given that FA concentrations can vary largely between sources, concentration-dependent SIMMs that are also able to incorporate δ13C-FA variability should be standard operation procedures to correctly assess the contribution of sediment sources via SIMMs.

Conclusions

This paper reflects on the use of δ13C-FAs in erosion studies and provides recommendations for its application. We strongly advise the use of saturated long-chain (>20 carbon atoms) FAs as tracers and concentration-dependent Bayesian SIMMs. We anticipate progress in CSSI sediment fingerprinting from two current developments: (i) development of hierarchical Bayesian SIMMs to better address catchment complexity and (ii) incorporation of dual isotope approaches (δ13C- and δ2H-FA) to improve estimates of sediment sources.

Keywords

Biotracers Compound-specific stable isotope (CSSI) analysis Erosion Fatty acids (FAs) Sediment fingerprinting Stable isotope mixing models (SIMMS

References

  1. Agrawal S, Galy V, Sanyal P, Eglinton T (2014) C-4 plant expansion in the Ganga Plain during the last glacial cycle: insights from isotopic composition of vascular plant biomarkers. Org Geochem 67:58–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alewell C, Birkholz A, Meusburger K, Schindler-Wildhaber Y, Mabit L (2016) Quantitative sediment source attribution with compound-specific isotope analysis in a C3 plant-dominated catchment (central Switzerland). Biogeosciences 13:1587–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amblés A, Colina-Tejada A, Jambu P, Lemee L, Parlanti E (1998) Experimental leaching of podzol soil lipids. Nature and biological origin of water soluble components. Agrochimica 42:158–171Google Scholar
  4. Amblés A, Jambu P, Parlanti E, Joffre J, Riffe C (1994) Incorporation of natural monoacids from plant residues into an hydromorphic forest podzol. Eur J Soil Sci 45:175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Badeck FW, Tcherkez G, Nogues S, Piel C, Ghashghaie J (2005) Post-photo synthetic fractionation of stable carbon isotopes between plant organs—a widespread phenomenon. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 19:1381–1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banowetz GM, Whittaker GW, Dierksen KP, Azevedo MD, Kennedy AC, Griffith SM, Steiner JJ (2006) Fatty acid methyl ester analysis to identify sources of soil in surface water. J Environ Qual 35:133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartley R, Bainbridge ZT, Lewis SE, Kroon FJ, Wilkinson SN, Brodie JE, Silburn DM (2014) Relating sediment impacts on coral reefs to watershed sources, processes and management: a review. Sci Total Environ 468:1138–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bayrak Y (2006) Application of Langmuir isotherm to saturated fatty acid adsorption. Micropor Mesopor Mat 87:203–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benstead JP, March JG, Fry B, Ewel KC, Pringle CM (2006) Testing Isosource: stable isotope analysis of a tropical fishery with diverse organic matter sources. Ecology 87:326–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bergamino L, Dalu T, Richoux NB (2014) Evidence of spatial and temporal changes in sources of organic matter in estuarine sediments: stable isotope and fatty acid analyses. Hydrobiologia 732:133–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bianchi TS, Canuel EA (2011) Chemical biomarkers in aquatic ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey 417 pp CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blake WH, Ficken KJ, Taylor P, Russell MA, Walling DE (2012) Tracing crop-specific sediment sources in agricultural catchments. Geomorphology 139:322–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blessing M, Jochmann MA, Schmidt TC (2008) Pitfalls in compound-specific isotope analysis of environmental samples. Anal Bioanal Chem 390:591–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blonder B, Lamanna C, Violle C, Enquist BJ (2014) The n-dimensional hypervolume. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:595–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boardman J (2006) Soil erosion science: reflections on the limitations of current approaches. Catena 68:73–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Boecklen WJ, Yarnes CT, Cook BA, James AC (2011) On the use of stable isotopes in trophic ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 42:411–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bollasina MA (2014) Hydrology: probing the monsoon pulse. Nat Clim Chang 4:422–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bourgeois S, Pruski AM, Sun MY, Buscail R, Lantoine F, Kerherve P, Vetion G, Riviere B, Charles F (2011) Distribution and lability of land-derived organic matter in the surface sediments of the Rhone prodelta and the adjacent shelf (Mediterranean Sea, France): a multi proxy study. Biogeosciences 8:3107–3125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brandt C, Cadisch G, Nguyen LT, Vien TD, Rasche F (2016) Compound-specific δ13C isotopes and Bayesian inference for erosion estimates under different land use in Vietnam. Geoderma Regional 7:311–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brusco MJ (2014) A comparison of simulated annealing algorithms for variable selection in principal component analysis and discriminant analysis. Comput Stat Data Anal 77:38–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bull ID, van Bergen PF, Poulton R, Evershed RP (1998) Organic geochemical studies of soils from the Rothamsted classical experiments—II. Soils from the Hoosfield Spring Barley Experiment treated with different quantities of manure. Org Geochem 28:11–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bunzel K, Schaefer RB, Thraen D, Kattwinkel M (2015) Pesticide runoff from energy crops: a threat to aquatic invertebrates? Sci Total Environ 537:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Canuel EA, Martens CS (1996) Reactivity of recently deposited organic matter: degradation of lipid compounds near the sediment-water interface. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 60:1793–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cerdeira JO, Silva PD, Cadima J, Minhoto M (2015) Subselect: selecting variables subsets. R package version 0.12–5. Web http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=subselect. Accessed. May 20, 2016
  25. Chen FX, Fang NF, Shi ZH (2016) Using biomarkers as fingerprint properties to identify sediment sources in a small catchment. Sci Total Environ 557:123–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chikaraishi Y (2014) 13C/12C signatures in plants and algae. In: Holland HD, Turekian KK (eds) Treatise on geochemistry. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 95–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chikaraishi Y, Naraoka H (2003) Compound-specific delta D-delta C-13 analyses of n-alkanes extracted from terrestrial and aquatic plants. Phytochemistry 63:361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chikaraishi Y, Naraoka H (2005) Delta C-13 and delta D identification of sources of lipid biomarkers in sediments of Lake Haruna (Japan). Geochim Cosmochim Acta 69:3285–3297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Chikaraishi Y, Naraoka H (2007) Delta C-13 and delta D relationships among three n-alkyl compound classes (n-alkanoic acid, n-alkane and n-alkanol) of terrestrial higher plants. Org Geochem 38:198–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Chikaraishi Y, Naraoka H, Poulson SR (2004a) Carbon and hydrogen isotopic fractionation during lipid biosynthesis in a higher plant (Cryptomeria japonica). Phytochemistry 65:323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Chikaraishi Y, Naraoka H, Poulson SR (2004b) Hydrogen and carbon isotopic fractionations of lipid biosynthesis among terrestrial (C3, C4 and CAM) and aquatic plants. Phytochemistry 65:1369–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Collins AL, Pulley S, Foster IDL, Gellis A, Porto P, Horowitz AJ (2016) Sediment source fingerprinting as an aid to catchment management: a review of the current state of knowledge and a methodological decision-tree for end-users. J Environ Manag. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.075 Google Scholar
  33. Collins AL, Walling DE, Leeks GJL (1998) Use of composite fingerprints to determine the provenance of the contemporary suspended sediment load transported by rivers. Earth Surf Process Landf 23:31–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Collins AL, Zhang YS, Duethmann D, Walling DE, Black KS (2013) Using a novel tracing-tracking framework to source fine-grained sediment loss to watercourses at sub-catchment scale. Hydrol Process 27:959–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Cooper RJ, Krueger T, Hiscock KM, Rawlins BG (2014) Sensitivity of fluvial sediment source apportionment to mixing model assumptions: a Bayesian model comparison. Water Resour Res 50:9031–9047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Cooper RJ, Pedentchouk N, Hiscock KM, Disdle P, Krueger T, Rawlins BG (2015) Apportioning sources of organic matter in streambed sediments: an integrated molecular and compound-specific stable isotope approach. Sci Total Environ 520:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dai JH, Sun MY (2007) Organic matter sources and their use by bacteria in the sediments of the Altamaha estuary during high and low discharge periods. Org Geochem 38:1–15Google Scholar
  38. Dawson TE, Mambelli S, Plamboeck AH, Templer PH, Tu KP (2002) Stable isotopes in plant ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:507–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. de la Fuente MA, Luna P, Juarez M (2006) Chromatographic techniques to determine conjugated linoleic acid isomers. Trends Anal Chem 25:917–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. D'Haen K, Verstraeten G, Degryse P (2012) Fingerprinting historical fluvial sediment fluxes. Prog Phys Geogr 36:154–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Dinel H, Schnitzer M, Mehuys GR (1990) Soil lipids: origin, nature, content, decomposition, and effect on soil physical properties. In: Bollag JM, Stotzky G (eds) Soil biochemistry, vol 6. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 397–429Google Scholar
  42. Drenzek NJ, Montlucon DB, Yunker MB, Macdonald RW, Eglinton TI (2007) Constraints on the origin of sedimentary organic carbon in the Beaufort Sea from coupled molecular C-13 and C-14 measurements. Mar Chem 103:146–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Droppo IG (2001) Rethinking what constitutes suspended sediment. Hydrol Process 15:1551–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Dungait JAJ, Docherty G, Straker V, Evershed RP (2008) Interspecific variation in bulk tissue, fatty acid and monosaccharide delta(13)C values of leaves from a mesotrophic grassland plant community. Phytochemistry 69:2041–2051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Dungait JAJ, Docherty G, Straker V, Evershed RP (2010) Seasonal variations in bulk tissue, fatty acid and monosaccharide delta C-13 values of leaves from mesotrophic grassland plant communities under different grazing managements. Phytochemistry 71:415–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Fang JD, Wu FC, Xiong YQ, Li FS, Du XM, An D, Wang LF (2014) Source characterization of sedimentary organic matter using molecular and stable carbon isotopic composition of n-alkanes and fatty acids in sediment core from Lake Dianchi, China. Sci Total Environ 473:410–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Feakins SJ, Bentley LP, Salinas N, Shenkin A, Blonder B, Goldsmith GR, Ponton C, Arvin LJ, Wu MS, Peters T, West AJ, Martin RE, Enquist BJ, Asner GP, Malhi Y (2016) Plant leaf wax biomarkers capture gradients in hydrogen isotopes of precipitation from the Andes and Amazon. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 182:155–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Fletcher WK, Muda J (1999) Influence of selective logging and sedimentological process on geochemistry of tropical rainforest streams. J Geochem Explor 67:211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Fox JF, Martin DK (2015) Sediment fingerprinting for calibrating a soil erosion and sediment-yield model in mixed land-use watersheds. J Hydrol Eng 20:C4014002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Fox JF, Papanicolaou AN (2008) An un-mixing model to study watershed erosion processes. Adv Water Resour 31:96–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Galy V, Eglinton T (2011) Protracted storage of biospheric carbon in the Ganges-Brahmaputra basin. Nat Geosci 4:843–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Gardner R, Gerrard A (2003) Runoff and soil erosion on cultivated rainfed terraces in the Middle Hills of Nepal. Appl Geogr 23:23–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Gellis AC, Walling DE (2011) Sediment source singerprinting (tracing) and sediment budgets as tools in targeting river and watershed restoration programs. In: Simon A, Bennett SJ, Castro JM (eds) Stream restoration in dynamic fluvial systems: scientific approaches, analyses, and tools. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 263–291Google Scholar
  54. Gibbs MM (2008) Identifying source soils in contemporary estuarine sediments: a new compound-specific isotope method. Estuar Coasts 31:344–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Gibbs MM (2013) Protocols on the use of the CSSI technique to identify and apportion soil sources from land use. Report no: HAM2013–106. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd, Hamilton, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  56. Goni MA, Ruttenberg KC, Eglinton TI (1998) A reassessment of the sources and importance of landderived organic matter in surface sediments from the Gulf of Mexico. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 62:3055–3075Google Scholar
  57. Granek EF, Compton JE, Phillips DL (2009) Mangrove-exported nutrient incorporation by sessile coral reef invertebrates. Ecosystems 12:462–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Griepentrog M, Eglinton TI, Hagedorn F, Schmidt MWI, Wiesenberg GLB (2015) Interactive effects of elevated CO2 and nitrogen deposition on fatty acid molecular and isotope composition of above- and belowground tree biomass and forest soil fractions. Glob Chang Biol 21:473–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Grieu P, Lucero DW, Ardiani R, Ehleringer JR (2001) The mean depth of soil water uptake by two temperate grassland species over time subjected to mild soil water deficit and competitive association. Plant Soil 230:197–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hancock GJ, Revill AT (2013) Erosion source discrimination in a rural Australian catchment using compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA). Hydrol Process 27:923–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Haregeweyn N, Melesse B, Tsunekawa A, Tsubo M, Meshesha D, Balana BB (2012) Reservoir sedimentation and its mitigating strategies: a case study of Angereb reservoir (NW Ethiopia). J Soils Sediments 12:291–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Heaton THE (1999) Spatial, species, and temporal variations in the C-13/C-12 ratios of C-3 plants: implications for palaeodiet studies. J Archaeol Sci 26:637–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hobbie EA, Werner RA (2004) Intramolecular, compound-specific, and bulk carbon isotope patterns in C-3 and C-4 plants: a review and synthesis. New Phytol 161:371–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hopkins JB, Ferguson JM (2012) Estimating the diets of animals using stable isotopes and a comprehensive Bayesian mixing model. PLoS One 7:e28478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hou J, D'Andrea WJ, MacDonald D, Huang Y (2007) Hydrogen isotopic variability in leaf waxes among terrestrial and aquatic plants around Blood Pond, Massachusetts (USA). Org Geochem 38:977–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hu JF, Zhang HB, Peng PA (2006) Fatty acid composition of surface sediments in the subtropical Pearl River estuary and adjacent shelf, Southern China. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 66:346–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Huang YS, Shuman B, Wang Y, Webb T (2004) Hydrogen isotope ratios of individual lipids in lake sediments as novel tracers of climatic and environmental change: a surface sediment test. J Paleolimnol 31:363–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ichihara K, Fukubayashi Y (2010) Preparation of fatty acid methyl esters for gas-liquid chromatography. J Lipid Res 51:635–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Jackson A (2016) SIBER. Web https://github.com/AndrewLJackson/SIBER. Accessed. 15 July, 2016
  70. Jandl G, Baum C, Leinweber P (2013) Crop-specific differences in the concentrations of lipids in leachates from the root zone. Arch Agron Soil Sci 59:119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Jandl G, Leinweber P, Schulten HR, Ekschmitt K (2005) Contribution of primary organic matter to the fatty acid pool in agricultural soils. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1033–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Jones AA, Sessions AL, Campbell BJ, Li C, Valentine DL (2008) D/H ratios of fatty acids from marine particulate organic matter in the California Borderland Basins. Org Geochem 39:485–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Koch A, McBratney A, Adams M, Field D, Hill R, Crawford J, Minasny B, Lal R, Abbott L, O'Donnell A, Angers D, Baldock J, Barbier E, Binkley D, Parton W, Wall DH, Bird M, Bouma J, Chenu C, Flora CB, Goulding K, Grunwald S, Hempel J, Jastrow J, Lehmann J, Lorenz K, Morgan CL, Rice CW, Whitehead D, Young I, Zimmermann M (2013) Soil security: solving the global soil crisis. Global Policy 4:434–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Krull E, Sachse D, Muegler I, Thiele A, Gleixner G (2006) Compound-specific delta(13)C and delta(2)H analyses of plant and soil organic matter: a preliminary assessment of the effects of vegetation change on ecosystem hydrology. Soil Biol Biochem 38:3211–3221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Liu JZ, Liu WG, An ZS (2015) Insight into the reasons of leaf wax delta D n-alkane values between grasses and woods. Sci Bull 60:549–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Liu WG, Yang H (2008) Multiple controls for the variability of hydrogen isotopic compositions in higher plant n-alkanes from modern ecosystems. Glob Chang Biol 14:2166–2177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Liu WG, Yang H, Li LW (2006) Hydrogen isotopic compositions of n-alkanes from terrestrial plants correlate with their ecological life forms. Oecologia 150:330–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Loh PS, Chen CTA, Lou JY, Anshari GZ, Chen HY, Wang JT (2012) Comparing lignin-derived phenols, delta C-13 values, OC/N ratio and C-14 age between sediments in the Kaoping (Taiwan) and the Kapuas (Kalimantan, Indonesia) rivers. Aquat Geochem 18:141–158Google Scholar
  79. Martinez-Carreras N, Udelhoven T, Krein A, Gallart F, Iffly JF, Ziebel J, Hoffmann L, Pfister L, Walling DE (2010) The use of sediment colour measured by diffuse reflectance spectrometry to determine sediment sources: application to the Attert River catchment (Luxembourg). J Hydro 382:49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Matsumoto K, Kawamura K, Uchida M, Shibata Y (2007) Radiocarbon content and stable carbon isotopic ratios of individual fatty acids in subsurface soil: implication for selective microbial degradation and modification of soil organic matter. Geochem J 41:483–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Milinsk MC, Matsushita M, Visentainer JV, de Oliveira CC, de Souza NE (2008) Comparative analysis of eight esterification methods in the quantitative determination of vegetable oil fatty acid methyl esters (FAME). J Braz Chem Soc 19:1475–1483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Miller JR, Miller SMO (2007) Contaminated rivers: a geomorphological-geochemical approach to site assessment and remediation. Springer Science and Business Media, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 418 pp Google Scholar
  83. Montanarella L, Pennock DJ, McKenzie N, Badraoui M, Chaude V, Bpatista I, Mamo T, Yemefack M, Aulakh MS, Yagi K, Hong SY, Vijarnsorn P, Zhang GL, Arrouays D, Black H, Krasilnikov P, Sobocka J, Alegre J, Henriquez CR, Mendonca-Santos MDL, Taboada M, Espinosa-Victoria D, AlShankiti A, AlviPanah SK, Elskeikh EAEM, Hempel J, Arbestrain MC, Nachtergaele FRV (2016) World’s soils are under threat. Soil 2:79–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Moore JW, Semmens BX (2008) Incorporating uncertainty and prior information into stable isotope mixing models. Ecol Lett 11:470–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Mueller KE, Polissar PJ, Oleksyn J, Freeman KH (2012) Differentiating temperate tree species and their organs using lipid biomarkers in leaves, roots and soil. Org Geochem 52:130–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Mukundan R, Walling DE, Gellis AC, Slattery MC, Radcliffe DE (2012) Sediment source fingerprinting: transforming from a research tool to a management tool. J Am Water Resour Assoc 48:1241–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Naraoka H, Yamada K, Ishiwatari R (1995) Carbon isotopic difference of saturated long-chain n-fatty acids between a terrestrial and a marine sediment. Geochem J 29:189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Nearing MA, Pruski FF, O'Neal MR (2004) Expected climate change impacts on soil erosion rates: a review. J Soil Water Conserv 59:43–50Google Scholar
  89. Niggemann J, Schubert CJ (2006) Fatty acid biogeochemistry of sediments from the Chilean coastal upwelling region: sources and diagenetic changes. Org Geochem 37:626–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Olley J, Caitcheon G (2000) Major element chemistry of sediments from the Darling-Barwon River and its tributaries: implications for sediment and phosphorus sources. Hydrol Process 14:1159–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Ouyang XG, Guo F, Bu HM (2015) Lipid biomarkers and pertinent indices from aquatic environment record paleoclimate and paleoenvironment changes. Quat Sci Rev 123:180–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Owens PN, Batalla RJ, Collins AJ, Gomez B, Hicks DM, Horowitz AJ, Kondolf GM, Marden M, Page MJ, Peacock DH, Petticrew EL, Salomons W, Trustrum NA (2005) Fine-grained sediment in river systems: environmental significance and management issues. River Res Appl 21:693–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Panagos P, Borrelli P, Poesen J, Ballabio C, Lugato E, Meusburger K, Montanarella L, Alewell C (2015) The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe. Environ Sci Pol 54:438–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Parnell AC, Inger R, Bearhop S, Jackson AL (2010) Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too much variation. PLoS One 5:e9672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Parnell AC, Phillips DL, Bearhop S, Semmens BX, Ward EJ, Moore JW, Jackson AL, Grey J, Kelly DJ, Inger R (2013) Bayesian stable isotope mixing models. Environmetrics 24:387–399Google Scholar
  96. Perks MT, Warburton J, Bracken L (2014) Critical assessment and validation of a time-integrating fluvial suspended sediment sampler. Hydrol Process 28:4795–4807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Phillips DL, Gregg JW (2003) Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too many sources. Oecologia 136:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Phillips DL, Inger R, Bearhop S, Jackson AL, Moore JW, Parnell AC, Semmens BX, Ward EJ (2014) Best practices for use of stable isotope mixing models in food-web studies. Can J Zoolog 92:823–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Phillips DL, Koch PL (2002) Incorporating concentration dependence in stable isotope mixing models. Oecologia 130:114–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Phillips JM, Russell MA, Walling DE (2000) Time-integrated sampling of fluvial suspended sediment: a simple methodology for small catchments. Hydrol Process 14:2589–2602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Pimentel D (2006) Soil erosion: a food and environmental threat. Environ Dev Sustainability 8:119–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Pimentel D, Burgess M (2013) Soil erosion threatens food production. Agriculture 3:443–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Ponton C, West AJ, Feakins SJ, Galy V (2014) Leaf wax biomarkers in transit record river catchment composition. Geophys Res Lett 41:6420–6427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Radke J, Bechtel A, Gaupp R, Puttmann W, Schwark L, Sachse D, Gleixner G (2005) Correlation between hydrogen isotope ratios of lipid biomarkers and sediment maturity. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 69:5517–5530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Reiffarth DG, Petticrew EL, Owens PN, Lobb DA (2016) Sources of variability in fatty acid (FA) biomarkers in the application of compound-specific stable isotopes (CSSIs) to soil and sediment fingerprinting and tracing: a review. Sci Total Environ 565:8–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Rhoton FE, Emmerich WE, DiCarlo DA, McChesney DS, Nearing MA, Ritchie JC (2008) Identification of suspended sediment sources using soil characteristics in a semiarid watershed. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:1102–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Rickson RJ, Deeks LK, Graves A, Harris JAH, Kibblewhite MG, Sakrabani R (2015) Input constraints to food production: the impact of soil degradation. Food Sec 7:351–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Rosell-Melé A, McClymont EL (2007) Biomarkers as paleoceanographic proxies. In: Hillaire-Marcel C, De Vernal A (eds) Developments in marine geology, Volume 1. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 441–490Google Scholar
  109. Sachse D, Billault I, Bowen GJ, Chikaraishi Y, Dawson TE, Feakins SJ, Freeman KH, Magill CR, McInerney FA, van der Meer MTJ, Polissar P, Robins RJ, Sachs JP, Schmidt HL, Sessions AL, White JWC, West JB, Kahmen A (2012) Molecular paleohydrology: interpreting the hydrogen-isotopic composition of lipid biomarkers from photosynthesizing organisms. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 40:221–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Sanchez-Chardi A, Ribeiro CAO, Nadal J (2009) Metals in liver and kidneys and the effects of chronic exposure to pyrite mine pollution in the shrew Crocidura russula inhabiting the protected wetland of Donana. Chemosphere 76:387–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Seki O, Kawamura K, Ishiwatari R (2012) Assessment of hydrogen isotopic compositions of n-fatty acids as paleoclimate proxies in Lake Biwa sediments. J Quat Sci 27:884–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Seki O, Nakatsuka T, Shibata H, Kawamura K (2010) A compound-specific n-alkane delta C-13 and delta D approach for assessing source and delivery processes of terrestrial organic matter within a forested watershed in northern Japan. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 74:599–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Semmens BX, Ward EJ, Moore JW, Darimont CT (2009) Quantifying inter- and intra-population niche variability using hierarchical Bayesian stable isotope mixing models. PLoS One 4:e6187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Semmens BX, Ward EJ, Parnell AC, Phillips DL, Bearhop S, Inger R, Jackson A, Moore JW (2013) Statistical basis and outputs of stable isotope mixing models: comment on Fry (2013). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 490:285–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Sherriff S, Franks S, Rowan J, Fenton O, Ó’hUallacháin D (2015) Uncertainty-based assessment of tracer selection, tracer non-conservativeness and multiple solutions in sediment fingerprinting using synthetic and field data. J Soils Sediments 15:2101–2116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Silva APD (2001) Efficient variable screening for multivariate analysis. J Multivar Anal 76:35–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Sinninghe Damsté JS, Schouten S (2006) Biological markers for anoxia in the photic zone of the water column. In: Volkman JK (ed) Marine organic matter: biomarkers, isotopes and DNA. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 127–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Smith JA, Mazumder D, Suthers IM, Taylor MD (2013) To fit or not to fit: evaluating stable isotope mixing models using simulated mixing polygons. Methods Ecol Evol 4:612–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Smith TB, Owens PN (2014) Flume- and field-based evaluation of a time-integrated suspended sediment sampler for the analysis of sediment properties. Earth Surf Process Landf 39:1197–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Smith SV, Renwick WH, Bartley JD, Buddemeier RW (2002) Distribution and significance of small, artificial water bodies across the United States landscape. Sci Total Environ 299:21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Stock BC, Semmens BX (2013) MixSIAR GUI User Manuel. Version 3.1. Web https://github.com/brianstock/MixSIAR/. Accessed. 26 February, 2016
  122. Stock BC, Semmens BX (2016) Unifying error structures in commonly used biotracer mixing models. Ecology 97:2562–2569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Sun WY, Shao QQ, Liu JY (2013) Soil erosion and its response to the changes of precipitation and vegetation cover on the Loess Plateau. J Geogr Sci 23:1091–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Thothong W, Huon S, Janeau JL, Boonsaner A, de Rouw A, Planchon O, Bardoux G, Parkpian P (2011) Impact of land use change and rainfall on sediment and carbon accumulation in a water reservoir of North Thailand. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140:521–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Tiecher T, Caner L, Minella JPG, dos Santos DR (2015) Combining visible-based-color parameters and geochemical tracers to improve sediment source discrimination and apportionment. Sci Total Environ 527:135–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Troeh FR, Hobbs JA, Donahue RL (2004) Soil and water conservation for productivity and environmental protection. Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 672 pp Google Scholar
  127. Tuo JC, Wu CJ, Zhang MF, Chen R (2011) Distribution and carbon isotope composition of lipid biomarkers in Lake Erhai and Lake Gahai sediments on the Tibetan Plateau. J Great Lakes Res 37:447–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Ulén B, Bechmann M, Øygarden L, Kyllmar K (2012) Soil erosion in Nordic countries—future challenges and research needs. Acta Agric Scand Sect B 62:176–184Google Scholar
  129. Urban JD, Tachovsky JA, Haws LC, Staskal DW, Harris MA (2009) Assessment of human health risks posed by consumption of fish from the Lower Passaic River, New Jersey. Sci Total Environ 408:209–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Vale SS, Fuller IC, Procter JN, Basher LR, Smith IE (2016) Application of a confluence-based sediment-fingerprinting approach to a dynamic sedimentary catchment, New Zealand. Hydrol Process 30:812–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. VanBergen PF, Bull ID, Poulton PR, Evershed RP (1997) Organic geochemical studies of soils from the Rothamsted classical experiments. 1. Total lipid extracts, solvent insoluble residues and humic acids from Broadbalk wilderness. Org Geochem 26:117–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, Green P, Glidden S, Bunn SE, Sullivan CA, Liermann CR, Davies PM (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467:555–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Walling DE (2013) The evolution of sediment source fingerprinting investigations in fluvial systems. J Soils Sediments 13:1658–1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Walling DE, Golosov V, Olley J (2013) Introduction to the special issue 'tracer applications in sediment research'. Hydrol Process 27:775–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Walling D, Wilkinson S, Horowitz A (2011) Catchment erosion, sediment delivery, and sediment quality. In: Rogers P, Uhlenbrook S, Frimmel F, Hanaki K, Tom V (eds) Treatise on water science: the science of hydrology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 305–338Google Scholar
  136. Warren CR, McGrath JF, Adams MA (2001) Water availability and carbon isotope discrimination in conifers. Oecologia 127:476–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Werner RA, Brand WA (2001) Referencing strategies and techniques in stable isotope ratio analysis. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 15:501–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Wiesenberg GL, Gocke M (2017) Analysis of lipids and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons as indicators of past and present (micro)biological activity. In: McGenity T, Timmis K, Nogales B (eds) Hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology protocols: petroleum, hydrocarbon and lipid analysis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 61–91Google Scholar
  139. Wiesenberg GLB, Schwark L (2006) Carboxylic acid distribution patterns of temperate C-3 and C-4 crops. Org Geochem 37:1973–1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Wiesenberg GLB, Schwarzbauer J, Schmidt MWI, Schwark L (2004) Source and turnover of organic matter in agricultural soils derived from n-alkane/n-carboxylic acid compositions and C-isotope signatures. Org Geochem 35:1371–1393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Wilkie KMK, Chapligin B, Meyer H, Burns S, Petsch S, Brigham-Grette J (2013) Modern isotope hydrology and controls on delta D of plant leaf waxes at Lake El'gygytgyn, NE Russia. Clim Past 9:335–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Wilkinson SN, Hancock GJ, Bartley R, Hawdon AA, Keen RJ (2013) Using sediment tracing to assess processes and spatial patterns of erosion in grazed rangelands, Burdekin River basin, Australia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 180:90–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Wisser D, Frolking S, Hagen S, Bierkens MFP (2013) Beyond peak reservoir storage? A global estimate of declining water storage capacity in large reservoirs. Water Resour Res 49:5732–5739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Zhang GH, Nearing MA, Liu BY (2005) Potential effects of climate change on rainfall erosivity in the Yellow River basin of China. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 48:511–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Zocatelli R, Lavrieux M, Disnar J-R, Le Milbeau C, Jacob J, Breheret JG (2012) Free fatty acids in Lake Aydat catchment soils (French Massif Central): sources, distributions and potential use as sediment biomarkers. J Soils Sediments 12:734–748Google Scholar
  146. Zuazo VHD, Pleguezuelo CRR (2008) Soil-erosion and runoff prevention by plant covers. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 28:65–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hari R. Upadhayay
    • 1
    • 2
  • Samuel Bodé
    • 1
  • Marco Griepentrog
    • 1
  • Dries Huygens
    • 1
  • Roshan M. Bajracharya
    • 2
  • William H. Blake
    • 3
  • Gerd Dercon
    • 4
  • Lionel Mabit
    • 4
  • Max Gibbs
    • 5
  • Brice X. Semmens
    • 6
  • Brian C. Stock
    • 6
  • Wim Cornelis
    • 7
  • Pascal Boeckx
    • 1
  1. 1.Isotope Bioscience Laboratory—ISOFYS, Faculty of Bioscience EngineeringGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Aquatic Ecology Center (AEC), School of ScienceKathmandu UniversityDhulikhelNepal
  3. 3.School of Geography, Earth and Environmental SciencesPlymouth UniversityPlymouthUK
  4. 4.Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Department of Nuclear Sciences and ApplicationsInternational Atomic Energy Agency, IAEAViennaAustria
  5. 5.National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research LtdHamiltonNew Zealand
  6. 6.Scripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of California San DiegoSan DiegoUSA
  7. 7.Department of Soil Management, Faculty of Bioscience EngineeringGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations