Evaluation of biogeochemical reactivity of fresh and weathered contaminated dredged sediments
- 250 Downloads
Metal mobility in contaminated marine sediments is largely controlled by low-soluble sulfides. In dredged sediments exposed to air and water, geochemical and microbial-mediated processes may enhance the weathering and leaching of hazardous contaminants, especially trace metals. The objective of the present study was to thoroughly characterize and assess the biogeochemical reactivity of marine-dredged sediments.
Materials and methods
Two samples of dredged sediments, one stored (to preserve anoxic conditions) and another exposed to the air, were assessed in the perspective of their long-term management. Biogeochemical reactivity was evaluated, especially by a qualitative assessment of aerobic iron- and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria activity.
Results and discussion
Despite the high content of total sulfides (2 to 3.5 wt.% S), the acid-volatile fraction was low (4.3 × 10−3 vs. 9.4 × 10−5 g S kg−1 in raw and weathered sediments, respectively), as an indication of the high degree of crystallinity of sulfide minerals present in samples. The raw sediment was reactive, particularly to aerobic bacteria that decreased the pH from 7.0 to 4.2, for neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, and from 4.5 to 2.5, for acidophilic iron-oxidizing, within only 18 days. Even though only neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria seem reactive in the aged sediment, they countered the major buffering effect due to the high amount of carbonates. Important differences in the temporal evolution of pH and Eh of the raw and aged sediments support these results.
Neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria showed to be the most reactive in both sediments. Finally, despite the sharp pH decrease over time, acidophilic bacteria activity does not seem to be particularly enhanced.
KeywordsBiogeochemical reactivity Dredged marine sediment Iron-oxidizing bacteria Sulfate-reducing bacteria Sulfur-oxidizing bacteria Sulfur cycle
The research presented in this paper was supported by the Region Rhône-Alpes with a CMIRA grant, and by the University of Lyon-Saint-Étienne through financial travel support for the Ph.D. applicant. The authors are grateful to the Research and Service Unit in Mineral Technology (Unité de Recherche et de Service en Technologie Minérale (URSTM)), University of Quebec in Abitibi-Temiscamingue (UQAT) for the experimental support. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Prof. John W. Molson during the manuscript preparation.
- AFNOR (1995a) Qualité du sol—dosage du carbone organique et du carbone total après combustion sèche (analyse élémentaire). NF ISO 10694Google Scholar
- AFNOR (1995b) Sols: reconnaissance et essais—Identification granulométrique—Méthode de tamisage par voie humide. XP P 94–041Google Scholar
- AFNOR (2000) Caractérisation des boues—Détermination de la teneur en matière sèche et de la teneur en eau. NF EN 12880Google Scholar
- American Public Health Association (APHA) (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st edition, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (1990) Standard test methods for sulfate-reducing bacteria in water and water-formed deposits. D4412-84:533–535Google Scholar
- Association Française de Normalisation (AFNOR) (1986) Essais des eaux—Dosage des ions sulfates—Méthode néphélométrique. NF T90–040Google Scholar
- Bouzahzah H, Califice A, Benzaazoua M, Mermillod-Blondin R, Pirard E (2008) Modal analysis of mineral blends using optical image analysis versus X ray diffraction. Proc. Int. Congress Appl. Mineral. ICAM08, AusIMM, Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Calmano W, Hong J, Förstner U (1993) Binding and mobilization of heavy metals in contaminated sediments affected by pH and redox potential. Water Sci Technol 28:223–235Google Scholar
- Couvidat J (2015) Gestion d’un sédiment de dragage marin contaminé: caractérisation de la réactivité biogéochimique, valorisation en mortier et évaluation environnementale. PhD thesis, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon, France, 239 ppGoogle Scholar
- Dold B (2014) Evolution of acid mine drainage formation in sulphidic mine tailings. Minerals 4:21–641Google Scholar
- European Commission 2000/532/EC: Decision of 3 May 2000 replacing Decision 94/3/EC establishing a list of wastes pursuant to Article 1(a) of Council Directive 75/442/EEC on waste and Council Decision 94/904/EC establishing a list of hazardous waste pursuant to Article 1(4) of Council Directive 91/689/EEC on hazardous waste (notified under document number C(2000) 1147) (Text with EEA relevance)Google Scholar
- Jorgensen BB, Nelson DC (2004) Sulfide oxidation in marine sediments: geochemistry meets microbiology. In: Amend JP, Edwards KJ, Lyons TW (eds) Sulfur biogeochemistry: past and present. Geological Society of America, BoulderGoogle Scholar
- Nordstrom DK, Southam G (1997) Geomicrobiology of sulfide mineral oxidation. Rev Mineral 35:361–390Google Scholar
- Ouangrawa M (2007) Étude expérimentale et analyse numérique des facteurs qui influencent le comportement hydro-géochimique de résidus miniers sulfureux partiellement saturés. PhD Dissertation (In French), Department of Civil, Geological, and Mineral Engineering. Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada, 464 ppGoogle Scholar
- Postgate JR (1984) The sulphate-reducing bacteria. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Schippers A (2004) Biogeochemistry of metal sulfide oxidation in mining environments, sediments and soils. In: Amend JP, Edwards KJ, Lyons TW (eds) Sulfur biogeochemistry: past and present. Geological Society of America, BoulderGoogle Scholar
- Sobek AA, Schuller WA, Freeman JR, Smith RM (1978) Field and laboratory methods applicable to overburden and minesoils. Report EPA-600/2-78-054. US Environmental Protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
- Suárez-Suárez A, López-López A, Tovar-Sánchez A, Yarza P, Orfila A, Terrados J, Arnds J, Marqués S, Niemann H, Schmitt-Kopplin P, Amann R, Rosselló-Móra R (2011) Response of sulfate-reducing bacteria to an artificial oil-spill in a coastal marine sediment. Environ Microbiol 13:1488–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Young RA (1993) The Rietveld method. Oxford University Press, NYC, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
- Zagury GJ, Colombano SM, Narasiah KS, Ballivy G (1997) Neutralization of acid mine tailings by addition of alkaline sludges from pulp and paper industry. Environ Technol 18:959–973Google Scholar