Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 17, Issue 9, pp 2274–2283 | Cite as

Impact of fertilization on soil polyphenol dynamics and carbon accumulation in a tea plantation, Southern China

  • Dongmei Fan
  • Kai Fan
  • Dingwu Zhang
  • Min Zhang
  • Xiaochang WangEmail author
2015 International Symposium on Forest Soils

Abstract

Purpose

The strong role that soil polyphenols play in soil organic matter (SOM) formation affects soil carbon sequestration. N deposition, which comes from man-made fertilizer, influences plant growth and soil biochemical properties therefore greatly regulates soil polyphenol metabolism. The objective of this experiment was to understand the effect of fertilizer form and rate on soil polyphenol dynamics as well as to understand the potential relationship between soil phenols and C accumulation.

Materials and methods

Urea, rapeseed cake, and chicken manure, respectively, referred as N, B, and F in the text, were applied at three rates (low N, medium N, and high N, referred as 1, 2, and 3 in the text, respectively); plots without fertilization were set as control (CK, for short). Seasonal dynamics of soil total polyphenol (Tp) and bound polyphenol (Bp) concentrations were monitored. Polyphenol oxidase (PPO), peroxidase (POD), and soil fluorescein diacetate (FDA) hydrolysis activities, all factors relevant to polyphenol metabolism, were measured simultaneously. The relationship between soil polyphenols and soil C concentration was also determined.

Results and discussion

N-fertilization altered the seasonal change pattern and the accumulation level of soil Tp and Bp, which possibly resulted from the enhancement of soil microbial activities and the change of soil nutrient status. Positive linear correlation was observed between soil Tp and TC (total C) contents, which means fertilization could influence C accumulation through affecting the metabolism of soil polyphenols. Soil chemical characteristics and enzyme activities that relate to soil polyphenol metabolism were influenced by fertilization as well. Mitigated TC increment was observed in most fertilization treatments mainly due to the increased SOM decomposition rate.

Conclusions

Our findings reveal the important role of soil phenols played in C accumulation in a tea plantation due to the significant, positive linear relationship between soil Tp and TC. Long-term studies, combined with soil microorganism community structure, soil humification, and tea leaf litter decomposition experiments, are necessary for fully understanding the role that polyphenols play in soil C cycle.

Keywords

Carbon accumulation Fluorescein diacetate hydrolase Polyphenol oxidase Peroxidase Soil polyphenols 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Professors Yaoping Luo and Hairong Xu for the assistance with the experimental design and Professor Zhihong Xu for the suggestion of the academic writing and other members in the Xiaochang Wang'lab. This work was financially supported through grants from the Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture (0812201215), Unilever (China) Limited Shanghai Branch New (H20151653), and the National Key Research and Development Plan (2016YFD0200900).

Supplementary material

11368_2016_1535_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Fig S1 (DOCX 17 kb)
11368_2016_1535_MOESM2_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Fig S2 (DOCX 17 kb)

References

  1. Benbi DK, Yadav SK (2015) Decomposition and carbon sequestration potential of different riceresidue-derived by-products and farmyard manure in a sandy loam soil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 46:2201–2211Google Scholar
  2. Carreiro MM, Sinsabaugh RL, Repert DA, Parkhurst DF (2000) Microbial enzyme shifts explain litter decay responses to simulated nitrogen deposition. Ecology 81:2359–2365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cesco S, Mimmo T, Tonon G, Tomasi N, Pinton R, Terzano R, Neumann G, Weisskopf L, Renella G, Landi L (2012) Plant-borne flavonoids released into the rhizosphere: impact on soil bio-activities related to plant nutrition. A review. Biol Fertil Soils 48:123–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dixon RK, Solomon AM, Brown S, Houghton RA, Trexier MC, Wisniewski J (1994) Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263:185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Falchini L, Naumova N, Kuikman PJ, Bloem J, Nannipieri P (2003) CO2 evolution and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles of bacterial communities in soil following addition of low molecular weight substrates to simulate root exudation. Soil Biol Biochem 35:775–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fan K, Fan D, Ding Z, Su Y, Wang X (2015) Cs-miR156 is involved in the nitrogen form regulation of catechins accumulation in tea plant (Camellia sinensis L. Plant Physiol Biochemi 97:350–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Forrest G, Bendall D (1969) The distribution of polyphenols in the tea plant (Camellia sinensis L. Biochem J 113:741–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frey SD, Knorr M, Parrent JL, Simpson RT (2004) Chronic nitrogen enrichment affects the structure and function of the soil microbial community in temperate hardwood and pine forests. For Ecol Manag 196:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ge Y, Chen C, Xu Z, Eldridge SM, Chan KY, He Y, He J-Z (2010) Carbon/nitrogen ratio as a major factor for predicting the effects of organic wastes on soil bacterial communities assessed by DNA-based molecular techniques. Environ Sci Pollut Res 17:807–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghani A, Ledgard S, Dexter M, Lindsey S (2010) Effects of polyphenolic rich biomaterials on transformation of nitrogen in soils, 2010 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World, Brisbane, Austrilia, pp 101–104Google Scholar
  11. Hagerman, AE (2012) Fifty years of polyphenol-protein complexes. Recent advances in polyphenol research, vol 3, 3, 71–97ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Halvorson JJ, Schmidt MA, Hagerman AE, Gonzalez JM, Liebig MA (2016) Reduction of soluble nitrogen and mobilization of plant nutrients in soils from U.S northern Great Plains agroecosystems by phenolic compounds. Soil Biol Biochem 94:211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hättenschwiler S, Vitousek PM (2000) The role of polyphenols in terrestrial ecosystem nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol Evol 15:238–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heimler D, Vignolini P, Dini MG, Vincieri FF, Romani A (2006) Antiradical activity and polyphenol composition of local Brassicaceae edible varieties. Food Chem 99:464–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kader F, Rovel B, Girardin M, Metche M (1996) Fractionation and identification of the phenolic compounds of highbush blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum, L. Food Chem 55:35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kennedy JA, Powell HKJ (1985) Polyphenol interactions with aluminum(III) an iron (III)- their possible involvment in the podzolization process. Aust J Chem 38:879–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khan SA, Mulvaney RL, Ellsworth TR, Boast CW (2007) The myth of nitrogen fertilization for soil carbon sequestration. J Environ Qual 36:1821–1832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kraus TEC, Dahlgren RA, Zasoski RJ (2003) Tannins in nutrient dynamics of forest ecosystems—a review. Plant Soil 256:41–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li, J (2005) Effect of different kinds of fertilizers and its rate on yield and quality of tea. Master Thesis, Sichuan Agricultural UniversityGoogle Scholar
  20. Li, S (2010) Research on the carbon balance of Chinese tea plantation ecosystem. Ph.D Thesis, Zhejiang UniversityGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin K, Ye F, Li Q, Guo Y, Xu B, Zhao J (2012) Change regularity of phenols content in soil of forest ecosystem of Cunninghamia lanceolata. J Plant Resour Environ 21:30–35Google Scholar
  22. Ma X (2010) Activity of soil fluorescein diacetate (FDA) hydrolase under long-term fertilization. J Zhejiang Univ (Agric & Life Sci) 36:451–455Google Scholar
  23. Ma Y, Wang X, Wei M, Qi Y, Li T (2005) Accumulation of phenolic acids in continuously cropped cucumber soil and their effects on soil microbes and enzyme activities. Chin J Appl Ecol 16:2149–2153Google Scholar
  24. Macheix J-J, Fleuriet A (1990) Fruit phenolics. CRC pressGoogle Scholar
  25. Mack MC, Schuur EAG, Bret-Harte MS, Shaver GR, Chapin FS (2004) Ecosystem carbon storage in arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization. Nature 431:440–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martens DA (2000) Plant residue biochemistry regulates soil carbon cycling and carbon sequestration. Soil Biol Biochem 32:361–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Michel K, Matzner E (2003) Response of enzyme activities to nitrogen addition in forest floors of different C-to-N ratios. Biol Fertil Soil 38:102–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Montgomery MW, Sgarbieri VC (1975) Isoenzymes of banana polyphenol oxidase. Phytochemistry 14(5–6):1245–1249Google Scholar
  29. Nannipieri P, Badalucco L (2003) Biological processes, processes in the soil-plant system: modelling concepts and applicationsGoogle Scholar
  30. Northup RR, ZS Y, Dahlgren RA, Vogt KA (1995) Polyphenol control of nitrogen release from pine litter. Nature 377:227–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Northup RR, Dahlgren RA, McColl JG (1998) Polyphenols as regulators of plant-litter-soil interactions in northern California’s pygmy forest: a positive feedback? Biogeochemistry 42:189–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rabinovich ML, Bolobova AV, Vasil’chenko LG (2004) Fungal decomposition of natural aromatic structures and xenobiotics: a review. Applied Biochem Microbiol 40:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rossiter M, Schultz JC, Baldwin IT (1988) Relationships among defoliation, red oak phenolics, and gypsy moth growth and reproduction. Ecology 69:267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmidt MA (2012) Tannins in natural soil systems. Dissertation Thesis, Miami UniverstiyGoogle Scholar
  35. Stevenson FJ (1994) Humus chemistry: genesis, composition, reactions. John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  36. Triberti L, Nastri A, Baldoni G (2016) Long-term effects of crop rotation, manure and mineral fertilisation on carbon sequestration and soil fertility. Eur J Agron 74:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Waldrop MP, Zak DR, Sinsabaugh RL (2004a) Microbial community response to nitrogen deposition in northern forest ecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1443–1451Google Scholar
  38. Waldrop MP, Zak DR, Sinsabaugh RL, Gallo M, Lauber C (2004b) Nitrogen deposition modifies soil carbon storage through changes in microbial enzymatic activity. Ecol Appl 14:1172–1177Google Scholar
  39. Yang M, Tan L, Ye S, Huang X, Guo D (2012) Effects of continuous eucalyptus plantation on activity of polyphenol oxidase and phenol contents in soil. J Soil Water Conserv 26(165–169):174Google Scholar
  40. Yang R, Su Y, Wang T, Yang Q (2016) Effect of chemical and organic fertilization on soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation in a newly cultivated farmland. J Integr Agric 15:658–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ye F (2009) Study on the effect of forest ecosystem conversion on soil phenols and its functional mechanism. Master Thesis, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry UniversityGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang, M, Chen, Y, Yu, C, Yu, C, Pan, Z, Fan, D, Luo, Y, Wang, X (2013) Dynamic assessments of plant biomass and carbon storage during the production cycle of tea gardens. J Zhejiang Univ (Agriculture & Life Sciences) 687–694Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dongmei Fan
    • 1
  • Kai Fan
    • 1
  • Dingwu Zhang
    • 2
  • Min Zhang
    • 3
  • Xiaochang Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Institute of Tea ScienceZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.TINGYI (Cayman Islands) HOLDING CORP.ShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Recycling and Eco-treatment of Waste Biomass of Zhejiang ProvinceZhejiang University of Science & TechnologyHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations