Impact of urban development on streamflow regime of a Portuguese peri-urban Mediterranean catchment
- 394 Downloads
Relatively little is known in the Mediterranean environment about changes in streamflow during urban development in partially urbanized peri-urban catchments. This paper explores the modification of streamflow regime as a consequence of the construction of an enterprise park, a major road, and expansion of residential areas, leading to urban areas increase from 32 to 40 % in a small catchment (6.2 km2), located in the periphery of one of the main cities in central mainland Portugal.
Materials and methods
The study was carried out over five hydrological years (October 2008–September 2009 to October 2012–September 2013), including two initial years of pre- and three following years of post-additional urban development. Streamflow was recorded by a V-notch weir at the catchment outlet at 5-min intervals. Rainfall was recorded at a weather station 0.5 km north of the catchment and by five tipping-bucket raingauges installed in January 2011 within the study catchment. Streamflow was converted into runoff and split into baseflow and stormflow components by applying a mathematical low-pass digital filter. Streamflow differences were investigated through changes in (i) annual runoff coefficients, (ii) annual baseflow index, (iii) seasonal baseflow index and stormflow coefficient, and (iv) storm event analysis.
Results and discussion
Annual runoff coefficient ranged from 14 to 21 % and storm runoff coefficient from 9 to 14 %, both between the driest 2011/12 and wettest 2012/13. Although these differences were influenced by inter-annual weather variability, a comparison between years with similar rainfall before and after additional urban development showed a 43 % increase in storm runoff. Impacts on streamflow were also noticed through changes on hydrograph: (i) regression lines of storm runoff against rainstorm parameters exhibited higher vertical positions in 2012/13 than 2008/09, (ii) gradual increase in peak flow but with a clear distance between pre- and post- additional urbanization, (iii) quicker response time from 60–75 min to 40–45 min between both periods, and (iv) decrease in recession time from 21–29 h to 7–9 h for the same periods.
The dispersed urban pattern and permeable soils provide many overland flow sinks, favouring relatively low storm runoff of the catchment. Nevertheless, the enlargement of impervious surfaces (from 12.8 to 17.0 %) and particularly the storm drainage system installed in new urban areas led to great changes on rainfall–runoff event responses. Urban planning should consider the landscape mosaic of peri-urban areas in order to maximize water infiltration and minimize the impacts on streamflow regime.
KeywordsRainfall–runoff events Recession time Response time Runoff coefficient Storm runoff Urbanization
This research was carried out in the framework of the (1) PhD research fellowship of Carla Ferreira (SFRH/BD/64493/2009), funded by the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT), under QREN-POPH and co-funded by ESF and MEC national funds, and (2) FRURB project “Managing Flood Risk in Urban areas in a global change context” (PTDC/AUR-URB/123089/2010), also funded by FCT. Additional funding was provided by the FCT as a post-doctoral fellowship for João Nunes (SFRH/BPD/87571/2012). The authors would like to acknowledge Daniel Soares for fieldwork assistance and Lídia Carvalho for the help with the land-use analysis and streamflow data compilation.
- Bach PM, Rauch W, Mikkelsen PS, McCarthy DT, Deletic A (2014) A critical review of integrated urban water modelling e Urban drainage and beyond. Environ Modell Software 54:88–107Google Scholar
- Chu ML, Knouf JH, Ghulam A, Guzman JA, Pan Z (2013) Impacts of urbanization on river flow frequency: a controlled experimental modelling-based evaluation approach. J Hydrol 495:1–12Google Scholar
- Davies HA (1981) The water balance of urban impermeable surfaces: catchment and process studies. University College London, DissertationGoogle Scholar
- Devia GK, Ganasri BP, Dwarakish GS (2015) A review on hydrological models. Aquati Procedia 4:1001–1007Google Scholar
- European Environment Agency (EEA) (2006) Urban sprawl in Europe: the ignored challenge. Report No 10/2006, Copenhagen. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eea_report_2006_10
- Ferreira AJD (1996) Processos hidrológicos e hidroquímicos em povoamentos de Eucalyptus globulus Labill. e Pinus pinaster Aiton. Dissertation, University of Aveiro (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
- Ferreira CSS, Ferreira ADF, de Lima JLMP, Nunes JP (2011) Assessment of surface hydrologic properties on a small urbanized Mediterranean basin: experimental design and first results. Die Bodenkultur 62(1–4):57–62Google Scholar
- Ferreira AJD, Nunes JP, de Lima JLMP Ferreira CSS, Esteves T, Nunes M (2010) Urban flood risk and pollutant relocation as a result of global change. A catchment experimental approach in central Portugal. Folia Geographica, Series Geographica-Physica XLI: 59–66. http://www.geo.uj.edu.pl/foliageographica/index.php?id=2010&nr=2010_04&lang=1
- Ferreira CSS, Walsh RPD, Shakesby RA, Keizer JJ, Soares D, González-Pelayo O, Coelho COA, Ferreira AJD (2016) Differences in overland flow, hydrophobicity and soil moisture dynamics between Mediterranean woodland types in a peri-urban catchment in Portugal. J Hydrol 533:473–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hood MJ, Clausen JC, Warner GS (2007) Comparison of stormwater lag times for low impact and traditional residential development. J Am Water Resour As 43(4):1036–1046Google Scholar
- INMG - Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia e Geofísica (2001) O clima de Portugal. Normais climatológicas da região de “Beira Litoral”, correspondentes a 1971–2000. Fascículo A, volume XLII. Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia e Geofísica, Lisboa (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
- Jarnagin T (2007) Historical analysis of the relationship of streamflow flashiness with population density, imperviousness, and percent urban land cover in the Mid-Atlantic Region. Environmental Protection Agency, Internal Report APM 408. http://www.epa.gov/esd/land-sci/pdf/Jarnagin_2007_Historical_Analysis_of_Streamflow_Flashiness.pdf
- Lana-Renault N, Latron J, Karssenberg D, Serrano-Muela P, Regués D, Bierkens MFP (2011) Differences in streamflow in relation to changes in land cover: a comparative study in two sub-Mediterranean mountain catchments. J Hydrol 411:366–378Google Scholar
- Nisbet T (2005) Water use by trees. Forestry Commission, Information Note FCIN065. http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/FCIN065.pdf/$FILE/FCIN065.pdf. Assessed 21 September 2015Google Scholar
- Nunes JP, de Lima JLMP, Ferreira AJD (2009) Modelling the impact of urbanization on hydrological extremes. IHP-VII UNESCO Tech Doc Hydrol 84:41–48Google Scholar
- United Nations (UN) (2014) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, ST/ESA/SER.A/352, New York. http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Highlights/WUP2014-Highlights.pdf
- World Reference Base (WRB) for Soil Resources (2006) A framework for international classification, correlation and communication. FAO, 145 ppGoogle Scholar
- Ying C, Youpeng X, Yixing Y (2009) Impacts of land use change scenarios on storm-runoff generation in Xitiaoxi basin, China. Quat Int 28(1–2):121–128Google Scholar