Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Use of biochar-compost to improve properties and productivity of the degraded coastal soil in the Yellow River Delta, China

  • 1415 Accesses

  • 40 Citations

Abstract

Purpose

Nutrient deficiency and salt stress (sodium, Na+) strongly limited the productivity of the degraded coastal soils in the Yellow River Delta. Biochar-based functional materials have been considered as a promising amendment to solving the problem of global soil security (e.g., erosion, fertility loss, acidification, and salinization). Therefore, this study aimed to explore the potential of using a biochar-compost amendment (BCA) to improve the coastal soil properties and productivity.

Materials and methods

The BCA was produced from composting of biochar and additives including seafood shell powder, peanut shell, commercial humate, and inorganic nutrients. Two halophytes, sesbania (Sesbania canabina (Retz.) Pers) and seashore mallow (Kosteletzkya virginica), were chosen as the tested plants in a 52-day pot experiment. BCA was added as the rates of 0, 1.5, 5, and 10 % (w/w). At the end of the incubation, the shoot height, biomass, and root morphological parameters including length, tips, and surface area were measured, as well as the properties (e.g., soil organic matter (SOM) content and cation exchange capacity (CEC)) of the rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils.

Results and discussion

The BCA application at 1.5 % enhanced the growth of sesbania and seashore mallow and increased their total biomass by 309 and 70.8 %, respectively, while significantly inhibited both the halophyte growths at 10 %. Similarly, both the halophyte root morphologies (e.g., length and tips) significantly increased by BCA addition at 1.5 %. The promoting growth of the both halophytes could be resulted from the improvement of soil properties such as the increased SOM and CEC, the decreased amount of the exchangeable sodium (Ex-Na) and exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), and the rhizosphere effect (e.g., decreased soil pH). The higher rate of BCA addition (e.g., 10 %) sharply increased soil salinity, responsible for the inhibition of both the halophyte growths. Although BCA addition may directly supply much nitrogen (N) for the soils, N bioavailability for both halophytes was not largely improved.

Conclusions

The short-term laboratory pot experiments revealed that producing the biochar-compost with desired properties (e.g., BCA) could be a feasible alternative to remediate the degraded coastal soil in the Yellow River Delta. Moreover, the addition of BCA should be kept at an optimal level, which may produce expected positive results. Our results will be helpful for supporting the strategy of designing right biochar-compost for the right soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Abiven S, Schmidt MWI, Lehmann J (2014) Biochar by design. Nat Geosci 7:326–327

  2. Agegnehu G, Bass AM, Nelson PN, Muirhead B, Wright G, Bird MI (2015) Biochar and biochar-compost as soil amendments: effects on peanut yield, soil properties and greenhouse gas emissions in tropical North Queensland, Australia. Agr Ecosyst Environ 213:72–85

  3. Akhter A, Hage-Ahmed K, Soja G, Steinkellner S (2015) Compost and biochar alter mycorrhization, tomato root exudation, and development of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Front Plant Sci 6:529

  4. Beesley L, Moreno-Jiménez E, Gomez-Eyles JL, Harris E, Robinson B, Sizmur T (2011) A review of biochars’ potential role in the remediation, revegetation and restoration of contaminated soils. Environ Pollut 159:3269–3282

  5. Brennan A, Moreno-Jiménez E, Puschenreiter M, Alburquerque JA, Switzer C (2014) Effects of biochar amendment on root traits and contaminant availability of maize plants in a copper and arsenic impacted soil. Plant Soil 379:351–360

  6. Bruun EW, Petersen CT, Hansen E, Holm JK, Hauggaard-Nielsen H (2014) Biochar amendment to coarse sandy subsoil improves root growth and increases water retention. Soil Use and Manage 30:109–118

  7. Chaganti VN, Crohn DM (2015) Evaluating the relative contribution of physiochemical and biological factors in ameliorating a saline–sodic soil amended with composts and biochar and leached with reclaimed water. Geoderma 259–260:45–55

  8. Chen ZM, Xiao X, Chen BL, Zhu LZ (2015) Quantification of chemical states, dissociation constants and contents of oxygen-containing groups on the surface of biochars produced at different temperatures. Environ Sci Technol 49:309–317

  9. Dempster DN, Jones DL, Murphy DV (2012) Organic nitrogen mineralisation in two contrasting agro-ecosystems is unchanged by biochar addition. Soil Biol Biochem 48:47–50

  10. Gill JS, Sale PWG, Peries RR, Tang C (2009) Changes in soil physical properties and crop root growth in dense sodic subsoil following incorporation of organic amendments. Field Crop Res 114:137–146

  11. Hinsinger P, Plassard C, Tang CX, Jaillard B (2003) Origins of root-mediated pH changes in the rhizosphere and their responses to environmental constraints: a review. Plant Soil 248:43–59

  12. Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, van der Velde M, Bastos AC (2011) A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agr Ecosyst Environ 144:175–187

  13. Jones DL, Rousk J, Edwards-Jones G, DeLuca TH, Murphy DV (2012) Biochar-mediated changes in soil quality and plant growth in a three year field trial. Soil Biol Biochem 45:113–124

  14. Khan N, Clark I, Sánchez-Monedero MA, Shea S, Meier S, Qi FJ, Kookana RS, Bolan N (2016) Physical and chemical properties of biochars co-composted with biowastes and incubated with a chicken litter compost. Chemosphere 142:14–23

  15. Kong DX, Miao CY, Borthwick AGL, Duan QY, Liu H, Sun QH, Ye AZ, Di ZH, Gong W (2015) Evolution of the Yellow River Delta and its relationship with runoff and sediment load from 1983 to 2011. J Hydrol 520:157–167

  16. Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota—a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1812–1836

  17. Mia S, van Groenigen JW, van de Voorde TFJ, Oram NJ, Bezemer TM, Mommer L, Jeffery S (2014) Biochar application rate affects biological nitrogen fixation in red clover conditional on potassium availability. Agr Ecosyst Environ 191:83–91

  18. Novak JM, Busscher WJ (2013) Selection and use of designer biochars to improve characteristics of Southeastern USA Coastal Plain degraded soils. In: Lee JW (ed) Advanced biofuels and bioproducts. Springer, New York, pp 69–96

  19. Novak JM, Lima I, Xing B, Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Das K, Ahmedna M, Rehrah D, Watts DW, Busscher WJ (2009) Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand. Ann Environ Sci 3:195–206

  20. Pansu M, Gautheyrou J (2006) Handbook of soil analysis: mineralogical, organic and inorganic methods. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

  21. Rajkovich S, Enders A, Hanley K, Hyland C, Zimmerman AR, Lehmann J (2012) Corn growth and nitrogen nutrition after additions of biochars with varying properties to a temperate soil. Biol Fert Soils 48:271–284

  22. Sastre-Conde I, Lobo MC, Beltrán-Hernández RI, Poggi-Varaldo HM (2015) Remediation of saline soils by a two-step process: washing and amendment with sludge. Geoderma 247–248:140–150

  23. Schulz H, Glaser B (2012) Effects of biochar compared to organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil quality and plant growth in a greenhouse experiment. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 175:410–422

  24. Schulz H, Dunst G, Glaser B (2013) Positive effects of composted biochar on plant growth and soil fertility. Agron Sustain Dev 33:817–827

  25. Soinne H, Hovi J, Tammeorg P, Turtola E (2014) Effect of biochar on phosphorus sorption and clay soil aggregate stability. Geoderma 219–220:162–167

  26. Song YJ, Zhang XL, Ma B, Chang SX, Gong J (2014) Biochar addition affected the dynamics of ammonia oxidizers and nitrification in microcosms of a coastal alkaline soil. Biol Fert Soils 50:321–332

  27. Spokas KA, Cantrell KB, Novak JM, Archer DW, Ippolito JA, Collins HP, Boateng AA, Lima IM, Lamb MC, McAloon AJ, Lentz RD, Nichols KA (2011) Biochar: a synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration. J Environ Qual 41:973–989

  28. Tedeschi A, Lavini A, Riccardi M, Pulvento C, d’Andria R (2011) Melon crops (Cucumis melo L., cv. Tendral) grown in a Mediterranean environment under saline-sodic conditions: part I. Yield and quality. Agr Water Manage 98:1329–1338

  29. Tejada M, Garcia C, Gonzalez JL, Hernandez MT (2006) Use of organic amendment as a strategy for saline soil remediation: influence on the physical, chemical and biological properties of soil. Soil Biol Biochem 38:1413–1421

  30. Thomas SC, Frye S, Gale N, Garmon M, Launchbury R, Machado N, Melamed S, Murray J, Petroff A, Winsborough C (2013) Biochar mitigates negative effects of salt additions on two herbaceous plant species. J Environ Manage 129:62–68

  31. Wang GJ, Xu ZW (2013) The effects of biochar on germination and growth of wheat in different saline-alkali soil. Asian Agr Res 5:116–119

  32. Wang ZY, Liu GC, Zheng H, Li FM, Ngo HH, Guo WS, Liu C, Chen L, Xing BS (2015a) Investigating the mechanisms of biochar’s removal of lead from solution. Bioresource Technol 177:308-317

  33. Wang ZY, Zong HY, Zheng H, Liu GC, Chen L, Xing BS (2015b) Reduced nitrification and abundance of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in acidic soil amended with biochar. Chemosphere 138:576-583

  34. Wu Y, Xu G, Shao HB (2014) Furfural and its biochar improve the general properties of a saline soil. Solid Earth 5:665–671

  35. Xu HJ, Wang XH, Li H, Yao HY, Su JQ, Zhu YG (2014) Biochar impacts soil microbial community composition and nitrogen cycling in an acidic soil planted with rape. Environ Sci Technol 48:9391–9399

  36. Yang L, Liao F, Huang M, Yang LT, Li YR (2015) Biochar improves sugarcane seedling root and soil properties under a pot experiment. Sugar Tech 17:36–40

  37. Zhang AF, Cui LQ, Pan GX, Li LQ, Hussain Q, Zhang XH, Zheng JW, Crowley D (2010) Effect of biochar amendment on yield and methane and nitrous oxide emissions from a rice paddy from Tai Lake plain, China. Agr Ecosyst Environ 139:469–475

  38. Zhang T, Wang T, Liu KS, Wang LX, Wang K, Zhou Y (2015) Effects of different amendments for the reclamation of coastal saline soil on soil nutrient dynamics and electrical conductivity responses. Agr Water Manage 159:115–122

  39. Zheng H, Wang ZY, Deng X, Herbert S, Xing BS (2013) Impacts of adding biochar on nitrogen retention and bioavailability in agricultural soil. Geoderma 206:32–39

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41406085, 41573089, 41325013), Ocean Public Welfare Scientific Research Project (201305021), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2014DQ011), and Postdoctoral Fund in China (2014M550374).

Author information

Correspondence to Hao Zheng.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Yong Sik Ok

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, X., Liu, G., Xia, Y. et al. Use of biochar-compost to improve properties and productivity of the degraded coastal soil in the Yellow River Delta, China. J Soils Sediments 17, 780–789 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1361-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Biochar-compost amendment
  • Degraded coastal soil
  • Productivity
  • Halophyte
  • Remediation