Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 1529–1537 | Cite as

Build-up of carbon fractions in technosol-biochar amended partially reclaimed mine soil grown with Brassica juncea

  • Alfonso Rodríguez-Vila
  • Verónica Asensio
  • Rubén Forján
  • Emma F. Covelo
Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article
  • 270 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Soil organic carbon (SOC) and its labile fractions are strong determinants of physical, chemical and biological properties. The objective of the present work was to evaluate the effects of organic amendments (technosol made of wastes and biochar) and Brassica juncea L. on the soil C fractions in a reclaimed mine soil.

Materials and methods

The studied soil was from a former copper mine that was subsequently partially reclaimed with vegetation and wastes. A greenhouse experiment was carried out to amend the mine soil with different proportions of technosol and biochar mixture and planting B. juncea. B. juncea plants can tolerate high levels of metals and can produce a large amount of biomass in relatively short periods of time.

Results and discussion

The results showed that with the addition of biochar and wastes, soil pH increased from 2.7 to 6.18, SOC from undetectable to 105 g kg−1 and soil total nitrogen (TN) from undetectable to 11.4 g kg−1. Amending with wastes and biochar also increased dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from undetectable to 5.82 g kg−1, carbon in the free organic matter (FOM) from undetectable to 30.42 g kg−1, FAP (carbon in fulvic acids removed with phosphoric acid) from undetectable to 24.14 g kg−1 and also increased the humification ratio, the humification index, the polymerisation rate and the organic carbon in the humified fractions (humic acids, fulvic acids and humin). Soils amended and vegetated with B. juncea showed lower FOM values and higher humification index values than the soils amended only with biochar and wastes.

Conclusions

This study concludes that the combined addition of wastes and biochar has a greater potential for both increasing and improving organic carbon fractions in mine soils. The authors recommend the application of biochar and technosol made of wastes as a soil amendment combined with B. juncea on soils that are deficient in organic matter, since they increased all of the SOC fractions in the studied copper mine soil.

Keywords

Biochar Brassica juncea Organic matter fractionation Settling pond Wastes 

References

  1. Agegnehu G, Bass AM, Nelson PN, Muirhead B, Wright G, Bird MI (2015) Biochar and biochar-compost as soil amendments: effects on peanut yield, soil properties and greenhouse gas emissions in tropical North Queensland, Australia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 213:72–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad P, Sarwat M, Bhat NA, Wani MR, Kazi AG, Tran L-SP (2013) Alleviation of cadmium toxicity in Brassica juncea L. (Czern. & Coss.) by calcium application involves various physiological and biochemical strategies. PLoS ONE 10:e0114571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alburquerque JA, de la Fuente C, Bernal MP (2011) Improvement of soil quality after “alperujo” compost application to two contaminated soils characterised by differing heavy metal solubility. J Environ Manage 92:733–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asensio V, Vega FA, Andrade ML, Covelo EF (2013) Technosols made of wastes to improve physico-chemical characteristics of a copper mine soil. Pedosphere 23:1–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asensio V, Vega FA, Covelo EF (2014) Effect of soil reclamation process on soil C fractions. Chemosphere 95:511–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker LR, White PM, Pierzynski GM (2011) Changes in microbial properties after manure, lime, and bentonite application to a heavy metal-contaminated mine waste. Appl Soil Ecol 48:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beesley L, Dickinson D (2011) Carbon and trace element fluxes in the pore water of an urban soil following greenwaste compost, woody and biochar amendments, inoculated with the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris. Soil Biol Biochem 43:188–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolan NS, Kunhikrishnan A, Naidu R (2013) Carbon storage in a heavy clay soil landfill site after biosolid application. Sci Total Environ 465:216–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bustamante MA, Paredes C, Marhuenda-Egea FC, Pérez-Espinosa A, Bernal MP, Moral R (2008) Co-composting of distillery wastes with animal manures: carbon and nitrogen transformations in the evaluation of compost stability. Chemosphere 72:551–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Camps Arbestain M, Madinabeitia Z, Anza Hortalà M, Macías-García F, Virgel S, Macías F (2008) Extractability and leachability of heavy metals in Technosols prepared from mixtures of unconsolidated wastes. Waste Manag 28:2653–2666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2006) World Reference Base For Soil Resources, IUSS, ISRIC, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerzabek MH, Antil RS, Kögel-Knabner I, Knicker H, Kirchmann H, Haberhauer G (2006) How are soil use and management reflected by soil organic matter characteristics: a spectroscopic approach. Eur J Soil Sci 57:485–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Herath I, Kumarathilaka P, Navaratne A, Rajakaruna N, Vithanage M (2015) Immobilization and phytotoxicity reduction of heavy metals in serpentine soil using biochar. J Soils Sediments 15:126–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hernández T, GarcIa E, García C (2015) A strategy for marginal semiarid degraded soil restoration: a sole addition of compost at a high rate. A five-year field experiment. Soil Biol Biochem 89:61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumar V, Chopra AK (2014) Accumulation and translocation of metals in soil and different parts of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) amended with sewage sludge. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 92:103–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lamb DT, Heading S, Bolan N, Naidu R (2012) Use of biosolids for phytocapping of landfill soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:2695–2705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu C, Wang H, Tang X, Guan Z, Reid BJ, Rajapaksha AU, Ok YS, Sun H (2015) Biochar increased water holding capacity but accelerated organic carbon leaching from a sloping farmland soil in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. doi:10.1007/s11356-015-4885-9 Google Scholar
  18. Macías F, Calvo de Anta R (2009) Niveles genéricos de referencia de metales pesados y otros elementos traza en los suelos de Galicia. Xunta de Galicia, SpainGoogle Scholar
  19. Meier S, Curaqueo G, Khan N, Bolan N, Rilling J, Vidal C, Fernández N, Acuña J, González M-E, Cornejo P, Borie F (2015) Effects of biochar on copper immobilization and soil microbial communities in a metal-contaminated soil. J Soils Sediments. doi:10.1007/s11368-015-1224-1 Google Scholar
  20. Neilson S, Rajakaruna N (2012) Roles of rhizospheric processes and plant physiology in applied phytoremediation of contaminated soils using Brassica oilseeds. In: Anjum NA, Ahmad I, Pereira ME, Duarte AC, Umar S, Khan NA (eds) The plant family Brassicaceae. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, The Netherland, pp 313–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peltre C, Nyord T, Bruun S, Jensen LS, Magid J (2015) Repeated soil application of organic waste amendments reduces draught force and fuel consumption for soil tillage. Agric Ecosyst Environ 211:94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peña A, Mingorance MD, Guzmán-Carrizosa I, Fernández-Espinosa AJ (2015) Improving the mining soil quality for a vegetation cover after addition of sewage sludges: inorganic ions and low-molecular-weight organic acids in the soil solution. J Environ Manage 150:216–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pérez-Esteban J, Escolástico C, Moliner A, Masaguer A, Ruiz-Fernández J (2014) Phytostabilization of metals in mine soils using Brassica juncea in combination with organic amendments. Plant Soil 377:97–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pérez-Lomas AL, Delgado G, Párraga J, Delgado R, Almendros G, Aranda V (2010) Evolution of organic matter fractions after application of co-compost of sewage sludge with pruning waste to four Mediterranean agricultural soils. A soil microcosm experiment. Waste Manage 30:1957–1965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Porta J (1986) Técnicas y experimentos en Edafología. Collegi Oficial D`Enginyers Agronoms de Catalunya, Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  26. Puig CG, Álvarez-Iglesias L, Reigosa MJ, Pedrol N (2013) Eucalyptus globulus leaves incorporated as green manure for weed control in maize. Weed Sci 61:154–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Quartacci MF, Argilla A, Baker AJM, Navari-Izzo F (2006) Phytoextraction of metals from a multiply contaminated soil by Indian mustard. Chemosphere 63:918–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rodríguez-Vila A, Covelo EF, Forján R, Asensio V (2014) Phytoremediating a copper mine soil with Brassica juncea L., compost and biochar. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21(19):11293–11304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rodríguez-Vila A, Covelo EF, Forján R, Asensio V (2015) Recovering a copper mine soil using organic amendments and phytomanagement with Brassica juncea L. J Environ Manage 147:73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sanchez-Monedero MA, Roig A, Martínez-Pardo C, Cegarra J, Paredes C (1996) A microanalysis method for determining total organic carbon in extracts of humic substances. Relationships between total organic carbon and oxidable carbon. Bioresour Technol 57:291–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seeber J, Seeber GUH (2005) Effects of land-use changes on humus forms on alpine pastureland (Central Alps, Tyrol). Geoderma 124:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sellami F, Hachicha S, Chtourou M, Medhioub K, Ammar E (2008) Maturity assessment of composted olive mill wastes using UV spectra and humification parameters. Bioresour Technol 99:6900–6907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Senesi N (1989) Composted materials as organic fertilizers. Sci Total Environ 82–82:521–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shen Z-J, Wang Y-P, Sun Q-Y, Wang W (2014) Effect of vegetation succession on organic carbon, carbon of humus acids and dissolved organic carbon in soils of copper mine tailings sites. Pedosphere 24:271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sherene T (2009) Effect of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) on heavy metal mobility in soils. Nat Environ Pollut Technol 8:817–821Google Scholar
  36. Tandy S, Healey JR, Nason MA, Williamson JC, Jones DL (2009) Remediation of metal polluted mine soil with compost: co-composting versus incorporation. Environ Pollut 157:690–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. USDA (1998) Soil quality indicators : pHGoogle Scholar
  38. Ussiri DAN, Lal R, Jacinthe PA (2006) Soil properties and carbon sequestration of afforested pastures in reclaimed minesoils of Ohio. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1797–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vega FA, Covelo EF, Andrade ML (2005) Limiting factors for reforestation of mine spoils from Galicia (Spain). Land Degrad Dev 16:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang S, Cao J, Hu W, Zhang X, Duan C (2013) An evaluation of the effectiveness of novel industrial by-products and organic wastes on heavy metal immobilization in Pb-Zn mine tailings. Environ Sci Process Impacts 15:2059–2067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhao R, Jiang D, Coles N, Wu J (2015) Effects of biochar on the acidity of a loamy clay soil under different incubation conditions. J Soils Sediments 15:1919–1926CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alfonso Rodríguez-Vila
    • 1
  • Verónica Asensio
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rubén Forján
    • 1
  • Emma F. Covelo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant Biology and Soil Science, Faculty of BiologyUniversity of VigoPontevedraSpain
  2. 2.Department of Plant Nutrition, CENAUniversidade de São Paulo (CENA-USP)PiracicabaBrazil

Personalised recommendations