Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 1331–1348 | Cite as

Heavy metal content and toxicity of mine and quarry soils

  • Manoel Lago-Vila
  • Andrés Rodríguez-Seijo
  • Daniel Arenas-Lago
  • Luisa Andrade
  • Maria Flora Alonso Vega
Phytoremediation of Polluted Soils: Recent Progress and Developments

Abstract

Purpose

Soils formed in metallic mines and serpentinite quarries, among other unfavourable features, have high levels of heavy metals. They can release into the environment causing surface and subsurface water contamination, uptake by plants, their accumulation in the food chain and adverse effects on living organisms. In this work, we studied the magnitude of the soils’ toxic effects not only on spontaneous plants but also on two species with phytoremediation potential.

Materials and methods

Several soils from two different exploitations were selected: a lead and zinc mine and a serpentinite quarry. Soils were characterized, and the pseudo-total and extractable contents of Co, Cr and Ni in soils from a serpentinite quarry were determined. The Cd, Pb and Zn pseudo-total and extractable contents were determined in soils developed in the Pb/Zn abandoned mine. Using a biotest, the chronic toxicity of the soil samples on higher plants was determined. Festuca ovina L., Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link., Sinapis alba L. and Brassica juncea L. were selected, the first two because they are spontaneous plants in the study areas and the last two because they have heavy metal phytoremediation potential.

Results and discussion

Pseudo-total contents of Co, Cr and Ni in the serpentinite quarry soils and of Zn, Pb and Cd in the Zn/Pb mine soils exceed generic reference levels. CaCl2 is the reactant that extracts the highest proportion of Co, Cr and Ni in the quarry soils and EDTA the largest proportion of Pb Zn and Cd content in the mine soils. The germination index values based on seed germination and root elongation bioassays revealed increasing plant sensitivity to the mine soils in the following order: B. juncea < S. alba < F. ovina < C. scoparius. The wide range of GI values indicates that the response of test plants to soil heavy metals depended on their concentrations and soil characteristics, especially pH and organic matter content.

Conclusions

The pollution index indicates severe Cd, Pb and Zn contamination in the mine soils, as well as high Cr and Ni and moderate Co contamination in the serpentinite quarry soils. The performed biotests were suitable for identifying toxic soils and showed that the studied soils are toxic to the spontaneous plants, more to C. scoparius than to F. ovina. They also indicate that the mine soils are more toxic than the quarry soils for both species.

Keywords

Brassicaceae Heavy metals Mine and quarry soils Pollution index Soil toxicity Spontaneous plants 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Xunta de Galicia for financing the project EM2013/018. F.A. Vega is hired under a Ramón y Cajal contract at the University of Vigo. A. Rodríguez-Seijo thanks the University of Vigo for his pre-doctoral fellowship. D. Arenas-Lago is grateful to the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and the University of Vigo for the FPI-MICINN.

Compliance with ethical standards

We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. This research does not involve human participants and/or animals.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

References

  1. Abreu MM, Batista MJ, Magalhães MCF, Matos JX (2011) Acid mine drainage in the Portuguese Iberian Pyrite Belt. In: Brock CR (ed) Mine drainage and related problems. Nova Science Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Adamo P, Dudka S, Wilson MJ, McHardy WJ (2002) Distribution of trace elements in soils from the Sudbury smelting area (Ontario, Canada). Water Air Soil Poll 137:95–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AFNOR (1994) Qualité des sols. Méthodes d’analyses-Recueil de normes françaises. Association française de normalization, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. Agnieszka B, Tomasz C, Jerzy W (2014) Chemical properties and toxicity of soils contaminated by mining activity. Ecotoxicology 23:1234–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ali H, Khan E, Sajad MA (2013) Phytoremediation of heavy metals-concepts and applications. Chemosphere 91:869–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anawar HM, Canha N, Santa-Regina I, Freitas MC (2013) Adaptation, tolerance, and evolution of plant species in a pyrite mine in response to contamination level and properties of mine tailings: sustainable rehabilitation. J Soils Sediments 13:730–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anjos C, Magalhães MCF, Abreu MM (2012) Metal (Al, Mn, Pb and Zn) soils extractable reagents for available fraction assessment: Comparison using plants, and dry and moist soils from the Braçal abandoned lead mine area, Portugal. J Geochem Explor 113:45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arenas-Lago D, Andrade ML, Vega FA, Singh BR (2015) TOF-SIMS and FE-SEM/EDS to verify the heavy metal fractionation in serpentinite quarry soils. Catena 73:2541–2556Google Scholar
  9. Arenas-Lago D, Lago-Vila M, Rodríguez-Seijo A, Andrade ML, Vega FA (2014) Risk of metal mobility in soils from a Pb/Zn depleted mine (Lugo, Spain). Environ Earth Sci 72:2541–2556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ayora C, Caraballo MA, Macias F, Rötting TS, Carrera J, Nieto J (2013) Acid mine drainage in the Iberian Pyrite Belt: 2. Lessons learned from recent passive remediation experiences. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:7837–7853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bidar G, Pruvot C, Garcon G, Verdin A, Shirali P, Douay F (2009) Seasonal and annual variations of metal uptake, bioaccumulation, and toxicity in Trifolium repens and Lolium perenne growing in a heavy metal-contaminated field. Environ Sci Pollut Res 16:42–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boularbah A, Schwartz C, Bitton G, Aboudrar W, Ouhammou A, Morel JL (2006a) Heavy metal contamination from mining sites in South Morocco: 2. Assessment of metal accumulation and toxicity in plants Chemosphere 63:811–817Google Scholar
  13. Boularbah A, Schwartz C, Bitton G, Morel JL (2006b) Heavy metal contamination from mining sites in South Morocco: 1. Use of a biotest to assess metal toxicity of tailings and soils Chemosphere 63:802–810Google Scholar
  14. Broadley MR, Willey NJ, Wilkins JC, Baker AJM, Mead A, White PJ (2001) Phylogenetic variation in heavy metal accumulation in angiosperms. New Phytol 152:9–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cabala J, Teper L (2007) Metalliferous constituents of rhizosphere soils contaminated by Zn-Pb mining in southern Poland. Water Air Soil Pollut 178:351–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cabala J, Zogala B, Dubiel R (2008) Geochemical and geophysical study of historical Zn-Pb ore processing waste dump areas (Southern Poland). Pol J Environ Stud 17:693–700Google Scholar
  17. Cavallo A, Rimoldi B (2013) Chrysotile asbestos in serpentinite quarries: a case study in Valmalenco, Central Alps, Northern Italy. Environ Sci-Proc Imp 15:1341–1350Google Scholar
  18. Covelo EF, Vega FA, Andrade ML (2008) Sorption and desorption of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn by a Fibric Histosol and its organo-mineral fraction. J Hazard Mater 159:342–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Czerniawska-Kusza I, Ciesielczuk T, Kusza G, Cichoń A (2006) Comparison of the Phytotoxkit microbiotest and chemical variables for toxicity evaluation of sediments. Environ Toxicol 21:367–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Day PR (1965) Particle fractionation and particle size analysis. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 1. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 545–566Google Scholar
  21. Favas PJC, Pratas J, Gomes MEP, Cala V (2011) Selective chemical extraction of heavy metals in tailings and soils contaminated by mining activity: environmental implications. J Geochem Explor 111:160–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feng MH, Shan XQ, Zhang SZ, Wen B (2005) Comparison of a rhizosphere-based method with other one-step extraction methods for assessing the bioavailability of soil metals to wheat. Chemosphere 59:939–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. García-Lorenzo ML, Martínez-Sánchez MJ, Pérez-Sirvent C, Molina J (2009) Ecotoxicological evaluation for the screening of areas polluted by mining activities. Ecotoxicology 18:1077–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gisbert C, Clemente R, Navarro-Aviñó J, Baixauli C, Ginér A, Serrano R, Walker DJ, Bernal MP (2006) Tolerance and accumulation of heavy metals by Brassicaceae species grown in contaminated soils from Mediterranean regions of Spain. Environ Exp Bot 56:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Houba VJG, Temminghoff EJM, Gaikhorst GA, Van Vark W (2000) Soil analysis procedures using 0.01 M calcium chloride as extraction reagent. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 31:1299–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Iavazzo P, Adamo P, Boni M, Hillier S, Zampella M (2012) Mineralogy and chemical forms of lead and zinc in abandoned mine wastes and soils: an example from Morocco. J Geochem Explor 113:56–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. IUSS Working Group WRB (2014) World reference base for soil resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports N° 106. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  28. Jiménez MN, Bacchetta G, Casti M, Navarro FB, Lallena AM, Fernández-Ondoño E (2011) Potential use in phytoremediation of three plant species growing on contaminated mine-tailing soils in Sardinia. Ecol Eng 37:392–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jiménez MN, Bacchetta G, Casti M, Navarro FB, Lallena AM, Fernández-Ondoño E (2014) Study of Zn, Cu and Pb content in plants and contaminated soils in Sardinia. Plant Biosyst 148:419–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kabata-Pendias A (2010) Trace elements in soils and plants, 4th edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lago-Vila M, Arenas-Lago D, Rodríguez-Seijo A, Andrade Couce ML, Vega FA (2015) Cobalt, chromium and nickel contents in soils and plants from a serpentinite quarry. Solid Earth 6:323–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lindsay WL, Norwell WA (1978) Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Macías FV, Calvo RA (2009) Niveles genéricos de referencia de metales pesados y otros elementos traza en suelos de Galicia. Xunta de Galicia, Santiago de CompostelaGoogle Scholar
  34. Mankiewicz-Boczek J, Nałecz-Jawecki G, Drobniewska A, Kaza M, Sumorok B, Izydorczyk K, Zalewski M, Sawicki J (2008) Application of a microbiotests battery for complete toxicity assesstement of rivers. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 71:830–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McKeague JA, Day JH (1966) Dithionite and oxalate-extractable Fe and Al as aids in differentiating various classes of soils. Can J Soil Sci 46:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mench M, Schwitzguébel JP, Schroeder P, Bert V, Gawronski S, Gupta S (2009) Assessment of successful experiments and limitations of phytotechnologies: contaminant uptake, detoxification and sequestration, and consequences for food safety. Environ Sci Pollut Res 16:876–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mendez MO, Maier RM (2008) Phytoremediation of mine tailings in temperate and arid environments. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 7:47–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Naidu R, Bolan NS, Megharaj M, Juhasz AL, Gupta SK, Clothier BE, Schulin R (2008) Chemical bioavailability in terrestrial environments, chapter 1. In: Hartemink AE, McBratney AB, Naidu R (eds) Chemical bioavailability in terrestrial environments. Developments in soil science, volume 32. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oze C, Skinner C, Schroth AW, Coleman RG (2008) Growing up green on serpentine soils: biogeochemistry of serpentine vegetation in the Central Coast Range of California. Appl Geochem 23:3391–3403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pueyo M, López-Sánchez JF, Rauret G (2004) Assessment of CaCl2, NaNO3 and NH4NO3 extraction procedures for the study of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn extractability in contaminated soils. Anal Chim Acta 504:217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Quental L, Sousa AJ, Marsh S, Abreu MM (2013) Identification of materials related to acid mine drainage using multi-source spectra at S. Domingos Mine, Southeast Portugal. Int J Remote Sens 34:1928–1948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Raskin I, Smith RD, Salt DE (1997) Phytoremediation of metals: using plants to remove pollutants from the environment. Curr Opin Biotech 8:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rodríguez-Seijo A, Arenas-Lago D, Lago-Vila M, Vega FA, Andrade Couce L (2014) Limitations for revegetation in lead/zinc minesoils (NW Spain). J Soils Sediments 14:785–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Santos ES, Abreu MM, Batista MJ, Magalhães MCF, Fernandes E (2014) Inter-population variation on the accumulation and translocation of potentially harmful chemical elements in Cistus ladanifer L. from Brancanes, Caveira, Chança, Lousal, Neves Corvo and São Domingos mines in the Portuguese Iberian Pyrite Belt. J Soils Sediments 14:758–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shah MT, Ara J, Muhammad S, Khan S, Asad SA, Ali L (2014) Potential heavy metals accumulation of indigenous plant species along the mafic and ultramafic terrain in the Mohmand agency, Pakistan. Clean Soil Air Water 42:339–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shallari S, Schwartz C, Hasko A, Morel JL (1998) Heavy metals in soils and plants of serpentine and industrial sites of Albania. Sci Total Environ 209:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sherdrick BH, McKeague JA (1975) A comparison of extractable Fe and Al data using methods followed in the USA and Canada. Can J Soil Sci 55:77–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Slattery W, Conyers M, Aitken R (1999) Soil pH, aluminium, manganese and lime requirement. In: Peverill KI, Sparrow L, Reuter D (eds) Soil analysis: an interpretation manual. CSIRO, Australia, pp 103–125Google Scholar
  49. US EPA (1996) Ecological effects test guidelines: Seed hermination/root elongation toxicity test. Office of Prevention, Pesticide and Toxic Substances (OPPTS) 850.4200. EPA, Washington DC, 712-C-96-154 Google Scholar
  50. US EPA (2003) Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. OSWER Directive, Washington DC, 9285.7-55 Google Scholar
  51. US Soil Conservation Service (1972) Dithionite citrate method. Soil, survey laboratory methods and procedures for collecting soil samples. Soil Survey Investigation, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  52. Vamerali T, Bandiera M, Mosca G (2010) Field crops for phytoremediation of metal-contaminated land. A review. Environ Chem Lett 8:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vidal-Torrado P, Calvo R, Macias F, Carvalho SG, Silva AC (2007) Geochemical and mineralogical evolution in alteration profiles on serpentinized rocks in southwestern Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 31:1069–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wahsha M, Bini C, Argese E, Minello F, Fontana S, Wahsheh H (2012) Heavy metals accumulation in willows growing on Spolic Technosols from the abandoned Imperina Valley mine in Italy. J Geochem Explor 123:19–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walkey A, Black IA (1934) An Examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic titration method. Soil Sci 34:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wei B, Yang L (2010) A review of heavy metal contaminations in urban soils, urban road dusts and agricultural soils from China. Microchem J 94:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang H, Young SD (2006) Characterizing the availability of metals in contaminated soils. II. The soil solution. Soil Use Manage 21:459–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manoel Lago-Vila
    • 1
  • Andrés Rodríguez-Seijo
    • 1
  • Daniel Arenas-Lago
    • 1
  • Luisa Andrade
    • 1
  • Maria Flora Alonso Vega
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant and Soil ScienceUniversidad de Vigo, As LagoasMarcosendeSpain

Personalised recommendations