Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 1121–1129 | Cite as

Arsenic speciation and kinetic release simulation of stream sediment contaminated by gold mining

Sediments, Sec 2 • Physical and Biogeochemical Processes • Research Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Purpose

Understanding the mechanisms and kinetics controlling the release of metals from sediment is a prerequisite for evaluating the risk of sediment contaminated by toxic elements. The objectives of this research were to determine the leaching properties of arsenic (As) from stream sediment contaminated by gold mining and to quantify the kinetic rate of As release using a leaching experiment and numerical modeling.

Materials and methods

In this study, we collected surface stream sediment from Jiehe River which was contaminated by gold mining in Zhaoyuan, Shandong Province. Chemical speciation of As was analyzed by a modified three-step BCR sequential extraction procedure. The sediment microscopic morphological characteristics and elemental composition on the surface of the sediment were analyzed by scanning electron microscope-energy dispersive spectrometer (SEM-EDS). Release kinetics of As were studied by a simulated leaching experiment using a stirred-flow reactor and a two-site equilibrium-kinetic model.

Results and discussion

The sediments we studied were significantly contaminated by As, with maximum concentrations of 777.8–3389 mg/kg. Sequential extraction analysis suggested that As contents in weak acid extractable, oxidizable, reducible, and residual forms were 2.6–9.8, 18–79, 2.4–7.1, and 8.7–75 %, respectively. SEM-EDS analysis showed that As on the surface of the sediment was higher than its overall content in all four sediments especially sediment JH27, which has high content of TOC, indicating that abundant As was sorbed or precipitated on the sediment surface. Our two-site equilibrium-kinetic model fits the As release data well and can reproduce the stop-flow experimental results. Kinetic rates obtained from curve fitting showed large variation among sediments for As, indicating different reaction mechanisms.

Conclusions

The release of As from stream sediment contaminated by gold mining was nonequilibrium and time-dependent and might cause long-term pollution to river water. Our two-site model was demonstrated as an effective tool to describe the kinetic release of As from stream sediment to waters.

Keywords

Arsenic Kinetic release Gold mining Speciation Stream sediment 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Chengli Qu for chemical analysis. This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41271506, 41230858) and Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZZD-EW-14). Dr. Hua Zhang was financially supported by the Recruitment Program of Global Young Experts (1000Plan).

References

  1. Abraitis PK, Pattrick RAD, Vaughan DJ (2004) Variations in the compositional, textural and electrical properties of natural pyrite: a review. Int J Miner Process 74:41–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartal A, Sparks DL, Pesek JD, Feigenbaum S (1990) Analyses of adsorption-kinetics using a stirred-flow chamber. 1. Theory and critical tests. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:1273–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brannon JM, Patrick WH Jr (1987) Fixation, transformation, and mobilization of arsenic in sediments. Environ Sci Technol 21:450–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chandra AP, Gerson AR (2010) The mechanisms of pyrite oxidation and leaching: a fundamental perspective. Surf Sci Rep 65:293–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dang DH, Tessier E, Lenoble V, Durrieu G, Omanović D, Mullot J-U, Pfeifer H-R, Mounier S, Garnier C (2014) Key parameters controlling arsenic dynamics in coastal sediments: an analytical and modeling approach. Mar Chem 161:34–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deditius AP, Utsunomiya S, Reich M, Kesler SE, Ewing RC, Hough R, Walshe J (2011) Trace metal nanoparticles in pyrite. Ore Geol Rev 42:32–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Desbarats AJ, Parsons MB, Percival JB (2015) Arsenic mobility in mildly alkaline drainage from an orogenic lode gold deposit, Bralorne mine, British Columbia. Appl Geochem 57:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Equeenuddin SM, Tripathy S, Sahoo PK, Panigrahi MK (2013) Metal behavior in sediment associated with acid mine drainage stream: role of pH. J Geochem Explor 124:230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaur VK, Gupta SK, Pandey SD, Gopal K, Misra V (2005) Distribution of heavy metals in sediment and water of River Gomti. Environ Monit Assess 102:419–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang JH, Kretzschmar R (2010) Sequential extraction method for speciation of arsenate and arsenite in mineral soils. Anal Chem 82:5534–5540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hudson-Edwards KA, Houghton SL, Osborn A (2004) Extraction and analysis of arsenic in soils and sediments. Trends Anal Chem 23:745–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Keon NE, Swartz CH, Brabander DJ (2001) Validation of an arsenic sequential extraction method for evaluating mobility in sediments. Environ Sci Technol 35:2778–2784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim J, Hyun S (2015) Nonequilibrium leaching behavior of metallic elements (Cu, Zn, As, Cd, and Pb) from soils collected from long-term abandoned mine sites. Chemosphere 134:150–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kwon Y-T, Lee C-W (2001) Ecological risk assessment of sediment in wastewater discharging area by means of metal speciation. Microchem J 70:255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liang N, Yang LY, Dai JR, Pang XG (2011) Heavy metal pollution in surface water of Linglong gold mining area, China, 2011 3rd international conference on environmental science and information application technology esiat. Pt A, Procedia Environ Sci Elsevier Science Bv, Amsterdam 10:914–917Google Scholar
  16. Linge KH (2008) Methods for investigating trace element binding in sediments. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 38:165–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lu RK (2000) Analytical methods for soil and agro-chemistry. China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  18. Macgregor K, MacKinnon G, Farmer JG, Graham MC (2015) Mobility of antimony, arsenic and lead at a former antimony mine, Glendinning, Scotland. Sci Total Environ 529:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mandal B, Suzuki K (2002) Arsenic round the world: a review. Talanta 58:201–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Molinari A, Ayora C, Marcaccio M, Guadagnini L, Sanchez-Vila X, Guadagnini A (2014) Geochemical modeling of arsenic release from a deep natural solid matrix under alternated redox conditions. Environ Sci Pollut 21:1628–1637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ng JC, Wang J, Sharim A (2003) A global health problem caused by arsenic from natural sources. Chemosphere 52:1353–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. NRC (1999) Arsenic in drinking water. National Academic Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  23. Nriagu JO, Bhattacharya P, Mukherjee AB, Bundschuh J, Zevenhoven R, Loeppert RH (2007) Arsenic in soil and groundwater: an overview. In: Bhattacharya P, Mukherjee AB, Bundschuh J, Zevenhoven R, Loeppert RH (eds) Arsenic in soil and groundwater environment: biogeochemical interactions, health effects and remediation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Paikaray S (2015) Arsenic geochemistry of acid mine drainage. Mine Water Environ 34:181–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pandey M, Pandey AK, Mishra A, Tripathi BD (2015) Assessment of metal species in river Ganga sediment at Varanasi, India using sequential extraction procedure and SEM–EDS. Chemosphere 134:466–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pueyo M, Mateu J, Rigol A, Vidal M, López-Sánchez JF, Rauret G (2008) Use of the modified BCR three-step sequential extraction procedure for the study of trace element dynamics in contaminated soils. Environ Pollut 152:330–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rauret G, López-Sánchez JF, Sahuquillo A, Rubio R, Davidson C, Ure A, Quevauviller P (1999) Improvement of the BCR three step sequential extraction procedure prior to the certification of new sediment and soil reference materials. J Environ Monit 1:57–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rubinos DA, Iglesias L, Diaz-Fierros F, Teresa Barral M (2011) Interacting effect of pH, phosphate and time on the release of arsenic from polluted river sediments (Anllns river, Spain). Aquat Geochem 17:281–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Selim HM, Amacher MC, Iskandar IK (1989) Modeling the transport of chromium (vi) in soil columns. Soil Sci Soc Am J 53:996–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shi Z, Di Toro DM, Allen HE, Ponizovsky AA (2005) Modeling kinetics of Cu and Zn release from soils. Environ Sci Technol 39:4562–4568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smedley PL, Kinniburgh DG (2002) A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl Geochem 17:517–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sparks DL (1989) Kinetics of soil chemical processes. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  33. Teasdale PR, Apte SC, Ford PW, Batley GE, Koehnken L (2003) Geochemical cycling and speciation of copper in waters and sediments of Macquarie Harbour, Western Tasmania. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 57:475–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Herreweghe S, Swennen R, Vandecasteele C, Cappuyns V (2003) Solid phase speciation of arsenic by sequential extraction in standard reference materials and industrially contaminated soil samples. Environ Pollut 122:323–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Varol M (2011) Assessment of heavy metal contamination in sediments of the Tigris River (Turkey) using pollution indices and multivariate statistical techniques. J Hazard Mater 195:355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang S, Mulligan CN (2006) Effect of natural organic matter on arsenic release from soils and sediments into groundwater. Environ Geochem Health 28:197–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wenzel WW, Kirchbaumer N, Prohaska T, Stingeder G, Lombi E, Adri-ano DC (2001) Arsenic fractionation in soils using an improved sequential extraction procedure. Anal Chim Acta 436:309–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wolkersdorfer C (2008) Water management at abandoned flooded underground mines. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  39. World Health Organization (WHO) (1993) Guidelines for drinking water quality. Recommendations, 2nd edn. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang JH, Zhou XH (2000) The Rb–Sr isochron of ore and pyrite subsamples from Linglong gold deposit, Jiaodong Peninsula, eastern China and their geological significance. Chin Sci Bull 45:2272–2277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yin Y, Allen HE, Huang CP, Sparks DL, Sanders PF (1997) Kinetics of mercury(II) adsorption and desorption on soil. Environ Sci Technol 31:496–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zemberyova M, Bartekova J, Hagarova I (2006) The utilization of modified BCR three-step sequential extraction procedure for the fractionation of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in soil reference materials of different origins. Talanta 70:973–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang GS, Qu JH, Liu HJ, Liu RP, Li GT (2007) Removal mechanism of As(III) by a novel Fe-Mn binary oxide adsorbent: oxidation and sorption. Environ Sci Technol 41:4613–4619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang H, Yu J, Zhou S (2014) Spatial distribution of As, Cr, Pb, Cd, Cu, and Zn in the water and sediment of a river impacted by gold mining. Mine Water Environ 33:206–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Coastal Zone Environmental Processes and Ecological Remediation, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of SciencesYantaiChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.School of Environment and Materials Engineering, Yantai UniversityYantaiChina

Personalised recommendations