Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 665–673 | Cite as

Role of woody biochar and fungal-bacterial co-inoculation on enzyme activity and metal immobilization in serpentine soil

  • Tharanga Bandara
  • Indika Herath
  • Prasanna Kumarathilaka
  • Mihiri Seneviratne
  • Gamini Seneviratne
  • Nishanta Rajakaruna
  • Meththika Vithanage
  • Yong Sik Ok
Biochar for a Sustainable Environment

Abstract

Purpose

In this study, we investigated the effect of biochar (BC) and fungal bacterial co-inoculation (FB) on soil enzymatic activity and immobilization of heavy metals in serpentine soil in Sri Lanka.

Materials and methods

A pot experiment was conducted with tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) at 1, 2.5, and 5 % (w/w) BC ratios. Polyphenol oxidase, catalase and dehydrogenase activities were determined by idometric, potassium permanganate oxidisable, and spectrophotometric methods, respectively. Heavy metal concentrations were assessed by 0.01 M CaCl2 and sequential extraction methods.

Results and discussion

An increase in BC application reduced polyphenol oxidase, dehydrogenase, and catalase activity. The application of FB increased soil dehydrogenase activity, with the maximum activity found in 1 % BC700 + FB treatment. Moreover, the CaCl2 extractable metals (Ni, Mn, and Cr) in 5 % BC700 amended soil decreased by 92, 94, and 100 %, respectively, compared to the control. Sequential extraction showed that the exchangeable concentrations of Ni, Mn, and Cr decreased by 55, 70, and 80 % in 5 % BC700, respectively.

Conclusions

Results suggest that the addition of BC to serpentine soil immobilizes heavy metals and decreases soil enzymatic activities. The addition of FB to serpentine soil improves plant growth by mitigating heavy metal toxicity and enhancing soil enzymatic activities.

Keywords

Biochar Bioremediation Black carbon Charcoal Phytotoxicity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Biochar production and characterization of this research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program, through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (project number: 2012R1A1B3001409) (100 %).

References

  1. Ahmad M, Soo Lee S, Yang JE, Ro HM, Han Lee Y, Sik Ok Y (2012) Effects of soil dilution and amendments (mussel shell, cow bone, and biochar) on Pb availability and phytotoxicity in military shooting range soil. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 79:225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad M, Lee SS, Lim JE, Lee SE, Cho JS, Moon DH, Hashimoto Y, Ok YS (2014a) Speciation and phytoavailability of lead and antimony in a small arms range soil amended with mussel shell, cow bone and biochar: EXAFS spectroscopy and chemical extractions. Chemosphere 95:433–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmad M, Moon DH, Vithanage M, Koutsospyros A, Lee SS, Yang JE, Lee SE, Jeon C, Ok YS (2014b) Production and use of biochar from buffalo‐weed (Ambrosia trifida L.) for trichloroethylene removal from water. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 89(1):150–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, LimJE ZM, Bolan N, Mohan D, Vithanage M, Lee SS, Ok YS (2014c) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Almaroai YA, Usman ARA, Ahmad M, Moon DH, Cho JS, Joo YK, Jeon C, Lee SS, Ok YS (2014) Effects of biochar, cow bone, and eggshell on Pb availability to maize in contaminated soil irrigated with saline water. Environ Earth Sci 71(3):1289–1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Al-Wabel MI, Al-Omran A, El-Naggar AH, NadeemM UAR (2013) Pyrolysis temperature induced changes in characteristics and chemical composition of biochar produced from conocarpus wastes. Bioresour Technol 131:374–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Al-Wabel MI, Usman AR, El-Naggar AH, Aly AA, Ibrahim HM, Elmaghraby S, Al-Omran A (2015) Conocarpus biochar as a soil amendment for reducing heavy metal availability and uptake by maize plants. Saudi J Biol Sci 22:503–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arini A, Feurtet-Mazel A, MorinS M-BR, Coste M, Delmas F (2012) Remediation of a watershed contaminated by heavy metals: a 2-year field biomonitoring of periphytic biofilms. Sci Total Environ 425:242–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Armienta M, Rodríguez R, Ceniceros N, Juarez F, Cruz O (1996) Distribution, origin and fate of chromium in soils in Guanajuato, Mexico. Environ Pollut 91(3):391–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Awad YM, Blagodatskaya E, Ok YS, Kuzyakov Y (2012) Effects of polyacrylamide, biopolymer, and biochar on decomposition of soil organic matter and plant residues as determined by 14C and enzyme activities. Eur J Soil Biol 48:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baugé S, Lavkulich L, Schreier H (2013) Serpentine affected soils and the formation of magnesium phosphates (struvite). Can J Soil Sci 93(2):161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bestawy EE, Helmy S, Hussien H, Fahmy M, Amer R (2013) Bioremediation of heavy metal-contaminated effluent using optimized activated sludge bacteria. Appl Water Sci 3(1):181–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Demisie W, Liu Z, Zhang M (2014) Effect of biochar on carbon fractions and enzyme activity of red soil. Catena 121:214–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doran JW, Zeiss MR (2000) Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality. Appl Soil Ecol 15(1):3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gall JE, Boyd RS, Rajakaruna N (2015) Transfer of heavy metals through terrestrial food webs: a review. Environ Monit Assess 87:201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. He Z-L, Yang X-E (2007) Role of soil rhizobacteria in phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soils. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 8(3):192–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herath H, Rajapaksha AU, Vithanage M, Seneviratne G (2014) Developed fungal–bacterial biofilms as a novel tool for bioremoval of hexavelant chromium from wastewater. Chem Ecol 30:418–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herath I, Kumarathilaka P, Navaratne A, Rajakaruna N, Vithanage M (2015) Immobilization and phytotoxicity reduction of heavy metals in serpentine soil using biochar. J Soils Sediments 15(1):126–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Houben D, Evrard L, Sonnet P (2013a) Beneficial effects of biochar application to contaminated soils on the bioavailability of Cd, Pb and Zn and the biomass production of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Biomass Bioenergy 57:196–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Houben D, Evrard L, Sonnet P (2013b) Mobility, bioavailability and pH-dependent leaching of cadmium, zinc and lead in a contaminated soil amended with biochar. Chemosphere 92(11):1450–1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jiang T-Y, Jiang J, Xu R-K, Li Z (2012) Adsorption of Pb (II) on variable charge soils amended with rice-straw derived biochar. Chemosphere 89(3):249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jin K, Sleutel S, Buchan D, De Neve S, Cai D, Gabriëls D, Jin J (2009) Changes of soil enzyme activities under different tillage practices in the Chinese Loess Plateau. Soil Tillage Res 104(1):115–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones D, Rousk J, Edwards-Jones G, DeLuca T, Murphy D (2012) Biochar-mediated changes in soil quality and plant growth in a three year field trial. Soil Biol Biochem 45:113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karami N, Clemente R, Moreno-Jiménez E, Lepp NW, Beesley L (2011) Efficiency of green waste compost and biochar soil amendments for reducing lead and copper mobility and uptake to ryegrass. J Hazard Mater 191(1):41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kashem M, Singh B (2001) Metal availability in contaminated soils: I. Effects of floodingand organic matter on changes in Eh, pH and solubility of Cd, Ni andZn. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 61(3):247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kayama M, Sasa K, Koike T (2002) Needle life span, photosynthetic rate and nutrient concentration of Picea glehnii, P. Jezoensis and P. Abies planted on serpentine soil in northern Japan. Tree Physiol 22(10):707–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lammirato C, Miltner A, Kaestner M (2011) Effects of wood char and activated carbon on the hydrolysis of cellobiose by β-glucosidase from Aspergillus niger. Soil Biol Biochem 43(9):1936–1942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota—a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43(9):1812–1836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lucchini P, Quilliam RS, DeLuca TH, Vamerali T, Jones DL (2014) Does biochar application alter heavy metal dynamics in agricultural soil? Agric Ecosyst Environ 184:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ma Y, Rajkumar M, Freitas H (2009) Improvement of plant growth and nickel uptake by nickel resistant-plant-growth promoting bacteria. J Hazard Mater 166(2–3):1154–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Neilson S, Rajakaruna N (2015) Phytoremediation of agricultural soils: using plants to clean metal-contaminated arable land. In: Phytoremediation, Springer, 159–168Google Scholar
  32. Paz-Ferreiro J, Gascó G, Gutiérrez B, Méndez A (2012) Soil biochemical activities and the geometric mean of enzyme activities after application of sewage sludge and sewage sludge biochar to soil. Biol Fert Soils 48(5):511–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Paz-Ferreiro J, Lu H, Fu S, Méndez A, Gascó G (2013) Use of phytoremediation and biochar to remediate heavy metal polluted soils: a review. Solid Earth Discuss 5(2):2155–2179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Quintelas C, Rocha Z, Silva B, Fonseca B, Figueiredo H, Tavares T (2009) Removal of Cd (II), Cr (VI), Fe (III) and Ni (II) from aqueous solutions by an E. Coli biofilm supported on kaolin. Chem Eng J 149(1):319–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Qureshi S, Richards BK, Steenhuis TS, McBride MB, Baveye P, Dousset S (2004) Microbial acidification and pH effects on trace element release from sewage sludge. Environ Pollut 132(1):61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rajakaruna N, Tompkins KM, Pavicevic PG (2006) Phytoremediation: an affordable green technology for the clean-up of metal-contaminated sites in Sri Lanka. Ceylon J Sci 35:25–39Google Scholar
  37. Rajapaksha AU, Vithanage M, Oze C, Bandara WMAT, Weerasooriya R (2012) Nickel and manganese release in serpentine soil from the ussangoda ultramafic complex, Sri Lanka. Geoderma 189–190:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rajapaksha AU, Vithanage M, Ok YS, Oze C (2013) Cr(VI) formation related to Cr(III)-muscovite and birnessite interactions in ultramafic environments. Environ Sci Technol 47(17):9722–9729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rajapaksha AU, Vithanage M, Zhang M, Ahmad M, Mohan D, Chang SX, Ok YS (2014) Pyrolysis condition affected sulfamethazine sorption by tea waste biochars. Bioresour Technol 166:303–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rajapaksha A, Ahmad M, Vithanage M, Kim K-R, Chang J, Lee S, Ok Y (2015) The role of biochar, natural iron oxides, and nanomaterials as soil amendments for immobilizing metals in shooting range soil. Environ Geochem Hlth 1–12Google Scholar
  41. Seneviratne M, Seneviratne G, Madawala HMSP, Iqbal M, Rajakaruna N, Bandara T, Vithanage M (2015a) A preliminary study of the role of bacterial-fungal co-inoculation on heavy metal phytotoxicity in serpentine soil. Aust J Bot 63:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Seneviratne M, Vithanage M, Madawala HMSP, Seneviratne G (2015b) A novel microbial biofilm for bioremoval of nickel from aqueous media. Bioremediation 19:239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Singh P, Cameotra SS (2004) Enhancement of metal bioremediation by use of microbial surfactants. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 319(2):291–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith SE, Read DJ (1996) Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic pressGoogle Scholar
  45. Susaya JP, Kim K-H, Asio VB, Chen Z-S, Navarrete I (2010) Quantifying nickel in soils and plants in an ultramafic area in Philippines. Environ Monit Assess 167(1–4):505–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tabatabai MA (1994) Soil enzymes. In: Bottomley PS, Angle JS, Weaver RW (eds) Methods of soil analysis: part 2—microbiological and biochemical properties. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 775–833Google Scholar
  47. Tessier A, Campbell PG, Bisson M (1979) Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Anal Chem 51(7):844–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tica D, Udovic M, Lestan D (2011) Immobilization of potentially toxic metals using different soil amendments. Chemosphere 85(4):577–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Hullebusch ED, Zandvoort MH, Lens PN (2003) Metal immobilisation by biofilms: mechanisms and analytical tools. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 2:9–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vithanage M, Rajapaksha A, Oze C, Rajakaruna N, Dissanayake CB (2014) Metal release from serpentine soils in Sri Lanka. Environ Monit Assess 186(6):3415–3429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang Q, Xiao F, He T, Wang S (2013) Responses of labile soil organic carbon and enzyme activity in mineral soils to forest conversion in the subtropics. Ann For Sci 70:579–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wu F, Jia Z, Wang S, Chang SX, Startsev A (2013) Contrasting effects of wheat straw and its biochar on greenhouse gas emissions and enzyme activities in a chernozemic soil. Biol Fert Soil 49(5):555–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang X, Wang H, He L, Lu K, Sarmah A, Li J, Bolan NS, Pei J, Huang H (2013) Using biochar for remediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals and organic pollutants. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20(12):8472–8483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zheng H, Wang Z, Deng X, Herbert S, Xing B (2013) Impacts of adding biochar on nitrogen retention and bioavailability in agricultural soil. Geoderma 206:32–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tharanga Bandara
    • 1
  • Indika Herath
    • 1
  • Prasanna Kumarathilaka
    • 1
  • Mihiri Seneviratne
    • 2
  • Gamini Seneviratne
    • 2
  • Nishanta Rajakaruna
    • 3
    • 4
  • Meththika Vithanage
    • 1
  • Yong Sik Ok
    • 5
  1. 1.Chemical and Environmental Systems Modeling Research GroupNational Institute of Fundamental StudiesKandySri Lanka
  2. 2.Microbial Biotechnology UnitNational Institute of Fundamental StudiesKandySri Lanka
  3. 3.College of the AtlanticBar HarborUSA
  4. 4.Unit for Environmental Sciences and ManagementNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroomSouth Africa
  5. 5.Korea Biochar Research Center and Department of Biological EnvironmentKangwon National UniversityChuncheonKorea

Personalised recommendations